Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Behav. Neurosci.

Sec. Individual and Social Behaviors

Volume 19 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2025.1549666

This article is part of the Research Topic Ethological neuroscience View all 9 articles

Behavioral tests for the assessment of social hierarchy in mice

Provisionally accepted
Hao Zheng Hao Zheng 1Dantong Chen Dantong Chen 2Zilong Zhong Zilong Zhong 1Ziyi Li Ziyi Li 3Meng Yuan Meng Yuan 1Zhenkun Zhang Zhenkun Zhang 3Xiaoping Zhou Xiaoping Zhou 4Guohui Zhu Guohui Zhu 5Sun Hongwei Sun Hongwei 1*Lin Sun Lin Sun 1*
  • 1 Department of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China
  • 2 clinical medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China
  • 3 school of clinical medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China
  • 4 Network Information Center, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, China
  • 5 Depression Treatment Center, Weifang Mental Health Center, Weifang, Shandong Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Social hierarchy refers to the set of social ranks in a group of animals where individuals can gain priority access to resources through repeated social interactions. Key mechanisms involved in this process include conflict, social negotiation, prior experience, and physical advantages. The establishment and maintenance of social hierarchies not only promote group stability and well-being but also shape individual social behaviors by fostering cooperation and reducing conflict. Existing research indicates that social hierarchy is closely associated with immune responses, neural regulation, metabolic processes, and endocrine functions. These physiological systems collectively modulate an individual's sensitivity to stress and influence adaptive responses, thereby playing a critical role in the development of psychiatric disorders such as depression and anxiety. This review summarizes the primary behavioral methods used to assess social dominance in mice, evaluates their applicability and limitations, and discusses potential improvements. Additionally, it explores the underlying neural mechanisms associated with these methods to deepen our understanding of their biological basis. By critically assessing existing methodologies and proposing refinements, this study aims to provide a systematic reference framework and methodological guidance for future research, facilitating a more comprehensive exploration of the neural mechanisms underlying social behavior. The role of sex differences in social hierarchy formation remains underexplored. Most studies focus predominantly on males, while the distinct social strategies and physiological mechanisms of females are currently overlooked. Future studies should place greater emphasis on evaluating social hierarchy in female mice to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of sex-specific social behaviors and their 2 impact on group structure and individual health. Advances in automated tracking technologies may help address this gap by improving behavioral assessments in female mice. Future research may also benefit from integrating physiological data (e.g., hormone levels) to gain deeper insights into the relationships between social status, stress regulation, and mental health. Additionally, developments in artificial intelligence and deep learning could enhance individual recognition and behavioral analysis, potentially reducing reliance on chemical markers or implanted devices.

    Keywords: hierarchy, resource competition, Social Behavior, Behavioral assessment, Mental Disorders

    Received: 21 Dec 2024; Accepted: 21 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Zheng, Chen, Zhong, Li, Yuan, Zhang, Zhou, Zhu, Hongwei and Sun. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Sun Hongwei, Department of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China
    Lin Sun, Department of Psychology, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more