AUTHOR=Peng Ying-Ju , Kuo Chen-Yuan , Chang Sheng-Wei , Lin Ching-Po , Tsai Yuan-Hsiung 

TITLE=Acceleration of brain aging after small-volume infarcts

JOURNAL=Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

VOLUME=16

YEAR=2024

URL=https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/aging-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2024.1409166

DOI=10.3389/fnagi.2024.1409166

ISSN=1663-4365

ABSTRACT=<sec id="sec1"><title>Introduction</title><p>Previous studies have shown that stroke patients exhibit greater neuroimaging-derived biological “brain age” than control subjects. This difference, known as the brain age gap (BAG), is calculated by comparing the chronological age with predicted brain age and is used as an indicator of brain health and aging. However, whether stroke accelerates the process of brain aging in patients with small-volume infarcts has not been established. By utilizing longitudinal data, we aimed to investigate whether small-volume infarctions can significantly increase the BAG, indicating accelerated brain aging.</p></sec><sec id="sec2"><title>Methods</title><p>A total of 123 stroke patients presenting with small-volume infarcts were included in this retrospective study. The brain age model was trained via established protocols within the field of machine learning and the structural features of the brain from our previous study. We used <italic>t</italic>-tests and regression analyses to assess longitudinal brain age changes after stroke and the associations between brain age, acute stroke severity, and poststroke outcome factors.</p></sec><sec id="sec3"><title>Results</title><p>Significant brain aging occurred between the initial and 6-month follow-ups, with a mean increase in brain age of 1.04 years (<italic>t</italic> = 3.066, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). Patients under 50 years of age experienced less aging after stroke than those over 50 years of age (<italic>p</italic> = 0.245). Additionally, patients with a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score &gt;3 at admission presented more pronounced adverse effects on brain aging, even after adjusting for confounders such as chronological age, sex, and total intracranial volume (<italic>F</italic><sub>1,117</sub> = 7.339, <italic>p</italic> = 0.008, <italic>η</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.059). There were significant differences in the proportional brain age difference at 6 months among the different functional outcome groups defined by the Barthel Index (<italic>F</italic><sub>2,118</sub> = 4.637, <italic>p</italic> = 0.012, <italic>η</italic><sup>2</sup> = 0.073).</p></sec><sec id="sec4"><title>Conclusion</title><p>Stroke accelerates the brain aging process, even in patients with relatively small-volume infarcts. This phenomenon is particularly accentuated in elderly patients, and both stroke severity and poststroke functional outcomes are closely associated with accelerated brain aging. Further studies are needed to explore the mechanisms underlying the accelerated brain aging observed in stroke patients, with a particular focus on the structural alterations and plasticity of the brain following minor strokes.</p></sec>