Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci.
Sec. Neurocognitive Aging and Behavior
Volume 16 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1401818
This article is part of the Research Topic Lifestyle and Healthy Aging to Prevent Cognitive Decline and Dementia View all 6 articles

Detection of neurophysiological markers of cognitive reserve: an EEG study

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (NCGG), Ōbu, Japan
  • 2 Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), Tokyo, Japan
  • 3 Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, Kyōto, Japan
  • 4 Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background and Objectives: Cognitive reserve (CR) is a property of the brain that allows for better–than–expected cognitive performance relative to the degree of brain change over the course of life. However, neurophysiological markers of CR remain under-investigated. Electroencephalography (EEG) features may function as suitable neurophysiological markers of CR. To assess this, we investigated whether the dorsal attention network (DAN) and ventral attention network (VAN) activities, as measured during resting–state EEG, moderate the relationship between hippocampal volume and episodic memory. Methods: Participants were recruited as part of the National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology–Study of Geriatric Syndromes. Hippocampal volume was determined using magnetic MRI, and episodic memory was measured using word lists. After testing the effect of hippocampal volume on memory performance using multiple regression analysis, we evaluated the interactions between hippocampal volume and DAN and VAN network activities. We further used the Johnson–Neyman technique to quantify the moderating effects of DAN and VAN network activities on the relationship between hippocampal volume and word list memory, as well as to identify specific ranges of DAN and VAN network activity with significant hippocampal–memory association. Results: A total of 449 participants were included in this study. Our analysis revealed significant moderation of DAN with a slope of β = -0.00012 (95% CI: -0.00024; -0.00001, p = 0.040), and VAN with a slope of β = 0.00014 (95% CI: 0.00001; 0.00026, p = 0.031). Further, we found that a larger hippocampal volume was associated with improved memory performance, and that this association became stronger as the DAN activity decreased until a limit of DAN activity of 944.9, after which the hippocampal volume was no longer significantly related to word-list memory performance. For the VAN, we found that a higher hippocampal volume was more strongly associated with better memory performance when VAN activity was higher. However, when VAN activity extended beyond -914.6, the hippocampal volume was no longer significantly associated with word-list memory. Discussion: Our results suggest that attentional networks help to maintain memory performance in the face of age-related structural decline, meeting the criteria for the neural implementation of cognitive reserve.

    Keywords: Cognitive Reserve, Electroencephalography, dorsal attention network, ventral attention network, neurophysiological markers, Community-dwelling older adults

    Received: 16 Mar 2024; Accepted: 26 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Katayama, Stern, Habeck, Coors, Lee, Harada, Makino, Tomida, Morikawa, Yamaguchi, Nishijima, Misu, Fujii, Kodama and Shimada. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Osamu Katayama, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (NCGG), Ōbu, Japan

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.