Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Agron., 08 November 2024
Sec. Weed Management
This article is part of the Research Topic Herbicide Efficacy View all 6 articles

Editorial: Herbicide efficacy

  • 1Department of Agronomy, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • 2Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil
  • 3Department of Plant Health Management, College of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michael Okpara University of Agriculture, Umudike, Nigeria
  • 4Weed Science Laboratory, Benaki Phytopathological Institute, Athens, Greece
  • 5Queensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation (QAAFI), The University of Queensland, Gatton, QLD, Australia

Editorial on the Research Topic
Herbicide efficacy

Herbicides are chemicals used to manage unwanted plants (terrestrial or aquatic) called weeds. Over a long period, there has been a continuous effort to develop more selective herbicide compounds. However, the introduction of new herbicides with either a new mode of action or novel chemical classes has slowed in the last 30 years. For example, relatively few herbicides with new modes of action (MOAs) have been discovered in the past two decades (Qu et al., 2021). Farmers prefer chemical herbicides as they are the most effective and practical way to control weeds due to their high efficacy, specific mode of action, affordable cost, and better profitability (Abouziena and Haggag, 2016). Herbicides can enter a plant through roots, shoots, stems, foliage, or buds. To be effective, contact herbicides must adequately contact plants; systemic herbicides, meanwhile, are absorbed by plants and must move within them to the site of action without being deactivated and reach the site of action at toxic levels. Herbicide selectivity is based on differential absorption, translocation, and metabolism of herbicides in plants. Overall, herbicide performance largely depends on its application rate, environmental impacts, and spray technology.

In the wake of climate change, rising CO2 could alter yield losses due to competition from weeds, and weed control will be crucial in realizing any potential increase in the yield of C3 crops (Kaur et al., 2020). Climate variability also directly affects herbicide efficacy by altering the absorption and translocation of herbicides within the plant. Climate change leading to altered environmental conditions increases the risk for metabolism-based reduction in herbicide efficacy for weed control. A distinct variation in the efficacy of 2,4-D was found in Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson) grown at high temperature versus low temperature; enhanced 2,4-D metabolism at high temperatures resulted in reduced amounts of herbicide to control the resistant A. palmeri population (Rudell et al., 2023). In addition to the physicochemical properties of herbicides, environmental factors such as temperature, humidity, wind speed, and soil physicochemical properties may significantly impact the performance of herbicides. Knowledge of soil phase characteristics and the mechanisms involved in herbicide transformation can help in understanding the fate of herbicides in soil. Therefore, the current Research Topic was initiated for this purpose and includes five research papers on application timing, herbicide rotation, integrated use of herbicides with non-chemical measures, and evaluation of herbicide efficacy.

Annual/rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum Gaudin) has evolved resistance to herbicides of multiple modes of action groups in many parts of the world (Heap, 2024); the worst-case scenario is probably the one taking place in many cropping regions in Australia. Dose-response studies are helpful in evaluating herbicide efficacy for weed control, crop safety, putative herbicide resistance, and herbicide persistence in soil (Price et al., 2012). The first article by Pritchard et al. published in this Research Topic explores the use of a dose-response experiment to differentiate susceptible and resistant Poa annua collections from a golf course in the southeastern United States; these collections were then screened for putative indaziflam resistance. Similarly, in the fourth article, a dose-response study conducted by Mahajan and Chauhan demonstrated the use of pendimethalin for effective control of late cohorts of L. rigidum while ensuring crop safety. The novel post-emergence use of pendimethalin, typically used as a pre-emergence herbicide, can diversify herbicide programs and delay resistance evolution in L. rigidum.

Plant age affects herbicide absorption as well as its translocation and activity in the plant. Herbicide efficacy is affected by spray technology, including spray volume, timing of herbicide application, and adjuvants added (Kaur et al., Brankov et al., 2023). The third article, by Kaur et al., demonstrated the effect of POST herbicides applied at two heights (10-15 cm and 20-30 cm) for multiple herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth control and seed production. Further, the excessive and non-sustainable use of herbicides may result in low agricultural production, environmental pollution, and health hazards. The repeated use of a similar mode of action may help in the faster evolution of herbicide resistance in weeds. The results from the fifth article, authored by Vulchi et al., indicated the necessity for rotating herbicides during alternate cropping seasons and emphasized integrating non-chemical strategies for barnyard grass (Echinochloa spp.) control in Californian (USA) rice production. Innovative and feasible integrated weed management systems, including herbicide programs with residual herbicides and crop rotations, may be designed for diverse production situations that can reduce weed infestations and environmental impacts and prolong the use of herbicides (Kaur et al.). Another manuscript by Vulchi et al. corroborates the above statements. This manuscript highlights that, when crop rotations were integrated with dicamba-based herbicide programs and residual herbicides, it helped in effective management of Palmer amaranth across tillage types and environments.

In conclusion, this special Research Topic on herbicide efficacy explored the relevant aspects for sustainable weed management with herbicides. Creating a novel herbicide is a significant challenge for the industry; therefore, good stewardship practices must be maintained to increase herbicide life. The high costs, regulatory hurdles, and eventual resistance make new discoveries daunting. Recently, herbicide-tolerant crops (and genetically modified organisms in general) have been considered an agro-business opportunity, potentially allowing the use of one and the same herbicide across many crops. The increasing world population seems to be a major driver for the need to increase food production output per area. The high impact of weed competition on yields makes weed control mandatory. To secure crop yields, herbicides for weed management will continue to be the preferred choice for the foreseeable future. However, herbicides should persist long enough to check weeds until the end of the critical period of weed competition but should not persist beyond the crop harvest. Moreover, the physicochemical properties of herbicides affect their behavior in soil and regulate their interaction mechanisms with organic and inorganic soil phases. Predicting herbicide movement and fate in soils is an important strategy in limiting their environmental impact. The non-sustainable use of pesticides, low efficacy, faster evolution of resistance in weeds, pollution, and biomagnification of pesticides in agroecosystems and food chains are questioning the success of chemical weed control. As one of the future trends, these adverse effects of herbicides would be addressed with the novel developments in nanotechnology. However, the road to finally accepting nanoherbicides in current cropping systems is not a short one; several obstacles need to be overcome, including the regulating framework for their approval.

Author contributions

SK: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. KM: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. FE: Conceptualization, Supervision,Writing – review & editing. DC: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. BC: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Qu R. Y., He B., Yang J. F., Lin H. Y., Yang W. C., Wu Q. U., et al. (2021). Where are the new herbicides? Pest Manage. Sci. 77, 2620–2625. doi: 10.1002/ps.6285

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Abouziena H. F., Haggag W. M. (2016). Weed control in clean agriculture: A review. Planta Daninha 34, 377–392. doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582016340200019

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Brankov M., Simi´c M., Ulber L., Tolimir M., Chachalis D., Dragičevi´c V. (2023). Effects of nozzle type and adjuvant selection on common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control using nicosulfuron in corn. Weed Technol. 37, 156–164. doi: 10.1017/wet.2023.16

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Heap I. (2024). The International Herbicide-Resistant Weed Database. Available online at: www.weedscience.org (Accessed September 29, 2024).

Google Scholar

Kaur S., Jabran K., Florentine S., Chauhan B. S. (2020). “Assuring crop protection in the face of climate change through an understanding of herbicide metabolisms and enhanced weed control strategies,” in Crop Protection under Changing Climate. Eds. Jabran K., Florentine S., Chauhan B. S. (Springer Nature, Switzerland AG), 17–56.

Google Scholar

Price W. J., Shafii B., Seefeldt S. S. (2012). Estimation of dose-response models for discrete and continuous data in weed science. Weed Technol. 26, 587–601. doi: 10.1614/WT-D-11-00101.1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rudell E. C., Aarthy T., Shyam C., Borgato E. A., Kaur S., Jugulam M. (2023). High temperature increases 2,4-D metabolism in resistant Amaranthus palmeri. Weed Sci. 71, 217–223. doi: 10.1017/wsc.2023.26

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: absorption, translocation, weed control, chemical control, mode of action

Citation: Kaur S, Mendes KF, Ekeleme F, Chachalis D and Chauhan BS (2024) Editorial: Herbicide efficacy. Front. Agron. 6:1504465. doi: 10.3389/fagro.2024.1504465

Received: 30 September 2024; Accepted: 25 October 2024;
Published: 08 November 2024.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Shibu Jose, University of Missouri, United States

Copyright © 2024 Kaur, Mendes, Ekeleme, Chachalis and Chauhan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Simerjeet Kaur, simer@pau.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.