This article is a commentary on:
Is Trichoderma ear rot on maize really a new dangerous plant disease?
Annette Pfordt
Andreas von Tiedemann- Division of Plant Pathology and Crop Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Georg-August University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
A Commentary on
Is Trichoderma ear rot on maize really a new dangerous plant disease?
By Trillas MI, Segarra G and Avilés M (2024) Front. Agron. 6:1386568. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2024.1386568
Introduction
The above opinion paper strongly refers to a publication on pathogenic Trichoderma strains causing a novel disease in maize, Trichoderma ear rot (Pfordt et al., 2020). As the main findings and conclusions in this study are questioned by the authors, we herewith present a response to their criticisms.
Response to the criticism of weak evidence for Trichoderma afroharzianum as an aggressive plant pathogen
The assertion made by Trillas et al. that there is “weak evidence” for the involvement of Trichoderma afroharzianum as an aggressive plant pathogen overlooks the substantial experimental data presented in our study. We demonstrated that T. afroharzianum can cause significant ear rot in maize, and our findings do not rely on speculative mechanisms of pathogenicity but are grounded in empirical evidence. Our experiments showed clear pathogenic effects under controlled conditions, where T. afroharzianum was the sole inoculated agent, leading to pronounced disease symptoms and substantial damage to maize ears. Moreover, the aggressiveness of T. afroharzianum was evident in the disease symptoms observed in maize as well as wheat and barley (Pfordt et al., 2023), with significant differences in dry matter loss compared to control groups.
Response to the doubts concerning Trichoderma afroharzianum as a primary pathogen
The criticism raised by Trillas et al. suggesting that Trichoderma afroharzianum acts only as a secondary invader after Fusarium infection and not as a primary pathogen. We rigorously followed Koch’s postulates to confirm T. afroharzianum as a primary causal agent of ear rot in maize. The pathogen was isolated from infected maize ears in the field, cultured, and successfully re-inoculated on healthy maize plants, leading to the same disease symptoms.
Unlike findings reported in other studies where Trichoderma was identified as a symptomless secondary fungus following Fusarium infections, our results revealed that T. afroharzianum induced distinct, strong symptoms caused by its own infection. Unlike opportunistic species that require external damage or co-infection to establish themselves, T. afroharzianum was able to infect maize ears directly, as observed in our silk channel inoculation experiments. This finding is crucial, as it differentiates T. afroharzianum from other species of Trichoderma traditionally considered as opportunistic or secondary pathogens (Pfordt et al., 2024a).
Furthermore, the high disease severity and dry matter loss observed in our experiments, compared to the controls, strongly indicate that T. afroharzianum has aggressive pathogenic characteristics (Pfordt et al., 2024b). Not least, we refer to recent reports from Northern Italy on Trichoderma ear rot detected in commercial maize fields (Sanna et al., 2022).
Response to the criticism regarding environmental and agronomic conditions
Trillas et al. raised concerns about the lack of detailed environmental and agronomic conditions described in our study, particularly regarding temperature, humidity, and pest management practices. While our publication did provide relevant information on the warm and dry summer conditions under which Trichoderma afroharzianum ear rot was observed in maize fields, it is important to emphasize that the focus of our study was on establishing the pathogenicity of T. afroharzianum rather than conducting an epidemiological analysis of environmental factors. These conditions were sufficient to establish the context of the outbreak and demonstrate the potential of T. afroharzianum as a primary pathogen.
In addition, our greenhouse experiments, which followed standard protocols, were designed to minimize the impact of external environmental variables, allowing us to focus on the pathogenic potential of the fungus. While the field conditions may vary and contribute to disease severity, the controlled conditions in the greenhouse (23°C) ensured that the results were attributable solely to the pathogen and not confounding environmental factors.
The following publications further support the findings of T. afroharzianum’s pathogenic potential under controlled environmental conditions:
Pfordt et al., 2023: Pathogenicity of Trichoderma afroharzianum in cereal crops.
Pfordt et al., 2024a: Phylogenetic analysis of pathogenic and non-pathogenic Trichoderma isolates.
Pfordt et al., 2024b: Impact of Trichoderma afroharzianum infection on fresh matter content and grain quality in maize.
Response to concerns regarding the use of high conidia concentrations
Trillas et al. have criticized our study for employing a spore concentration of 106 conidia/mL of Trichoderma afroharzianum, suggesting that such high concentrations are unlikely to occur in natural environments and lack justification in the literature. However, it is crucial to highlight that the use of a concentration of 106 conidia/mL is standard practice not only in our research but also in pathogenicity assays for other pathogens, such as Fusarium and Aspergillus, where similar inoculation strategies are employed (Reid et al., 1995; Reid and Hamilton, 1996)
This concentration allows for a robust evaluation of the pathogen’s virulence under controlled conditions and in field studies. Furthermore, Trichoderma-based biocontrol products are also commonly applied at similar concentrations to plants in commercial settings (Lombardi et al., 2020; MycoSolutions AG, 2022; Du et al., 2024).
Response to concerns regarding the specification of maize hybrids
Trillas et al. have raised the concern that we did not specify the maize hybrids used in our greenhouse experiments, referring only to “maize seeds of two varieties.” While we acknowledge the importance of transparency in methodology, it is important to clarify that our primary objective was to assess the pathogenicity of Trichoderma afroharzianum isolates rather than to compare the susceptibility of different maize hybrids.
In our greenhouse experiments, we utilized the maize hybrids LiKeit (DSV) and Mallory (LimaGrain). These hybrids were selected for their widespread use in commercial maize production, ensuring that our findings would have practical relevance across commonly cultivated varieties.
The use of two maize varieties was intended to provide a broader basis for our pathogenicity assays. Both hybrids were selected based on their common use in agricultural practice, ensuring that our findings could be applicable to a broader range of maize cultivars used in practical production.
Discussion
Altogether, the case of Trichoderma ear rot demonstrates the ever-known potential of novel pathogens to evolve as a result of adaptive evolution. Modern crop production systems with the continuous cultivation of a limited number of crop species pose a constant challenge to microbial populations in the agroecosystem. Adaptive evolution has been experienced in the past by adaptation to new hosts of formerly unimportant pathogens or pests, which suddenly gain significance in threatening particular crops. All these phenomena indicate that pathogen and pest evolution continue and we can never relax with the situation as given at a present point of time. The crop protection scientific community should be alert and open-minded towards such developments in order to keep pace with upcoming novel challenges in crop health. Trichoderma cob rot is a striking novel example of such natural evolutionary processes and thus a very interesting case to study, in order to better understand the fundamental factors and principles underlying the evolution of pathogenicity and parasitism on plants. Moreover, it raises our awareness of risks associated with the use of living microbes in crop protection.
Author contributions
AP: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AT: Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by Federal Ministry for Food and Agriculture, grant number FKZ2221NR014A
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Du W., Dai P., Zhang M., Yang G., Huang W., Liang K., et al. (2024). Effects of two Trichoderma strains on apple replant disease suppression and plant growth stimulation. JoF 10, 804. doi: 10.3390/jof10110804
Lombardi N., Caira S., Troise A. D., Scaloni A., Vitaglione P., Vinale F., et al. (2020). Trichoderma applications on strawberry plants modulate the physiological processes positively affecting fruit production and quality. Frontier Microbiol. 11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01364
MycoSolutions AG (2022). Trichoderma atrobrunneum: Wirkung und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten. Available online at: https://mycosolutions.ch/trichoderma-atrobrunneum/ (Accessed November 24, 2022).
Pfordt A., Schiwek S., Karlovsky P., von Tiedemann A. (2020) Trichoderma afroharzianum ear rot- A new disease on maize in Europe. Front. Agron. 2. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2020.547758
Pfordt A., Douanla-Meli C., Schäfer B. C., Schrader G., Tannen E., Chandarana M. J., et al. (2024a). Phylogenetic analysis of pathogenic and non-pathogenic Trichoderma isolates from plants, soil and commercial bio products. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.27.615377
Pfordt A., Gaumann P., von Tiedemann A. (2023). Pathogenicity of Trichoderma afroharzianum in cereal crops. Pathogens 12, 936. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12070936
Pfordt A., Steffen L., Raz T., Naumann M. (2024b). Impact of Trichoderma afroharzianum infection on fresh matter content and grain quality in maize. Frontier Plant Sci. 15, 1–15. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1436201
Reid L. M., Hamilton R. (1996). Effects of inoculation position, timing, macroconidial concentration, and irrigation on resistance of maize to Fusarium graminearum infection through kernels. Can. J. Plant Pathol. 18, 279–285. doi: 10.1080/07060669609500625
Reid L. M., Hamilton R. I., Mather D. E. (1995). Effect of macroconidia suspension volume and concentration on expression of resistance to Fusarium graminearum in maize. Plant Dis. 59, 461–466. doi: 10.1094/PD-79-0461
Keywords: Trichoderma, maize, pathogen, disease, ear rot
Citation: Pfordt A and von Tiedemann A (2025) Commentary: Is Trichoderma ear rot on maize really a new dangerous plant disease? Front. Agron. 7:1544363. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2025.1544363
Received: 12 December 2024; Accepted: 22 January 2025;
Published: 04 February 2025.
Edited by:
Davide Spadaro, University of Turin, ItalyReviewed by:
Marzia Beccaccioli, Sapienza University of Rome, ItalyCopyright © 2025 Pfordt and von Tiedemann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Annette Pfordt, YW5uZXR0ZS5wZm9yZHRAdW5pLWdvZXR0aW5nZW4uZGU=