Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Anim. Sci.
Sec. Animal Nutrition
Volume 5 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fanim.2024.1451266

A meta-analytical approach for estimating methane suppression from dietary additives in ruminants

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
  • 2 Herd Health Pty Ltd, Maffra, Australia
  • 3 Other, Geelong, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Methane production inhibitors included in feed additives are increasingly used to suppress methane production in the rumen. Most products interact with the rumen microbiome and/or component biochemical pathways that scavenge free hydrogen ions (H+) to make methane (CH 4 ).The capacity of these agents to inhibit rumen methane production is determined by the ability of the chemical to block methane production pathways, the amount of agent delivered to the rumen (i.e. the dose) and the absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (i.e. the pharmacokinetic; PK) characteristics of the chemical that contribute to removal from the site of action (the rumen).The intrinsic inhibitory capacity of an agent determines the maximum rate of methane suppression. This maximal rate may reduce according to pharmacokinetic effects arising from dose rate and frequency. Most studies of additive methane reduction efficacy use total mixed ration (TMR; with the additive included into the ration) feeding systems and estimate methane reduction (absolute or relative) across a 24-hour period. Few studies report critical pharmacokinetic parameters, making it difficult to extrapolate findings into non-TMR systems (such as grazing) where differing doses and dose frequencies apply. We consider the likely behaviour of a rumen-acting oral additive to reduce methane production from basic pharmacokinetic principles and propose an analytical approach to data from multiple field studies employing different dose rates and dose frequencies to estimate methane suppression responses. This is based upon a logistic transformation of relative efficacy (percentage reduction in methane comparing treatment with control groups) as the dependent variable and includes total dose, dose frequency, quadratic and interaction terms between total dose and dose frequency as independent variables that potentially capture any pharmacokinetic effects on performance. The model was tested using simulation and verified against real data (cattle 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) methane-reduction studies) with a good fit between predicted and observed methane suppression. We propose use of the general form of this logistic model with dose and dose frequency components included that address basic pharmacological impacts on methane suppression as the standard approach to meta-analysis.

    Keywords: Rumen additives, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, Methane, Model, Meta-analysis

    Received: 18 Jun 2024; Accepted: 08 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Shephard, Whittem, Hepworth, Macdonald and Eckard. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Richard Shephard, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.