REVIEW article
Front. Agron.
Sec. Agroecological Cropping Systems
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fagro.2025.1495846
This article is part of the Research TopicAgroecological Practices To Enhance Resilience Of Farming SystemsView all 13 articles
Spotlight on agroecological cropping practices to improve the resilience of farming systems: A qualitative review of meta-analytic studies
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Biobased Resources in the Bioeconomy, Institute of Crop Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
- 2Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
- 3Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, College of Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The capacity of agriculture to withstand or recover from increasing stresses (i.e., resilience) will be continuously challenged by extreme climate change events in the coming decades, altering the growing conditions for crop species. By prioritizing natural processes, agroecology seeks to foster climate change adaptation, boost resilience, and contribute to a low-emission agricultural system. Nineteen different agroecological practices using "resilience-related terms" and "meta-analysis,", within the subject areas 'Agriculture and Biological Science' and 'Environmental Science' were addressed, and 34 meta-analyses were reviewed to summarize the state-of-the-art agroecological adaptative strategies applied globally, and the current knowledge gaps on the role of agroecological practices in improving farming system resilience. Two main agroecological strategies stand out: i) crop diversification and ii) ecological soil management. The most frequent diversification practices included agroforestry, intercropping, cover cropping, crop rotation, mixed cropping, mixed farming, and the use of local varieties. Soil management strategies practices included green manure, no-till farming, mulching, and the addition of organic matter. The analyzed studies highlight the complex interplay among soil, plant, climate, management, and socio-economic contexts within the selected agroecological practices. The results varied-positive, null, or negative-depending largely on sitespecific factors. Developing and understanding more complex systems in a holistic approach, that integrates plants and animals across multiple trophic levels (feeding relationships, nutrient cycling, and aligning with the principles of a circular economy) is essential. More research is, therefore, needed to understand the interactions between crop diversity and soil management, their impacts on resilience, and how to translate research into practical strategies that farmers can implement effectively.
Keywords: Agroecological intensification, conservation agriculture, drought tolerance, intercropping, Mixed cropping, Soil management, Sustainable intensification, Traditional knowledge
Received: 13 Sep 2024; Accepted: 24 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Von Cossel, Scordia, Altieri and Gresta. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Moritz Von Cossel, Department of Biobased Resources in the Bioeconomy, Institute of Crop Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany
Danilo Scordia, Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, 98122, Italy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.