Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Behav. Neurosci.
Sec. Motivation and Reward
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1455478
This article is part of the Research Topic Sex as a biological variable in the neurocircuitry of motivated behavior View all 5 articles

Sex differences in glutamate transmission and plasticity in reward related regions

Provisionally accepted
  • Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Disruptions in glutamate homeostasis within the mesolimbic reward circuitry may play a role in the pathophysiology of various reward related disorders such as major depressive disorders, anxiety, and substance use disorders. Clear sex differences have emerged in the rates and symptom severity of these disorders which may result from differing underlying mechanisms of glutamatergic signaling. Indeed, preclinical models have begun to uncover baseline sex differences throughout the brain in glutamate transmission and synaptic plasticity. Glutamatergic synaptic strength can be assessed by looking at morphological features of glutamatergic neurons including spine size, spine density, and dendritic branching. Likewise, electrophysiology studies evaluate properties of glutamatergic neurons to provide information of their functional capacity. In combination with measures of glutamatergic transmission, synaptic plasticity can be evaluated using protocols that induce long-term potentiation or long-term depression. This review will consider preclinical rodent literature directly comparing glutamatergic transmission and plasticity in reward related regions of males and females. Additionally, we will suggest which regions are exhibiting evidence for sexually dimorphic mechanisms, convergent mechanisms, or no sex differences in glutamatergic transmission and plasticity and highlight gaps in the literature for future investigation.

    Keywords: sex differences, Glutamate, long-term depression (LTD), long-term potentiation (LTP), spine density, structural plasticity, Electrophysiology

    Received: 26 Jun 2024; Accepted: 30 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Kniffin and Briand. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Lisa A. Briand, Temple University, Philadelphia, 19122, Pennsylvania, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.