Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci.
Sec. Parkinson’s Disease and Aging-related Movement Disorders
Volume 17 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1455432
This article is part of the Research Topic Function of Vestibular and Auditory Systems in Neurogenerative Disorders View all 6 articles

Rhythmic auditory cues improve gait asymmetry during unobstructed walking in people with Parkinson's disease but have no effect on obstacle avoidance -AsymmGait-Parkinson study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Human Movement Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Sciences, São Paulo State University, Bauru, Brazil
  • 2 Department of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Jerusalem, Israel
  • 3 Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil
  • 4 Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University, Campus Rio Claro, Rio Claro, Brazil
  • 5 Medical School Hamburg, Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
  • 6 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Federal University of ABC, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This study investigated the influence of rhythmic auditory cues (RAC) on gait asymmetry (GA) during unobstructed and obstacle avoidance walking in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) and neurologically healthy individuals. Thirteen individuals with PD (70.33±6.02 years) and 13 healthy controls (CG) (70.77±7.56 years) participated in this study. They performed a total of five trials during unobstructed walking and 10 trials during obstacle walking under each auditory cue condition (without and with RAC). For obstacle walking, five trials were performed with each limb as leading during obstacle avoidance. First, the volunteers performed the trials without RAC. The trial order, unobstructed or obstacle walking, was randomly defined, and the cues (controlled by a metronome) were personalized according to participants' cadence. The symmetric index of gait parameters was analyzed using 2x2 factorial analysis of variance (group and RAC as factors) separately for each gait type (unobstructed and obstructed walking). A group-by-auditory cue interaction for step velocity (p = 0.027) showed that the PD group exhibited 57.6% reduced asymmetry with RAC during unobstructed walking, with no significant effects observed for the CG. However, RAC had no effect on GA during obstacle avoidance walking in people with PD, but with the CG exhibited 10.5% greater step length asymmetry, 7.1% greater step duration asymmetry, 7.0% greater step velocity asymmetry, and 10.6% greater double support duration asymmetry during obstacle avoidance with RAC (p < 0.001). We conclude that RAC can reduce GA in people with PD during unobstructed walking, but appear to have no effect and negative effects on GA during obstacle walking in people with PD and neurologically healthy individuals, respectively.

    Keywords: Walking, rhythmic auditory cueing, Rehabilitation, Symmetry, neurodegenerative disease, Movement Disorders

    Received: 26 Jun 2024; Accepted: 31 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Cursiol, Santos, Beretta, Orcioli-Silva, Simieli, Schlenstedt, Coelho and Barbieri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Fabio Augusto Barbieri, Human Movement Research Laboratory, Department of Physical Education, Faculty of Sciences, São Paulo State University, Bauru, 17033-360, Brazil

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.