Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci., 15 March 2023
Sec. Neurocognitive Aging and Behavior
This article is part of the Research Topic Vertigo/Vestibular Disorders and Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly View all 13 articles

Examination of brain area volumes based on voxel-based morphometry and multidomain cognitive impairment in asymptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis

Wei DuanWei Duan1Li LuLi Lu1Chun CuiChun Cui2Tongsheng ShuTongsheng Shu2Dazhi Duan
Dazhi Duan1*
  • 1Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital (Xinqiao Hospital), Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China
  • 2Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital (Xinqiao Hospital), Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, China

Objective: Recent evidence has demonstrated that unilateral carotid artery stenosis (CAS) can contribute to the development of cognitive impairment. However, the features of cognitive dysfunction induced by unilateral CAS remain unclear.

Methods: Sixty asymptomatic patients with unilateral CAS were divided into mild, moderate and severe stenosis groups. These patients and 20 healthy controls provided clinical data and serum, which was used to assess the levels of certain vascular risk factors. Then, they participated in a battery of neuropsychological tests. Additionally, all participants underwent a 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the brain. Chi-square tests and one-way ANOVA were used to determine significant differences in the risk factors and cognitive test scores between groups. Multiple logistic regression analysis and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify the independent risk factors for cognitive impairment in patients with CAS. Finally, fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) T1-weighted MRI images were processed by voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis using the Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) 8 software.

Results: Compared with healthy controls, the scores of the Mini-Mental State Examination, Digital Span Test backward, and Rapid Verbal Retrieve were significantly reduced in patients with left CAS. The scores in all cognitive scales were significantly lower in patients with right CAS than in controls. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the degree of carotid stenosis was an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment in asymptomatic patients with unilateral CAS. Furthermore, VBM analysis showed that, compared with those in healthy controls, gray matter and white matter volumes in specific brain areas were markedly decreased in patients with severe unilateral CAS. However, in patients with moderate right CAS, there was a significant decline in the volume of gray matter in the left parahippocampal gyrus and supplementary motor area. Additionally, the volume of white matter in the left insula was obviously lower in patients with moderate right CAS than in healthy controls.

Conclusion: Unilateral asymptomatic CAS, especially on the right side, contributed to cognitive impairment, including memory, language, attention, executive function and visuospatial function. In addition, based on VBM analysis, both gray matter atrophy and white matter lesions were found in patients with unilateral asymptomatic CAS.

Introduction

Cognitive impairment affects the patients’ well-being and their ability to live independent and productive lives (Chaytor and Schmitter-Edgecombe, 2003). It also places large demands on societal, hospital, and financial resources (Rockwood et al., 2002). Although, the prevalence of vascular cognitive impairment induced by ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke or transient ischemic attack increases gradually with age, increasing evidence suggests that cognitive impairment also occurs in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (CAS) (Xiang et al., 2013; Lal et al., 2017; Pillai, 2022). Atherosclerosis is a direct consequence of multiple vascular risk factors and can lead to increased intima-media thickness (IMT), plaque formation, and subsequent carotid artery stenosis or occlusion (Xiang et al., 2013). An increasing number of studies have demonstrated that CAS induced by atherosclerosis might be a potential risk factor for cognitive impairment in elderly people. Recent data has further indicated that patients with unilateral CAS might present with specific cognitive impairment relevant to the ipsilateral hemispheric functions (Huang et al., 2014). Moreover, high-grade stenosis of the unilateral carotid artery might contribute to multidomain cognitive impairment (Yue et al., 2016; He et al., 2021). However, there is limited knowledge on the characteristics and differences in cognitive impairment caused by unilateral CAS. Furthermore, the underlying mechanism of cognitive dysfunction induced by CAS remains unclear.

In the present study, we enrolled asymptomatic patients with three different levels of unilateral CAS as well as age-, sex-, and education level-matched healthy controls. A comprehensive battery of standardized neuropsychological tests was performed to analyze the cognitive impairment of the four groups. Additionally, we compared clinical vascular risk factors between the patients with unilateral CAS and healthy controls and determined independent risk factors for cognitive impairment. Finally, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images were acquired, and voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis (Takeuchi and Kawashima, 2017) using statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was performed to explore the abnormal gray and white matter volumes in asymptomatic patients with unilateral CAS.

Materials and methods

Subjects

Patients with different levels of unilateral carotid artery stenosis (n = 60) and healthy controls (n = 20) were recruited to participate in this study between June 2017 and January 2021 in the Department of Neurology in Xinqiao Hospital, Army Military Medical University. All patients underwent head and neck computed tomography angiography (CTA) to identify the degree of their carotid artery stenosis. The enrolled patients with carotid artery stenosis were divided into three groups by 2 neurologists and 1 radiologist: mild, moderate and severe. The degree of CAS was also classified according to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) standard into categories of no stenosis, mild stenosis (0–29%), moderate stenosis (30–69%), severe stenosis (70–89%), subtotal occlusion and occlusion. It should be noted that patients with previous stroke history or transient ischemic attack in either hemisphere or other diseases or medical events, such as intracranial tumors, central nervous system demyelinating diseases, severe brain trauma, history of neurological surgery, infection, or carbon monoxide poisoning, were excluded from the study. We also excluded patients with severe hearing and visual impairment, precluding a reliable assessment of cognitive function, or with severe psychotic disorders. Finally, patients with carotid revascularization on either side, contralateral arterial occlusion, known vertebral basilar or intracranial stenosis or occlusion, intracranial arteriovenous malformation, or documented dementia were excluded. Patients with carotid artery stenosis did not have ischemic or hemorrhagic lesions in the brain, and healthy controls had no stenosis in the bilateral carotid artery detected by head and neck CTA. This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of Xinqiao Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, China. Full written informed consent for participation was obtained from each subject.

During admission, all participants provided demographic data and medical history. Age, sex, education, high blood pressure (HBP) and diabetes mellitus (DM) history, current smoking (CS) and current alcohol use (CAU) were obtained from the patient-administered questionnaire. Total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and uric acid (UA) were also measured.

Neuropsychological evaluation

The battery of neuropsychological tests assessing a range of cognitive domains comprised the Chinese version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trail-Making Test (TMT), Digital Span Test (DST), Rapid Verbal Retrieve (RVR), and Clock Drawing Test (CDT). All participants were administered the full cognitive battery. Testing was conducted in a quiet room and administered by a master’s-level neuropsychology technician blinded to study participant status (stenosis vs. control) under the supervision of a senior neuropsychologist. The order of administration was consistent across participants. The total testing time varied modestly among participants, ranging from 70 to 90 min, because of interindividual variability in completion time for tests without specific time limits. The tests were scored by a single neuropsychologist. Because mood could also influence results, the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) was administered concurrently.

Overall cognitive functions were detected in the MMSE. The MMSE was developed from different neuropsychological batteries and includes five sections worth a total of 30 points: orientation (10 points); registration (3 points); attention and calculation (5 points); recall (3 points); and language (9 points). A score of less than 24 points indicated cognition impairment. The TMT score reflected the information processing speed of the participants. In the TMT, patients were required to quickly draw lines to connect consecutively numbered circles in ascending order. The maximum test duration was set at 300 s, and the number of errors, as well as the time taken to complete the test (measured in seconds), were recorded. Any patient who stopped midway was asked to continue the test for the remainder of the test duration. If not completed within the time limit, an error was recorded. The DST score reflected the concentration, instantaneous memory, and resistance to information interference of the participants. These included forward and backward count tests, where an evaluator read a series of numbers aloud to the patients. Patients were then required to repeat these numbers in the same order that they heard or in the reverse order. One point was awarded for each test passed, and zero points were awarded for a failed test. The highest scores in the forward count test and backward count test were 16 and 14 points, respectively. Therefore, the highest total score was 30 points. The RVR score reflected the language and executive function of the participants. During the RVR, the patients were required to say as many animal names (such as cattle, horses, and sheep) as possible within 1 min and were scored based on the number of correct animal names. The patients were then asked to complete two more sections, listing the names of fruits and vegetables within 1 min each. The sum of the three scores was the total score of this test. The executive and visuospatial functions were examined in the CDT. The CDT required the patients to draw a clock dial on white paper independently, place the 12 numbers in the correct positions, and mark the position of the specified time with a watch needle. The most common and simple scoring method of CDT was the quartering method: (1) draw a closed circle, 1 point; (2) put the numbers in the correct positions, 1 point; (3) the dial includes all 12 correct figures, 1 point; and (4) place the pointer in the correct position.

Magnetic resonance imaging protocols

MRI scanning of the brain was performed using a 3.0 Tesla scanner (General Electric, Milwaukee, WI, United States) with a 12-channel head coil. Fast spin-echo (FSE) T2-weighted images and FLAIR T1-weighted images were acquired with TE/TR = 112.2/3160 ms and TE/IT/TR = 27.072/860/1696.68 ms. All MRI images were acquired with a voxel size of 0.4688 × 0.4688 × 5 mm (Lal et al., 2017), 20 sagittal slices and an in-plane resolution of 512 × 512.

Data analysis

All statistical analyses of demographic and clinical variables were performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL, United States), and a value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Continuous variables are presented as their means ± standard deviations. Categorical variables are presented as percentages. Chi-square tests and one-way ANOVA were used to determine significant differences in the frequencies of categories and differences in continuous variables between the groups, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the correlation between vascular risk factors and declined cognitive functions. Multiple logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify the independent risk factors for cognitive impairment in patients with carotid artery stenosis, with the degree of stenosis as a categorical variable.

The MRI data were processed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) 8 software (Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom) with VBM implemented in the VBM 8 toolbox1 with default parameters (Duan et al., 2016). Images were bias-corrected, tissue classified, and registered using linear (12-parameter affine) and nonlinear transformations (warping) within a unified model. Subsequently, VBM analysis was performed on the normalized gray matter and white matter segments, which were multiplied by the nonlinear components derived from the normalization matrix to preserve actual gray matter and white matter values locally (modulated GM and WM volumes). Importantly, the segments were not multiplied by the linear components of the registration to account for individual differences in brain orientation, alignment, and size globally. Finally, the images were smoothed with a Gaussian kernel of 8 mm full width at half maximum (FWHM). Voxelwise differences in gray matter and white matter between each group were examined using independent-sample t-tests. To avoid possible edge effects between different tissue types, we excluded all voxels with gray matter and white matter values of less than 0.09 (absolute threshold masking). We also applied a threshold of p < 0.05 with 10-voxel clustering criteria.

Results

Clinical characteristics and cognitive assessments

Table 1 shows a comparison of clinical data between the patients with left carotid artery stenosis and healthy controls. There was a significant difference in smoking status, alcohol consumption and high blood pressure among the groups with different levels of carotid artery stenosis and the healthy control group (p < 0.05). Additionally, marked differences in the levels of TC and HCY are also shown in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, there were significant differences in the MMSE, DST (backward) and RVR scores of patients and healthy controls (p<0.05). Obvious differences were not present in the scores of the HAMD, TMT, DST (forward) and CDT. These data indicated that instantaneous memory and language function significantly declined in asymptomatic patients with left CAS.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Differences of clinical risk factors and neuropsychological examinations of patients with left carotid artery stenosis.

The clinical characteristics of the asymptomatic patients with right carotid artery stenosis and healthy controls are shown in Table 2. There was no significant difference in age, sex and education nor in vascular risk factors examined in the study. However, Table 2 demonstrates that the scores of all the cognitive tests, including MMSE, TMT, DST, and CDT (p < 0.05), in patients with right CAS showed statistically significant differences when compared with healthy controls. These results revealed that many more special cognitive domains were impaired in asymptomatic patients with right CAS, including memory, language, attention, executive function and visuospatial function, than in those with left CAS.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Differences of clinical risk factors and neuropsychological examinations of patients with right carotid artery stenosis.

Pearson correlation analysis between vascular risk factors and impaired cognitive function

The correlative analysis between vascular risk factors and decreased cognitive function in asymptomatic patients with left CAS evaluated by the Pearson correlation coefficient is presented in Table 3. For these patients, there was a negative correlation between the degree of carotid stenosis and MMSE (r = −0.591, p = 0.000), DST (backward) (r = −0.544, p = 0.000), and RVR (r = −0.627, p = 0.000). In addition, there was a negative correlation between patient age and the MMSE (r = −0.240, p = 0.003) and RVR (r = −0.293, p = 0.008) scores. The MMSE scores were positively correlated with HDL-C (r = 0.244, p = 0.030) and negatively correlated with HAMD (r = −0.316, p = 0.004). The DST (backward) scores were negatively correlated with both TG (r = −0.248, p = 0.027) and HAMD (r = −0.496, p = 0.000). RVR scores were positively correlated with TC (r = 0.229, p = 0.041) and HDL-C (r = 0.300, p = 0.007) and negatively correlated with HCY (r = −0.301, p = 0.009).

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Pearson correlation analysis between vascular risk factors and impaired cognitive function in asymptomatic patients with left carotid artery stenosis.

Similarly, Table 4 shows the correlative analysis between vascular risk factors and decreased cognitive function in asymptomatic patients with right CAS evaluated by the Pearson correlation coefficient. As shown in Table 4, there was a negative correlation between patient age and all the cognitive scales. There was a negative correlation between the degree of carotid stenosis and MMSE (r = −0.675, p = 0.000), TMT (r = −0.520, p = 0.000), DST (forward) (r = −0.657, p = 0.000), DST (backward) (r = −0.641, p = 0.000), RVR (r = −0.730, p = 0.000) and CDT (r = −0.377, p = 0.001) for patients with right CAS. At the same time, there was a positive correlation with TC (r = 0.228, p = 0.042) and HDL-C (r = 0.224, p = 0.047) in the MMSE results.

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Pearson correlation analysis between vascular risk factors and impaired cognitive function in asymptomatic patients with right carotid artery stenosis.

Multiple logistic regression analysis for risk factors of cognitive impairment

Multiple logistic regression analyses of age, sex, degree of stenosis, CS, CAU, TC, TG, HDL-C, LDL-C, and HCY were performed to identify risk factors for cognitive impairment (Tables 5, 6). In patients with left CAS, the degree of stenosis was a risk factor for low MMSE (OR = 0.275, 95% CI 0.143−0.531), DST (backward) (OR = 0.355, 95% CI 0.204−0.618) and RVR (OR = 0.147, 95% CI 0.058−0.376) scores. Patient age was a risk factor for low MMSE (OR = 0.910, 95% CI 0.841−0.984) and RVR (OR = 0.881, 95% CI 0.792−0.979) scores (Table 5). Moreover, the degree of stenosis (OR = 0.147, 95% CI 0.058−0.376) was a risk factor for low DST (backward) scores in patients with left CAS (Table 5). As shown in Table 6, patient age was a risk factor for all cognitive scales except MMSE. The degree of stenosis was a risk factor for low TMT (OR = 0.247, 95% CI 0.128–0.475), DST (forward) (OR = 0.153, 95% CI 0.068–0.345), DST (backward) (OR = 0.122, 95% CI 0.049–0.306), RVR (OR = 0.068, 95% CI 0.020–0.228) and CDT (OR = 0.501, 95% CI 0.283–0.886) scores in patients with right CAS. Additionally, the degree of stenosis was also a risk factor for MMSE (OR = 0.249, 95% CI 0.127–0.490) in patients with right CAS (Table 6).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Multiple logistic regression analysis for risk factors of cognitive impairment in patients with left carotid artery stenosis.

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Multiple logistic regression analysis for risk factors of cognitive impairment in patients with right carotid artery stenosis.

Receiver operating characteristic curve for independent risk factors of cognitive impairment

Table 7 presents the independent risk factors for cognitive impairment in asymptomatic patients with unilateral CAS that were evaluated by ROC curve analysis. In the patients with left CAS, degree of stenosis was an independent risk factor for low MMSE (AUC = 0.194, p = 0.000), DST (backward) (AUC = 0.056, p = 0.000) and RVR (AUC = 0.129, p = 0.000) scores. Patient age was an independent risk factor for low MMSE scores (AUC = 0.355, p = 0.025). In the patients with right CAS, degree of stenosis was an independent risk factor for low MMSE (AUC = 0.172, p = 0.000), TMT (AUC = 0.190, p = 0.000), DST (forward) (AUC = 0.129, p = 0.000), DST (backward) (AUC = 0.134, p = 0.000), RVR (AUC = 0.112, p = 0.039) and CDT (AUC = 0.321, p = 0.021) scores. Patient age was an independent risk factor for all cognitive scale scores except the MMSE score (Table 7). Thus, these data revealed that the degree of stenosis was an independent risk factor for impaired cognition in asymptomatic patients with CAS.

TABLE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Table 7. The receiver operating characteristic curve performed for independent risk factors of cognitive impairment in patients with carotid artery stenosis.

Voxel-based morphometry analysis of brain area volumes

Figure 1 showed the VBM results for gray matter atrophy and white matter lesions in asymptomatic patients with right severe carotid artery stenosis compared with those in healthy controls. The red or yellow spots in Figure 1 indicated the brain regions with abnormal volumes in patients with right severe carotid artery stenosis. The gray and white matter volumes based on VBM analysis were compared between the patients with unilateral CAS and healthy controls by independent-sample t-tests. Table 8 shows that the gray matter volumes of three areas, left parietal lobe precuneus (T = 2.08, p < 0.05), right anterior cingulate (T = 2.82, p < 0.05), and right cingulate gyrus (T = 4.78, p < 0.05), obviously declined in the patients with left severe CAS when compared with healthy controls. Significantly decreased gray matter volumes were detected not only in the right parahippocampal gyrus (T = 1.93, p < 0.05) but also in the left supplementary motor area (T = 3.32, p < 0.05) in patients with right moderate CAS compared with healthy controls. Finally, there was a significant decrease in gray matter volume in the right occipital lobe precuneus (T = 2.06, p < 0.05) and right occipital lobe cuneus (T = 2.98, p < 0.05) in patients with right severe CAS compared with healthy controls. As shown in Table 9, significantly decreased white matter volume was detected in the left subgyral region in the patients with left severe CAS compared with healthy controls (T = 3.85, p < 0.05). There was a significant decline in left insula white matter volume in the patients with right moderate CAS compared with healthy controls (T = 3.63, p < 0.05). Additionally, white matter volume in the right subgyral region in the patients with right severe CAS was significantly decreased compared with that in the healthy controls (T = 5.47, p < 0.05).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) results of gray matter atrophy and white matter lesions in asymptomatic patients with right severe carotid artery stenosis compared with healthy controls. (A,D) Statistical parametric mapping (SPM) results in various brain regions. (B) Significantly decreased white matter volume was found in the right subgyral region (p < 0.05). (E) Gray matter atrophy was found in the right occipital lobe precuneus and right occipital lobe cuneus (p < 0.05). (C,F) Three-dimensional images of the asymptomatic patient with right severe carotid artery stenosis.

TABLE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Table 8. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis of the declined gray matter volume in patients with carotid artery stenosis compared with healthy controls.

TABLE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Table 9. Voxel-based morphometry analysis of the declined white matter volume in patients with carotid artery stenosis compared with healthy controls.

Discussion

Carotid artery atherosclerotic stenosis increases the risk of ischemic stroke, and the estimated rate of ipsilateral carotid-related acute ischemic stroke is 4.7% over 5 years (Balestrini et al., 2013; Chang et al., 2022). Increasing evidence has demonstrated that cognitive impairment is also associated with asymptomatic bilateral and unilateral CAS (Cheng et al., 2012; Xiang et al., 2013; Zavoreo et al., 2013; Buratti et al., 2014). Consistent with previous studies, our results revealed that unilateral CAS can contribute to cognitive decline. More importantly, many more cognitive domains were impaired in the patients with right CAS than in those with left CAS. Cognitive impairments found in asymptomatic patients with right CAS included those in the memory, language, attention, executive and visuospatial functions. These cognitive functions are also impaired as a result of vascular cognitive impairment (Bogolepova, 2022; Boomsma et al., 2022). Thus, our results indicated that CAS, especially right CAS, might play an important role in the development of vascular cognitive impairment. Additionally, multiple logistic regression analysis and the ROC curve analysis were used to confirm whether CAS is an important contributor to cognitive decline. The results of statistical analysis revealed that the degree of carotid stenosis was an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment. Our results suggest that, for the asymptomatic patients with CAS, revascularization could not only relieve stenosis of the carotid artery, but also, to a certain extent, improve the cognitive impairment. This finding was in line with those of several recent studies (Gupta et al., 2020; Turowicz et al., 2021).

The underlying mechanism of the cognitive impairment induced by unilateral CAS remains unclear. Previous studies have speculated on the involvement of cerebral hypoperfusion caused by hemodynamic disorders (Kaczmarz et al., 2021) and the uncoupling of cerebral hemodynamic and metabolic states (Gottler et al., 2019). Recently, thinning of the cortex was considered a potential biomarker, as it was previously shown to be associated with cognitive impairment in aging, neurodegenerative disease, and small vascular disease (Pettigrew et al., 2016; Weston et al., 2016). Increasing evidence has shown that gray matter atrophy is correlated with cognitive decline measured in asymptomatic patients with CAS (Benli et al., 2021; Gao et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2021). In contrast, a significant reduction in cortical thickness was not found in brain regions ipsilateral to the carotid stenosis (Nickel et al., 2019). Whether gray matter atrophy plays an important role in cognitive decline in patients with CAS is currently still under debate. In the present study, the T1-weighted MRI images of the recruited patients were acquired and processed by VBM analysis using the VBM 8 toolbox for SPM 8 software in MATLAB 2012a. In line with a previous study (Wang et al., 2021), loss of gray matter volume in patients was not only limited to the hemisphere ipsilateral to the stenosis but also observed in the contralateral hemisphere. We found that compared with healthy controls, gray matter volumes in patients with left severe CAS were significantly lower, and gray matter atrophy was widely distributed in the left precuneus, right anterior cingulate, and right cingulate gyrus. Furthermore, the gray matter volumes in patients with both moderate and severe right CAS were significantly decreased compared with those in healthy controls, and gray matter atrophy was detected in the left parahippocampal gyrus, right precuneus and right cuneus. Our findings indicated that gray matter atrophy was particularly vulnerable to stenosis of the right carotid artery.

In addition, we analyzed and compared the white matter volume between patients with CAS and healthy controls. Our results showed that white matter volume significantly decreased in asymptomatic patients with CAS compared with healthy controls. Consistent with the results of gray matter volume analysis, markedly decreased white matter volume was found in patients not only with left CAS but also with right CAS. Moreover, white matter volume in the left insula and right subgyral regions was significantly reduced in patients with moderate and severe right CAS compared with healthy controls. Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion due to carotid stenosis or occlusion has been shown to cause white matter injuries in animal experiments (Washida et al., 2019). Recently, increasing evidence shows that white matter hyperintensities are also present in patients with CAS (Ye et al., 2018; Benli et al., 2021; Gao et al., 2021). Cerebral hypoperfusion might be an important contributor to white matter hyperintensities induced by carotid stenosis, and the completeness of collateral circulation could protect these patients against white matter hyperintensities (Ye et al., 2019). It has also been reported that the development of cognitive dysfunction might be associated with the destructive effect of white matter hyperintensities on brain functional connectivity in patients with CAS (Porcu et al., 2020a,b).

Finally, our findings also revealed that there was a positive correlation between the level of TC and the scores of the MMSE and RVR tests. High levels of serum cholesterol could alleviate the cognitive dysfunction, especially language and executive function. Previous studies have shown that a high level of serum cholesterol is positively correlated with an increased risk of dementia (Loera-Valencia et al., 2019), and some studies have reported a decreased prevalence of Alzheimer’s dementia in patients taking cholesterol-lowering drugs (Barone et al., 2014). In contrast, a meta-analysis showed that there was no clear consistent relationship between cholesterol and cognitive decline (Peters et al., 2021). Furthermore, some studies have demonstrated that a higher concentration of TC might be a protective factor for cognitive performance (Lv et al., 2016; Pang et al., 2022). Therefore, further experiments are needed to identify the correlation between serum TC and cognitive impairment.

Limitation

Our study had a relatively small sample size and was a cross-sectional experiment based in a hospital. A specifically designed, randomized, controlled prospective population-based study is warranted in the future. Additionally, although we found abnormal brain regions in patients with CAS based on VBM analysis, we did not confirm the correlation between abnormal brain areas and impaired cognitive function. Finally, we did not explore the formation mechanism of abnormal brain areas caused by unilateral CAS.

Conclusion

The current study provided insights into the association between cognitive impairment and carotid artery stenosis. Unilateral asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis, especially of the right carotid artery, was significantly related to cognitive impairment, including memory, language, attention, executive function and visuospatial function. More importantly, both gray matter and white matter volumes detected by VBM analysis significantly declined in patients with unilateral asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The degree of carotid stenosis was an independent risk factor for cognitive impairment. Revascularization might prevent cognitive dysfunction in patients. In addition, there was a positive correlation with TC and special cognitive domains. The lower the cholesterol level is, the more severe the cognitive impairment.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

DD: conception and design, final approval of the version to be published. WD: participation in the whole work, drafting of the manuscript, and data analysis. CC and TS: MRI data acquisition and assessment. LL: demographic and cardiovascular risk factor data collection. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was supported by the Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873757) and Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing (cstc2021jcyj-msxmX0494) and Special Project for Scientific and Technological Innovation of Social Undertakings and Livelihood Security in Chongqing (cstc2017shmsA130004).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Footnotes

References

Balestrini, S., Lupidi, F., Balucani, C., Altamura, C., Vernieri, F., Provinciali, L., et al. (2013). One-year progression of moderate asymptomatic carotid stenosis predicts the risk of vascular events. Stroke 44, 792–794. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.671461

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barone, E., Di Domenico, F., and Butterfield, D. A. (2014). Statins more than cholesterol lowering agents in Alzheimer disease: their pleiotropic functions as potential therapeutic targets. Biochem. Pharmacol. 88, 605–616. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.10.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Benli, M. D., Guven, B., Guven, H., and Conkbayir, I. (2021). Silent brain infarcts and white matter lesions in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Acta Neurol. Belg. 121, 983–991. doi: 10.1007/s13760-020-01517-w

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bogolepova, A. N. (2022). Vascular cognitive impairment. Zh. Nevrol. Psikhiatr. Im. S S Korsakova 122, 17–23. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202212210117

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boomsma, J. M., Exalto, L. G., Barkhof, F., Leeuwis, A. E., Prins, N. D., Scheltens, P., et al. (2022). Vascular cognitive impairment and cognitive decline; a longitudinal study comparing different types of vascular brain injury - the TRACE-VCI study. Cereb. Circ. Cogn. Behav. 3:100141. doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2022.100141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buratti, L., Balucani, C., Viticchi, G., Falsetti, L., Altamura, C., Avitabile, E., et al. (2014). Cognitive deterioration in bilateral asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis. Stroke 45, 2072–2077. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.005645

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, R. W., Tucker, L. Y., Rothenberg, K. A., Lancaster, E., Faruqi, R. M., Kuang, H. C., et al. (2022). Incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis without surgical intervention. JAMA 327, 1974–1982. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.4835

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaytor, N., and Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2003). The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychol. Rev. 13, 181–197. doi: 10.1023/b:nerv.0000009483.91468.fb

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cheng, H. L., Lin, C. J., Soong, B. W., Wang, P. N., Chang, F. C., Wu, Y. T., et al. (2012). Impairments in cognitive function and brain connectivity in severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 43, 2567–2573. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.645614

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duan, D., Li, C., Shen, L., Cui, C., Shu, T., and Zheng, J. (2016). Regional Gray matter atrophy coexistent with occipital periventricular white matter hyper intensities. Front. Aging Neurosci. 8:214. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00214

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gao, L., Ruan, Z., Xiao, Y., and Xu, H. (2021). Surface-based cortical morphometry, white matter hyperintensity, and multidomain cognitive performance in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Neuroscience 467, 16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2021.05.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gottler, J., Kaczmarz, S., Kallmayer, M., Wustrow, I., Eckstein, H. H., Zimmer, C., et al. (2019). Flow-metabolism uncoupling in patients with asymptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis assessed by multi-modal magnetic resonance imaging. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 39, 2132–2143. doi: 10.1177/0271678X18783369

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, A. N., Bhatti, A. A., Shah, M. M., Mahajan, N. P., Sadana, D. K., and Huded, V. (2020). Carotid artery stenting and its impact on cognitive function: a prospective observational study. Neurointervention. 15, 74–78. doi: 10.5469/neuroint.2020.00038

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

He, S., Duan, R., Liu, Z., Zhang, C., Li, T., Wei, Y., et al. (2021). Altered functional connectivity is related to impaired cognition in left unilateral asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis patients. BMC Neurol. 21:350. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02385-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Huang, K. L., Chang, T. Y., Chang, C. H., Liu, H. L., Chang, Y. J., Liu, C. H., et al. (2014). Relationships between ophthalmic artery flow direction and cognitive performance in patients with unilateral carotid artery stenosis. J. Neurol. Sci. 336, 184–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.10.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaczmarz, S., Gottler, J., Petr, J., Hansen, M. B., Mouridsen, K., Zimmer, C., et al. (2021). Hemodynamic impairments within individual watershed areas in asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis by multimodal MRI. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 41, 380–396. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20912364

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lal, B. K., Dux, M. C., Sikdar, S., Goldstein, C., Khan, A. A., Yokemick, J., et al. (2017). Asymptomatic carotid stenosis is associated with cognitive impairment. J. Vasc. Surg. 66, 1083–1092. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.038

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Loera-Valencia, R., Goikolea, J., Parrado-Fernandez, C., Merino-Serrais, P., and Maioli, S. (2019). Alterations in cholesterol metabolism as a risk factor for developing Alzheimer's disease: potential novel targets for treatment. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 190, 104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.03.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lv, Y. B., Yin, Z. X., Chei, C. L., Brasher, M. S., Zhang, J., Kraus, V. B., et al. (2016). Serum cholesterol levels within the high Normal range are associated with better cognitive performance among Chinese elderly. J. Nutr. Health Aging 20, 280–287. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0701-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nickel, A., Kessner, S., Niebuhr, A., Schroder, J., Malherbe, C., Fischer, F., et al. (2019). Cortical thickness and cognitive performance in asymptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 19:154. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1127-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pang, K., Liu, C., Tong, J., Ouyang, W., Hu, S., and Tang, Y. (2022). Higher Total cholesterol concentration may be associated with better cognitive performance among elderly females. Nutrients 14:14. doi: 10.3390/nu14194198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peters, R., Xu, Y., Antikainen, R., Beckett, N., Gussekloo, J., Jagger, C., et al. (2021). Evaluation of high cholesterol and risk of dementia and cognitive decline in older adults using individual patient meta-analysis. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 50, 318–325. doi: 10.1159/000519452

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pettigrew, C., Soldan, A., Zhu, Y., Wang, M. C., Moghekar, A., Brown, T., et al. (2016). Cortical thickness in relation to clinical symptom onset in preclinical AD. Neuroimage Clin. 12, 116–122. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.06.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pillai, L. (2022). Asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis stenosis, inflammation, and cognitive impairment. J. Vasc. Surg. 75:1651. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.078

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Porcu, M., Garofalo, P., Craboledda, D., Suri, J. S., Suri, H. S., Montisci, R., et al. (2020a). Carotid artery stenosis and brain connectivity: the role of white matter hyperintensities. Neuroradiology 62, 377–387. doi: 10.1007/s00234-019-02327-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Porcu, M., Sanfilippo, R., Montisci, R., Balestrieri, A., Suri, J. S., Wintermark, M., et al. (2020b). White-matter hyperintensities in patients with carotid artery stenosis: an exploratory connectometry study. Neuroradiol. J. 33, 486–493. doi: 10.1177/1971400920959323

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rockwood, K., Brown, M., Merry, H., Sketris, I., and Fisk, J. (2002). Vascular cognitive impairment investigators of the Canadian study of H, aging. Societal costs of vascular cognitive impairment in older adults. Stroke 33, 1605–1609. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000017878.85274.44

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Takeuchi, H., and Kawashima, R. (2017). Voxel-based morphometry and cognitive function. Brain Nerve 69, 547–556. doi: 10.11477/mf.1416200781

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turowicz, A., Czapiga, A., Malinowski, M., Majcherek, J., Litarski, A., and Janczak, D. (2021). Carotid revascularization improves cognition in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis and cognitive decline. Greater improvement in younger patients with more disordered neuropsychological performance. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 30:105608. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105608

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, P., Cai, H., Luo, R., Zhang, Z., Zhang, D., and Zhang, Y. (2021). Measurement of cortical atrophy and its correlation to memory impairment in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis based on VBM-DARTEL. Front. Aging Neurosci. 13:620763. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.620763

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Washida, K., Hattori, Y., and Ihara, M. (2019). Animal models of chronic cerebral hypoperfusion: from mouse to primate. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20:20. doi: 10.3390/ijms20246176

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weston, P. S., Nicholas, J. M., Lehmann, M., Ryan, N. S., Liang, Y., Macpherson, K., et al. (2016). Presymptomatic cortical thinning in familial Alzheimer disease: a longitudinal MRI study. Neurology 87, 2050–2057. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003322

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiang, J., Zhang, T., Yang, Q. W., Liu, J., Chen, Y., Cui, M., et al. (2013). Carotid artery atherosclerosis is correlated with cognitive impairment in an elderly urban Chinese non-stroke population. J. Clin. Neurosci. 20, 1571–1575. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2013.02.026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ye, H., Wang, Y., Qiu, J., Wu, Q., Xu, M., and Wang, J. (2018). White matter hyperintensities and their subtypes in patients with carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 8:e020830. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020830

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ye, H., Wu, X., Yan, J., Wang, J., Qiu, J., and Wang, Y. (2019). Completeness of circle of Willis and white matter hyperintensities in patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis. Neurol. Sci. 40, 509–514. doi: 10.1007/s10072-018-3683-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yue, W., Wang, A., Zhu, R., Yan, Z., Zheng, S., Wang, J., et al. (2016). Association between carotid artery stenosis and cognitive impairment in stroke patients: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One 11:e0146890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146890

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zavoreo, I., Basic Kes, V., Lisak, M., Marsic, N., Ciliga, D., and Trost, B. T. (2013). Cognitive decline and cerebral vasoreactivity in asymptomatic patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis. Acta Neurol. Belg. 113, 453–458. doi: 10.1007/s13760-013-0196-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: carotid artery stenosis, cognitive impairment, gray matter, white matter, voxel-based morphometry analysis

Citation: Duan W, Lu L, Cui C, Shu T and Duan D (2023) Examination of brain area volumes based on voxel-based morphometry and multidomain cognitive impairment in asymptomatic unilateral carotid artery stenosis. Front. Aging Neurosci. 15:1128380. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1128380

Received: 20 December 2022; Accepted: 21 February 2023;
Published: 15 March 2023.

Edited by:

Lisheng Yu, Peking University People's Hospital, China

Reviewed by:

Yuka Kotozaki, Iwate Medical University, Japan
Babak Baban, Augusta University, United States

Copyright © 2023 Duan, Lu, Cui, Shu and Duan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Dazhi Duan, ddz92@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.