Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Astron. Space Sci.
Sec. Astrostatistics
Volume 11 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fspas.2024.1326926
This article is part of the Research Topic Statistical Methods for Event Data – Illuminating the Dynamic Universe View all 4 articles

Bayesian inference: More than Bayes's theorem

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States
  • 2 Department of Statistics and Data Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States
  • 3 Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Bayesian inference gets its name from Bayes's theorem, expressing posterior probabilities for hypotheses about a data generating process as the (normalized) product of prior probabilities and a likelihood function. But Bayesian inference uses all of probability theory, not just Bayes's theorem. Many hypotheses of scientific interest are composite hypotheses, with the strength of evidence for the hypothesis dependent on knowledge about auxiliary factors, such as the values of nuisance parameters (e.g., uncertain background rates or calibration factors). Many mportant capabilities of Bayesian methods arise from use of the law of total probability, which instructs analysts to compute probabilities for composite hypotheses by marginalization over auxiliary factors. This tutorial targets relative newcomers to Bayesian inference, aiming to complement tutorials that focus on Bayes's theorem and how priors modulate likelihoods. The emphasis here is on marginalization over parameter spaces-both how it is the foundation for important capabilities, and how it may motivate caution when parameter spaces are large. Topics covered include the difference between likelihood and probability, understanding the impact of priors beyond merely shifting the maximum likelihood estimate, and the role of marginalization in accounting for uncertainty in nuisance parameters, systematic error, and model misspecification.

    Keywords: astrostatistics, bayesian methods, Poisson Distribution, nuisanace parameters, systematic error, likelihood, Marginalization

    Received: 24 Oct 2023; Accepted: 18 Jun 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Loredo and Wolpert. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Thomas Loredo, Center for Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, 14853, New York, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.