ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci.

Sec. Neurocognitive Aging and Behavior

Volume 17 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1566652

Handgrip Strength and Risk of Cognitive Impairment Across Different Glucose Metabolism Statuses: Insights from the CHARLS Study

Provisionally accepted
Shiqi  WangShiqi Wang1Liangchen  LiLiangchen Li2Jia  YuJia Yu3Xianli  SunXianli Sun4Jianqiao  ChenJianqiao Chen5*
  • 1Zhengzhou First People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China
  • 2Navy Qingdao Special Service Recuperation Center, Qingdao, China
  • 3Haikou Cadre’s Sanitarium of Hainan Military Region, Haikou, China
  • 4Hainan Branch of General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Sanya, China
  • 5Department of Geriatrics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, People's Hospital of Henan University, Zhengzhou, China., Zhengzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Both low handgrip strength (HGS) and abnormal glucose metabolism have been implicated in an increased risk of cognitive impairment. However, whether HGS interacts with glucose metabolism status to influence cognitive function remains unclear. This study explores the relationship between HGS and cognitive impairment risk among middle-aged and older Chinese adults and examines the potential modulation of this association by glucose metabolism status.Methods: Data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) collected in 2011 and 2018 were analyzed, including 7,301 participants aged ≥45 years. Cognitive impairment was the primary outcome. Logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were applied to evaluate the association between HGS and cognitive impairment risk across different glucose metabolism statuses.The study included 7,301 participants (mean age: 58.8 ± 8.9 years; 49.3% female). Over a 7-year follow-up, the mean cognitive function score declined from 12.05 ± 3.30 to 7.75 ± 5.70. After adjusting for confounders, logistic regression analyses indicated that higher HGS was significantly associated with a lower risk of cognitive impairment. Participants in the highest HGS quartile (Q4) had a significantly reduced odds of cognitive impairment compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49-0.71; P < 0.001). RCS analysis demonstrated a significant negative linear correlation between HGS and cognitive impairment across individuals with normal glucose regulation, prediabetes, and diabetes (P < 0.001). The interaction pvalue was 0.277, indicating no significant differences in this association among glucose metabolism subgroups.Higher HGS is significantly associated with a reduced risk of cognitive impairment among middle-aged and older individuals, irrespective of glucose metabolism status. These findings suggest that HGS assessment could be a valuable universal tool for evaluating cognitive impairment risk, regardless of metabolic conditions.

Keywords: handgrip strength, cognitive impairment, Glucose metabolism status, middle-aged and older, CHARLS

Received: 25 Jan 2025; Accepted: 09 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Wang, Li, Yu, Sun and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jianqiao Chen, Department of Geriatrics, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, People's Hospital of Henan University, Zhengzhou, China., Zhengzhou, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more