Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Aging Neurosci., 22 November 2023
Sec. Neurocognitive Aging and Behavior
Volume 15 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1333781

Corrigendum: Prefrontal event-related potential markers in association with mild cognitive impairment

This article is a correction to:

  1. Prefrontal event-related potential markers in association with mild cognitive impairment

    1. Read original article
\r\nJoel Eyamu,Joel Eyamu1,2Wuon-Shik KimWuon-Shik Kim1Kahye KimKahye Kim1Kun Ho Lee,,Kun Ho Lee3,4,5Jaeuk U. Kim, Jaeuk U. Kim1,2*
  • 1Digital Health Research Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • 2KM Convergence Science, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • 3Gwangju Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (GARD) Cohort Research Center, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
  • 4Department of Biomedical Science, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
  • 5Dementia Research Group, Korea Brain Research Institute, Daegu, Republic of Korea

A corrigendum on
Prefrontal event-related potential markers in association with mild cognitive impairment

by Eyamu, J., Kim, W.-S., Kim, K., Lee, K. H., and Kim, J. U. (2023). Front. Aging Neurosci. 15:1273008. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1273008

In the published article, there was an error. The results of the ERP timings' differences between patients with MCI and healthy individuals were misreported, as “lower” or “reduced” instead of “higher” or “increased/slowed.”

A correction has been made to Results, ERP measures, paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated:

“Patients with MCI showed a significantly larger AUC of the P300 duration [t = −2.13, p = 0.034] and an early onset zero-crossing time point (T1) [t = 2.38, p = 0.018] compared to the CN individuals, while exhibiting a lower difference between the onset zero-crossing time point and the 50% fractional area latency (FALT1) [t = −3.08, p = 0.002], the difference between the 50% fractional area latency and the late zero-crossing time point (T2FAL) [t = −2.25, p = 0.025], and the duration of the P300; the difference between the late and onset zero-crossing time points (T2T1) [t = −3.30, p = 0.001].”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“Patients with MCI showed a significantly larger AUC of the P300 duration [t = −2.13, p = 0.034] and an early onset zero-crossing time point (T1) [t = 2.38, p = 0.018] compared to the CN individuals, while exhibiting a higher difference between the onset zero-crossing time point and the 50% fractional area latency (FALT1) [t = −3.08, p = 0.002], the difference between the 50% fractional area latency and the late zero-crossing time point (T2FAL) [t = −2.25, p = 0.025], and the duration of the P300; the difference between the late and onset zero-crossing time points (T2T1) [t = −3.30, p = 0.001].”

A correction has also been made to Discussion, paragraph 2. This sentence previously stated:

“The ERP analysis indicated that patients with MCI displayed an elevated AUC and early T1, while demonstrating reduced P300 timings of FALT1, T2FAL, and T2T1, compared to CN individuals.”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“The ERP analysis indicated that patients with MCI displayed an elevated AUC and early T1, while demonstrating slower P300 timings of FALT1, T2FAL, and T2T1, compared to CN individuals.”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, event-related potential, electroencephalography, cognitive function, behavioral measure, screening tool

Citation: Eyamu J, Kim W-S, Kim K, Lee KH and Kim JU (2023) Corrigendum: Prefrontal event-related potential markers in association with mild cognitive impairment. Front. Aging Neurosci. 15:1333781. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1333781

Received: 06 November 2023; Accepted: 09 November 2023;
Published: 22 November 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Julie A. Onton, University of California, San Diego, United States

Copyright © 2023 Eyamu, Kim, Kim, Lee and Kim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jaeuk U. Kim, jaeukkim@kiom.re.kr

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.