ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Anim. Sci.

Sec. Animal Nutrition

Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fanim.2025.1546486

This article is part of the Research TopicQuantifying and Mitigating Pollution from Livestock Production SystemsView all 4 articles

In vitro comparison of naturally bioactive plant extracts, essential oils, and marine algae targeting different modes of action for mitigation of enteric methane emissions in ruminants

Provisionally accepted
Ian  HodgeIan Hodge1,2*Patrick  QuillePatrick Quille2Manimaran  AyyachamyManimaran Ayyachamy1Shane  O'ConnellShane O'Connell1,2,3
  • 1Marigot Research Centre, Tralee, Co. Kerry, Ireland
  • 2Munster Technological University, Tralee, Co. Kerry, Ireland
  • 3Centre for Applied Bioscience Research, Tralee, Co. Kerry, Ireland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Feed additives to reduce enteric methane (CH4) emissions from ruminants are gaining attention to help curb agriculture's 24% share of global CH4 emissions. Several mechanisms of action of feed additives for mitigating rumen methanogenesis have been identified from ongoing research, however, there is still a need to determine the most effective method and explore potential synergies between these different approaches. This study evaluates the CH4 mitigation potential of nine natural feed additives, focusing on their mode of action in reducing CH4 emissions during in vitro fermentation. The natural feed additives assessed include garlic oil (GO), garlic powder (GP), allicin (ALL), yucca schidigera plant extract (Yucca), and an essential oil blend (EO), all functioning as rumen microbiome modifiers. Calcareous marine algae rumen buffer (CMA) and its magnesium oxidefortified form (CMA.MgO) acted as hydrogen sinks, while Asparagopsis taxiformis (cultured and ocean forms) inhibited the central enzyme involved in methane metabolism. Total gas, CH4, and volatile fatty acid (VFA) outputs were recorded after in vitro batch fermentations simulating rumen 24 h metabolic events. The CMA.MgO rumen buffer displayed significant reductions (P=0.02) in both CH4 emissions relative to the control (Rel % CH4; 40.1%) and total gas production relative to the control (Rel % Total gas; 22.9%). The greatest synergistic effect on gas emissions was achieved by combining GP with the CMA buffer treatment, leading to significant reductions (P<0.05) in Rel % Total gas by 37% and Rel % CH4 by 64.5%. Additionally, sole supplementation of CMA.MgO, GO, and Yucca demonstrated improved rumen productivity by increasing total VFAs by 39.8%, 24.4%, and 22.6% compared to the control result, respectively. Feed additives altering rumen microbial populations by reducing methanogens and promoting VFA production increase readily available energy for the animal while reducing CH4 generation significantly. Semi-continuous rumen culture fermentations or in vivo studies can confirm the long-term stability of synergistic antimethanogenic mechanisms, potentially optimising CH4 inhibitors like A. taxi and EO for commercial use.

Keywords: in vitro, Rumen, bioactives, Methane reduction, mode of action

Received: 17 Dec 2024; Accepted: 10 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Hodge, Quille, Ayyachamy and O'Connell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ian Hodge, Marigot Research Centre, Tralee, Co. Kerry, Ireland

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more