Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Big Data
Sec. Medicine and Public Health
Volume 7 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fdata.2024.1455399

Making the most of big qualitative datasets: A living systematic review of analysis methods

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
  • 2 Oxford Vaccine Group, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
  • 3 Centre on Climate Change & Planetary Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, England, United Kingdom
  • 4 School of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Catolica Madre y Maestra, Santiago, Santiago, Dominican Republic

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Qualitative data provides deep insights into an individual’s behaviours and beliefs, and the contextual factors that may shape these. Big qualitative data analysis is an emerging field that aims to identify trends and patterns in large qualitative datasets. The purpose of this review was to identify the methods used to analyse large bodies of qualitative data, their cited strengths and limitations and comparisons between manual and digital analysis approaches. A multi-faceted approach has been taken to develop the review relying on academic, grey and media-based literature, using approaches such as iterative analysis, frequency analysis, text network analysis and team discussion. The review identified 520 articles that detailed analysis approaches of big qualitative data. From these publications a diverse range of methods and software used for analysis were identified, with thematic analysis and basic software being most common. An important finding was identifying an increase in the use of larger non-traditional qualitative data sources (social media data, images and videos) and methods and (semantic network analysis, topic modelling, and the breadth and depth method) in more recent publications.Studies were most commonly conducted in high-income countries, and the most common data sources were open-ended survey responses, interview transcripts, and first-person narratives. We identified an emerging trend to expand the sources of qualitative data (e.g. using social media data, images, or videos), and develop new methods and software for analysis. As the qualitative analysis field may continue to change, it will be necessary to conduct further research to the compare the utility of different big qualitative analysis methods and to develop standardized guidelines to raise awareness and support researchers in the use of more novel approaches for big qualitative analysis.

    Keywords: big qual data, Research Methods, healthcare, digital tools, artificial intelligence, machine learning

    Received: 26 Jun 2024; Accepted: 29 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Chandrasekar, Clark, Martin, Vanderslott, Flores, Aceituno, Vindrola-Padros and Vera San Juan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Norha Vera San Juan, Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, England, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.