
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Anim. Sci.
Sec. Animal Nutrition
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1583281
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The large intestine healthy microbiota in sheep hosts pathogenic, but mainly nonpathogenic bacteria, which are essential to intestinal metabolism, contributing energy, antigens, and metabolites that positively impact host physiology, immunity, and metabolism. However, this microbiota also poses a public health risk due to fecal contamination in animal products, such as wool. This study examined how maternal diet and pregnancy type influence the relative abundance of zoonotic bacterial DNA belonging to phyla Firmicutes and Proteobacteria in sheep feces and wool. In total, 18 Ile de France ewes, with 8 carrying twins and 10 single lambs, were divided into two groups: one fed ad libitum on naturalized pasture, the other given red clover hay plus lupine, from 45 days prepartum to 60 days postpartum. Both fecal and wool samples were collected from ewes and lambs four and three times, respectively, and analyzed via qPCR for Firmicutes (Clostridium perfringens type C, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus uberis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Streptococcus agalactiae) and Proteobacteria (Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli serotype O157). Data were analyzed using repeated measures two-way ANOVA. Results showed lower bacterial abundance in fecal samples than in wool samples, with ewe's wool exhibiting a lower bacterial abundance compared with lamb's wool. E. faecalis (Firmicutes) and E. coli (Proteobacteria) were the most prevalent bacteria, suggesting environmental contamination related to sheep behavior. In summary, handling offspring from birth to weaning and ewes until 60 days postpartum may increase zoonotic pathogen transmission risk, raising public health concerns regarding exposure to intestinal pathogenic bacteria.
Keywords: Relative abundance, pathogenic phyla bacteria, Wool contamination, Sheep, Human risk, Public Health
Received: 25 Feb 2025; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gallardo Paffetti, Azocar-Aedo, Parra, Larraín and Díaz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Maria A. Gallardo Paffetti, Escuela de Medicina Veterinaria, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.