AUTHOR=Farmus Linda , Arpin-Cribbie Chantal A. , Cribbie Robert A. TITLE=Continuous Predictors of Pretest-Posttest Change: Highlighting the Impact of the Regression Artifact JOURNAL=Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics VOLUME=4 YEAR=2019 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/applied-mathematics-and-statistics/articles/10.3389/fams.2018.00064 DOI=10.3389/fams.2018.00064 ISSN=2297-4687 ABSTRACT=

Researchers are often interested in exploring predictors of change, and commonly use a regression based model or a gain score analysis to compare degree of change across groups. Methodologists have cautioned against the use of the regression based model when there are non-random group differences at baseline because this model inappropriately corrects for baseline differences. Less research has addressed the issues that arise when exploring continuous predictors of change (e.g., a regression model with posttest as the outcome and pretest as a covariate). If continuous predictors of change correlate with pretest scores, the modeled relationship between predictors and change may be an artifact. This two-part study explored the statistical artifact, or overestimation of effect estimates, that may arise when continuous predictors of change are included in pretest-posttest regression based models. Study 1 revealed that the problematic regression based model that covaries out pretest scores is currently being applied in psychology literature more often than models that do not covary pretest scores, and that the conditions leading to the artifact (i.e., spurious effects) were met in a significant amount of studies reviewed. Study 2 demonstrated that the artifact arises in conditions common within psychological research, and directly impacts Type I error rates. Recommendations are provided regarding which regression based models are appropriate when pretest scores are correlated with continuous predictors.