ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Anim. Sci.

Sec. Animal Physiology and Management

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1580654

Prenatal wildfire smoke PM2.5 exposure has carryover effects on the postnatal calf

Provisionally accepted
Alexandra  PaceAlexandra Pace1Patricia  VillamedianaPatricia Villamediana2Maristela  RovaiMaristela Rovai2Gabriella  PonceGabriella Ponce3Natalie  EllisNatalie Ellis1Angela  StegemanAngela Stegeman1Mallery  LarsonMallery Larson1Denise  KonetchyDenise Konetchy1Pedram  RezamandPedram Rezamand4Amy  SkibielAmy Skibiel1*
  • 1University of Idaho, Moscow, United States
  • 2South Dakota State University, Brookings, South Dakota, United States
  • 3The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
  • 4University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Health and performance of dairy calves can be influenced by the intra-uterine environment. Environmental stressors such as heat stress, maternal inflammatory status, and nutrient deficiencies have been shown to impair intra-uterine and postnatal development, with implications for long-term productivity. Recent studies in primates have reported lower birth weights and altered infant inflammatory markers associated with maternal exposure to wildfire smoke particulate matter (wildfire-PM2.5) during pregnancy. However, the impact of intra-uterine exposure to wildfire-PM2.5 on dairy calf growth and health is unknown. Holstein heifer calves were born to cows exposed (WFS, n = 17) or unexposed (CON, n = 26) to wildfire smoke during mid-gestation. Calves were monitored from birth through 6 months of life to evaluate growth patterns, health, and basal metabolic and inflammatory markers. Although there was no difference detected between groups in gestation length or calf frame size, WFS calves had lower birth weights compared with that of CON (36.87 ± 0.87 kg vs. 40.82 ± 0.80 kg). WFS calves had greater average daily gain in the pre-weaning period but lower gain in the post-weaning period compared with CON. WFS calves also had greater plasma glucose concentrations in the pre-weaning period, lower 𝛽-hydroxybutyrate concentrations in the early post-weaning period, and greater non-esterified fatty acid concentrations for much of the pre-weaning and the early post-weaning period relative to those for CON calves. In addition, WFS calves had lower white blood cell counts throughout the pre-weaning period, coupled with greater serum albumin and lower serum amyloid A through the study, as well as lower haptoglobin concentrations at approximately 3 months of age. All calves received adequate passive transfer of immunity, but WFS calves had greater serum IgG concentrations, yet no difference was detected in apparent efficiency of IgG absorption compared with that for CON. WFS calves had lower odds of lung consolidation throughout the study. Overall, these results indicate that prenatal exposure to wildfire particulates restricts fetal growth and programs postnatal calf metabolic and immune systems, which may have implications for future health and productivity.

Keywords: Intra-uterine, in-utero growth restriction, developmental programming, Catch-up growth, Air Quality

Received: 20 Feb 2025; Accepted: 14 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Pace, Villamediana, Rovai, Ponce, Ellis, Stegeman, Larson, Konetchy, Rezamand and Skibiel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Amy Skibiel, University of Idaho, Moscow, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more