Jessica Atef Nassef Sefen
Jayaditya Devpal Patil
Helen Cooper- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland – Bahrain,, Muharraq, Bahrain
Co-ingestion of energy drinks and alcohol has long been in practice and has been poorly regulated despite a growing body of literature of their potential negative health impacts. Co-ingestion of energy drinks with alcohol has multiple counter-active effects such as reduction of body sway, fatigue and sedative effects induced by alcohol, along with increased subjective feeling of alertness, which may lead to increased binge-drinking, intoxication, decreased perception of intoxication, dehydration, and alcohol poisoning. Adding energy drinks to alcohol may also have synergistic effects in causing alcohol dependency and addiction. The association between caffeine, a common active ingredient in energy drinks, and alcohol is relatively well defined, however association with other active ingredients such as taurine, niacin, and pyridoxine, is less understood, pointing to a gap in our knowledge regarding this practice. Nonetheless, the current associations between AMED (Alcohol Mixed with Energy Drinks) and risky behavior secondary to intoxication and cases of alcohol poisoning have led various national governing bodies to regulate this practice. This review highlights the potential effects of AMED on human physiology based on what is known from human and animal models, and sheds light on specific biochemical interactions between alcohol and active ingredients found in energy drinks; Caffeine, Taurine, and Glucuronolactone. The review also touches on the regulation of this practice around the world, and the impact it has on its users, and points researchers to gaps in our knowledge on the interactions between alcohol and EDs and the full extent of their effects.
Introduction
Alcohol mixed with energy drinks; epidemiology
The co-ingestion of alcohol mixed with energy drinks (AMED) is a very common practice worldwide, particularly prominent in the younger population where studies from the United States (US) revealed 10.6% of students in grades 8, 10, and 12, and 31.8% of young adults aged 19–28 had consumed AMED at least once in the past year (Kponee et al., 2014; Johnson et al., 2018; Schulenberg et al., 2018). A study surveying college students in the US regarding patterns of energy drink (ED) use found the consumption of AMED was reported by 57% of women and 50% of men (Malinauskas et al., 2007). Another survey of 450 medical students in Italy, 56.9% reported ED consumption of which 48.4% mixed EDs with alcohol; 36% of those who reported ever combining ED and alcohol had done so on more than three occasions in the previous month (Oteri et al., 2007). Similar figures have been found in research investigating the frequency of ED usage among college students in Turkey, where 37.2% reported mixing EDs with alcohol (Attila and Çakir, 2011). Although unclear why young drinkers are driven to consume AMEDs, some literature suggests consumption during parties, taste enhancement of alcohol, and energy and pleasure seeking behaviors are some motivators (Ballistreri and Corradi-Webster, 2008; O’Brien et al., 2008). Regardless of the motives, this phenomenon of mixing energy drinks with alcohol is quite prevalent in today’s society, although unclear if the consumption patterns have increased over time. It is thus important to establish their combinatorial effects and potential implications–which are vital to understand from both medical and sociolegal perspectives–such as drinking habits among users, addiction, binge-drinking, alcohol poisoning, and general wellbeing. This review aims to highlight the aforementioned literature on AMED, while also shedding light on specific interactions between alcohol and active ingredients found in EDs, the impact it has on human physiology and safety, and existing regulations on EDs in different parts of the world.
Biochemical interactions between alcohol and active ingredients in energy drinks
Alcohol is known to potentiate GABAergic neurotransmission by increasing GABA release (Kumar et al., 2009; Woodward, 2009). In addition, alcohol inhibits glutamatergic neurotransmission by acting on ionotropic glutamate receptors (Siggins et al., 2003; Woodward, 2009). Alcohol also modulates dopamine neurotransmission by directly altering the activity of dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) (Morikawa and Morrisett, 2010). It is widely believed that alcohol-induced increase in VTA neuronal activity leads to increased dopamine release which mediates the reinforcing euphoric effects of alcohol (Gonzales et al., 2004; Tupala and Tiihonen, 2004). This mechanism may be affected by active ingredients found in EDs.
Caffeine-alcohol interactions
The most common ingredient in EDs is caffeine, which is often combined with taurine, glucuronolactone, and B vitamins such as niacin, and pyridoxine (Reissig et al., 2009). Caffeine is a non-selective competitive antagonist at the adenosine receptor and produces its effects by counteracting the effects of endogenous adenosine (O’Brien, 2009). Adenosine is an inhibitory neurotransmitter that increases sedation and contributes to sleep under normal conditions, hence these inhibitory effects of caffeine induces wakefulness. This interaction relies on the ability of adenosine to modulate the function of central ascending neurotransmitter systems, which are involved in motor activation and reward dopaminergic systems and arousal effects through cholinergic, noradrenergic, histaminergic, and orexinergic systems. Among the four A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 adenosine receptors, A1 and A2A receptors are the ones predominantly expressed in the brain and are the primary target receptors for caffeine (Fredholm et al., 1999; Ferré, 2010; Juliano et al., 2014). The arousing effects of caffeine depend on the inhibition of multiple inhibitory mechanisms that adenosine exerts on (Ferré, 2010). As dopamine activity is involved in the reward system, elevated dopamine levels play a key role in the abuse potential of most drugs of abuse, including alcohol. The activation of adenosine receptors inhibits dopamine activity through proposed mechanisms including A2A/D2 and A1/D1 receptor-receptor interaction (Ferré et al., 2008; Ferré, 2010) and modulation of dopamine binding affinity (Franco et al., 2000), therefore caffeine indirectly increases dopamine activity. Because caffeine acts as an adenosine receptor antagonist, it blocks adenosine activity, resulting in increased dopamine activity (Nagy et al., 1990; Garrett and Griffiths, 1997; Yao et al., 2002). These biochemical interactions create the basis of the claim that AMED may be dangerous because the stimulant effects of caffeine counteract the sedative effects of alcohol, giving users a false feeling of sobriety thus increasing alcohol consumption and encouraging risk-taking behavior (such as driving under the influence of alcohol). The increased dopamine also stimulates the brain reward system when alcohol is mixed with it, thus the striatal A2A–D2 receptor interactions provide an important pathway by which caffeine can potentiate the reinforcing euphoric effects of alcohol.
The role of adenosine antagonism on voluntary ethanol intake was explored in literature examining the effect of different caffeine doses and selective adenosine A1 and A2A receptor antagonists in mice. This study found caffeine between doses of 2.5–20.0 mg/kg to significantly increase ethanol consumption in moderate ethanol consumers, however no effects were observed in low or high ethanol consumers (SanMiguel et al., 2019).
A preclinical study that assessed the effect of pre-treatment with caffeine on voluntary ethanol consumption in rodents found low and high caffeine doses to have no effect on ethanol consumption but moderate doses of 5 mg/kg to increase ethanol intake (Kunin et al., 2000). A second animal study assessing if caffeine would enhance ethanol-conditioned place preference and enhance ethanol-stimulated locomotor activity found higher doses of caffeine to result in statistically significant increase in locomotion, however, at higher doses of alcohol this is decreased. No significant findings were found in terms of place preference (Hilbert et al., 2013). One trial assessing the interaction between caffeine and ethanol to assess if caffeine can affect the ability of ethanol to elicit conditioned place preference and conditioned place aversion, found caffeine to not have an effect on its own, while ethanol elicited significant conditioned-place preference and aversion. Caffeine significantly prevented ethanol-elicited conditioned-place preference and, also prevented the acquisition of ethanol-elicited conditioned-place aversion (Porru et al., 2020).
Increased drinking with EDs may be explained through the A2A receptor mechanism wherein activation of the A2A receptor decreases alcohol consumption (Houchi et al., 2008) and caffeine is known to inhibit this receptor, therefore potentially attributing to increased alcohol intake (Ferré, 2010).
Alcohol mixed with energy drinks has been shown to increase binge-drinking in some animal studies due to interactions between shared receptors and proposed that such interaction may have a dose dependent relationship (SanMiguel et al., 2019). However this does not mean the same is also applicable to humans.
In another instance of a study looking at the interaction of caffeine on the effects of alcohol on conditioned taste aversion, ataxia, and locomotor activity in mice found that the combination of caffeine and alcohol produced robust locomotor sensitization. After repeated exposure, the effect of the drug combination on activity was approximately 2.5 times greater than either that produced by alcohol or caffeine alone. The authors conclude that co-intoxication with caffeine and alcohol has a possible synergistic effect on locomotor sensitization rather than an additive one. The study revealed that previous caffeine exposure increased the ataxic response to the caffeine and alcohol combination, however, seemed to reduce the ataxic response to high doses of alcohol. The artical failed to show any effect on conditioned taste aversion (Christina et al., 2015). An additional study looking at how ED affects the expression of ethanol sensitization in mice indicated that an alcohol sensitization effect could be enhanced in mice when acutely challenged with a mixture of an ED and alcohol (Ferreira et al., 2013). In summary, these animal model studies indicate that a history of exposure to the combination of alcohol and energy drinks may influence the locomotor response when subjects are acutely challenged (Ulenius et al., 2019).
Taurine-alcohol interactions
Taurine is a sulfur-containing amino acid and is the most abundant intracellular amino acid in humans (Gaull, 1989). It helps with skeletal muscle contractile function and attenuates exercise-induced DNA damage. Taurine also has other biological and physiologic functions; antiarrhythmic, inotropic, and chronotropic effects; central nervous system neuromodulation; endocrine or metabolic effects; and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties (Lourenço and Camilo, 2002; Juliano et al., 2014). Some studies have found that taurine is released from the nucleus accumbens following alcohol exposure and potentially plays a role in increasing extracellular dopamine levels in nucleus accumbens (Ericson et al., 2006, 2011). Elevated extracellular taurine levels may also be required for alcohol to induce dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens (Ericson et al., 2011). A study looking at the effect of taurine on alcohol-induced sleep time in mice found taurine to enhance the depressant effects of alcohol, suggesting an interaction between taurine and alcohol on the central nervous system (Ferko and Bobyock, 1988). Taurine may also influence some of the adverse effects of alcohol as shown by one controlled trial where pre-treatment with taurine reduced ethanol-induced increases of acetaldehyde in the blood and liver of rats (Watanabe et al., 1985). If this were the same in humans, it could be speculated that mixing EDs with alcohol means decreased hangovers with the same level of alcohol consumption. However, an opposing view is that the level of taurine and B vitamins (such as niacin) found in popular EDs are far below the amounts expected to deliver either therapeutic benefits or adverse effects (Clauson et al., 2008). A study exploring taurine and caffeine’s effect on ethanol-induced locomotion in mice failed to report any impact of acute administration of taurine on locomotion (Ulenius et al., 2019). The study does highlight an interesting finding where at particular dose combinations, co-administration of caffeine and taurine increased ethanol-induced locomotion to a greater extent than any drug administered alone or in combination (Ulenius et al., 2019). This contrasts with one previous study showing a dose-dependent relationship where taurine decreased ethanol-induced locomotion at low doses of ethanol but increased it at higher doses of ethanol (Aragon et al., 1992). This is still an area that is not sufficiently studied to make either claim and we hope future experimental research can try to build on this. However, despite the discrepancies, one can conclude that taurine may have subtle effects on ethanol-induced locomotion.
Glucuronolactone-alcohol interactions
Although glucuronolactone is one of the common ingredients in EDs, little to no research has been done on its health impacts in human or animal models. Additionally, there is no available literature on its interaction with alcohol, which is surely an area of interest. This was reiterated in studies published as early as 2010 (Higgins et al., 2010). Yet, over a decade later, no advancements have been made to try to understand this potentially harmful interaction. Despite many of these studies having been conducted on animal models and not replicated in humans, there is still concern over their effects on humans, even if not in identical mechanisms to that of the animal models.
Potential adverse effects of alcohol mixed with energy drink and impact on safety and alcohol dependence
After briefly discussing the biochemistry that forms the basis of these interactions, we can begin to understand the effects they may have and their impact in humans, especially their most frequent users.
In addition to AMED being common practice in more than half of college students by some estimates (Malinauskas et al., 2007), it is also more common in binge drinkers compared to occasional consumers of alcohol. A survey on Michigan high school students in the US found binge drinkers; defined as drinkers who reported consuming five or more alcoholic drinks in a row during the 30 days before survey administration, to be more than twice as likely to mix alcohol with EDs when compared to non-binge drinkers (49.0 vs. 18.2%, p < 0.001) (Gonzales et al., 2015).
The reverse is also true, as frequent consumers of EDs are also more likely to consume more alcohol, and also at an earlier age. One study exploring the associations between caffeinated energy drink usage, alcohol-use patterns, and alcohol-related consequences in college students in the US, found that when compared to occasional ED consumers, weekly or daily ED consumers were more likely to have gotten drunk at an earlier age (Arria et al., 2011). High-frequency ED users were also found to consume alcohol more frequently and in higher quantities, and were twice as likely to be alcohol dependent than those who infrequently consume them (American Psychiatric Association, 2000). Another study also found that college students in the UK drank more alcohol on occasions when they also consumed EDs (8.6 drinks vs. 4.6 drinks; p = 0.016) (Price et al., 2010). This raises concerns over the lack of regulation over EDs which can potentiate dangerous interactions and propagate alcohol dependencies and binge-drinking given the existing moderate correlation. In addition to more frequent drinking, drinkers aged 15–23 who mix alcohol with EDs are also four times more likely to binge drink at high intensity when compared to drinkers who do not mix alcohol with EDs (Emond et al., 2014).
The effects of AMED can also have dangerous consequences wherein one health report studying the demographics of AMED in New South Wales, Australia found 39 poison center calls related to AMED recorded at NSWPIC (New South Wales State-Wide Poisons Information Centre). Over a 6 year period, there were 657 presentations related to AMED use across 59 emergency departments in NSW. The number of calls relating to AMED use were split evenly by gender and the majority involved adolescents and young adults. Over two thirds of poison center calls involved the co-ingestion of AMEDs with other substances as well (Lubman et al., 2013).
Literature has further highlighted the effects of AMED on binge-drinking where a measurement-burst design study looked at the short term consequences of AMED compared with consuming alcohol alone and found that AMED was associated with an increase in the number of alcoholic drinks consumed, more hours spent drinking, elevated blood alcohol content, and a higher probability of subjective intoxication (Patrick and Maggs, 2014).
Alcohol mixed with energy drinks is also associated with high risk sexual behavior and illicit substance use. A comparative study in the US looking at this association among young adults found AMED consumers to be significantly more likely to report marijuana, cocaine, and ecstasy use. They had higher odds of engaging in high-risk sexual behaviors such as unprotected sex, sex while under the influence of drugs, and sex after having too much to drink. This relationship remained significant after accounting for demographic factors and other substance use (Snipes and Benotsch, 2013).
A survey done in Canada that looked at whether youth who use AMED were more likely to engage in driving, or being a passenger of a driver under the influence of alcohol or cannabis compared to youth who use either alcohol or energy drinks alone, found youth who use AMED demonstrated a higher risk profile for driving under the influence of alcohol or cannabis than youth who use alcohol alone (Wilson et al., 2018). Additionally, alcohol and EDs both act as diuretics causing dehydration. Several deaths have been associated with ED consumption after sport as a consequence of dehydration (Finnegan, 2003). This poses serious concern, particularly in the younger population, where individuals are more physically active. Increased dehydration may also exacerbate the effects of a hangover, and lead to greater impairment the day after consumption (Finnegan, 2003). Isolated reports of death due to AMED have also been reported (Scimex, 2018).
The links, of varying strengths, between AMED and binge-drinking, high frequency and quantity drinking, earlier age of drinking and alcohol poisoning, and death, while may be of varying strength, are concerning enough to demand attention and stress the need to address and regulate this practice.
Regulation of alcohol mixed with energy drinks around the world
We have explored the possible links, of varying strengths, between AMED and binge-drinking, high frequency and quantity drinking, earlier age of drinking and alcohol poisoning. While these may simply be correlations, they are concerning enough to demand attention.
In the early 2000s, beverages that combined alcohol, caffeine, and other stimulants, also known as caffeinated alcoholic beverages (CABs) were very popular (Federal Trade Commission, 2022; US Food and Drug Administration, 2022) but due to reported activities of alcohol poisoning, drunk driving, unprotected sexual intercourse and alcohol related injuries, the food and drug association (FDA) issued a notice requiring companies to remove CABs from the market in 2010. Standard alcohol and on-the-shelf caffeinated drinks do, however, remain available for individuals to mix, and regulations on EDs specifically are quite limited. The FDA lists caffeine, the primary ingredient in EDs, as “generally recognized as safe” when used in carbonated drinks at a certain level. Interestingly, this does not apply to EDs. The FDA has placed no restrictions on an upper caffeine limit in EDs whatsoever, meaning companies have no limitations over the caffeine content of their beverages and this is very concerning, given the potential for misuse (Heckman et al., 2010). Additionally, regulations in the US state that caffeine, along with any other ingredient, must be listed on the product label if added as an ingredient, however, the exact actual amount of caffeine, or any other ingredient, does not need to be listed on the label (Heckman et al., 2010).
Other regulatory bodies such as the Australia New Zealand Food Authority have a distinct category of beverages called “formulated caffeinated beverages” which must contain no less than 145 mg/L and no more than 320 mg/L of caffeine, which includes all caffeine present, regardless of the source (Heckman et al., 2010). Restrictions also exist for the amount of taurine and glucuronolactone permitted in EDs. The only regulation on the supply of AMEDs in Australia, is in Perth, Western Australia, where venues are prohibited from selling AMEDs after midnight, but this policy is undermined by the continued sale of EDs in the same venues after midnight (UK Wired, 2010). The European Union on the other hand, has not set an upper limit for caffeine content; however, if the beverage contains more than 150 mg/L, the product label must read “high caffeine content” followed by the amount of caffeine (Heckman et al., 2010; Lubman et al., 2013). In the UK, regulations are yet to be implemented. A proposed ban was resisted by Scotland in 2005 (UK Wired, 2010).
There is some progression in the regulation of this practice over the last few years. Regulatory authorities in Canada restrict the manufacture and sale of CAB unless the caffeine is derived from a natural source such as guarana, however, caffeine as an ingredient cannot be directly added to an alcoholic drink (UK Wired, 2010). The authorities have also recently reduced the amount of caffeine in EDs (no more than 400 mg of caffeine per liter or 180 mg per single serve) and EDs are now required to display the following warning labels: “do not mix with alcohol,” “high source of caffeine,” and “not recommended for children, pregnant/breastfeeding women, individuals sensitive to caffeine,” In Mexico, regulatory bodies have prohibited the sale of AMEDs in licensed venues (Lubman et al., 2013).
Conclusion
This review sheds light on the effects AMED can have from various perspectives. These include, but are not limited to, binge-drinking, more frequent and higher quantity consumption, younger age at drinking, alcohol poisoning, more negative after-effects, as well as engaging in risky sexual behavior and illicit substance use. The active ingredients in EDs contribute significantly and are part of the mechanism by which these effects are significantly increased in those mixing EDs with alcohol compared to those consuming alcohol alone, although there remain uncertainties on the evidence surrounding the exact mechanisms underlying interactions between alcohol and energy drink constituents. Further human studies of the interaction between alcohol and caffeine are needed to confirm the findings of animal models, while both animal and human studies are lacking for other ED ingredients.
However, in spite of these uncertainties on interactions, there is still a body of evidence suggestive of risky behaviors and harmful effects in people who consume AMED, underlining the public health need for regulation of the widespread global consumption of these. Further research in this area would be beneficial and aid regulatory bodies in the making of guidelines regarding the use and effects of AMED in years to come.
Author contributions
JS, JP, and HC: literature review, writing, editing, and revision of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Aragon, C. M., Trudeau, L. E., and Amit, Z. (1992). Effect of taurine on ethanol-induced changes in open-field locomotor activity. Psychopharmacology 107, 337–340. doi: 10.1007/BF02245158
Arria, A. M., Caldeira, K. M., Kasperski, S. J., Vincent, K. B., Griffiths, R. R. O., and Grady, K. E. (2011). Energy drink consumption and increased risk for alcohol dependence. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 35, 365–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01352.x
Attila, S., and Çakir, B. (2011). Energy-drink consumption in college students and associated factors. Nutrition 27, 316–322. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2010.02.008
Ballistreri, M. C., and Corradi-Webster, C. M. (2008). Consumption of energy drinks among physical education students. Rev. Lat. Am. Enferm. 16, 558–564. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692008000700009
Christina, E., May Harold, L., Haun William, C., and Griffin, I. I. I. (2015). Sensitization and Tolerance Following Repeated Exposure to Caffeine and Alcohol in Mice. Alcoholism 39, 1443–1452. doi: 10.1111/acer.12794
Clauson, K. A., Shields, K. M., McQueen, C. E., and Persad, N. (2008). Safety issues associated with commercially available energy drinks. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc. 48, 55–63.e. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2008.07055
Emond, J. A., Gilbert-Diamond, D., Tanski, S. E., and Sargent, J. D. (2014). Energy drink consumption and the risk of alcohol use disorder among a national sample of adolescents and young adults. J. Pediatr. 165, 1194–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.08.050
Ericson, M., Chau, P., Clarke, R. B., Adermark, L., and Soderpalm, B. (2011). Rising taurine and ethanol concentrations in nucleus accumbens interact to produce dopamine release after ethanol administration. Addict. Biol. 16, 377–385. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2010.00245.x
Ericson, M., Molander, A., Stomberg, R., and Soderpalm, B. (2006). Taurine elevates dopamine levels in the rat nucleus accumbens; antagonism by strychnine. Eur. J. Neurosci. 23, 3225–3229. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04868.x
Federal Trade Commission (2022). FTC sends warning letters to marketers of caffeinated alcohol drinks. Available online at: https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2010/11/ftc-sends-warning-letters-marketers-caffeinated-alcohol-drinksExternalexternal icon [accessed on 4, Jun 2022].
Ferko, A. P., and Bobyock, E. (1988). Effect of taurine on ethanol-induced sleep time in mice genetically bred for differences in ethanol sensitivity Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 31, 667–673. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(88)90246-8
Ferré, S. (2010). Role of the central ascending neurotransmitter systems in the psychostimulant effects of caffeine. J. Alzheimers Dis. 20, 35–S49. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1400
Ferré, S., Quiroz, C., Woods, A. S., Cunha, R., Popoli, P., Ciruela, F., et al. (2008). An update on adenosine A2A-Dopamine D2 receptor interactions: Implications for the functions of G Protein - coupled receptors. Curr. Pharm. Design 14, 1468–1474. doi: 10.2174/138161208784480108
Ferreira, S. E., Abrahao, K. P., and Souza- Formigoni, M. L. O. (2013). Expression of behavioral sensitization to ethanol is increased by energy drink administration. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 110, 245–248. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2013.07.014
Finnegan, D. (2003). The health effects of stimulant drinks. Nutr. Bull. 28, 147–155. doi: 10.1046/j.1467-3010.2003.00345.x
Franco, R., Ferré, S., Agnati, L., Torvinen, M., Ginés, S., Hillion, J., et al. (2000). Evidence for adenosine/dopamine receptor interaction: Indications for heteromerization. Neuropsychopharmacology 23, 50–59. doi: 10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00144-5
Fredholm, B. B., Battig, K., Holmen, J., Nehlig, A., and Zvartau, E. E. (1999). Actions of caffeine in the brain with special reference to factors that contribute to its widespread use. Pharmacol. Rev. 51, 83–133.
Garrett, B. E., and Griffiths, R. R. (1997). The role of dopamine in the behavioral effects of caffeine in animals and man. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 57, 533–541. doi: 10.1016/S0091-3057(96)00435-2
Gaull, G. E. (1989). Taurine in pediatric nutrition: Review and update. Pediatrics 83, 433–442. doi: 10.1542/peds.83.3.433
Gonzales, K. R., Largo, T. W., Miller, C., Kanny, D., and Brewer, R. D. (2015). Consumption of alcoholic beverages and liquor consumption by Michigan high school students, 2011. Prev. Chronic. Dis. 12:150290. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150290
Gonzales, R. A., Job, M. O., and Doyon, W. M. (2004). The role of mesolimbic dopamine in the development and maintenance of alcohol reinforcement. Pharmacol. Ther. 103, 121–146. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2004.06.002
Heckman, M. A., Sherry, K., and de Mejia, E. G. (2010). Energy Drinks: An Assessment of Their Market Size, Consumer Demographics, Ingredient Profile, Functionality, and Regulations in the United States. Comprehens. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safe. 9, 303–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2010.00111.x
Higgins, J. P., Tuttle, T. D., and Higgins, C. L. (2010). Energy beverages: Content and safety. Mayo Clin. Proc. 85, 1033–1041. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0381
Hilbert, M. L., May, C. E., and Griffin, W. C. III (2013). Conditioned reinforcement and locomotor activating effects of caffeine and ethanol combinations in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 110, 168–173. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2013.07.008
Houchi, H., Warnault, V., Barbier, E., Dubois, C., Pierrefiche, O., Ledent, C., et al. (2008). Involvement of A2A receptors in anxiolytic, locomotor, motivational properties of alcohol in mice. Genes Brain Behav. 7, 887–898. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00427.x
Johnson, L. D., Miech, R. A., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Schulenberg, J. E., and Patrick, M. E. (2018). Monitoring the Future: National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2017. 2017 Overview: Key Findings on Adolescent Drug Use. Michigan: The University of Michigan. doi: 10.3998/2027.42/148123
Juliano, L. M., Ferré, S., and Griffiths, R. R. (2014). “The pharmacology of caffeine,” in The ASAM Principles of Addiction Medicine: Fifth Edition, ed A. den Rijin (London: Wolters Kluwer Health Adis).
Kponee, K. Z., Siegel, M., and Jernigan, D. H. (2014). The use of caffeinated alcoholic beverages among underage drinkers: Results of a national survey. Addict. Behav. 39, 253–258. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.006
Kumar, S., Porcu, P., Werner, D. F., Matthews, D. B., Diaz-Granados, J. L., Helfand, R. S., et al. (2009). The role of GABA(A) receptors in the acute, chronic effects of alcohol: A decade of progress. Psychopharmacology 205, 529–564. doi: 10.1007/s00213-009-1562-z
Kunin, D., Gaskin, S., Rogan, F., Smith, B. R., and Amit, Z. (2000). Caffeine promotes ethanol drinking in rats. Alcohol 21, 271–277. doi: 10.1016/S0741-8329(00)00101-4
Lourenço, R., and Camilo, M. E. (2002). Taurine: A conditionally essential amino acid in humans? An overview in health and disease. Nutr. Hosp. 17, 262–270.
Lubman, D. I., Peacock, A., Droste, N., Pennay, A., Miller, P. G., Bruno, R., et al. (2013). Alcohol and energy drinks in NSW. Australia, NS: NSW Health.
Malinauskas, B. M., Aeby, V. G., Overton, R. F., Carpenter-Aeby, T., and Barber-Heidal, K. (2007). A survey of energy drink consumption patterns among college students. Nutr. J. 6:35. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-6-35
Morikawa, H., and Morrisett, R. A. (2010). Alcohol action on dopamine neurons in the ventral tegmental area: Interaction with intrinsic ion channels and neurotransmitter inputs. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 91, 235–288. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(10)91008-8
Nagy, L. E., Diamond, I., Casso, D. J., Franklin, C., and Gordon, A. S. (1990). Ethanol increases extracellular adenosine by inhibiting adenosine uptake via the nucleoside transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1946–1951. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)39923-5
O’Brien, M. C., McCoy, T. P., Rhodes, S. D., Wagoner, A., and Wolfson, M. (2008). Caffeinated cocktails: Energy drink consumption, high-risk drinking, and alcohol-related consequences among college students. Acad. Emerg. Med. 15, 453–460. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00085.x
O’Brien, M. C. (2009). The perfect storm: Alcohol, caffeine and youth. Presented at: Energy Drinks: Where the Science Meets Main Street. New York: SUNY Youth Sports Institute.
Oteri, A., Salvo, F., Caputi, A. P., and Calapai, G. (2007). Intake of energy drinks in association with alcoholic beverages in a cohort of students of the School of Medicine of the University of Messina. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 31, 1677–1680. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00464.x
Patrick, M. E., and Maggs, J. L. (2014). Energy Drinks and Alcohol: Links to Alcohol Behaviors and Consequences Across 56 Days. J. Adolesc. Health 54, 454–459. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.09.013
Porru, S., Maccioni, R., Bassareo, V., Peana, A. T., Salamone, J. D., Correa, M., et al. (2020). Effects of caffeine on ethanol-elicited place preference, place aversion and ERK phosphorylation in CD-1 mice. J. Psychopharmacol. 34, 1357–1370. doi: 10.1177/0269881120965892
Price, S. R., Hilchey, C. A., Darredeau, C., Fulton, H. G., and Barrett, S. P. (2010). Energy drink co-administration is associated with increased reported alcohol ingestion. Drug Alcohol. Rev. 29, 331–333. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2009.00163.x
Reissig, C. J., Strain, E. C., and Griffiths, R. R. (2009). Caffeinated energy drinks—a growing problem. Drug Alcohol. Depend. 99, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.08.001
SanMiguel, N., Lopez-Cruz, L., Muller, C. E., Salamone, J. D., and Correa, M. (2019). Caffeine modulates voluntary alcohol intake in mice depending on the access conditions: Involvement of adenosine receptors and the role of individual differences. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 186:172789. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2019.172789
Schulenberg, J. E., Johnson, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., Miech, R. A., and Patrick, M. E. (2018). Monitoring the Future: National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2017. Volume 2: College Students and Adults Ages 19–55. Michigan: The University of Michigan. doi: 10.3998/2027.42/146531
Scimex (2018). Expert reaction: Teenage girl dies after alcohol-energy drink mix. Available online at: https://www.scimex.org/newsfeed/expert-reaction-teenage-girl-dies-after-alcohol-energy-drink-mix (accessed May 22, 2022).
Siggins, G. R., Martin, G., Roberto, M., Nie, Z., Madamba, S., and De Lecea, L. (2003). Glutamatergic transmission in opiate and alcohol dependence. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1003, 196–211. doi: 10.1196/annals.1300.012
Snipes, D. J., and Benotsch, E. G. (2013). High-risk cocktails and high-risk sex: Examining the relation between alcohol mixed with energy drink consumption, sexual behavior, and drug use in college students. Addict. Behav. 38, 1418–1423. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.07.011
Tupala, E., and Tiihonen, J. (2004). Dopamine and alcoholism: Neurobiological basis of alcohol abuse. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psych. 28, 1221–1247. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2004.06.022
Ulenius, L., Adermark, L., Soderpalm, B., and Ericson, M. (2019). Energy drink constituents (caffeine and taurine) selectively potentiate ethanol-induced locomotion in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 187:172795. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2019.172795
US Food and Drug Administration (2022). Caffeinated Alcoholic Beverages. Available online at: https://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/FoodAdditivesIngredients/ucm19036 [accessed on 18, May 2022].
Watanabe, A., Hobara, N., and Nagashima, H. (1985). Lowering of liver acetaldehyde but not ethanol concentrations by pretreatment with taurine in ethanol-loaded rats. Experientia 41, 1421–1422. doi: 10.1007/BF01950014
Wilson, M. N., Cumming, T., Burkhalter, R., Langille, D. B., Ogilvie, R., and Asbridge, M. (2018). Driving under the influence behaviors among high school students who mix alcohol with energy drinks. Prevent. Med. 111, 402–409. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.035
Woodward, J. J. (2009). “The pharmacology of alcohol,” in Principles of Addiction Medicine 4th, eds R. K. Ries, S. C. Miller, D. A. Fiellin, and R. Saitz (Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.), 85–97.
Keywords: alcohol, energy drinks, caffeine, taurine, alcohol mixed with energy drink (AMED), adenosine, dopamine, regulations
Citation: Sefen JAN, Patil JD and Cooper H (2022) The implications of alcohol mixed with energy drinks from medical and socio-legal standpoints. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 16:968889. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.968889
Received: 14 June 2022; Accepted: 24 October 2022;
Published: 09 November 2022.
Edited by:
Valentina Bassareo, University of Cagliari, ItalyReviewed by:
Marcello Solinas, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), FranceCopyright © 2022 Sefen, Patil and Cooper. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jessica Atef Nassef Sefen, MTcyMDY2NTFAcmNzaS1tdWIuY29t