Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Artif. Intell.
Sec. Natural Language Processing
Volume 7 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1363531

From Outputs to Insights: A Survey of Rationalisation Approaches for Explainable Text Classification

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  • 2 ASUS Intelligent Cloud Services, Singapore, Singapore

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Deep learning models have achieved state-of-the-art performance for text classification in the last two decades. However, this has come at the expense of models becoming less understandable, limiting their application scope in high-stakes domains. The increased interest in explainability has resulted in many proposed forms of explanation. Nevertheless, recent studies have shown that rationales, or language explanations, are more intuitive and humanunderstandable, especially for non-technical stakeholders. This survey provides an overview of the progress the community has achieved thus far in rationalisation approaches for text classification. We first describe and compare techniques for producing extractive and abstractive rationales. Next, we present various rationale-annotated data sets that facilitate the training and evaluation of rationalisation models. Then, we detail proxy-based and human-grounded metrics to evaluate machine-generated rationales. Finally, we outline current challenges and encourage directions for future work.

    Keywords: Natural Language Processing, text classification, Explainable artificial intelligence, rationalisation, Language Explanations

    Received: 30 Dec 2023; Accepted: 02 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Mendez Guzman, Schlegel and Batista-Navarro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Erick A. Mendez Guzman, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.