Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Artif. Intell.

Sec. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence

Volume 8 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1512438

Comparison of the accuracy of GPT-4 and Resident Physicians in Differentiating Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules

Provisionally accepted
  • First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective: To assess the diagnostic performance of the GPT-4 model in comparison to resident physicians in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules using ultrasound images.Methods: This study analyzed 1,145 ultrasound images, including 632 malignant and 513 benign nodules. Both the GPT-4 model and two resident physicians independently classified the nodules using ultrasound images. The diagnostic accuracy of the resident physicians was determined by calculating the average of the individual accuracy rates of the two physicians and this was compared with the performance of the GPT-4 model.The GPT-4 model correctly identified 367 out of 632 malignant nodules (58.07%) and 343 out of 513 benign nodules (66.86%). Resident physicians identified 467 malignant (73.89%) and 383 benign nodules (74.66%). There was a statistically significant difference in the classification of malignant nodules (p < 0.001) and benign nodules (p = 0.048) between the GPT-4 model and residents. GPT-4 performed better for larger nodules (>1 cm) at 65.38%, compared to 53.77% for smaller nodules (≤1 cm, GPT-4 vs. Residents in Thyroid Nodule Classification p = 0.004). The AUC for GPT-4 was 0.67, while residents achieved 0.75.The GPT-4 model shows potential in classifying thyroid nodules, but its diagnostic accuracy remains significantly lower than that of resident physicians, particularly for smaller malignant nodules.

    Keywords: GPT-4, Large language models, thyroid nodules, ultrasound, artificial intelligence

    Received: 16 Oct 2024; Accepted: 10 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Boxiong, XiuMei, Shao, Sun and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Luzeng Chen, First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more