Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Aging Neurosci., 16 May 2022
Sec. Neurocognitive Aging and Behavior
This article is part of the Research Topic Glaucoma and Brain: Impact of Neurodegeneration on Visual Abilities and Related Biomarkers. View all 6 articles

Editorial: Glaucoma and Brain: Impact of Neurodegeneration on Visual Abilities and Related Biomarkers

  • 1Eye Clinic, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
  • 2San Matteo Hospital Foundation (IRCCS), Pavia, Italy
  • 3City of Udine Polyclinic, Udine, Italy

Glaucoma is a chronic disease characterized by the death of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and their axons, which leads to a progressive visual field loss. It is one of the major causes of poor vision worldwide in the elderly; therefore it constitutes a social health emergency whose impact is destined to increase over time: its prevalence is estimated to grow up to 112 million people in 2040 (Quigley and Broman, 2006; Tham et al., 2014; Bourne et al., 2018).

In recent years, there is increased evidence that primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a neurodegenerative disease and similar pathogenetic aspects have been found in other neurodegenerative disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, and Parkinson's disease. In particular, RCGs present apoptosis, a cell death mechanism, that occurs in the Alzheimer's disease. Studies showed that the β-Amyloid deposits and intraneuronal accumulations of hyperphosphorylated tau protein (pTau), specific of Alzheimer's disease, are also involved in the pathogenesis of glaucoma (Wostyn et al., 2010).

Researches carried out in glaucomatous patients highlighted functional and structural changes in the brain. The neurodegenerative process is not limited to the visual pathways but also extends into areas that are not related to the visual system (Gupta and Yücel, 2003, 2007; Gupta et al., 2006; Chang and Goldberg, 2012; Nuzzi et al., 2018). These alterations are correlated with clinical characteristics and severity of the glaucomatous disease. More recent studies proved that glaucoma neurodegeneration is also related to neuroinflammation processes that involve both eye and brain (Rolle et al., 2020).

In clinical practice visual impairment related to glaucomatous disease is quantified with the visual field analysis. As known, this test has several limitations and, above all, it is not able to detect damage at an early stage. Undoubtedly, it would be very interesting to identify other visual abilities that may be altered in glaucomatous patients, closely related to daily life, which may possibly appear in the early stages of the disease.

The purpose of this Research Topic was to publish new researches concerning brain involvement in glaucoma, impairment of other visual abilities and identification of biomarkers for early diagnosis.

Parisi et al. evaluated retinal ganglion cell (RCG) function and the neural conduction along the post-retinal large and small axons and its correlation with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in open-angle glaucoma patients. In these patients there is a dysfunction involving both post-retinal large and small axons. This abnormal post-retinal neural conduction was not correlated to the reduced RNFL thickness. These results supported the thesis that OAG is a neurodegenerative process, in which involvement is not limited only to neurons located at the retinal level (RGCs) but there is also an impairment of all visual pathway structures responsible for transferring visual information from the eye to the brain.

Demaria et al. studied the relationship between functional connectivity and visual field (VF) loss in primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients compared to healthy controls, evaluated with two resting-state (RS) (f)MRI scans. The authors found no consistent alterations in the global or local functional networks of glaucoma patients, i.e., global brain network communication in glaucoma is preserved. They identified brain areas as being hubs. Among these, the right LIG (Lingual Gyrus) relates consistently with the sensitivity of the binocular integrated VF (BIVF) of participants. The LIG is known for its role in visuospatial processing and topographical recognition, and lesions in this area affect the ability of patients to orient themselves. Frequently, glaucoma patients report difficulties in orientating and moving but this study does not verify cause or consequence of the compromised visual input so future work is needed.

The study of Zhang et al. analyzed retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) alterations in different stages of another neurodegenerative disease, the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), and their association with ALS progression parameters. POAG and ALS have several common pathogenic mechanisms, including mitochondrial alterations, axonal transport impairment and high levels of oxidative stress. Moreover, astrogliosis was detected in the subcortical white matter of occipital cortex in ALS and recent studies on ALS supported the involvement of other non-motor systems, including the visual pathways. The RNFL thickness decreases with the disease progression and precedes the RGCs thinning. The significant RNFL thinning in the early stage is related to a faster progression rate and the inverse U-shaped curve transformation might be in agreement with early-stage motor neuron axonopathy.

Qiu et al. evaluated the level of sex hormones in female patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) to determine whether they are associated with the onset and/or progression of POAG. A decreased E2 level was a risk factor for POAG and is associated with VF progression in women with POAG, especially in premenopausal subjects. Additionally, other sex hormones (PROG, LH, FSH, and TESTO) might also play a role in POAG pathogenesis.

Lastly, Arrigo et al. wrote a review about the elements in common between neurocognitive dysfunctions in glaucoma and in neurodegenerative diseases that lead to a cognitive impairment. In this regard, we would like to cite a recent study by Rolle et al. (2019) in which we tested the reading performance, using Radner reading charts, in glaucomatous patients. Indeed our own work fits with the conclusion of Arrigo et al., in particular we found that glaucomatous patients read Radner charts more slowly and inaccurately than controls, and had reading performance that correlated significantly with visual field defects.

In conclusion, the articles published in this Research Topic provide information about the pathogenesis of POAG and the close relationship between glaucoma and brain. They bring further evidences that glaucoma is a neurodegenerative disease that involves cognitive aspects and interferes with patients' quality of life. These studies may provide inputs in new diagnostic strategies, in neuroprotective challenges and also in future therapies, such as brain stimulation (Sabel et al., 2020). Further studies should be focused on the evaluation of the impairment of different visual abilities at earlier stages in order to provide biomarkers of the neurodegeneration, to verify the efficacy of neuroprotective treatments and to identify possible strategies to improve visual abilities, i.e., rehabilitation for these patients.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Bourne, R. R. A., Jonas, J. B., Bron, A. M., Cicinelli, M. V., Das, A., Flaxman, S. R., et al. (2018). Prevalence and causes of vision loss in high-income countries and in Eastern and Central Europe in 2015: magnitude, temporal trends and projections. Br. J. Ophthalmol 102, 575–585. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-311258

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chang, E. E., and Goldberg, J. L. (2012). Glaucoma 2.0: neuroprotection, neuroregeneration, neuroenhancement. Ophthalmology 119, 979–986. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, N., Ang, L. C. C., and de Noel, T. (2006). Human glaucoma and neural degeneration in intracranial optic nerve, lateral geniculate nucleus, and visual cortex. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90, 674–678. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.086769

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, N., and Yücel, Y. H. (2003). Brain changes in glaucoma. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 3, S32–S35. doi: 10.1177/112067210301303S06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gupta, N., and Yücel, Y. H. (2007). Glaucoma as a neurodegenerative disease. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 18, 110–114. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e3280895aea

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nuzzi, R., Dallorto, L., and Rolle, T. (2018). Changes of visual pathway and brain connectivity in glaucoma: a systematic review. Front. Neurosci. 12, 1–21. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00363

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quigley, H. A., and Broman, A. T. (2006). The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90, 262–267. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.081224

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rolle, T., Dallorto, L., Cafasso, R., Mazzocca, R., Curto, D., and Nuzzi, R. (2019). Reading ability in primary open-angle glaucoma: evaluation with radner reading charts. Optomet. Vis. Sci. 96, 55–61. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rolle, T., Ponzetto, A., and Malinverni, L. (2020). The role of neuroinflammaton in glaucoma: an update on molecular mechanisms and new therapeutic options. Front. Neurol. 11, 612422. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.612422

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sabel, B. A., Thut, G., Haueisen, J., Henrich-Noack, P., Herrmann, C. S., and Hunold, A. (2020). Vision modulation, plasticity and restoration using non- invasive brain stimulation: an IFCN-sponsored review. Clin. Neurophysiol. 131, 887–911. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.01.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tham, Y. C., Li, X., Wong, T. Y., Quigley, H. A., Aung, T., and Cheng, C. Y. (2014). Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 121, 2081–2090. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wostyn, P., Audenaert, K., and De Deyn, P. P. (2010). Alzheimer's disease: cerebral glaucoma? Med. Hypotheses 74, 973–977. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2009.12.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: glaucoma, brain, biomarker, neurodegeneration, visual abilities

Citation: Rolle T, Rossi GCM and Brusini P (2022) Editorial: Glaucoma and Brain: Impact of Neurodegeneration on Visual Abilities and Related Biomarkers. Front. Aging Neurosci. 14:919775. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.919775

Received: 13 April 2022; Accepted: 28 April 2022;
Published: 16 May 2022.

Edited and reviewed by: Kristy A. Nielson, Marquette University, United States

Copyright © 2022 Rolle, Rossi and Brusini. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Teresa Rolle, dGVyZXNhLnJvbGxlJiN4MDAwNDA7dW5pdG8uaXQ=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.