John P. Wise Jr- NeuroWise Laboratory of Environmental Neurotoxicology, Pediatrics Research Institute, Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, United States
We are imminently faced with the challenges of an increasingly aging population and longer lifespans due to improved health care. Concomitantly, we are faced with ubiquitous environmental pollution linked with various health effects and age-related diseases which contribute to increased morbidity with age. Geriatric populations are rarely considered in the development of environmental regulations or in toxicology research. Today, life expectancy is often into one’s 80s or beyond, which means multiple decades living as a geriatric individual. Hence, adverse health effects and late-onset diseases might be due to environmental exposures as a geriatric, and we currently have no way of knowing. Considering aging from a different perspective, the term “gerontogen” was coined in 1987 to describe chemicals that accelerate biological aging but has largely been left out of toxicology research. Thus, we are challenged with a two-faced problem that we can describe as a “toxic aging coin”; on one side we consider how age affects the toxic outcome of chemicals, whereas on the other side we consider how chemicals accelerate aging (i.e. how chemicals act as gerontogens). Conveniently, both sides of this coin can be tackled with a single animal study that considers multiple age groups and assesses basic toxicology of the chemical(s) tested and aging-focused endpoints. Here, I introduce the concept of this toxic aging coin and some key considerations for how it applies to toxicology research. My discussion of this concept will focus on the brain, my area of expertise, but could be translated to any organ system.
1 Introduction
We are entering a new international paradigm where environmental pollution is ubiquitous and coinciding with an unprecedented aging population. Today people are living 50 years longer than in 1950, and ∼10% of the global population is geriatric (aged 65+). Further, the United Nations projects by 2030, 20% of the population in developed nations will be geriatric, with the global population reaching this proportion by 2075 (United Nations et al., 2019; Gu et al., 2021). This dynamic presents new challenges to our health infrastructure as age-related diseases and comorbidities become increasingly prevalent in our populations. For many of these age-related diseases, environmental pollutants are significant contributors to their etiology and we will continue to see a rise in their prevalence unless we are able to reduce or remediate environmental pollution. Compounding this issue, we now recognize many of these pollutants may act as gerontogens—chemicals that induce or accelerate the biological aging process (Martin, 1987). Hence, we are challenged with a two-faced issue that we can refer to as a “toxic aging coin”: on the heads side we consider how age impacts the toxic outcome of a chemical, whereas on the tails side we consider how chemicals act as gerontogens. Here, I will discuss how this toxic aging coin applies to brain health, though this principle could be applied to any organ system. Importantly, our ability to investigate this toxic aging coin is enhanced by several key papers from the last decade describing the hallmarks of aging, hallmarks of brain aging (which are slightly different), and reviews describing the toxicology of aging (López-Otín et al., 2013; Sorrentino et al., 2014; Mattson and Arumugam, 2018; Rackova et al., 2021). This article will focus on the aspects of aging and gerontogens that are most impactful, and provide references to reviews that discuss relevant topics in further detail.
2 Heads: Age impacts neurotoxic effects of chemicals
The heads side of this toxic aging coin considers how age can change the neurotoxic effect of chemicals. From decades of lifespan research, we recognize the biology of our brains are distinct across ages which we can summarize simply as young, adult, or geriatric; a young brain is developing, an adult brain is mature, and a geriatric brain is degenerating. With these three distinctions, we can begin to conceptualize how age can alter the ways chemicals interact with our brains across our lifespan. Importantly, geriatric populations have largely been left out of the framework of environmental toxicology and safety regulations, leaving a huge gap in our understanding the toxicology of aging. In this Section 1 will discuss the heads side of the toxic aging coin, and how we as toxicologists should consider all age groups in our research—young, adult, and geriatric.
Neurodevelopmental exposures may occur pre- or postnatally, and the timing of exposure can have critically different impacts. The development of the nervous system begins relatively late during embryogenesis, and many of the mechanisms driving neural development are conserved across species. After the three main cell layers are formed (endoderm, mesoderm, ectoderm), the nervous system develops from the ectoderm during the gastrula stage. Neurodevelopment proceeds through tightly regulated signaling molecules to direct migration of neurons and axons to their terminal destinations, which may be affected by toxicants (Connors et al., 2008; Batool et al., 2019). Importantly, neurodevelopment features an initial overproduction of neurons followed by a period of cell death; both processes can be affected by toxicants. Hence, we can see environmental chemicals may disrupt neurodevelopment at multiple stages with drastically different outcomes (Rodier, 1995; Rice and Barone, 2000; Heyer and Meredith, 2017). The most studied outcomes of neurodevelopmental toxicology are neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g. autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder) and late-life neurodegenerative diseases following the Developmental Origin of Health and Disease (DOHaD) hypothesis (Schmid and Rotenberg, 2005; Wadhwa et al., 2009; Gluckman et al., 2010; Patisaul, 2017; Tran and Miyake, 2017; van de Bor et al., 2019). After birth, our brains continue to grow and change for much of our lives; typically, our brains are ∼80% of the maximum size by age 3, with the maximum gray matter, subcortical gray, and white matter volumes reached by age 6, 14, and 30, respectively (Bethlehem et al., 2022). After maximum brain volume is reached, regional declines are observed with age and each region exhibits a different rate of volume decline (Ziegler et al., 2012; Tamnes et al., 2013; Fuhrmann et al., 2022). After age 40 the volume of brain ventricles begins to rapidly increase, and after age 50 the white matter volume rapidly declines with age (Bethlehem et al., 2022).
2.1 The neurovascular unit and blood-brain barrier across ages
A critical component for distinguishing how environmental chemicals may impact brain health across ages is the blood brain barrier (BBB), a functional barrier formed by cells within the neurovascular unit (NVU). The NVU is made up of cerebrovascular endothelial cells, pericytes, and astrocytic endfeet, with neurons and microglia closely associated with the periphery to stimulate or respond to NVU functions as needed (Muoio et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2020). The BBB is formed by cerebrovascular endothelial cells at the start of angiogenesis during neonatal development (embryonic day 11 in rats), and express proteins that provide roles in structural, transport, metabolic, and adhesion properties distinct from endothelial cells in other tissues (Blanchette and Daneman, 2015). These early blood vessels initially exhibit leaky properties such as high rates of transcytosis and leukocyte adhesion molecules (LAMs). Leakiness decreases within the first few days following angiogenesis by endothelial cells, increasing the complexity of barrier proteins (e.g. TJ-1, ZO-1, occludin, claudins) and recruiting pericytes, which suppress endothelial expression of LAMs and transcytosis (Armulik et al., 2010; Daneman et al., 2010). Astrocyte endfeet cover almost the entire surface of microcapillaries in the brain, but astrogliogenesis begins after birth. Importantly, the interaction between astrocytic endfeet and cerebrovascular endothelial cells determines the final maturation of the NVU (Wolburg et al., 2009; Gilbert et al., 2019). Hence, there is a post-natal period where the NVU is not completely developed and infant brains are at higher risk for chemical insults. Upon maturation, the NVU/BBB serve to protect the brain parenchyma from peripheral blood components through barriers and efflux channels, while also providing nutrients through specific transport proteins (Daneman and Prat, 2015).
It is unclear when (or if there is) an age threshold that defines when a mature NVU/BBB shifts to a degenerative state. During aging it is clear there are several phenotypic changes that occur that contribute to leakiness in the degenerating cerebrovasculature, including: focal necrosis of endothelium, decreased endothelial mitochondrial density, increased pinocytic vesicles, loss of tight junction proteins, loss of astrocytic endfeet, stiffening of vessel walls, decreased microvascular density; and smaller capillary lumen size with greater tortuosity (Zeevi et al., 2010; Marques et al., 2013). These degenerative changes to the NVU/BBB are believed to contribute to the etiology of age-associated neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), age-associated susceptibility to stroke, white matter disease, delirium, and other age-associated neurological conditions. In sum, we exhibit a weaker BBB for a relatively short window (months) early in our development and for a much longer time (years to decades) toward the end of our lifespan. During these periods our brains are susceptible to insult by a wider variety of chemical insults.
2.2 Neuroinflammation across lifespan
Neuroinflammation is a defensive response to injury or infection to protect the brain and promote repair, primarily directed by microglia and astrocytes. Imbalance of neuroinflammation activity early in life can contribute to development of neurodevelopmental disorders, whereas later in life it can contribute to development of neurodegenerative diseases (Molofsky et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2016; Petrelli et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2020). Clinically, exaggerated neuroinflammation contributes to depression, cognitive impairment, memory loss, delirium, epilepsy, sickness behavior, and neurodegenerative diseases (Lyman et al., 2014). Microglia play the most significant role in neuroinflammation, shifting from a ramified, resting state to an activated phagocytic state in response to inflammatory stimuli, and can remain activated for long periods of time. While activated, microglia release pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g. IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β) and neurotoxic molecules (e.g. nitric oxide, NO) that contribute to impaired synaptic plasticity, loss of synapses, neuronal apoptosis, and long-term neurodegeneration (Lyman et al., 2014). Microglia become primed due to peripheral inflammation, toxicants, or normal aging, which results in an exaggerated response to secondary stimuli (e.g. infection, toxicants, stress) (Lyman et al., 2014; Barrientos et al., 2015). While the number of microglia does not change with age, the expression of activation markers including major histocompatibility complex II (MHC II), CD11b, and Iba-1 increase on a per cell basis and secrete higher amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Lyman et al., 2014). Normally, neuroinflammatory changes in microglia are transient and return to a resting, ramified state after the insult is cleared. Aging may present a context where microglia activation is not resolved and persists, resulting in a chronic state of primed microglia and exaggerated responses to noxious stimuli. Microglia can also recruit astrocytes to participate in neuroinflammation (Godbout and Johnson, 2009). When activated, astrocytes increase expression of glial fibrillary protein (GFAP). Depending on context and timing, this activation may contribute to immunosuppression and tissue repair, or it may exacerbate inflammatory reactions and tissue damage (Colombo and Farina, 2016). Overall, astrocytes display a more inflammatory phenotype with aging. Importantly, pro-inflammatory cytokines from microglia and astrocytes impair the integrity of the BBB, altering the resistance of tight junctions, increasing permeability, and enabling peripheral leukocytes to enter the brain (Terrando et al., 2011).
3 Tails: Chemicals act as gerontogens to accelerate biological aging
The tails side of this toxic aging coin considers how chemicals can accelerate biological aging. The role of genetics account for 10–25% of human lifespan, thus non-genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors must play a significant role in human aging (Ruby et al., 2018; van den Berg et al., 2019; Bin-Jumah et al., 2022). The term “gerontogen” was first coined in 1987 by Dr. George Martin to describe the effect of chemicals inducing or accelerating biological aging processes in tissues and cells (Martin, 1987). At the time of this publication, there was a detrimental lack of reliable aging biomarkers to support thorough investigation of gerontogens causing aging phenotypes. Hence, a proper investigation of aging toxicology had to wait. Since then, there has been a robust research effort to understand the genetics behind biological aging, and a push to better understand underlying gene-environment interactions (Martin, 1997; Rodríguez-Rodero et al., 2011; Moskalev et al., 2017; Singh et al., 2019). Yet the field of toxicology has lagged in recognizing the significance of aging as a toxicological phenotype, with relatively few studies investigating gerontogenic effects of chemicals. Today, however, the stage has been set and toxicology needs to step into the limelight. Nine hallmarks of aging were identified and described in 2013, and a distinct set of hallmarks for brain aging were described in 2018, that now enable proper mechanistic investigation of gerontogens (López-Otín et al., 2013; Mattson and Arumugam, 2018). Further, several animal models have been developed for rigorous aging studies ranging from C. elegans to fish to rodents (Holtze et al., 2021). With the advent of these aging hallmarks and research models, toxicologists now have the tools to mechanistically investigate gerontogens as a class of chemicals. In this Section 1 will discuss the tails side of this toxic aging coin perspective, and how we as toxicologists can capitalize on the available resources to investigate how chemicals may act as gerontogens, and I will note key review articles where further discussion may be warranted.
An aging brain manifests as deficits in learning and memory, attention, sensory perception, motor coordination, decision-making speed, and cognitive function (Yankner et al., 2009; Machado, 2020). Many of these are observed in well-known age-related neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke). With our rapidly growing geriatric population we can expect to see a similar significant increase in these age-related neurodegenerative diseases. It is projected we will see the number of people diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease more than double in the next 30 years from ∼ 5 million today to more than 12 million (Alzheimer’s Association, 2016). Similar to aging, these neurodegenerative diseases are believed to have a significant environmental influence, with only 5–10% of cases linked to genetic mutations driving their etiology (Bertram and Tanzi, 2005; Philstrøm et al., 2018). Faced with this societal challenge, it is imperative we understand how environmental chemicals contribute to brain aging and age-related neurodegenerative diseases and find ways to prevent or reduce exposures to such chemicals (Cannon and Greenamyre, 2011; Cicero et al., 2017).
The defined hallmarks of brain aging and that of peripheral tissues are slightly different. While there is quite a bit of overlap, two hallmarks of aging in peripheral tissues are still emerging in the context of brain aging, but are likely particularly relevant for the brain’s glial cells; cellular senescence and telomere attrition. Given that glial cells make up ∼50% of brain cells and displayed the strongest effect of differential gene expression in aging, it is probable these glial cells will have stronger deterministic effects in aging than neurons (Soreq et al., 2017).
3.1 Contributions of cellular senescence to brain aging
Perhaps the most important hallmark for assessing gerontogenic effects of chemicals is cellular senescence, defined as a state of permanent cell cycle arrest, as it is a terminal cellular phenotype that contributes to tissue/organ aging (López-Otín et al., 2013; Muñoz-Espín and Serrano, 2014; Hernandez-Segura et al., 2018; González-Gualda et al., 2021). This view is supported by various studies using senolytics to selectively induce apoptosis in senescent cells and showing improvement in age-related pathology (Baker and Petersen, 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Ogrodnik et al., 2021; Gonzales et al., 2022; Kim et al., 2022). From a reductionist point of view; abundance of senescent cells marks aging organs and, ultimately, aging bodies (Campisi, 2001). Senescent cells become more abundant with normal aging, are elevated in neurodegenerative diseases, and age-related symptoms can be alleviated with their selective removal by senolytic or senomorphic drugs (Kritsilis et al., 2018; Martínez-Cué and Rueda, 2020; Sikora et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2022). Thus, this hallmark is likely the most important for determining if a toxicant is a gerontogen.
Cellular senescence is characterized by an enlarged, flattened morphology, altered gene expression (e.g. increased p21, p16INK4a, C-fos, PCNA), increased senescence associated-β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) staining, altered mitochondrial function and morphology, altered cellular metabolism, and expression of the senescence associated secretory phenotype (SASP) (Hernandez-Segura et al., 2018; Martínez-Cué and Rueda, 2020). Several molecular pathways contribute to cells shifting to a senescent state, though many of the mechanisms for these pathways have yet to be elucidated. These pathways include, but are not limited to: DNA damage response, oxidative stress, telomere shortening, mitochondrial dysfunction, loss of proteostasis, and endoplasmic reticulum stress (Ben-Porath and Weinberg, 2005; Hernandez-Segura et al., 2018; Wei and Ji, 2018; Di Micco et al., 2020).
The impact of cellular senescence on brain health depends on the type of brain cell, but likely senescence of cells making up the NVU will have the most significant role in brain aging. A dysfunctional or impaired NVU will result in transient capillary occlusion, BBB leakage of blood proteins, pro-inflammatory SASP expression, neurovascular uncoupling, and impaired blood/nutrient supply to the brain, collectively promoting neurodegeneration (Cortes-Canteli et al., 2015; Bennett et al., 2018; Petersen et al., 2018; Bryant et al., 2020). The vast majority of chemical exposures to the brain will be delivered by the blood; hence the first brain cells at risk of gerontogens will be brain endothelial cells in the cerebrovasculature (Graves and Baker, 2020). Senescent endothelial cells shift their phenotype to express more surface leukocyte adhesion molecules (VCAM-1, ICAM-2, MAdCAM-1) and generate a proinflammatory environment to recruit peripheral immune cells to the senescent tissue, contributing to transient capillary occlusion (Gorgoulis et al., 2005; Lasry and Ben-Neriah, 2015; Bryant et al., 2020). BBB leakage, evidenced by increased extravasation of IgG and decreased expression of tight junction proteins, is another critical effect of aging on the NVU which likely precedes onset of neurodegenerative diseases (Pelegri et al., 2007; Bake et al., 2009; Yamazaki et al., 2016). Astrocytes can become pathogenic when senescent (Cohen and Torres, 2019). Evidence shows increased proportion of senescent astrocytes in the frontal cortex of AD patients and senescent astrocytes can induce neuronal apoptosis or synaptic dysfunction (Pertusa et al., 2007; Bhat et al., 2012; Miranda et al., 2012). Importantly, one study demonstrated the selective clearance of senescent astrocytes prevented tau deposition and degeneration of hippocampal and cortical neurons in an AD mouse model (Bussian et al., 2018). Similarly, microglia can become senescent and contribute to neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration, though these glia have not been as extensively studied and it is unclear if there is a distinction necessary for senescent vs. dystrophic microglia (Angelova and Brown, 2019). Aging microglia were initially identified by morphology in brains of aged individuals, and have subsequently been shown to exhibit impaired motility, iron accumulation, DNA damage accumulation, telomere shortening, and SASP-like changes in cytokine production (Streit, 2004; Sierra et al., 2007; Hayashi et al., 2008; von Bernhardi et al., 2015; Flanary and Streit, 2004; Orre et al., 2014; Simmons et al., 2007). Given the abundance of evidence for cellular senescence in brain aging and neurodegenerative diseases, and the growing evidence for senolytics as a preventative or therapeutic strategy for these conditions, it should be added to the hallmarks of brain aging. Further, we need more toxicology-based research to identify which chemicals contribute to cellular senescence and what senescent mechanisms or pathways they induce.
4 Concluding remarks
Considering the new societal shift we are imminently facing with a large geriatric population, we need a similar shift in toxicology research to investigate how chemicals interact with this toxic aging coin. Both sides of the toxic aging coin will be imminently relevant and important to the health and success of our societies. We need more research groups investigating this intersection of toxicology and aging for all major organs. If all three age groups (young, middle-aged, geriatric) are included in a toxicology study, one can readily consider both sides of the toxic aging coin within the same study; on one side, this study design enables assessing how toxic effects are different across the age groups, and on the other side, it enables assessing how toxicants affect aging hallmarks.
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
JW contributed all the writing and development of the ideas behind this manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by NIEHS R21 ES-033327.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Alzheimer’s Association, (2016). 2016 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 12, 459–509. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.03.001
Angelova, D. M., and Brown, D. R. (2019). Microglia and the aging brain: Are senescent microglia the key to neurodegeneration? J. Neurochem. 151, 676–688. doi:10.1111/jnc.14860
Armulik, A., Genové, G., Mäe, M., Nisanciogly, M. H., Wallgard, E., Niaudet, C., et al. (2010). Pericytes regulate the blood-brain barrier. Nature 468 (7323), 557–561. doi:10.1038/nature09522
Bake, S., Friedman, J. A., and Sohrabji, F. (2009). Reproductive age-related changes in the blood brain barrier: Expression of IgG and tight junction proteins. Microvasc. Res. 78, 413–424. doi:10.1016/j.mvr.2009.06.009
Baker, D. J., and Petersen, R. C. (2019). Cellular senescence in brain aging and neurodegenerative diseases: Evidence and perspectives. J. Clin. Invest. 128 (4), 1208–1216. doi:10.1172/JCI95145
Barrientos, R. M., Kitt, M. M., Watkins, L. R., and Maier, S. F. (2015). Neuroinflammation in the normal aging hippocampus. Neuroscience 309, 84–99. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.03.007
Batool, S., Raza, H., Zaidi, J., Riaz, S., Hasan, S., and Syed, N. I. (2019). Synapse formation: From cellular and molecular mechanisms to neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. J. Neurophysiol. 121 (4), 1381–1397. doi:10.1152/jn.00833.2018
Ben-Porath, I., and Weinberg, R. A. (2005). The signals and pathways activating cellular senescence. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 37 (5), 961–976. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2004.10.013
Bennett, R. E., Robbins, A. B., Hu, M., Cao, X., Betensky, R. A., Clark, T., et al. (2018). Tau induces blood vessel abnormalities and angiogenesis-related gene expression in P301L transgenic mice and human Alzheimer’s disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115 (6), E1289-E1298–E1298. doi:10.1073/pnas.1710329115
Bertram, L., and Tanzi, R. E. (2005). The genetic epidemiology of neurodegenerative disease. J. Clin. Invest. 115 (6), 1449–1457. doi:10.1172/JCI24761
Bethlehem, R. A. I., Seidlitz, J., White, S. R., Vogel, J. W., Anderson, K. M., Adamson, C., et al. (2022). Brain charts for the human lifespan. Nature 604, 525–533. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04554-y
Bhat, R., Crowe, E. P., Bitto, A., Moh, M., Katsetos, C. D., Garcia, F. U., et al. (2012). Astrocyte senescence as a component of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One 7 (9), e45069. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045069
Bin-Jumah, M. N., Nadeem, M. S., Gilani, S. J., Al-Abbasi, F. A., Ullah, I., Alzarea, S. I., et al. (2022). Genes and longevity of lifespan. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 1499. doi:10.3390/ijms23031499
Blanchette, M., and Daneman, R. (2015). Formation and maintenance of the BBB. Mech. Dev. 138, 8–16. doi:10.1016/j.mod.2015.07.007
Bryant, A. G., Hu, M., Carlyle, B. C., Arnold, S. E., Frosch, M. P., Das, S., et al. (2020). Cerebrovascular senescence is associated with tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Front. Neurol. 11, 575953. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.575953
Bussian, T. J., Aziz, A., Meyer, C., Swenson, B. L., van Deursen, J. M., and Baker, D. J. (2018). Clearance of senescent glial cells prevents tau-dependent pathology and cognitive decline. Nature 562, 578–582. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0543-y
Campisi, J. (2001). From cells to organisms: Can we learn about aging from cells in culture? Exp. Gerontol. 36, 607–618. doi:10.1016/s0531-5565(00)00230-8
Cannon, J. R., and Greenamyre, J. T. (2011). The role of environmental exposures in neurodegeneration and neurodegenerative diseases. Toxicol. Sci. 124 (2), 225–250. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfr239
Chen, W. W., Zhang, X., and Huang, W. J. (2016). Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 13, 3391–3396. doi:10.3892/mmr.2016.4948
Cicero, C. E., Mostile, G., Vasta, R., Rapisarda, V., Signorelli, S. S., Ferrante, M., et al. (2017). Metals and neurodegenerative diseases. A systematic review. Environ. Res. 159, 82–94. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.048
Cohen, J., and Torres, C. (2019). Astrocyte senescence: Evidence and significance. Aging Cell 18, e12937. doi:10.1111/acel.12937
Colombo, E., and Farina, C. (2016). Astrocytes: Key regulators of neuroinflammation. Trends Immunol. 37 (9), 608–620. doi:10.1016/j.it.2016.06.006
Connors, S. L., Levitt, P., Matthews, S. G., Slotkin, T. A., Johnston, M. V., Kinney, H. C., et al. (2008). Fetal mechanisms in neurodevelopmental disorders. Pediatr. Neurol. 38 (3), 163–176. doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2007.10.009
Cortes-Canteli, M., Mattei, L., Richards, A. T., Norris, E. H., and Strickland, S. (2015). Fibrin deposited in the Alzheimer’s disease brain promotes neuronal degeneration. Neurobiol. Aging 36 (2), 608–617. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.10.030
Daneman, R., and Prat, A. (2015). The blood-brain barrier. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a020412. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a020412
Daneman, R., Zhou, L., Kebede, A. A., and Barres, B. A. (2010). Pericytes are required for blood-brain barrier integrity during embryogenesis. Nature 468, 562–566. doi:10.1038/nature09513
Di Micco, R., Krizhanovsky, V., Baker, D., and di Fagagna, F. (2020). Cellular senescence in ageing: From mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 22, 75–95. doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00314-w
Flanary, B. E., and Streit, W. J. (2004). Progressive telomere shortening occurs in cultured rat microglia, but not astrocytes. Glia 45, 75–88. doi:10.1002/glia.10301
Fuhrmann, D., Madsen, K. S., Johansen, L. B., Baaré, W. F. C., and Kievit, R. A. (2022). The midpoint of cortical thinning between late childhood and early adulthood differs between individuals and brain regions: Evidence from longitudinal modelling in a 12-wave neuroimaging sample. NeuroImage 261, 119507.
Gilbert, A., Vidal, X. E., Estevez, R., Cohen-Salmon, M., and Boulay, A. C. (2019). Postnatal development of the astrocyte perivascular MLC1/GlialCAM complex defines a temporal window for the gliovascular unit maturation. Brain Struct. Funct. 224, 1267–1278. doi:10.1007/s00429-019-01832-w
Gluckman, P. D., Hanson, M. A., and Buklijas, T. (2010). A conceptual framework for the developmental origins of health and disease. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 1 (1), 6–18. doi:10.1017/S2040174409990171
Godbout, J. P., and Johnson, R. W. (2009). Age and neuroinflammation: A lifetime of psychoneuroimmune consequences. Immunol. Allergy Clin. North Am. 29 (2), 321–337. doi:10.1016/j.iac.2009.02.007
Gonzales, M. M., Garbarino, v. R., Zilli, E. M., Petersen, R. C., Kirkland, J. L., Tchkonia, T., et al. (2022). Senolytic therapy to modulate the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (SToMP-AD): A pilot clinical trial. J. Prev. Alzheimers Dis. 9, 22–29. doi:10.14283/jpad.2021.62
González-Gualda, E., Baker, A. G., Fruk, L., and Muñoz-Espín, D. (2021). A guide to assessing cellular senescence in vitro and in vivo. FEBS J. 288, 56–80. doi:10.1111/febs.15570
Gorgoulis, V. G., Pratsinis, H., Zacharatos, P., Demoliou, C., Sigala, F., Asimacopoulos, P. J., et al. (2005). P53-Dependent ICAM-1 overexpression in senescent human cells identified in atherosclerotic lesions. Lab. Invest. 85, 502–511. doi:10.1038/labinvest.3700241
Graves, S. I., and Baker, D. J. (2020). Implicating endothelial cell senescence to dysfunction in the ageing and diseased brain. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 127 (2), 102–110. doi:10.1111/bcpt.13403
Gu, D., Andreev, K., and Dupre, M. E. (2021). Major trends in population growth around the world. China CDC Wkly. 3 (28), 604–613. doi:10.46234/ccdcw2021.160
Hayashi, Y., Yoshida, M., Yamato, M., Ide, T., Wu, Z., Ochi-Shindou, M., et al. (2008). Reverse of age-dependent memory impairment and mitochondrial DNA damage in microglia by an overexpression of human mitochondrial transcription factor A in mice. J. Neurosci. 28 (34), 8624–8634. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1957-08.2008
Hernandez-Segura, A., Nehme, J., and Demaria, M. (2018). Hallmarks of cellular senescence. Trends Cell Biol. 28 (5), 436–453. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.001
Heyer, D. B., and Meredith, R. M. (2017). Environmental toxicology: Sensitive periods of development and neurodevelopmental disorders. NeuroToxicology 58, 23–41. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2016.10.017
Holtze, S., Gorshkova, E., Bradue, S., Cellerino, A., Dammann, P., Hildebrandt, T. B., et al. (2021). Alternative animal models of aging research. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8, 660959. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.660959
Kim, C. K., Sachdev, P. S., and Braidy, N. (2022). Recent neurotherapeutic strategies to promote healthy brain aging: Are we there yet? Aging Dis. 13 (1), 175–214. doi:10.14336/AD.2021.0705
Kim, Y. S., Choi, J., and Yoon, B. E. (2020). Neuron-glia interactions in neurodevelopmental disorders. Cells 9, 2176. doi:10.3390/cells9102176
Kritsilis, M., Rizou, S. V., Koutsoudaki, P. N., Evangelou, K., Gorgoulis, V. G., and Papadpoulos, D. (2018). Ageing, cellular senescence and neurodegenerative disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 2937. doi:10.3390/ijms19102937
Lasry, A., and Ben-Neriah, Y. (2015). Senescence-associated inflammatory responses: Aging and cancer perspectives. Trends Immunol. 36 (4), 217–228. doi:10.1016/j.it.2015.02.009
Liu, L., Liu, J., Bao, J., Bai, Q., and Wang, G. (2020). Interaction of microglia and astrocytes in the neurovascular unit. Front. Immunol. 11, 1024. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01024
López-Otín, C., Blasco, M. A., Partridge, L., Serrano, M., and Kroemer, G. (2013). The hallmarks of aging. Cell 153, 1194–1217. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039
Lyman, M., Lloyd, D. G., Ji, X., Vizcaychipi, M. P., and Ma, D. (2014). Neuroinflammation: The role and consequences. Neurosci. Res. 79, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2013.10.004
Machado, L. (2020). Understanding cognition and how it changes with aging, brain disease, and lifestyle choices. J. R. Soc. N. Z. 51 (1), 128–142. doi:10.1080/03036758.2020.1796102
Marques, F., Sousa, J. C., Sousa, N., and Palha, J. A. (2013). Blood-brain-barriers in aging and in Alzheimer's disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 8, 38. doi:10.1186/1750-1326-8-38
Martin, G. (1997). Genetics and the pathobiology of ageing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 352 (1363), 1773–1780. doi:10.1098/rstb.1997.0161
Martin, G. (1987). Interactions of aging and environmental agents: The gerontological perspective. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 228, 25–80.
Martínez-Cué, C., and Rueda, N. (2020). Cellular senescence in neurodegenerative diseases. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 14, 16. doi:10.3389/fncel.2020.00016
Mattson, M. P., and Arumugam, T. V. (2018). Hallmarks of brain aging: Adaptive and pathological modification by metabolic states. Cell Metab. 27, 1176–1199. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.05.011
Miranda, C. J., Barun, L., Jiang, Y., Hester, M. E., Zhang, L., Riolo, M., et al. (2012). Aging brain microenvironment decreases hippocampal neurogenesis through Wnt-mediated survivin signaling. Aging Cell 11 (3), 542–552. doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2012.00816.x
Molofsky, A. V., Krenick, R., Ullian, E., Tsai, H., Deneen, B., Richardson, W. D., et al. (2012). Astrocytes and disease: A neurodevelopmental perspective. Genes Dev. 26, 891–907. doi:10.1101/gad.188326.112
Moskalev, A. A., Proshkina, E. N., Belyi, A. A., and Solovyev, I. A. (2017). Genetics of aging and longevity. Russ. J. Genet. Appl. Res. 7, 369–384. doi:10.1134/s2079059717040074
Muñoz-Espín, D., and Serrano, M. (2014). Cellular senescence: From physiology to pathology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 482–496. doi:10.1038/nrm3823
Muoio, V., Persson, P. B., and Sendeski, M. M. (2014). The neurovascular unit – concept review. Acta Physiol. 210, 790–798. doi:10.1111/apha.12250
Ogrodnik, M., Evans, S. A., Fielder, E., Victorelli, S., Kruger, P., Salmonowicz, H., et al. (2021). Whole-body senescent cell clearance alleviates age-related brain inflammation and cognitive impairment in mice. Aging Cell 20 (2), e13296. doi:10.1111/acel.13296
Orre, M., Kamphuis, W., Osborn, L. M., Melief, J., Kooijman, L., Huitinga, I., et al. (2014). Acute isolation and transcriptome characterization of cortical astrocytes and microglia from young and aged mice. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.07.008
Patisaul, H. B. (2017). Chemical contributions to neurodevelopmental disorders. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 4 (2), 123–130. doi:10.1177/2372732217719909
Pelegri, C., Canudas, A. M., del Valle, J., Casadesus, G., Smith, M. A., CAmins, A., et al. (2007). Increased permeability of blood-brain barrier on the hippocampus of a murine model of senescence. Mech. Ageing Dev. 128, 522–528. doi:10.1016/j.mad.2007.07.002
Pertusa, M., García-Matats, S., Rodríguez-Farré, E., Sanfelilu, C., and Cristòfol, R. (2007). Astrocytes aged in vitro show a decreased neuroprotective capacity. J. Neurochem. 101 (3), 794–805. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04369.x
Petersen, M. A., Ryu, J. K., and Akassoglou, K. (2018). Fibrinogen in neurological diseases: Mechanisms, imaging and therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 19, 283–301. doi:10.1038/nrn.2018.13
Petrelli, F., Pucci, L., and Bezzi, P. (2016). Astrocytes and microglia and their potential link with autism spectrum disorders. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 10, 21. doi:10.3389/fncel.2016.00021
Philstrøm, L., Wiethoff, S., and Houlden, H. (2018). “Chapter 22 – genetics of neurodegenerative diseases: An overview,” in Handbook of clinical neurology. Editors G. G. Kovacs, and I. Alafuzoff (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier), 145.
Rackova, L., Mach, M., and Brnoliakova, Z. (2021). An update in toxicology of ageing. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 84, 103611. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2021.103611
Rice, D., and Barone, S. (2000). Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: Evidence from humans and animal models. Environ. Health Perspect. 108 (3), 511–533. doi:10.1289/ehp.00108s3511
Rodier, P. (1995). Developing brain as a target of toxicity. Environ. Health Perspect. 103 (6), 73–76. doi:10.1289/ehp.95103s673
Rodríguez-Rodero, S., Fernández-Morera, J. L., Menéndez-Torre, E., Calvanese, V., Fernández, A. F., and Fraga, M. F. (2011). Aging genetics and aging. Aging Dis. 2 (3), 186–195.
Ruby, J. G., Wright, K. M., Rand, K. A., Kermany, A., Noto, K., Curtis, D., et al. (2018). Estimates of the heritability of human longevity are substantially inflated due to assortative mating. Genetics 210, 1109–1124. doi:10.1534/genetics.118.301613
Schmid, C., and Rotenberg, J. S. (2005). Neurodevelopmental toxicology. Neurol. Clin. 23 (2), 321–336. doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2004.12.010
Sierra, A., Gottfriend-Blackmore, A. C., McEwen, B. S., and Bulloch, K. (2007). Microglia derived from aging mice exhibit an altered inflammatory profile. Glia 55, 412–424. doi:10.1002/glia.20468
Sikora, E., Bielak-Zmijewska, A., Dudkowska, M., Krzystyniak, A., Mosieniak, G., Wesierska, M., et al. (2021). Cellular senescence in brain aging. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13, 646924. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.646924
Simmons, D. A., Casale, M., Alcon, B., Pham, N., Narayan, N., and Lynch, G. (2007). Ferritin accumulation in dystrophic microglia is an early event in the development of Huntington’s disease. Glia 55, 1074–1084. doi:10.1002/glia.20526
Singh, P. P., Demmitt, B. A., Nath, R. D., and Brunet, A. (2019). The genetics of aging: A vertebrate perspective. Cell 177, 200–220. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.038
Soreq, L., Rose, J., Soreq, E., Hardy, J., Trabzuni, D., Cookson, M. R., et al. (2017). UK brain expression consortium, north American brain expression ConsortiumMajor shifts in glial regional identity are a transcriptional hallmark of human brain aging. Cell Rep. 18 (2), 557–570. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.011
Sorrentino, J. A., Sanoff, H. K., and Sharpless, N. E. (2014). Defining the toxicology of aging. Trends Mol. Med. 20 (7), 375–384. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2014.04.004
Streit, W. J. (2004). Microglia and Alzheimer’s disease pathogenesis. J. Neurosci. Res. 77 (1), 1–8. doi:10.1002/jnr.20093
Tamnes, C. K., Walhovd, K. B., Dale, A. M., Østby, Y., Grydeland, H., Richardson, G., et al. (2013). Brain development and aging: Overlapping and unique patterns of change. NeuroImage 68, 63–74. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.039
Terrando, M., Eriksson, L. I., Ryu, J. K., Yang, T., Monaco, C., Feldmann, M., et al. (2011). Resolving postoperative neuroinflammation and cognitive decline. Ann. Neurol. 70 (6), 986–995. doi:10.1002/ana.22664
Tran, N. Q. V., and Miyake, K. (2017). Neurodevelopmental disorders and environmental toxicants: Epigenetics as an underlying mechanism. Int. J. Genomics 2017, 7526592. doi:10.1155/2017/7526592
United Nations (UN)Department of Economic and Social AffairsPopulation Division (2019). World population prospects 2019. Volume II: Demographic Profiles (ST/ESA/SER.!/427) (United Nations).
van de Bor, M. (2019). “Chapter 2: Fetal toxicology,” in Handbook of clinical neurology. Editors L. S. de Vries, and H. C. Glass (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier), 162.
van den Berg, N., Rodríguez-Girondo, M., van Dijk, I. K., Mourits, R. J., Mandemakers, K., Janssens, A. A. P. O., et al. (2019). Longevity defined as top 10% survivors and beyond is transmitted as a quantitative genetic trait. Nat. Commun. 10, 35. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07925-0
von Bernhardi, R., Eugenin-von Bernhardi, L., and Eugenin, J. (2015). Microglial cell dysregulation in brain aging and neurodegeneration. Front. Aging Neurosci. 7, 124. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2015.00124
Wadhwa, P. D., Buss, C., Entringer, S., and Swanson, J. M. (2009). Developmental origins of health and disease: Brief history of the approach and current focus on epigenetic mechanisms. Semin. Reprod. Med. 27 (5), 358–368. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1237424
Wei, W., and Ji, S. (2018). Cellular senescence: Molecular mechanisms and pathogenicity. J. Cell. Physiol. 233 (12), 9121–9135. doi:10.1002/jcp.26956
Wolburg, H., Noell, S., Woldburg-Buchholz, K., Mack, A., and Fallier-Becker, P. (2009). Agrin, aquaporin-4, and astrocyte polarity as an important feature of the blood-brain barrier. Neuroscientist 15 (2), 180–193. doi:10.1177/1073858408329509
Yamazaki, Y., Baker, D. J., Tachibana, M., Liu, C. C., van Deursen, J. M., Brott, T. G., et al. (2016). Vascular cell senescence contributes to blood-brain barrier breakdown. Stroke 47 (4), 1068–1077. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010835
Yankner, B. A., Lu, T., and Loerch, P. (2009). The aging brain. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 3, 41–66. doi:10.1146/annurev.pathmechdis.2.010506.092044
Zeevi, N., Pachter, J., McCullough, L. D., Wolfson, L., and Kuchel, G. A. (2010). The blood-brain barrier: Geriatric relevance of a critical brain-body interface. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 58, 1749–1757. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03011.x
Zhang, P., Kishimoto, Y., Grammatikakis, I., Gottimukkala, K., Cutler, R. G., Zhang, S., et al. (2019). Senolytic therapy alleviates Aβ-associated oligodendrocyte progenitor cell senescence and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer's disease model. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 719–728. doi:10.1038/s41593-019-0372-9
Keywords: gerontogen, aging, toxicology, neuroinflamation, blood brain barrier (BBB), cellular senescence
Citation: Wise Jr JP (2022) The intersection between toxicology and aging research: A toxic aging coin perspective. Front. Aging 3:1014675. doi: 10.3389/fragi.2022.1014675
Received: 08 August 2022; Accepted: 06 September 2022;
Published: 21 September 2022.
Edited by:
Ana Paula Dantas, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), SpainReviewed by:
Markus Schosserer, Medical University of Vienna, AustriaCopyright © 2022 Wise Jr. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: John P. Wise Jr, john.wise.1@louisville.edu