Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Agron.
Sec. Plant-Soil Interactions
Volume 6 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fagro.2024.1378339
This article is part of the Research Topic Agronomy and Sustainable Development Goal 2: Zero Hunger View all 3 articles

Productivity of sorghum and millets under different in-field rainwater management options on soils of varying fertility status in Zimbabwe

Provisionally accepted
Layton Makuchete Layton Makuchete 1Hatirarami Nezomba Hatirarami Nezomba 1*Apollonia Hove Apollonia Hove 1Jairos Rurinda Jairos Rurinda 1Vengai Mbanyele Vengai Mbanyele 2Shaw Mlambo Shaw Mlambo 3Elijah Nyakudya Elijah Nyakudya 1Florence Mtambanengwe Florence Mtambanengwe 1Paul Mapfumo Paul Mapfumo 1
  • 1 University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
  • 2 University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  • 3 Botswana International University of Science and Technology, Palapye, Central District, Botswana

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Traditional cereal crops are important for food and nutrition security in rural communities of southern Africa, but their productivity is often constrained by low soil water. Planting Basins (PB), Tied Ridges (TR) and Conventional Ploughing (CP) were evaluated, over two cropping seasons (2020/21 and 2021/22), for their effects on sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.), Moench], pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.] and finger millet [Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn] productivity on degraded (< 0.4 % soil organic carbon) and productive (> 0.6% soil organic carbon) fields under rainfed conditions in Mbire (<450 mm rainfall year -1 ) and Mutasa (> 800 mm rainfall year -1 ) districts in Zimbabwe. Field trials were established on degraded and productive field sites in each district, with sorghum, pearl millet and finger millet either sown as monocrops or intercropped with cowpea. The experiments were laid out in a 2 ×3 ×3 factorial in a randomized complete block design (RCBD). The highest sorghum grain yield response of 2.1 t ha -1 was attained under PB on productive soils. Overall, PB and TR increased sorghum, finger millet and pearl millet grain yields by 43 to 58% compared with CP. Growing sorghum, finger millet and pearl millet on productive soils increased grain yields by 64, 33 and 43%, respectively, compared with degraded soils. Intercropping sorghum, pearl millet and finger millet with cowpea increased cereal yields by between 23 and 42% over the sole crops.Rainwater use efficiency averaged 1 kg grain mm -1 on productive fields and 0.4 kg grain mm -1 on degraded fields. PB produced the highest net profit of $USD 408 on a productive field.Overall, production of sorghum and millets on productive soils gave positive economic returns irrespective of rainwater management option and cropping system. Conversely, 63% of the treatments on degraded soils recorded negative economic returns in both districts. We conclude that in-field rainwater management technologies combined with other agronomic practices like intercropping increase productivity of sorghum and millets under rainfed conditions. However, degraded soils remain a challenge for increased productivity of traditional cereal crops.

    Keywords: Degraded fields, Intercrops, Productive fields, rainwater use efficiency, Smallholder

    Received: 29 Jan 2024; Accepted: 23 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Makuchete, Nezomba, Hove, Rurinda, Mbanyele, Mlambo, Nyakudya, Mtambanengwe and Mapfumo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Hatirarami Nezomba, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.