AUTHOR=Tsuruta Manami , Inukai Keigo TITLE=How Are Individual Time Preferences Aggregated in Groups? A Laboratory Experiment on Intertemporal Group Decision-Making JOURNAL=Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics VOLUME=4 YEAR=2018 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/applied-mathematics-and-statistics/articles/10.3389/fams.2018.00043 DOI=10.3389/fams.2018.00043 ISSN=2297-4687 ABSTRACT=

The study of intertemporal decision-making is an interdisciplinary scientific topic of economics, psychology, and neuroscience. Most of these studies focus on individual intertemporal decisions, but little is known about the relationship between groups and individual time preferences. As a result, we intend to assess the role of group intertemporal decision-making. We experimentally investigate how to aggregate individual time preferences by clarifying who has the most influence on group decisions among heterogeneous group members. We formulate two hypotheses. The first is the multilateral bargaining hypothesis, which is based on the multilateral bargaining model. If people employ this model to reach agreement, the most patient member in a group has the greatest impact on group choices. The second is the median voter hypothesis, which is based on the median voter model. When people employ this model to reach agreement, the median patient member in a group has the greatest impact on group choices. Here, we find that the median patient member in a group has a significant impact on group decisions in an unstructured bargaining situation. This finding suggests that people use the majority voting rule during group intertemporal decision-making. Thus, our findings support the median voter hypothesis. Furthermore, the results of a chat analysis show that this result is partially due to people's conformity with the majority opinion.