Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci.
Sec. Neurocognitive Aging and Behavior
Volume 17 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1496224

Simulated Driving Behaviour over the Adult Age Span

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Department of Medical Biophysics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 2 Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 3 Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 4 Brain Health and Wellness Research Program, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • 5 Department of Physics, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Canada
  • 6 Faculty of Medicine (Neurosurgery), University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Motor vehicle accidents remain a leading cause of accidental death worldwide. Death and injury rates are particularly high for both young inexperienced drivers and elderly drivers. Understanding the behavioural changes that are associated with maturation and aging could inform assessments of driving performance and lead to new measures identifying at-risk drivers. To shed further light on such effects, this study aims to characterize simulated driving behaviour across and within age groups using a large driving simulation dataset.Methods: The analyzed dataset consisted of 112 participants (47/112 (42%) female) between the ages of 17 and 85 (average: 54 ± 22 years). Participants performed navigation in scenarios modeled after the standard licensing test of Ontario, Canada, which included a series of turns at intersections with different levels of complexity (e.g., involving oncoming traffic or pedestrians) and levels of distraction (requiring auditory responses to common-knowledge questions). Behavioural metrics were defined and investigated not only for the full completion of each task but also based on common subtasks (e.g. braking at an intersection), which were then compared across and within age groups (young, middle-aged, old). Results: Overall, young adults behaved similarly to middle-aged adults for basic tasks but showed differences during traffic navigation subtasks when distracted, such as starting to decelerate significantly later when approaching intersections. Old drivers, on the other hand, drove at lower average speed, stopped earlier at intersections, and left increased distances to pedestrians, but required significantly more time to complete the driving tasks.Conclusions: With rich detail arising from intra-task quantification, the results were consistent with and additive to previous literature showcasing that compared to middle-aged adults, young adults showed performance suggestive of riskier driving behaviour, and old adults showed performance suggestive of caution consequent to declining driving ability. In particular, the intra-task quantification revealed that the driving of young adults was more impacted by the presence of distraction (e.g., delayed decelerating), whereas old adults prioritized safe driving (e.g., correctly braking at intersections) over responding to distractions. The study may be used as motivation for future studies of driving safety and accident prevention, and informed assessment of governmental regulations.

    Keywords: 7610 (1262 Introduction, 1152 Methods, 1813 Results, 2879 Discussion, 504 Captions) driving, Distracted driving, driving simulation, Aging

    Received: 13 Sep 2024; Accepted: 04 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Menze, Churchill, Schweizer and Graham. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Simon James Graham, Department of Medical Biophysics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 1L7, Ontario, Canada

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.