The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Anim. Sci.
Sec. Animal Welfare and Policy
Volume 5 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fanim.2024.1487688
Social preferences in chickenseffects of domestication and tameness
Provisionally accepted- Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
It has been suggested that evolution of domesticated phenotypes may have evolved as a result of correlated selection responses to reduced fear, a prominent feature in early domestication. To investigate whether domestication changes in social preferences can be attributed to increased tameness, we studied two lines of Red Junglefowl, ancestors of domesticated chickens, bidirectionally selected during 12 generations for high (HF) or low (LF) fear of humans and compared the differences between these lines to those between unselected Red Junglefowl (RJF) and domesticated White Leghorn egg layers (WL). One bird at a time was observed on its own for 12 min in an arena with one adjacent pen behind netting on each side. One of the adjacent pens contained familiar birds, and the other contained unfamiliar birds. Towards the end of the observation period, a sudden stressful stimulus was displayed, and we compared the reactions of the breeds to this as well. Male RJF spent more time close to the unfamiliar birds than WL, and performed more agonistic behaviour, but this was not mirrored in the selected birds. For females, it was WL that performed the most agonistic behaviour. Both LF and WL males showed more non-agonistic social exploration than HF and RJF respectively. Male LF and WL emitted more food calls than HF and RJF respectively. We conclude that several differences between RJF and WL were mirrored in the selection lines, with LF behaving more like domesticated WL. This is in line with the hypothesis that selection for tameness may have driven domestication related changes in social behaviour against conspecifics.
Keywords: Domestication, Red jungle fowl (Gallus gallus), social preference, Chickens, Tameness, Social Behavior, White Leghorn
Received: 28 Aug 2024; Accepted: 27 Nov 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Jensen and Gjøen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Per Jensen, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.