Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Anal. Sci.
Sec. Biomedical Analysis and Diagnostics
Volume 4 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/frans.2024.1505510
This article is part of the Research Topic Thought Leaders in Analytical Science Research View all 6 articles

Novel and Rapid Analytical Platform Development Enabled by Advances in 3D Printing

Provisionally accepted
Quan Jason Cheng Quan Jason Cheng *Alexander S Malinick Alexander S Malinick Cole P Ebel Cole P Ebel Daniel D Stuart Daniel D Stuart Santino N Valiulis Santino N Valiulis Victor A Hanson Victor A Hanson
  • University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    3-Dimensional (3D) printing technology has greatly facilitated the recent advancements in science and engineering that benefit many aspects of scientific investigation, with examples including disease diagnostics, dentistry, aerospace, and fundamental research. For analytical chemistry, many advancements can be directly linked to achievements associated with 3D printing of optics, flow systems, mechanical/structural components, and parts related to detection/measurement, which before the advent of 3D printing were limited by complicated, cumbersome, expensive, and material-limited production. More importantly, the totality of these advances has made the possibility of 3D printing the majority of an analytical system an achievable reality. In this review, we highlight the recent achievements and advancements reported in literature that will facilitate the development of the next generation analytical instrumentation through the use of 3D printing technology. A great deal of attention is given to those in the context of bioanalytical platforms and novel biosensing strategies. Limited by space, we will explicitly focus the discussion on the following areas: improvement/utilization of new printing materials, methods towards higher resolution, fabrication and production of optical components, novel microfluidic flow systems, and printed structural components for instrumentation.

    Keywords: 3D printing, Analytical instrumentation, optics, fluidics, scaffolds 14, 22, 23, 24

    Received: 03 Oct 2024; Accepted: 22 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Cheng, Malinick, Ebel, Stuart, Valiulis and Hanson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Quan Jason Cheng, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.