Editorial: Use of 3D Models in Drug Development and Precision Medicine - Advances and Outlook

Editorial on the Research Topic
Use of 3D Models in Drug Development and Precision Medicine: Advances and Outlook

Three-dimensional (3D) in vitro models in the drug development pipeline can help selecting the most promising and safe drug candidates at the pre-clinical stage, prior to clinical trials, reducing and sometimes even replacing animal studies in accordance with the “3Rs (Reduction, Refinement and Replacement) principle” (Herrmann and Jayne, 2019). Several types of 3D in vitro cultures have been developed for this purpose, including advanced models such as organ-on-chips and microfluidic models (Sontheimer-Phelps et al., 2019; Peck et al., 2020), organoids (Kim et al., 2020), and mini-organs (Lawlor et al., 2020). These models have also opened many new opportunities and research directions in the drug discovery space. For example, 3D organoids generated from cells harvested from patients can be applied toward a personalized medicine approach. Moreover, the development and translational investigation of new therapies or treatments for degenerative or regenerative applications, can be expedited by tissue engineering solutions powered by the current knowledge in 3D in vitro modeling. This facilitates drug formulation and screening with a direct input into the regulatory science and industrial technological innovation pipeline.

This Research Topic covers the areas of the development, use and validation of in vitro 3D models where novel methodologies and findings demonstrate the key role of three-dimensionality in biology, and provide a platform to increase the success rate in translating new diagnostic and treatment solutions into real clinical innovative approaches to the benefit of patients. This Research Topic features five review and perspective articles, which elucidate the multiple facets of the field of alternative models in drug discovery and provide critical considerations for its short- and long-term development. These reviews are complemented by three original research articles, which help contextualizing the challenges and the potential of the state-of-the-art in 3D in vitro modeling.

In the cancer research area, Kitaeva et al. contributed with a review on advanced in vitro models. This manuscript provides an in-depth comparison of different methodologies including two- and three-dimensional cultures, Boyden chambers, microfluidic systems, and 3D bioprinting. Mondadori et al. performed a systematic literature review updated to January 2020 on the microfluidic models available for the study of cancer and immune cells extravasation highlighting the key role of biophysical, biochemical, and environmental factors in the several studies analyzed. Similarly, Bracher et al. discuss the need for a systematic approach to review in vitro methods in brain tumor research. This approach would enable to identify relevant appraisal criteria to aid planning and/or evaluation of brain tumor studies using advanced in vitro methods.

In the tissue engineering field, the review by Thompson et al. provides insights on commercially available organ-on-chip platforms incorporating active biomechanical stimulation. The authors highlight instances where mechanical stimuli can drastically alter a given biochemical response with relevance to pre-clinical studies. They also critically discuss which level of approximation of the in vivo conditions is sufficient for the proposed screening applications. In their review entitled “Building Scaffolds for Tubular Tissue Engineering,” Boys et al. from University of Cambridge, discuss some of state-of-the-art methods for producing hollow and tubular systems. The latter deem essential to provide crucial tissue structures including vasculature, the intestines, and the trachea. The authors carefully review different methodologies such as casting, electrospinning, rolling, 3D printing, and decellularization.

In the lung research area, Movia et al. present a perspective article on the status and the outlook of in vitro respiratory models for toxicity studies. Notably this contribution provides a compendium of regulatory information useful for all researchers in the field. Ramos-Gomes et al. took a distinct perspective for their contribution to the topic, by introducing a novel method to study nanoparticle-cell interactions in the lung. This work details a clever imaging protocol to obtain time-series at high spatial resolution in an ex vivo system. The authors discuss the potential of this approach for assessing novel therapeutic strategies with a special emphasis on nanomedicine.

In the organoids and mini-organs field, Zietek et al. describe the applicability of 3D organoids for in vitro investigation of intestinal biochemical processes related to transport and metabolism of nutrients and drugs. The authors, relying on a wide range of methodologies, provide a thorough assessment of the robustness and reliability of intestinal organoids. Whereas, Govindan et al. detail the step-by-step procedure leading to the generation of human mini-brains (i.e., 3D brain in vitro spheroid models comprising of neurons and glial cells, generated from human induced pluripotent neural stem cells) and the protocols to successfully label projection neurons, perform immunohistochemistry and 3D imaging at large scales.

In conclusion, this Research Topic provides an extended overview of the advanced in vitro approaches that can be applied to drug development and precision medicine. We are sure the reader will find this Research Topic as a useful reference for state-of-the-art in the fast-growing field of 3D cultures, organ-on-chip, organoids and mini-organs and their use in the relevant toxicology, bioengineering, and biomedical fields.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the drafting and finalization of the editorial.

Funding

This work has been supported, in parts, by the European Union's HORIZON 2020 Framework Programme under Grant Agreements Nos. 760928 and 761104.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Herrmann, K., and Jayne, K. (2019). Animal Experimentation: Working Towards a Paradigm Change. Boston, MA: Brill. doi: 10.1163/9789004391192

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J., Koo, B.-K., and Knoblich, J. A. (2020). Human organoids: model systems for human biology and medicine. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 571–584. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0259-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lawlor, K. T., Vanslambrouck, J. M., Higgins, J. W., Chambon, A., Bishard, K., Arndt, D., et al. (2020). Cellular extrusion bioprinting improves kidney organoid reproducibility and conformation. Nat. Mater. 20, 260–271. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-00853-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peck, R. W., Hinojosa, C. D., and Hamilton, G. A. (2020). Organs-on-chips in clinical pharmacology: putting the patient into the center of treatment selection and drug development. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 107, 181–185. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1688

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sontheimer-Phelps, A., Hassell, B. A., and Ingber, D. E. (2019). Modelling cancer in microfluidic human organs-on-chips. Nat. Rev. Cancer 19, 65–81. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0104-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar