The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Behav. Neurosci.
Sec. Learning and Memory
Volume 18 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1415047
Auditory stimuli suppress contextual fear responses in safety learning independent of a possible safety meaning
Provisionally accepted- 1 Laboratory of Synaptic Mechanisms, Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Science, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- 2 Neurosciences Institute, School of Medicine, New York University, New York, United States
- 3 Laboratory of Computational Neuroscience, Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Science, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- 4 Laboratory of Sensory Processing, Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Science, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
- 5 School of Computer and Communication Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
Safety learning allows the identification of non-threatening situations, a learning process instrumental for survival and psychic health. In contrast to fear learning, in which a sensory cue (conditioned stimulus, CS) is temporally linked to a mildly aversive stimulus (US), safety learning is studied by presenting the CS and US in an explicitly unpaired fashion. This leads to "conditioned inhibition" of fear responses in which sensory cues can acquire a safety meaning (CS-). In one variant of safety learning, an auditory CS-was shown to reduce contextual fear responses during recall, as measured by freezing of mice. Here, we performed control experiments to test whether auditory stimuli might interfere with freezing by mechanisms other than safety learning ("external inhibition"). Surprisingly, when auditory stimulation was omitted during training (US-only controls), such stimuli still significantly suppressed contextual freezing during recall, indistinguishable from the reduction of freezing after regular safety training. The degree of this external inhibition was positively correlated with the levels of contextual freezing preceding the auditory stimulation. Correspondingly, in fear learning protocols which employ a new context during recall and therefore induce lower contextual freezing, auditory stimuli did not induce significant external inhibition. These experiments show that in safety learning protocols that employ contextual freezing, the freezing reduction caused by auditory stimuli during recall is dominated by external inhibition, rather than by learned safety. Thus, in safety learning experiments extensive controls should be performed to rule out possible intrinsic effects of sensory cues on freezing behavior.
Keywords: Safety learning, fear learning, freezing behavior, external inhibition, Contextual fear memory, auditory-cued fear memory, startle response, Valence
Received: 09 Apr 2024; Accepted: 04 Sep 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Mombelli, Osypenko, Palchaudhuri, Sourmpis, Brea, Kochubey and Schneggenburger. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ralf Schneggenburger, Laboratory of Synaptic Mechanisms, Brain Mind Institute, School of Life Science, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.