Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci.
Sec. Neurocognitive Aging and Behavior
Volume 16 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1417349
This article is part of the Research Topic Mental, Sensory, Physical and Life Style Parameters Related to Cognitive Decline in Aging View all 9 articles

Association of sleep quality with cognitive dysfunction in middle-aged and elderly adults: a cross-sectional study in China

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 2 Air Force General Hospital PLA, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
  • 3 Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan Province, China
  • 4 Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objectives: Sleep is an indispensable part of human health, which can help us to restore physical strength, enhance immunity and maintain nervous system stability. The relationship between sleep quality and cognitive dysfunction is unclear, especially at the community population level. This study aims to explore the association between sleep quality and cognitive dysfunction.: A total of 5224 community residents were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Cognitive function was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Sleep quality was assessed by the multidimensional sleep questionnaire. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the association between sleep quality and cognitive dysfunction. The adjusted models took into account relevant demographic, clinical, and sleep variables.Results: A total of 3106 participants were enrolled in this study, of whom 463 (15%) had cognitive dysfunction. Total sleep duration, staying up, sleep latency, number of awakenings, and history of sleep medications were associated with cognitive dysfunction in unadjusted models, and these effects were consistent after adjustment. First, those who slept 6-7.9 hours per day (OR=0.57, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.80, P=0.001) had a lower risk for cognitive dysfunction compared to those who slept less than 6 hours per day. Second, participants who stayed up more than 10 times over the three months (OR=1.90, 95% CI 1.20 to 3.00, P=0.006) were more likely to suffer cognitive dysfunction than those who never stayed up. Third, we also found that participants with sleep latencies of 16-30 minutes were less likely to experience cognitive dysfunction than those with sleep latencies of less than 16 minutes after adjusting confounders (OR=0.33, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.47, P<0.001). Fourth, participants who woke up once (OR=1.65, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.30, P=0.003) and three or more times (OR=2.34, 95% CI 1.25 to 4.36, P=0.008) after falling asleep had a higher risk than those who did not wake up at night. Last, participants taking sleep medication (OR=2.97, 95% CI 1.19 to 7.45, P=0.020) were more vulnerable to cognitive dysfunction, relative to participants without taking any medications.Our results suggest that after adjustment for potential confounding variables, poor sleep quality is associated with cognitive dysfunction.

    Keywords: sleep quality, cognitive dysfunction, sleep duration, staying up, Sleep latency

    Received: 14 Apr 2024; Accepted: 04 Sep 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Mengyang, Liu, Wang, Liu, Deng, Zhang and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Xin Wang, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
    Baoguo Wang, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.