Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Agron.
Sec. Plant-Soil Interactions
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fagro.2025.1472749
This article is part of the Research Topic Optimizing the Use of Organic Amendments to Meet Climate-Smart Agriculture and Soil Fertility Goals View all 4 articles

Organic Amendments Tighten Nitrogen Cycling in Agricultural Soils: A Meta-Analysis on Gross Nitrogen Flux

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Corvallis, United States
  • 2 University of New Hampshire, Durham, North Carolina, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Understanding how nutrient inputs affect nitrogen (N) transformations and storage is vital for developing sustainable agroecosystems. Organic N inputs, such as crop residues (e.g., cover crop biomass and stover) and animal manures, can accelerate N cycling by increasing mineralization and immobilization rates to provide crops with more opportunities to intercept N as it moves through bioavailable pools. We aimed to understand how organic and synthetic soil amendments inhibit or promote N mineralization, immobilization, and nitrification rates. We synthesized results from studies using 15 N pool dilution methods to assess N transformation rates in response to different soil amendments. Our findings indicate that adding synthetic, manure, and crop derived residues as soil amendments increased mineralization by 60%, 135%, and 214%, respectively, relative to the unamended controls. While manure and residue produced similar mineralization rates, residue amendments induced significantly higher immobilization rates than synthetic and manure amendments -a sevenfold and fourfold increase, respectively. Furthermore, only residue N amendments enhanced the ammonium (NH4 + ) pool size, while synthetic and manure amendments resulted in no change in NH4 + pool size. These results suggest that residue amendments encourage tighter coupling of the carbon (C) and N cycles compared to manure or synthetic amendments by delivering C rich substrates (e.g., C/N ratio >20:1) to soil microbes. This tighter coupling with residue amendments leads to faster mineralizationimmobilization processes and larger NH4 + pools than those observed with manure or synthetic amendments. As such, residue amendments encourage soil N recycling between inorganic and organic forms, which is crucial to supporting crop N needs throughout the growing season while minimizing N losses.• Amendment Effect: the natural-log transformed ratio of the means (i.e., response ratio; RR) quantifying the differences between amended and unamended soils.• 𝐴𝐸 ∆ : Percent change in transformation rates (or NH4 + pool size) with respect to zero (i.e., back-transformed RR)

    Keywords: Isotope pool dilution, 15N, Gross nitrogen mineralization and immobilization, gross nitrogen transformation, Organic amendment, Inorganic amendment, meta analysis

    Received: 30 Jul 2024; Accepted: 03 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Breza and Grandy. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Lauren C Breza, Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), Corvallis, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.