CORRECTION article

Front. Anim. Sci., 26 March 2025

Sec. Animal Nutrition

Volume 6 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2025.1591726

Corrigendum: From feed to field: effect of dietary protein level and use of a blend of feed additives on gaseous emissions from growing-finishing pig slurry

Esperanza FuertesEsperanza Fuertes1Laura Sarri*Laura Sarri1*Rodrigo CarniceroRodrigo Carnicero1Estefania Prez-Calvo&#x;Estefania Pérez-Calvo2†lvaro CaldernÁlvaro Calderón3Joaquim Balcells&#x;Joaquim Balcells1†Ahmad Reza SeradjAhmad Reza Seradj1Carlos Cantero-MartínezCarlos Cantero-Martínez4Jesús Fernndez-OrtegaJesús Fernández-Ortega4Gabriel de la Fuente*Gabriel de la Fuente1*
  • 1Departament de Ciència Animal, Universitat de Lleida — Agrotecnio-CERCA Center, Lleida, Spain
  • 2dsm-firmenich, Animal Nutrition and Health, Kaiseraugst, Switzerland
  • 3dsm-firmenich, Animal Nutrition and Health, Madrid, Spain
  • 4Departament de Ciència i Enginyeria Forestal i Agrícola Agrotecnio-CERCA Center, Lleida, Spain

A Corrigendum on
From feed to field: effect of dietary protein level and use of a blend of feed additives on gaseous emissions from growing-finishing pig slurry

By Fuertes E, Sarri L, Carnicero R, Pérez-Calvo E, Calderón Á, Balcells J, Seradj A R, Cantero-Martínez C, Fernández-Ortega J and de la Fuente G (2025). Front. Anim. Sci. 6:1508660. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1508660

In the published article, there was an error in Table 1 as published. The weight, expressed in g kg-1 of all the ingredients of the eight experimental diets was incorrect, as they were expressed in other units. In addition, the units in which they should be expressed are “g kg-1 as fed”, and not “g kg DM-1”. The corrected Table 1 and its caption appear below.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental diets of two feeding phases, growing and finishing, fed standard (SP) or low (LP) levels of crude protein, combined with the presence (SPA and LPA) or absence (SPC and LPC) of dietary treatment.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: ammonia emission, crude protein, feed additives, field application, slurry, swine

Citation: Fuertes E, Sarri L, Carnicero R, Pérez-Calvo E, Calderón Á, Balcells J, Seradj AR, Cantero-Martínez C, Fernández-Ortega J and de la Fuente G (2025) Corrigendum: From feed to field: effect of dietary protein level and use of a blend of feed additives on gaseous emissions from growing-finishing pig slurry. Front. Anim. Sci. 6:1591726. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1591726

Received: 11 March 2025; Accepted: 13 March 2025;
Published: 26 March 2025.

Edited and Reviewed by:

David L. Harmon, University of Kentucky, United States

Copyright © 2025 Fuertes, Sarri, Carnicero, Pérez-Calvo, Calderón, Balcells, Seradj, Cantero-Martínez, Fernández-Ortega and de la Fuente. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Laura Sarri, bGF1cmEuc2FycmlAdWRsLmNhdA==; Gabriel de la Fuente, Z2FicmllbC5kZWxhZnVlbnRlQHVkbC5jYXQ=

ORCID: Estefania Pérez-Calvo, orcid.org/0000-0002-1007-7250
Joaquim Balcells, orcid.org/0000-0002-2126-7375

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more