AUTHOR=Zane Flaminia , MacMurray Claire , Guillermain Clémence , Cansell Céline , Todd Nicolas , Rera Michael TITLE=Ageing as a two-phase process: theoretical framework JOURNAL=Frontiers in Aging VOLUME=5 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/aging/articles/10.3389/fragi.2024.1378351 DOI=10.3389/fragi.2024.1378351 ISSN=2673-6217 ABSTRACT=
Human ageing, along with the ageing of conventional model organisms, is depicted as a continuous and progressive decline of biological capabilities accompanied by an exponentially increasing mortality risk. However, not all organisms experience ageing identically and our understanding of the phenomenon is coloured by human-centric views. Ageing is multifaceted and influences a diverse range of species in varying ways. Some undergo swift declines post-reproduction, while others exhibit insubstantial changes throughout their existence. This vast array renders defining universally applicable “ageing attributes” a daunting task. It is nonetheless essential to recognize that not all ageing features are organism-specific. These common attributes have paved the way for identifying “hallmarks of ageing,” processes that are intertwined with age, amplified during accelerated ageing, and manipulations of which can potentially modulate or even reverse the ageing process. Yet, a glaring observation is that individuals within a single population age at varying rates. To address this, demographers have coined the term ‘frailty’. Concurrently, scientific advancements have ushered in the era of molecular clocks. These innovations enable a distinction between an individual’s chronological age (time since birth) and biological age (physiological status and mortality risk). In 2011, the “Smurf” phenotype was unveiled in