Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Anesthesiol.
Sec. Neuroanesthesiology
Volume 3 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fanes.2024.1395973
This article is part of the Research Topic Cerebral Blood Flow Regulation in the Face of Hemodynamic Stress View all 3 articles

Predictors of cerebral blood flow during surgery in the Trendelenburg position, and their correlations to postoperative cognitive function

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care medicin ,Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 2 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • 3 Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: In robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery patients are tilted 30-40° headdown. Knowledge of cerebral autoregulation and determinants of cerebral blood flow in this setting is limited, though postoperative cognitive impairment has been reported. This observational study describes the hemodynamic determinants of cerebral blood flow and dynamics of cerebral perfusion pressure during surgery in the Trendelenburg position and the correlations with postoperative cognition measures.We included patients scheduled for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy without known cerebrovascular disease. Cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, central venous pressure, optic nerve sheath diameter as a surrogate for intracranial pressure, and ultrasoundmeasured internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow and PaCO2 were recorded at six time points (awake, anesthetized, immediately after tilt, 1 hour of tilt, just before end of tilt, and before emerging from anesthesia). Comprehensive cognitive tests were performed before surgery and 10-and 180days post-surgery. Data was evaluated using linear regression models.Results: Forty-four males with a mean age of 67 years were included. Duration of anesthesia was 226 min [IQR 201,266] with 165 min [134,199] in head-down tilt. ICA flow decreased after induction of anesthesia (483 vs 344 mL/min) and remained lowered before increasing at return to horizontal position (331 vs 407 mL/min). Cerebral perfusion pressure decreased after 1h tilt (from 73 to 62 mmHg) and remained lowered (66 mmHg) also after return to horizontal position. Optic nerve sheath diameter increased from mean 5.8 mm to 6.4 mm during the course of surgery. ICA flow correlated positively with cardiac index (β 0.367. 1 L/min/m 2 increase corresponding to 92 mL/min increased ICA flow). PaCO2 had a positive effect on ICA flow (β 0.145. 1 kPa increase corresponding to 49 mL/min increased ICA flow), while mean arterial pressure had a negative effect (β -0.203. 10 mmHg increase corresponding to a 29 mL/min decline in ICA flow). We found no evidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction.ICA flow and cerebral perfusion pressure are significantly reduced during robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery. ICA flow positively correlates with cardiac index and PaCO2, but negatively with mean arterial pressure. Postoperative cognitive function was not impaired.

    Keywords: Cerebrovascular Circulation, cerebral autoregulation, Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, Trendelenburg position, postoperative cognitive dysfunction

    Received: 04 Mar 2024; Accepted: 14 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Nordum, Tveit, Idland, Øyen, Thomas, Søvik and Hyldebrandt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Signe Søvik, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care medicin ,Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.