Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Behav. Neurosci.
Sec. Learning and Memory
Volume 18 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1440601

Comprehensive ethological analysis of fear expression in rats using DeepLabCut and SimBA machine learning model

Provisionally accepted
Kanat Chanthongdee Kanat Chanthongdee 1,2Yerko Fuentealba Yerko Fuentealba 1Thor Wahlestedt Thor Wahlestedt 1Lou Foulhac Lou Foulhac 1Tetiana Kardash Tetiana Kardash 1Andrea Coppola Andrea Coppola 1Markus Heilig Markus Heilig 1Estelle Barbier Estelle Barbier 1*
  • 1 Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden
  • 2 Department of physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Defensive responses to threat-associated cues are commonly evaluated using conditioned freezing or suppression of operant responding. However, rats display a broad range of behaviors and shift their defensive behaviors based on immediacy of threats and context. This study aimed to identify the defensive behaviors that are triggered in response to threat-associated cues and assess whether they can accurately be identified using DeepLabCut in conjunction with SimBA. We evaluated behavioral responses to fear using the auditory fear conditioning paradigm. Observable behaviors triggered by threat-associated cues were manually scored using Ethovision XT. Subsequently, we investigated the effects of diazepam (0, 0.3, or 1mg/kg), administered intraperitoneally before fear memory testing, to assess its anxiolytic impact on these behaviors. We then developed a DeepLabCut + SimBA workflow for ethological analysis employing a series of machine learning models. The accuracy of behavior classifications generated by this pipeline was evaluated by comparing its output scores to the manually annotated scores. Our findings show that, besides conditioned suppression and freezing, rats exhibit heightened risk assessment behaviors, including sniffing, rearing, free-air whisking, and head scanning. We observed that diazepam dose-dependently mitigates these risk-assessment behaviors in both sexes, suggesting a good predictive validity of our readouts. With adequate amount of training data (approximately >30,000 frames containing such behavior), DeepLabCut + SimBA workflow yields high accuracy with a reasonable transferability to classify well-represented behaviors in a different experimental condition. We also found that maintaining the same condition between training and evaluation data sets is recommended while developing DeepLabCut + SimBA workflow to achieve the highest accuracy. Our findings suggest that an ethological analysis can be used to assess fear learning. With the application of DeepLabCut and SimBA, this approach provides an alternative method to decode ongoing defensive behaviors in both male and female rats for further investigation of fear-related neurobiological underpinnings.

    Keywords: Fear conditioning, Ethological analysis, Risk-assessment, DeepLabCut, SIMBA

    Received: 29 May 2024; Accepted: 15 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Chanthongdee, Fuentealba, Wahlestedt, Foulhac, Kardash, Coppola, Heilig and Barbier. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Estelle Barbier, Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.