ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bacteriol.

Sec. Molecular Bacteriology and Microbiome

Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fbrio.2025.1582787

This article is part of the Research TopicBacteria's Role in Soil Health and MicrobiomesView all articles

Plant-beneficial bacteria are promoted in pasture-crop rotations in the Uruguayan Pampa, contributing to soil health and crop performance

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn-Institut, Quedlinburg, Germany
  • 2National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA), Montevideo, Uruguay

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Understanding how pasture-crop rotation design influences long-term soil health and microbial dynamics is crucial for sustainable agroecosystems. Pasture–crop rotations may alleviate soil degradation, but their long-term effects or legacy on soil and rhizosphere microbiomes, including potential recruitment of plant-beneficial microorganisms, and their link to crop yield, need to be better understood. This study examines how land use intensity and grazed pasture legacy influence soil and rhizosphere prokaryotic diversity, composition, functionality, and crop productivity. A gradient of land use intensities ranging from continuous cropping (CCG), short (SR) and long (LR) pasture-crop rotations, permanent improved pasture (PIP) and natural grassland (NGL) was sampled in a long-term field experiment in the Uruguayan Pampa established in 1995. Moreover, two stages of the rotation, one year after pasture sown with sorghum (SRS, LRS) and two years after pasture with soybean (SRG, LRG), were studied to assess the persistence of pasture-derived legacies. Soil physicochemical and biological properties were measured to evaluate soil health along with crop productivity. Bulk soil, soybean, and sorghum rhizosphere prokaryotic communities were analyzed across land use intensities using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and functional assays on rhizosphere bacterial isolates. Results showed a partial retention of soil health assessed through selected soil properties, i.e. soil organic C, total N, and extractable soil protein content were higher in LRG compared to CCG, while an intermediate response was observed in SRG. LR preserved the pasture legacy, maintaining prokaryotic community composition similar to PIP and distinct from CCG, while SR converged to CCG and diverged from PIP. Soybean rhizosphere prokaryotic diversity and composition was strongly shaped by crop type and by soybean inoculation with Bradyrhizobium elkanii, overriding the effects of intensification and pasture legacy. Key soil taxa (Streptomyces, Solibacillus, Sphingomonas and Bradyrhizobium) were liked with improved soil functionality. Linking 16S rRNA gene sequencing data of rhizosphere taxa with rhizobacterial isolates showed that Pseudomonas, Bacillus, and Microbacterium, all exhibiting multiple plant-beneficial activities in vitro, were enriched in pasture rotations. This study highlights that pasture-crop rotation design, particularly pasture duration and plant composition, influences prokaryotic services and soil health, contributing towards the development of resilient agroecosystems.

Keywords: Soil microbiota, rhizosphere microbiota, Land use intensification, pasture legacy, Microbial Diversity

Received: 24 Feb 2025; Accepted: 16 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Cerecetto, Smalla, Babin and Leoni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Victoria Cerecetto, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Julius Kühn-Institut, Quedlinburg, Germany
Carolina Leoni, National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA), Montevideo, 11100, Uruguay

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more