ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Adolesc. Med.
Sec. Obesity and Nutrition in Adolescents
Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fradm.2025.1547910
This article is part of the Research TopicHolistic Approaches to Understanding Obesity and Metabolic Diseases in Urban EnvironmentsView all 10 articles
Relationship between Child Opportunity Index and Body Mass Index Z-score: A mixedeffects analysis with data from a lifestyle intervention with Hispanic children
Provisionally accepted- 1University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, United States
- 2School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- 3University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, United States
- 4University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: The Childhood Opportunity Index (COI) is a relatively new measure for assessing opportunity across education, health and environment, and socio-economic context. Research indicates that higher COI is associated with lower obesity risk; however, existing research offers no evidence for differences, or lack thereof, across racial/ethnic groups. The larger body of research on the relationship between neighborhood environments and obesity risk among Hispanic children with low-income between 5 to 11-year-olds is limited. The study aims to further explore the relationship between neighborhood opportunities, measured by the COI, and children’s body mass index z-scores (BMIz), adjusted for age and sex.Materials and Methods: The data are from a sample of Hispanic child-parent dyads (n=253) who participated in a one-year family lifestyle intervention. A linear mixed-effects model was fitted, with BMIz as the dependent variable, COI categorized into four levels, time, parent BMI, family income, adult education, child age, child sex, calories, language spoken in the household, physical activity, treatment group, and a time*treatment group interaction. Predicted probabilities were also produced.Results: After adjusting for covariates, children in the second (β=-.15, 95% CI=-0.27, -0.03), third (β=-.19, 95% CI=-0.31, -0.06), and fourth (β=-.15, p = 95% CI=-0.28, -0.02) quartiles of the COI quartiles had significantly lower BMIz compared to those in the first (lowest) COI quartile. Predicted probabilities show the different predictive margins of BMIz at each time point for each quartile compared to the first quartile.Conclusions: All the higher COI levels were linked to healthier weight status compared to the lowest COI level, though the pattern was not linear for any of the observed associations. Further investigation into the impact of different COI levels may be warranted to assess each quartile’s impact against each other, which was outside the scope of the current study. Results also provide evidence for potentially strengthening intervention supports for those at the lowest COI level, respective to those from all other COI levels.
Keywords: environmental factors, body mass index z-score, intervention, Hispanic, Multilevel model
Received: 18 Dec 2024; Accepted: 21 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Vazquez, Wood, Handique, Liang, Yin and Parra-Medina. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Christian E Vazquez, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.