
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
REVIEW article
Front. Antibiot.
Sec. Antibiotics in Clinical Settings
Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frabi.2025.1570989
This article is part of the Research TopicTuberculosis treatment monitoring toolsView all articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Tuberculosis drug trials are primarily designed to identify antibiotic regimens with the strongest potency to kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis. However, microbiologic cure is not synonymous with improved health and recovery. Beyond antimicrobial efficacy, parameters such as morbidity and mortality related to lung function, cardiovascular health, and cancer should be prioritized. This narrative review emphasizes the critical need to emphasize clinical outcomes as much, if not more, than microbiological endpoints. We examine the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and determinants of non-microbiological outcomes in tuberculosis, providing a synthesis of current knowledge. While there is growing evidence for some biomarkers to risk stratify TB patients for risk of all-cause mortality, relapse, or lung damage, no evidence was found on TB-associated cancer or cardiovascular disease. In addition to monitoring microbiologic outcomes, clinical trials and treatment cohorts need to capture patient-centered health dimensions more broadly.Finally, we highlight key research gaps and opportunities to evaluate nonmicrobiological biomarkers, aiming to improve patient monitoring and enable stratified approaches to tuberculosis management.
Keywords: Tuberculosis, biomarker, cardiovascular, Sequelae, Cancer
Received: 04 Feb 2025; Accepted: 09 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 DiNardo, Sabiiti, Gillespie, Georghiou, Heinrich, Hittel, Taghlabi, Carrero Longlax, Panzner, Musia, Lange, Vasiliu, Arts, Mandalakas, Ruhwald, Van Crevel, Kohli and Stuyver. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Andrew DiNardo, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.