Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci., 07 August 2024
Sec. Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias

Association of peak expiratory flow with motoric cognitive risk syndrome among older adults

\r\nHui Xu*&#x;Hui Xu1*†Xiangwen Gong&#x;Xiangwen Gong2†Kaiwang Cui&#x;Kaiwang Cui2†Xuerui LiXuerui Li3Long ChenLong Chen4Yiyi LuYiyi Lu2Yangfang LiaoYangfang Liao2Jianping Liu*Jianping Liu2*
  • 1Big Data Center, Beijing Children’s Hospital, National Center for Children’s Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
  • 2Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Ganzhou Key Laboratory of Respiratory Diseases, Ganzhou Institute of Respiratory Diseases, The Fifth People’s Hospital of Ganzhou, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China
  • 3Department of Geriatrics, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin Geriatrics Institute, Tianjin, China
  • 4School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, China

Background: The association between lung function and motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) is unclear. We aimed to explore the association of peak expiratory flow (PEF) with MCR using cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.

Methods: Within the CHARLS, 5095 participants were included in the cross-sectional analysis, and 4340 MCR-free participants were included in the longitudinal analysis. The PEF was assessed with a lung peak flow meter. MCR was characterized by cognitive complaints and a slow walking speed with normal mobility and without dementia. Logistic regression, Cox regression, and Laplace regression models were employed for data analysis.

Results: In this cross-sectional study, logistic regression analyses revealed that continuous PEF was associated with MCR (odds ratio [OR], 0.998; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.998, 0.999), and the ORs (95% CIs) of MCR prevalence were 0.857 (0.693, 1.061) for the middle tertile and 0.665 (0.524, 0.845) for the highest tertile compared to the lowest tertile. In a longitudinal cohort study, continuous PEF was dose-dependently associated with the risk of MCR. Compared with those in the lowest tertile of PEF, the hazard ratios (95% CIs) of incident MCR were 0.827 (0.661, 1,036) for the middle tertile and 0.576 (0.432, 0.767) for the highest tertile. Furthermore, compared with the lowest tertile, the highest tertile was associated with a delayed onset time of MCR of 0.484 (95% CI: 0.151, 0.817) years.

Conclusion: A higher PEF was related to a lower prevalence of MCR and a lower risk for MCR, and a higher PEF also prolonged the onset time of MCR.

Introduction

The world’s population is aging in an increasingly critical situation due to increasing life expectancy and declining fertility, and the influence of dementia on health is anticipated to increase dramatically, placing a significant burden on social security (United Nations, 2020). Sensory, motor, and cognitive functions change in the normal aging process, with a significant decrease in walking speed and motor activity (Puig et al., 1988). Motoric cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) was first reported in 2013 as a novel indicator of predementia phase clinical syndrome by combining slow walking speed with subjective cognitive complaints (Verghese et al., 2013). Recent studies have demonstrated that a diagnosis of MCR can be used as a screening indicator for adverse health outcomes (Chhetri et al., 2017), including falls (Callisaya et al., 2016), disability (Doi et al., 2017), dementia, cardiovascular disease (Meiner et al., 2020), and mortality (Beauchet et al., 2019). As MCR can be assessed with a relatively less complex method, MCR could be considered a useful tool for comprehending the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in the long preclinical period that results in dementia. Hence, identifying protective or risk factors for MCR, particularly changeable factors, holds great significance in tackling the issues posed by cognitive function decline.

A range of lung function trajectories are present in health and disease and could have significant clinical consequences (Agusti and Faner, 2019). PEF, a quickly and easily administered measurement of lung function, is identified as the maximum flow produced by the maximum force from total lung volume (Beauchet et al., 2019). Thus, PEF is a practicable indicator of general robustness and is workable in large-scale surveys and clinical contexts (Trevisan et al., 2019).

However, the research investigating the direct association between PEF and MCR is relatively limited. Several explanations could contribute to this association: Firstly, PEF as a key measure of respiratory function, may influence the brain’s oxygen supply and cognitive function. Studies suggest a link between good respiratory health and enhanced cognitive abilities, possibly because sufficient oxygen supports brain neuron activity, boosting cognition (Ngwenya et al., 2016; Donahue et al., 2023). Secondly, PEF is tied to overall health and lifestyle choices. People with higher PEF tend to adopt healthier habits like regular exercise and balanced eating, which are known to benefit cognitive and motor functions (Cotman and Berchtold, 2002). Considering the rational explanation for the association between PEF and MCR and the scare direct study in present, to explore whether and to what extent PEF influenced MCR, we assessed the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships of PEF with MCR in older Chinese adults.

Materials and methods

Study population

The study population was sourced from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), an ongoing longitudinal cohort of individuals ≥ 45 years of age. Previous studies have elucidated the study design and assessment protocol for CHARLS (Zhao et al., 2014). In summary, multistage probability sampling was used to recruit individuals from 450 communities and administrative villages spanning 28 provinces in China. Upon enrollment, every individual completed a standardized questionnaire and anthropometric measurements. Afterward, these individuals were followed every two years. The Biomedical Ethics Review Committee of Peking University approved the CHARLS (IRB00001052-11015). Each individual was allowed to share their data and signed a consent permitting disclosure. Data from the 2011, 2013, and 2015 CHARLS cohorts were collected for our study, and the data can be requested at http://charls.pku.edu.cn/.

At baseline, 17708 participants aged ≥ 45 years were enrolled, with 7082 (39.9%) individuals aged ≥ 60 years meeting the criteria for the walking speed assessment. Among the 7082 individuals, we excluded 1987 participants with mental disabilities (n = 236), memory-related diseases (n = 156), and missing data on PEF (n = 1584) and MCR (n = 11) at baseline. Thus, 5095 participants were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. Furthermore, individuals with MCR at baseline (n = 600) and individuals with memory-related disease (n = 135) or missing MCR data (n = 20) during the follow-up period were excluded. Finally, 4,340 participants were enrolled in the longitudinal cohort study (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Flowchart of the study participants.

Assessment of PEF

The PEF was measured and recorded by train technicians with a lung peak flow meter and a disposable mouthpiece. Participants in the stand-up activity were directed to breathe deeply, hold the mouthpiece, cover it completely with their mouth, avoid air leakage, and then blow into the mouthpiece as fast and hard as they could. PEF was assessed 3 times with an interval of 30 seconds for each time in units of L/min, and the maximum value of the 3 times was used in the present study. A higher PEF indicated better lung function.

Assessment of MCR

MCR was characterized by cognitive complaints and a slow walking speed with normal mobility and without dementia, following a previously established protocol (Bai et al., 2021).

Cognitive complaints were assessed by asking participants to self-rate their current memory. Individuals who rated their memory as fair or poor were considered to have cognitive complaints, while others were considered free of cognitive complaints.

Slow walking speed was established as one standard deviation below the average walking speed for the age- and sex-specific population at baseline. All participants ≥ 60 years were eligible for the walking test and were categorized into groups for every 5-year age interval. However, participants with a disease (e.g., ankle sprain) that hindered their walking ability did not complete the walking speed test. Individuals were directed to walk at their normal speed on the walkway. Participants were allowed to use walking aids if necessary. The number of times the participants walked across the walkway twice was recorded by a stopwatch, and the average time was calculated. Walking speed was computed as the distance traveled by 2.5 meters divided by the average time in seconds (m/s). The slow walking speed in this study was defined as < 0.51 m/s in men aged 60–64 years, < 0.49 m/s in men aged 65–69 years, < 0.45 m/s in men aged 70–74 years, < 0.43 m/s in men aged 75–79 years, < 0.38 m/s in men aged ≥ 80 years, < 0.47 m/s in women aged 60–64 years, < 0.44 m/s in women aged 65–69 years, < 0.43 m/s in women aged 70–74 years, < 0.40 m/s in women aged 75–79 years, and < 0.36 m/s in women aged ≥ 80 years.

Assessment of potential confounders

Information on age, sex, education, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and chronic illnesses (e.g., hypertension, diabetes) was obtained through a uniform structured questionnaire administered by a trained interviewer. Body mass index (BMI) was determined by dividing weight by height, with the unit expressed in kilograms/meters squared (kg/m2). Weight and height were evaluated using a height and weight scale with participants wearing lightweight clothing and no shoes by standard measurement procedures. Education was classified into three groups: illiterate, primary school and below, or middle school and above. Smoking status and alcohol consumption status were also classified into three groups: never, former, and current. All chronic illnesses were classified as yes or no.

Statistical analysis

Differences in characteristics among individuals with or without MCR in the cross-sectional study and among individuals with the lowest, middle, and highest PEFs in the longitudinal study were tested by one-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables, while chi-square tests were used for categorical variables.

The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by logistic regression models to assess the cross-sectional association between PEF (continuous and tertiles) and MCR at baseline. The hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated by a Cox regression model to assess the longitudinal association between PEF and MCR during follow-up. The proportional hazards assumption of the Cox regression model was not violated after testing. The 10th percentile differences (PDs) in the longitudinal relationship between the MCR onset time and the PEF were calculated via a Laplace regression model. The models were initially adjusted for age, sex, and education, and further additional adjustments were made for BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and chronic diseases.

In the sensitivity analysis, the missing covariate data were imputed for 252 individuals in the cross-sectional or longitudinal study using multiple imputations via a chained equation. Furthermore, we conducted a repeated analysis of the models when we excluded 2278 participants with lung disease (n = 710) or arthritis (n = 1568) at baseline. Stratified analysis was performed based on sex, education, smoking status, and alcohol consumption to examine the longitudinal associations of PEF with the HRs of MCR. In addition, we compared the characteristics of participants with and without PEF. Finally, we reanalyzed the data using a new slower gait cutoff (< 0.654 m/s in men aged < 75 years, < 0.513 m/s in men aged ≥ 75 years, < 0.598 m/s in women aged < 75 years, < 0.424 m/s in women aged ≥ 75 years), which is the highest cutoff of slow gait among seven Health and Retirement Studies (Jayakody et al., 2024).

Stata SE 15.0 (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) was used for analysis. A two-tailed P value ≤ 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Characteristics of the cross-sectional study population

In total, there were 5095 individuals (49.83% female; mean age: 68.74 ± 6.40 years) in the cross-sectional analyses. Individuals with MCR were more likely to have a stroke and lower PEF than those without MCR. The differences in age, sex, education, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption status, hypertension status, diabetes status, heart disease status, lung disease status, and asthma status between the two groups were not significant (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the cross-sectional study population stratified by the MCR (n = 5095).

Cross-sectional association of PEF with MCR

Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that continuous PEF was linked to MCR (OR, 0.998; 95% CI, 0.998, 0.999). The ORs (95% CIs) of incident MCR were 0.857 (0.693, 1.061) and 0.665 (0.524, 0.845) for the middle and highest tertiles of PEF, respectively, compared to the lowest tertile (Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the cross-sectional association between peak expiratory flow (PEF) and motor cognitive risk syndrome (MCR): results from the logistic regression model.

Characteristics of the longitudinal study population

There were 4340 participants (49.52% female; mean age: 68.74 ± 6.41 years) in the longitudinal analyses. Participants in the highest tertile of PEF were more likely to be younger, male, smokers, and drinkers; to have higher education, BMI, and less heart disease and lung disease than those in the lowest tertile (Table 3).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Baseline characteristics of the longitudinal study population by PEF category (n = 4340).

Longitudinal association of PEF with MCR

During the follow-up (accounting for 16782 person-years), a total of 9.88% (429/4340) of participants developed MCR. The proportions of MCR were 12.98% (199/1533), 10.10% (145/1435), and 6.20% (85/1372) for the lowest, middle and highest tertiles of PEF, respectively. According to the multi-adjusted Cox regression models, continuous PEF showed a dose-dependent correlation with the risk of MCR, where each point increase in PEF corresponded to a 2‰ decrease in the risk of MCR. Compared to the lowest tertile of PEF, the HRs (95% CIs) of incident MCR were 0.827 (0.661, 1.036) and 0.576 (0.432, 0.767) for the middle and the highest tertiles, respectively (Table 4).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Hazard ratios (HRs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and 10th percentile differences (PDs) in years of incident motor cognitive risk syndrome (MCR) in the longitudinal relation to peak expiratory flow (PEF): results from the Cox regression model and Laplace regression model.

Laplace regression analysis showed that the multi-adjusted 10th PDs (95% CI) of time (years) at the onset of MCR for individuals with the highest PEF were 0.484 (0.151, 0.817) years later compared to those with the lowest. Each increase in the PEF score resulted in a 0.002-year delay in the onset of MCR (Table 4).

Sensitivity analysis

The results remained largely consistent with those of the initial analyses after missing data were imputed by multiple imputations (Supplementary Tables 1, 2) and when 2278 participants with lung disease and asthma at baseline were excluded (Supplementary Tables 3, 4). According to the stratified analyses, the longitudinal associations of PEF with MCR were similar in two subgroups (males and females, illiterate and literate individuals, smokers and nonsmokers, and drinkers and nondrinkers) (Supplementary Tables 58). Compared with individuals without PEFs, individuals with PEFs were more likely to be younger, male, smokers, and drinkers; to have a higher education, BMI, and asthma; and to have less hypertension and stroke (Supplementary Table 9). The cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between PEF and MCR weakened somewhat but remained significant when we used higher cutoff points for slower gait (Supplementary Table 10).

Discussion

In this nationally representative cohort of older Chinese adults, our findings suggest that higher PEF correlated with a reduced incidence of MCR in a cross-sectional study and a lower risk of MCR in a longitudinal cohort study. Furthermore, the highest tertile of PEF could prolong the onset time of MCR by approximately 0.48 years relative to the lowest tertile.

Pulmonary function may have predictive effects on cognitive performance among middle-aged and older adults (Min et al., 2007; Singh-Manoux et al., 2011; Duggan et al., 2020). However, evidence supporting the longitudinal association of pulmonary function with cognition is scarce and inconsistent. A systematic review (including four longitudinal studies) demonstrated that although substantial cross-sectional studies supported a strong association between pulmonary function and cognition, longitudinal studies supporting these associations were limited (Duggan et al., 2020). Similarly, a cohort study from America suggested that impaired pulmonary function was linked with worse baseline cognitive performance, but no association was detected between lung function and cognitive decline over time (Pathan et al., 2011). One study from the Rush Memory and Aging Project demonstrated that low lung function was related to faster cognitive decline (Wang et al., 2022). Longitudinal data from the CHARLS revealed a significant inverse association between higher baseline PEF and the absolute value of cognitive decline among males but not females (Lai et al., 2022). Another study using the same data also showed that high baseline PEF was independently linked to a slower rate of cognitive decline in older adults in China (Shang et al., 2021).

Furthermore, research on the relationship between lung function and walking speed is relatively rare. A cross-sectional study of the Canadian general population showed that lower lung function was related to perceived poor general health and physical performance (Duong et al., 2022). A study from Sweden indicated that the proportion of individuals with moderate-to-severe walking impairment was markedly greater among individuals with the poorest PEF performance (Trevisan et al., 2020). Data from the Whitehall II study suggested that greater lung function was associated with greater walking speed, memory, and reasoning (Singh-Manoux et al., 2011). However, evidence on the longitudinal association between lung function and walking speed is limited. In addition, MCR, a novel predementia syndrome that combines cognition and physical function indicators, has recently drawn special attention from scholars. To our knowledge, research on the association between lung function and MCR is scarce. An observational study from the National Health and Aging Trends Study revealed that one standard deviation below the mean PEF standardized residual was associated with a 1.60-fold greater odds of developing MCR syndrome (Ho and Verghese, 2023). In our study, using both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, we suggested that a higher PEF was associated with a reduced MCR incidence at baseline and was also related to a decreased risk of MCR over time and could further prolong the onset time of MCR, suggesting that early identification of individuals with a changed PEF could facilitate timely interventions to prevent or delay the onset of cognitive decline and mobility impairments. The clinical significance of these findings may provide a new approach to assessing and preventing cognitive risk and offer new ideas for clinical practice and public health policy development.

It is important to discuss the potential influence of the lower gait speed cutoff points used in the CHARLS compared to those used in other studies, such as the U.S. Health and Retirement Study, the English Longitudinal Study of Aging, Survey of Health, Aging and Retirement in Europe, the Harmonized Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia for Longitudinal Aging Study in India, the Mexican Health and Aging Study, and the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (Jayakody et al., 2024). Considering the racial differences and differences in gait speed measurements, the variability in gait speed has already been identified in previous studies. Thus, the cutoff points of slow gait speed was determined as one standard deviation below the average gait was determined as one standard deviation below the average walking speed for the age- and sex-specific population for each cohort (Oh-Park et al., 2010; Verghese et al., 2013; Cotton et al., 2024). Although the gait speed cutoff points were lower in our study than those in others, the relationship between PEF and MCR was still significant according to the use of higher cutoff points in the sensitivity analyses.

The mechanisms underlying the relationship between PEF and MCR remain unclear. An inflammatory reaction may be initiated by decreased lung function (Reynolds, 1987). This inflammation might progress to low-grade systemic inflammation leading to an adverse vascular reaction and additional oxidative stress (Han et al., 2007). The pathogenesis of dementia is closely linked to inflammation and oxidative stress within the central nervous system (Maccioni et al., 2009). Furthermore, pulmonary dysfunction may also have a direct adverse impact on neurotransmitter synthesis, oxidative stress, and blood-brain barrier integrity via chronic hypoxia and inflammation (Dodd, 2015). Moreover, impaired PEF may lead to clinical complications and reduced physical activity, as well as providing an inadequate peripheral energy supply (Marciniuk, 2008; Roberts and Mapel, 2012).

The strength of the current study is that it is the first study to explore the relationship between lung function and MCR using a representative Chinese cohort of older people. Nevertheless, it is essential to acknowledge several limitations. First, lung function was only assessed by PEF and may not fully reflect the overall lung status. Second, some potential confounders, such as smoking status, education, and chronic diseases, were evaluated through self-reported questions, which may introduce recall bias. Furthermore, although our study fully adjusted for potential sources of bias, the unmeasured confounding factors that may have influenced our findings remained. In addition, the mediation effect of physical activity in the association between PEF and MCR have not found in present study, and this might be due to the missing data on physical activity for 64% of the participants. At present, we have not yet accessed a dataset that includes information on inflammation. Consequently, we are unable to analyze the potential mediating role of inflammation in the association between PEF and MCR. However, we are committed to exploring the mediating effects of inflammation (including a spectrum of inflammation-related indicators) in this association in future research, once the necessary data becomes available. Finally, the generalizability of the findings is restricted considering the individuals with missing PEF data.

In summary, our study presents novel evidence that a high PEF is linked to a decreased prevalence of MCR and may reduce the risk of MCR and further prolong its onset time. Our findings emphasize the significance of maintaining good lung function for physical and cognitive health. Furthermore, additional longitudinal research is necessary to elucidate the mechanisms underlying this relationship in the general population.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: http://charls.pku.edu.cn/.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Biomedical Ethics Review Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052-11015). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author contributions

HX: Writing–review and editing, Conceptualization. XG: Writing–original draft, Formal analysis, Data curation. KC: Writing–original draft, Formal analysis, Data curation. XL: Writing–review and editing, Formal analysis, Data curation. LC: Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing–review and editing. YiL: Writing–review and editing. YaL: Writing–review and editing. JL: Writing–review and editing, Conceptualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of the article. XG received grants from 2023 to 2025 the First Batch of Provincial Clinical Key Specialty Construction Projects in Jiangxi [Gan Wei Yi Zi (2023) No. 82] and the Gannan Soviet Area Talent Support Program [Gan Shi Cai Zi (2021) No. 1]. HX received grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 82301731), the 2022 Scientific Research Project of Chronic Diseases Control and Health Education (No. BJMB0012022028019) and the Beihang University and Capital Medical University Advanced Innovation Center for Big Data-Based Precision Medicine Plan (No. BHME-201901).

Acknowledgments

We thank the China Center for Economic Research, National School of Development at Peking University for providing the CHARLS data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1412542/full#supplementary-material

References

Agusti, A., and Faner, R. (2019). Lung function trajectories in health and disease. Lancet Respir. Med. 7, 358–364. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30529-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bai, A., Shi, H., Huang, X., Xu, W., and Deng, Y. (2021). Association of C-reactive protein and motoric cognitive risk syndrome in community-dwelling older adults: The China health and retirement longitudinal study. J. Nutr. Health Aging 25, 1090–1095. doi: 10.1007/s12603-021-1678-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Beauchet, O., Sekhon, H., Launay, C. P., Chabot, J., Rolland, Y., Schott, A. M., et al. (2019). Motoric cognitive risk syndrome and mortality: Results from the EPIDOS cohort. Eur. J. Neurol. 26, 794–e756. doi: 10.1111/ene.13891

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Callisaya, M. L., Ayers, E., Barzilai, N., Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J. M., Lipton, R. B., et al. (2016). Motoric cognitive risk syndrome and falls risk: A multi-center study. J. Alzheimers Dis. 53, 1043–1052. doi: 10.3233/JAD-160230

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Chhetri, J. K., Chan, P., Vellas, B., and Cesari, M. (2017). Motoric cognitive risk syndrome: Predictor of dementia and age-related negative outcomes. Front. Med. 4:166. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00166

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cotman, C. W., and Berchtold, N. C. (2002). Exercise: A behavioral intervention to enhance brain health and plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 25, 295–301. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(02)02143-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cotton, K., Ayers, E., Jin, Y., Beauchet, O., Derby, C. A., Lipton, R. B., et al. (2024). Elevated blood homocysteine increases the risk of incident motoric cognitive risk syndrome: A two-cohort study. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 79:114. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glae114

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Dodd, J. W. (2015). Lung disease as a determinant of cognitive decline and dementia. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 7:32. doi: 10.1186/s13195-015-0116-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Doi, T., Shimada, H., Makizako, H., Tsutsumimoto, K., Verghese, J., and Suzuki, T. (2017). Motoric cognitive risk syndrome: Association with incident dementia and disability. J. Alzheimers Dis. 59, 77–84. doi: 10.3233/JAD-170195

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Donahue, P. T., Xue, Q. L., and Carlson, M. C. (2023). Peak expiratory flow predicts incident dementia in a representative sample of U.S. older adults: The national health and aging trends study (NHATS). J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 78, 1427–1435. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac235

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Duggan, E. C., Graham, R. B., Piccinin, A. M., Jenkins, N. D., Clouston, S., Muniz-Terrera, G., et al. (2020). Systematic review of pulmonary function and cognition in aging. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 75, 937–952. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gby128

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Duong, M., Usman, A., Ma, J., Xie, Y., Huang, J., Zaman, M., et al. (2022). Associations between lung function and physical and cognitive health in the Canadian longitudinal study on aging (CLSA): A cross-sectional study from a multicenter national cohort. PLoS Med. 19:e1003909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003909

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, M. K., McLaughlin, V. V., Criner, G. J., and Martinez, F. J. (2007). Pulmonary diseases and the heart. Circulation 116, 2992–3005. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685206

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ho, Q. J., and Verghese, J. O. E. (2023). PEAK EXPIRATORY FLOW AND MOTORIC COGNITIVE RISK SYNDROME. CHEST 164:A5817. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.07.3750

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jayakody, O., Blumen, H. M., Breslin, M., Wang, C., and Verghese, J. (2024). Risk factors associated with the Motoric Cognitive Risk syndrome: A meta-analysis of data from a cross-national study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19032 [Epub ahead of print].

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lai, X., Sun, J., He, B., Li, D., Wang, S., and Zhan, S. (2022). Associations between pulmonary function and cognitive decline in the middle-aged and older adults: Evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 27:48. doi: 10.1265/ehpm.22-00158

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Maccioni, R. B., Rojo, L. E., Fernandez, J. A., and Kuljis, R. O. (2009). The role of neuroimmunomodulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1153, 240–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03972.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Marciniuk, D. D. (2008). The major limitation to exercise performance in COPD is inadequate energy supply to the respiratory and locomotor muscles vs. lower limb muscle dysfunction vs. dynamic hyperinflation. There is no magic bullet in COPD. J. Appl. Physiol. 105:762. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.zdg-8100.pcpcomm.2008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Meiner, Z., Ayers, E., and Verghese, J. (2020). Motoric cognitive risk syndrome: A risk factor for cognitive impairment and dementia in different populations. Ann. Geriatr. Med. Res. 24, 3–14. doi: 10.4235/agmr.20.0001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Min, J. Y., Min, K. B., Paek, D., Sakong, J., and Cho, S. I. (2007). The association between neurobehavioral performance and lung function. Neurotoxicology 28, 441–444. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2006.03.019

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ngwenya, L. B., Burke, J. F., and Manley, G. T. (2016). Brain tissue oxygen monitoring and the intersection of brain and lung: A comprehensive review. Respir. Care 61, 1232–1244. doi: 10.4187/respcare.04962

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Oh-Park, M., Holtzer, R., Xue, X., and Verghese, J. (2010). Conventional and robust quantitative gait norms in community-dwelling older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 58, 1512–1518. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02962.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Pathan, S. S., Gottesman, R. F., Mosley, T. H., Knopman, D. S., Sharrett, A. R., and Alonso, A. (2011). Association of lung function with cognitive decline and dementia: The atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Eur. J. Neurol. 18, 888–898. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03340.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Puig, L., Pilar Garcia, M., de Moragas, J. M., Matias Guiu, X., Moreno, A., and Cadafalch, J. (1988). Cutaneous extramedullary hematopoiesis in a patient with acute myelofibrosis. Arch. Dermatol. 124, 329–331. doi: 10.1001/archderm.124.3.329

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Reynolds, H. Y. (1987). Lung inflammation: Normal host defense or a complication of some diseases? Annu Rev Med 38, 295–323. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.38.020187.001455

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Roberts, M. H., and Mapel, D. W. (2012). Limited lung function: Impact of reduced peak expiratory flow on health status, health-care utilization, and expected survival in older adults. Am. J. Epidemiol. 176, 127–134. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr503

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Shang, X., Scott, D., Chan, R. K., Zhang, L., and He, M. (2021). Association of pulmonary function with cognitive decline in older adults: A nationwide longitudinal study in China. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 76, 1423–1430. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab096

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh-Manoux, A., Dugravot, A., Kauffmann, F., Elbaz, A., Ankri, J., Nabi, H., et al. (2011). Association of lung function with physical, mental and cognitive function in early old age. Age 33, 385–392. doi: 10.1007/s11357-010-9189-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Trevisan, C., Rizzuto, D., Maggi, S., Sergi, G., Welmer, A. K., and Vetrano, D. L. (2019). Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between peak expiratory flow and frailty in older adults. J. Clin. Med. 8:1901. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111901

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Trevisan, C., Rizzuto, D., Sergi, G., Maggi, S., Welmer, A. K., and Vetrano, D. L. (2020). Peak expiratory flow, walking speed and survival in older adults: An 18-year longitudinal population-based study. Exp. Gerontol. 135:110941. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2020.110941

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

United Nations (2020). World population ageing 2020 highlights. New York, NY: United Nations.

Google Scholar

Verghese, J., Wang, C., Lipton, R. B., and Holtzer, R. (2013). Motoric cognitive risk syndrome and the risk of dementia. J Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 68, 412–418. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls191

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, J., Song, R., Dove, A., Qi, X., Ma, J., Laukka, E. J., et al. (2022). Pulmonary function is associated with cognitive decline and structural brain differences. Alzheimers Dement. 18, 1335–1344. doi: 10.1002/alz.12479

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, Y., Hu, Y., Smith, J. P., Strauss, J., and Yang, G. (2014). Cohort profile: The China health and retirement longitudinal study (CHARLS). Int. J. Epidemiol. 43, 61–68. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys203

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: motoric cognitive risk syndrome, peak expiratory flow, older adults, lung function, cohort study

Citation: Xu H, Gong X, Cui K, Li X, Chen L, Lu Y, Liao Y and Liu J (2024) Association of peak expiratory flow with motoric cognitive risk syndrome among older adults. Front. Aging Neurosci. 16:1412542. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1412542

Received: 05 April 2024; Accepted: 25 July 2024;
Published: 07 August 2024.

Edited by:

Helena Blumen, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States

Reviewed by:

Emmeline Ayers, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, United States
Kieran Reid, Harvard Medical School, United States

Copyright © 2024 Xu, Gong, Cui, Li, Chen, Lu, Liao and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hui Xu, xuhuiyunyun@126.com; Jianping Liu, gzwyhwk@126.com

These authors have equally contributed to this work and share first authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.