AUTHOR=Chou Chia-Ju , Chang Chih-Ting , Chang Ya-Ning , Lee Chia-Ying , Chuang Yi-Fang , Chiu Yen-Ling , Liang Wan-Lin , Fan Yu-Ming , Liu Yi-Chien TITLE=Screening for early Alzheimer’s disease: enhancing diagnosis with linguistic features and biomarkers JOURNAL=Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience VOLUME=16 YEAR=2024 URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/aging-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1451326 DOI=10.3389/fnagi.2024.1451326 ISSN=1663-4365 ABSTRACT=Introduction

Research has shown that speech analysis demonstrates sensitivity in detecting early Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but the relation between linguistic features and cognitive tests or biomarkers remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate how linguistic features help identify cognitive impairments in patients in the early stages of AD.

Method

This study analyzed connected speech from 80 participants and categorized the participants into early-AD and normal control (NC) groups. The participants underwent amyloid-β positron emission tomography scans, brain magnetic resonance imaging, and comprehensive neuropsychological testing. Participants’ speech data from a picture description task were examined. A total of 15 linguistic features were analyzed to classify groups and predict cognitive performance.

Results

We found notable linguistic differences between the early-AD and NC groups in lexical diversity, syntactic complexity, and language disfluency. Using machine learning classifiers (SVM, KNN, and RF), we achieved up to 88% accuracy in distinguishing early-AD patients from normal controls, with mean length of utterance (MLU) and long pauses ratio (LPR) serving as core linguistic indicators. Moreover, the integration of linguistic indicators with biomarkers significantly improved predictive accuracy for AD. Regression analysis also highlighted crucial linguistic features, such as MLU, LPR, Type-to-Token ratio (TTR), and passive construction ratio (PCR), which were sensitive to changes in cognitive function.

Conclusion

Findings support the efficacy of linguistic analysis as a screening tool for the early detection of AD and the assessment of subtle cognitive decline. Integrating linguistic features with biomarkers significantly improved diagnostic accuracy.