ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Appl. Math. Stat.

Sec. Mathematical Finance

Volume 11 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fams.2025.1567626

This article is part of the Research TopicFinancial Modeling with FrictionsView all 7 articles

Value at Risk long memory volatility models with heavy-tailed distributions for Cryptocurrencies

Provisionally accepted
  • University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This paper investigates the volatility dynamics and underlying long memory features of four major cryptocurrencies-Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and Ripple-which were selected due to their high liquidity, large trading volumes, and historical significance in the digital asset market. The long-range dependence exhibited in cryptocurrency markets is often overlooked. However, based on the strong evidence of persistent dependence in the return series, we adopt advanced volatility models that are capable of accommodating high volatility and heavy-tails, as well as the long memory properties of cryptocurrencies. Specifically, we employ long-memory extensions of the GAS (Long memory GAS) and GARCH (Fractionally Integrated Asymmetric Power ARCH) models, integrating heavy-tailed innovation distributions: the Generalized Hyperbolic Distribution (GHD) and Generalized Lambda Distribution (GLD). Standard GARCH and GAS models are included as benchmarks. The performance of the models are assessed using Value-at-Risk (VaR) estimation, backtesting (in-sample and out-of-sample) and volatility forecasting metrics. The results indicate that long memory models, particularly the FIAPARCH model, consistently outperforms the standard GAS and GARCH models in capturing tail risk and the volatility persistence. These findings emphasize the critical role of long memory in modeling the risk of cryptocurrencies, indicating that accounting for volatility persistence can significantly enhance the accuracy of risk estimates and strengthen risk management practices.

Keywords: cryptocurrency, generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), Generalized Autoregressive Score (GAS), long memory (LM), Value-at-Risk (VaR)

Received: 27 Jan 2025; Accepted: 24 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Subramoney, Chinhamu and Chifurira. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Stephanie Danielle Subramoney, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.