REVIEW article

Front. Microbiol., 08 April 2016

Sec. Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy

Volume 7 - 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00470

Antimicrobial Drugs in Fighting against Antimicrobial Resistance

  • 1. Ministry of Agriculture Laboratory for Risk Assessment of Quality and Safety of Livestock and Poultry Products, Huazhong Agricultural University Wuhan, China

  • 2. National Reference Laboratory of Veterinary Drug Residues (HZAU) and Ministry of Agriculture Key Laboratory for the Detection of Veterinary Drug Residues in Foods, Huazhong Agricultural University Wuhan, China

Abstract

The outbreak of antimicrobial resistance, together with the lack of newly developed antimicrobial drugs, represents an alarming signal for both human and animal healthcare worldwide. Selection of rational dosage regimens for traditional antimicrobial drugs based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic principles as well as development of novel antimicrobials targeting new bacterial targets or resistance mechanisms are key approaches in tackling AMR. In addition to the cellular level resistance (i.e., mutation and horizontal gene transfer of resistance determinants), the community level resistance (i.e., bilofilms and persisters) is also an issue causing antimicrobial therapy difficulties. Therefore, anti-resistance and antibiofilm strategies have currently become research hotspot to combat antimicrobial resistance. Although metallic nanoparticles can both kill bacteria and inhibit biofilm formation, the toxicity is still a big challenge for their clinical applications. In conclusion, rational use of the existing antimicrobials and combinational use of new strategies fighting against antimicrobial resistance are powerful warranties to preserve potent antimicrobial drugs for both humans and animals.

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the ultimate fears to the health of humans and animals worldwide. Use of antimicrobial drugs in humans or animals results in the emergence and dissemination of resistant bacteria, and overuse or abuse of them makes this situation worse. Thus, it is important to simultaneously preserve effective antimicrobials as long as possible as well as continue to employ them for the service of human and animal health (Chang et al., 2015).

The dissemination of AMR has not been paralleled by the development of novel antimicrobials. This is due to that the process of drug discovery and clinical trials of new antimicrobials takes a long time, and only a few new agents have recently been approved for use. These situations prompt the efforts to develop alternatives to traditional antimicrobials, as described in our previous review (Cheng et al., 2014). However, some of the alternatives are only used for the prevention of bacterial infections (e.g., vaccines); some show indirect effect against pathogens (e.g., immunomodulators, feed enzymes); some are of complex composition (e.g., probiotics, plant extracts), thus the effects vary greatly; and the antimicrobial peptides, such as one of the bacteriocins, lantibiotics, have been reported causing bacterial resistance (Draper et al., 2015).

In this review, we briefly focus on old and novel antimicrobial agents in tackling AMR. The AMR occurs on two levels, the cellular level resistance (mutation and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) of resistance determinants) and the community level resistance (biofilm and persister cells) (Penesyan et al., 2015). The studies reviewed suggest that only rational use of existing old antimicrobial drugs and combinational use of anti-resistance or antibiofilm strategies with antimicrobials as well as continuing development of new antimicrobial agents could fight against AMR.

Mechanisms of AMR

AMR includes two levels of resistance, the cellular level resistance and the community level resistance (Penesyan et al., 2015; Table 1). The development of cellular resistance occurs due to endogenous gene mutations as well as via HGT of resistance determinants from other microorganisms. Also, a group of bacteria can be tolerant to the environmental stress that individual cells cannot, which is called the community level resistance. Such tolerance can cause an increased resistance to antimicrobials (Penesyan et al., 2015). For example, the resistance obtained by microorganisms in biofilm can be up to 1000 times higher than that gained by their planktonic counterparts, which impairs the treatment of biofilm-associated infections in clinical treatment (Lebeaux et al., 2014b; Penesyan et al., 2015). The main mechanism currently proposed to explain such tolerance is the presence of persister cells. The persisters can escape the lethal action of antimicrobials by entering a physiological state in which the antimicrobials do not kill them, a phenomenon known as bacterial persistence (Maisonneuve and Gerdes, 2014). Moreover, the cellular and community levels of resistance can be synergistic, thereby greatly enhancing the overall AMR of the microbial community (Penesyan et al., 2015).

Table 1

MechanismsReferences
CELLULAR LEVEL RESISTANCE
Drug inactivation by hydrolysis (e.g., β-lactamase for β-lactam resistance) or modification (e.g., acetyltransferases for aminoglycoside resistance)Shaw et al., 1993; Bush and Fisher, 2011
Target alteration by reducing the binding affinity to the drug (e.g., DNA gyrase mutation for fluoroquinolone resistance) or bypassing the drug targetHooper and Jacoby, 2015
Reducing drug influx by decreased permeability (e.g., the Gram-negative outer membrane)Nikaido, 2003
Drug extrusion via efflux pumpsLi et al., 2015
HGT of resistance determinants from other microorganismsD'Costa et al., 2006
COMMUNITY LEVEL RESISTANCE
Biofilm matrix acts as a shield against antimicrobials (e.g., polysaccharides against aminoglycoside, extracellular DNA against cationic peptides)Mulcahy et al., 2008; Khan et al., 2010; Chiang et al., 2013
Antimicrobials targeting dividing bacteria have a limited effect against the slow or non-growing persistersLewis, 2008, 2010
Starvation-induced stringent response caused by nutrient limitation in biofilm mediates high biofilm-specific resistanceNguyen et al., 2011; Bernier et al., 2013
SYNERGY BETWEEN COMMUNITY AND CELLULAR LEVEL RESISTANCE
Significantly enhanced mutation rate in biofilms leads to faster development of resistant mutantsConibear et al., 2009
Extracellular DNA in biofilm facilitates HGT of resistance determinants, encourages the acquisition and exchange of resistant integron gene cassettes, and promotes conjugation and natural transformationBlázquez, 2003; Townsend et al., 2003; Gillings et al., 2009; Domingues et al., 2012
The sub-inhibitory concentration of antimicrobials in biofilm is favorable to increasing the rates of mutation, recombination and HGTGillings and Stokes, 2012; Morita et al., 2014
Mechanisms of cellular level resistance can act in a biofilm-specific mannerZhang and Mah, 2008

Mechanisms of AMR (derived from Penesyan et al., 2015).

Revisit to old antimicrobials

As AMR to commonly used antimicrobial drugs increases, older antimicrobials are being “revived” and attracting attention. These old antimicrobials represent a new alternative for the control of AMR (Pulcini et al., 2012). Cassir et al. (2014) have provided a collection of microbiological and clinical data on potentially useful older antimicrobials for the successful treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections (e.g., polymyxins, fosfomycin, mecillinam, temocillin, and nitrofurantoin), MDR Gram-positive infections (e.g., trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, clindamycin, pristinamycin, rifampicin, and fusidic acid), and MDR tuberculosis (e.g., clofazimine, amoxicilline-clavulanate, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and minocycline). Since older antimicrobials have rarely been subjected to present drug development procedures, they are less considered in practice guidelines. Therefore, their efficacy and safety must be revaluated to optimize therapy.

A number of antimicrobials discovered decades ago that have unique chemical scaffolds and/or utilize novel modes of action to interact with bacterial targets, such as ribosome (Arenz and Wilson, 2016). For example, dityromycin, a cyclic decapeptide antibiotic produced by Streptomyces sp., can uniquely bind to ribosomal protein S12 in the small ribosomal subunit, a mode of action different than any other known translational inhibitor (Bulkley et al., 2014). In many cases, these “forgotten” compounds display cytotoxicity against eukaryotic cells and thus were abandoned (Arenz and Wilson, 2016). However, recent structure-function analysis gives us better understanding of the similarities and differences between bacterial targets and their eukaryotic counterparts, thereby guiding the future development of more specific and less toxic inhibitors. With the increased understanding of AMR mechanisms, revisiting the known antimicrobials are helpful to the exploration of the next generation of antimicrobial drugs.

Procedures for registration of antimicrobials drugs have improved significantly. Both EU (EMA, 2013) and US authorities (FDA, 2010) have published numerous guidance documents, and addressed the increasing need for antimicrobials that are active against MDR bacteria. The guidance documents include recommendations for dosage regimens based on pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationships. PK/PD provides a universal framework for exposure-response relationships, and the responses include efficacy, toxicity, and emergence of resistance (Muller et al., 2015). Exposure-response relationships also provide a means to translate experimental and preclinical data into the clinical settings, including setting clinical breakpoints, as extensively described by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (Mouton et al., 2012). To determine the optimal dose, several key features of the exposure-response relationship need to be determined, including MIC distribution of the interested microorganisms, the PK profiles for a variety of doses and patient populations, and the exposure-response relationship and PD target (Muller et al., 2015).

There are knowledge gaps for those revived antimicrobials in the areas of PK profiling in patients, as well as PD targets derived from preclinical and clinical studies (Muller et al., 2015). Although the regulatory requirements for new antimicrobial agents have become more and more rigorous, updates of the product information for old antimicrobials are either missing or insufficient, which would pose significant risks of potential harm to the patients. In addition, there is no motivation for companies to develop antimicrobials when the cost and time of drug approval is far beyond commercial interests, even if there is an obvious medical need.

In summary, redevelopment of an old antimicrobials leads to an improved understanding of its chemistry, PK/PD as well as optimizing its clinical use in different patient populations. Optimization of antimicrobial therapy in terms of PK/PD is essential to improve therapeutic efficacy but minimize the toxicity and the risk of resistance development during treatment (Mouton et al., 2011). As old antimicrobials are rarely included in surveillance programs, the evaluation of the risks of drug resistance is lacking. The prescription of old antimicrobials needs to be regulated by professional antimicrobial stewardships. Besides, as public health concern, cost effectiveness should be integrated in further comparisons between old and currently used antimicrobials.

Development of new antimicrobials

The current antimicrobials, mainly derived from natural sources, inhibit cellular processes such as cell wall biosynthesis, DNA replication, and protein synthesis. With the worldwide emergence of AMR, there is renewed interest in the investigation of alternative essential cellular processes, including bacterial central metabolic pathways, as the drug targets for the next generation of antimicrobials (Murima et al., 2014). For examples, bedaquiline is an antitubercular drug targeting the F0F1 ATP synthase (Andries et al., 2005). Like bedaquiline, Q203, an optimized imidazopyridine amide compound, selectively inhibits the respiratory cytochrome bc1 complex in mycobacteria regardless of architectural conservation of the bc1 complex in many species (Pethe et al., 2013). The inhibition of the bacterial divisome, mainly by targeting the central cell division mediator FtsZ, has been accepted as a promising strategy for antimicrobial attack by either interfering with the natural dynamics and functions of FtsZ during the cell cycle or activating a bacterial protease to degrade FtsZ, thus causing bacterial death in a suicidal manner (Sass and Brötz-Oesterhelt, 2013). The mode of action of alkyl gallate is a combination of direct targeting of FtsZ and permeabilization of bacterial membranes, which is a promising hit for the further development of antibacterials (Król et al., 2015). Recent efforts have also been devoted to developing drugs that interrupt the assimilation of iron by bacteria, a process that is vital to cellular homeostasis (Foley and Simeonov, 2012). The unique asymmetric outer membrane in Gram-negative bacteria, which acts as a permeability barrier that protects the cell from external stresses such as the presence of antimicrobials, has become an attractive drug target. A novel β-hairpin macrocyclic peptide, JB-95, exhibits an ability to selectively disrupt the outer membrane through interactions with selected β-barrel outer membrane proteins including BamA and LptD, but not the inner membrane of E. coli (Urfer et al., 2016). Furthermore, the bacterial protein secretion pathway is a target for eliminating or disarming pathogens. Targeting the Sec-pathway for novel antimicrobial agents focuses on two key components: SecA, the ATP-driven motor protein responsible for driving preproteins across the cytoplasmic membrane and the Type I signal peptidase which is responsible for the removal of the signal peptide to allow the release of the mature protein from the membrane (Rao et al., 2014).

Targeting resistance, usually used in combination with the traditional antimicrobials, is another strategy to fight against AMR. Among the four general resistance mechanisms, which include target alteration (Hooper and Jacoby, 2015), drug inactivation (Shaw et al., 1993; Bush and Fisher, 2011), decreased permeability (Nikaido, 2003) and increased efflux (Sun et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015), drug extrusion by multidrug efflux pumps serves as an important mechanism of MDR. Efflux pumps also have physiological functions in response to various of environmental and physiological signals (Sun et al., 2014). Recent studies have tried to reverse the resistance phenotype conferred by efflux pump activation (Opperman and Nguyen, 2015; Venter et al., 2015). It was observed that the addition of efflux pump inhibitors partially restored drug susceptibility in vitro and in vivo in the anti-Mycobacterium tuberculosis therapy (Pule et al., 2016). The class of zinc-dependent hydrolases, metallo-β-lactamase, can confer bacteria with extended spectrum β-lactam resistance. The design of compounds with the β-lactam core scaffold is an attractive approach to the development of metallo-β-lactamase inhibitors. Some promising inhibitors, including cephalosporin derivatives, penicillin derivatives, carbapenem derivatives, cyclobutanone β-lactam analogs, thiol derivatives, succinic acid derivatives, mercaptoacetic acid thioester derivatives, pyrrole-, pyridine- and triazole-containing compounds, and DNA aptamer, have been thoroughly reviewed by King and Strynadka (King and Strynadka, 2013). Targeting the resistance mechanism itself by a vaccine is an interesting but hitherto unexplored approach (Henriques-Normark and Normark, 2014). Vaccination directed against the resistance mechanism can be possible when resistance is mediated by an enzyme whose activity can be inhibited by neutralizing antibodies.

Except for the above inhibitors targeting resistance, drugs in already-known classes such as new β-lactams, quinolones, aminoglycosides, and tetracyclines have been designed to escape from many of the known resistance mechanisms. BAL30072, a siderophore monosulfactam similar to aztreonam, exhibits antibacterial activity against most species of aerobic Gram-negative bacteria (Page et al., 2010). It is stable toward metallo-β-lactamases and is a poor substrate for many serine carbapenemases. Several new quinolones, such as avarofloxacin, delafloxacin, finafloxacin and the desfluoroquinolone nemonoxacin, which show enhanced activity against fluoroquinolone-resistant Gram-positive bacteria including MRSA are in clinical development (Page and Bush, 2014). A modified aminoglycoside, plazomicin, has been demonstrated activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial pathogens (Zhanel et al., 2012). Modified tetracyclines, such as tigecycline, omadacycline and eravacycline are of interest for their activity against many MDR Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter spp., including isolates expressing tetracycline-specific efflux and ribosomal protection proteins (Sutcliffe, 2011).

Approaches to combat biofilms

The approaches to combat biofilms are extensively reviewed by Beloin et al. (2014) (Table 2). During the biofilm development, the bacteria initially adhere to a surface that ultimately leads to colonization and infection by pathogenic bacteria. Therefore, reducing adhesion is a strategy to prevent biofilm formation and related infections (Veerachamy et al., 2014). Recently, non-specific inhibition of adhesion vs. targeting specific adhesions has been developed to reduce bacterial adhesion. Quorum sensing (QS), which controls many important physiological processes such as biofilm development, is a widespread intercellular form of communicating and cooperative activities of bacteria at the population level, and it depends on the production, secretion, and detection of small diffusible autoinducers, such as acyl-homoserine lactones, auto-inducing peptides and autoinducer 2 (Zhang and Li, 2016). Cyclic di-GMP is a second messenger that acts to regulate a wide range of functions including developmental transitions, adhesion and biofilm formation (Caly et al., 2015). Targeting these signaling pathways is also a strategy to prevent biofilm development. Moreover, using enzymes or chelating agents can hydrolyze biofilm components or destabilize biofilm matrix. On the other hand, persister cells have recently been subjected to an intensive research in order to limit biofilm-associated antimicrobial tolerance. The formation of persister cells depends on the ubiquitous bacterial regulatory nucleotides tetra and penta-guanosine phosphate (ppGpp) that activate inhibitors of cell growth (Germain et al., 2015). Therefore, interfering ppGpp could inhibit the formation of persister cells.

Table 2

Mode of actionsCategoriesReported approachesReferences
Non-specific anti-adhesionAnti-adhesive polymersPolymers comprising ester and cyclic hydrocarbon moieties reduced the attachment of E. coli, P. aeruginosa and S. aureusHook et al., 2012
Vascular catheters with a non-leaching poly-sulfobetaine surface modification reduced the adhesion of E. coli and S. aureusSmith et al., 2012
Methyl-cellulose-coated totally implantable venous access ports implanted in rats inhibited the adhesion of P. aeruginosa and S. aureusChauhan et al., 2014
Dental adhesives containing dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate inhibited S. mutans, S. gordonii, and S. sanguinis multispecies biofilmsZhang et al., 2015
Specific anti-adhesionImpeding adhesion biogenesisAL1 targeted the subunit polymerization of the type 1 pilus assembly, thus disrupted the pilus-dependent biofilm formation in uropathogenic E. coli.Lo et al., 2014
Lectins competitorsInhibitors of the type 1 fimbriae adhesion prevented catheter-associated urinary tract infections and chronic cystitis in mice infected by E. coliTotsika et al., 2013
Targeting virulence factorLimonene showed antibiofilm activity against S. pyogenes, S. mutans and S. mitis by downregulation of the surface-associated virulence factor genesSubramenium et al., 2015
Bulky hydrocarbonsMaltose derivatives with bulky hydro-carbon groups exhibited an inhibition of adhesins/receptors mediated binding of P. aeruginosaShetye et al., 2014
Targeting signaling pathwaysInterfering cyclic-di-GMPInhibitors of diguanylate cyclase enzymes that synthesize cyclic-di-GMP inhibited the biofilm formation by Vibrio choleraeSambanthamoorthy et al., 2012
Interfering QSAnalogs of QS autoinducers or enzymes degrading QS molecules were used to quench QS-controlling biofilm formationZhu and Kaufmann, 2013; Rampioni et al., 2014
Inhibitors of the quorum regulator, the staphylococcal accessory regulator A (SarA), showed antibiofilm activity against S. aureusBalamurugan et al., 2015
Dispersing biofilm matrixEnzymesDegradation of extracellular DNA by DNaseI or hydrolyzing poly-N-acetylglucosamine by Dispersin B dispersed biofilms in vitro and in vivoDarouiche et al., 2009; Hymes et al., 2013
Phage depolymerases can degrade the extracellular polymers to allow the permeation of bacteriophages into deeper biofilm layers to kill bacteriaParasion et al., 2014
Chelating agentsEDTA was an efficient adjuvant to gentamicin to eradicate E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and S. epidermidis biofilms and persistersBanin et al., 2006; Chauhan et al., 2012
Fighting persistersInhibiting persister formationThe ppGpp analog, relacin, inhibited the B. subtilis RelA synthetase activity and biofilm formationWexselblatt et al., 2012, 2013
Peptide 1018 displayed a specific antibiofilm activity against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus by inducing ppGpp degradationde la Fuente-Núñez et al., 2014
Art-175, an artilysin covalently combined a bacteriophage-encoded endolysin can pass the outer membrane to kill P. aeruginosa persistersBriers et al., 2014
Potentiating antimicrobialsSugar metabolic stimuli potentiated aminoglycoside against E. coli and S. aureus persisters by facilitating aminoglycoside uptakeAllison et al., 2011
Silver potentiated antimicrobials against bacterial biofilm and persisters by increasing ROS production and bacterial permeability to antimicrobialsMorones-Ramirez et al., 2013
Raising pH by using basic amino acids (e.g., L-arginine) potentiated aminoglycosides activity against E. coli and S. aureus persistersLebeaux et al., 2014a
Inactivating toleranceAHL QS inhibitors, brominated furanones, could revert antimicrobial tolerance of P. aeruginosa and E. coli persistersPan and Ren, 2013
Combining the acyldepsipeptide antibiotic that activates ClpP with rifampicin led to complete eradication of S. aureus biofilmsConlon et al., 2013

Recent studies of some promising antibiofilm strategies.

The deep research on the mechanism of biofilm formation leads to the emergence of numerous promising antibiofilm approaches. However, the conversion of experimental data into clinical settings is time-consuming and to some extent unsatisfactory. Non-biocidal anti-adhesive or anti-virulence strategies face the diversity of bacterial phenotypes and may only be active against a subpopulation of bacteria encountered in clinical practice, therefore limiting their overall efficacy. In vitro biofilms are probably structurally different from in vivo biofilms (Lebeaux et al., 2013). Currently, due to the diversity of the in vivo conditions leading to the complexity of clinical biofilm situations, the diversity of persister phenotypes is unknown. Most of the studies use rodent models, but these in vivo models may not properly replicate real clinical state. Furthermore, as for clinical trials, rigorous statistical analysis is compulsory in order to avoid any false positive results. Most importantly, molecules identified in vitro should be validated using in vivo models not only for the antibiofilm activity but also non-toxicity.

Metallic nanoparticles (NPs)

Physiochemical properties of nanomolecules as antimicrobial agents are widely used in human and veterinary medicine. Metallic NPs are of great interest for use as potential antimicrobial agents because of their unique optical, electronic, and magnetic properties (Kandi and Kandi, 2015). The electrostatic interaction of NPs with negatively charged bacterial surfaces draws the particles to the bacteria and promotes their penetration into the membrane, causing membrane disruption, bacterial flocculation, and a reduction in viability. The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is also a mechanism of antibacterial activity of NPs (Thekkae Padil and Černík, 2013). Further actions of NPs as antimicrobial agents include disrupting DNA during the replication and cell division of microorganisms, compromising the bacterial membrane integrity via physical interactions with the microbial cell, and releasing toxic metal ions and causing lysis of cells (Franci et al., 2015). Recently, the silicon dioxide NPs (Si-NP) were engineered to target the signaling molecules (i.e., acylhomoserine lactones) used for QS in order to halt bacterial communication (Miller et al., 2015). The bactericidal activity of NPs depends on size, stability and concentration in the growth medium (Tillotson and Theriault, 2013). The applications of nanomolecules in medicine have recently been evaluated in reports highlighting the in vitro antimicrobial activities of NPs (Table 3), and also the possible potential adverse effects of nanomolecules on human health and the environment (Kandi and Kandi, 2015).

Table 3

NanoparticlesTarget organismsReferences
Au-zeolites NPsE. coli
Salmonella typhi
Lima et al., 2013
PAH capped AuNPs and AgNPsBacillus Calmette-Guérin
E. coli
Zhou et al., 2012
AgNPsMicrocystis aeruginosaEl-Sheekh and El-Kassas, 2014
AgNPsEnterococcus hiraeVardanyan et al., 2015
AgNPs/halloysite nanotubes/graphene nanocomposites (Ag/HNTs/rGO)E. coli
S. aureus
Yu et al., 2014
Selenium and AgNPs produced by BacillusE. coli
S. aureus
Klebsiella spp.
Pseudomonas spp.
Singh et al., 2014
AgNO3 NPs produced by Allium spE. coli
Proteus spp.
Klebsiella spp.
Staphylococcus spp.
Enterobacter spp.
Bacillus spp.
Pseudomonas spp.
Lekshmi et al., 2012;
Aramwit et al., 2014;
El Kassas and Attia, 2014
ZnO NPsE. coli
P. aeruginosa
Aspergillus niger
Salmonella choleraesuis
S. aureus
Azizi et al., 2013;
Chitra and Annadurai, 2013
ZnO, CuO, and Fe2O3 NPsS. aureus
B. subtilis
P. aeruginosa
E. coli
Azam et al., 2012
Polyacrylamide-doped Fe3O4 NPsE. coliMukherje, 2014
Ag-implanted Ti NPsStreptococcus mutans
Porphyromonas gingivalis
Candida albicans
Zheng et al., 2012
H2TiO3 and SiO2 NPsE. coli
S. aureus
Enterococcus faecalis
Candida sp.
Krokowicz et al., 2015
Polymethyl methacrylate denture acrylic loading PtNPsS. mutans
S. sobrinus
Nam, 2014

Selected studies on the antibacterial activity of metallic nanoparticles.

As various metallic NPs and their oxides have already been used as potent antimicrobial agents, silver or ionic form is most toxic for microorganisms when compared to other metals (Seil and Webster, 2012). This makes silver of particularly interests. Silver NPs (AgNPs) probably have multiple mechanisms of antibacterial action (Markowska et al., 2013). For example, (1) AgNPs can affect bacterial membrane permeability by attaching to the cell membrane surface and modifying the cell potential; (2) AgNPs can causes oxidative damage by production of ROS (Kim et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2012); (3) AgNPs can interact with the SH-groups of bacterial membrane proteins and intracellular proteins, and also can interact with the phosphate residues in DNA, thus to interfere with protein synthesis and function and cell division (Durán et al., 2016). However, due to the current lack of knowledge, the exact basis for the activity of AgNPs is still uncharacterized.

The antibiofilm activity of AgNPs has also been demonstrated in a number of studies (Table 4). Most of the AgNPs are within the range of 1~100 nm. Although smaller AgNPs may have greater biological activity, it is important to note that differences in the chemical and physical properties of AgNP may cause variation in its antimicrobial and antibiofilm efficacy (Markowska et al., 2013). Because of the relatively low stability of colloidal solutions, some researchers propose the usage of stabilized AgNPs (Table 4). AgNPs can also enhance the antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of conventional antimicrobials. There are reports describing synergistic activity between AgNPs and, e.g., ampicillin, kanamycin, streptomycin or vancomycin against E. coli and P. aeruginosa (Wolska et al., 2012). Some AgNPs have been subjected to clinical trials (Franci et al., 2015).

Table 4

Diameter (nm)Biofilm of microorganismsReferences
65 ± 30 nmP. putidaFabrega et al., 2009
50 nmP. aeruginosa
S. epidermidis
Kalishwaralal et al., 2010
25.2 ± 4 nmP. aeruginosa (also kill the bacteria)Martinez-Gutierrez et al., 2013
20~30 nmSensitive strain of P. aeruginosa (inhibition rate of 67%)
Multidrug resistant strain of P. aeruginosa (inhibition rate of 56%)
Palanisamy et al., 2014
5~8 and 16~19 nmSalmonella enteritidis, S. hadar, and S. SenftenbergLosasso et al., 2014
12.6 ± 5.7 nmMycobacterium spp. (reduce survival of this bacterium to only 0.03%)Islam et al., 2013
2.7 ± 0.6 nm (used for dental composites)Oral bacteria S. mutansCheng et al., 2012
47 nm (citrate-capped)P. aeruginosaPark et al., 2013
20 nm (silver coated polyvinyl pyrrolidone)Streptococcus pneumoniaeBibbs et al., 2014
20 nm (starch-stabilized)P. aeruginosa
S. aureus
Mohanty et al., 2012
10 nm (used to coat the surface of catheters)(complete inhibition)
E. coli
S. aureus
Candida albicans (more than 50% inhibition)
Enterococcus sp.
coagulase-negative staphylococci
P. aeruginosa
Roe et al., 2008
8 nm (hydrolyzed casein peptide- stabilized)E. coli
P. Aeruginosa
Serratia proteamaculans
Radzig et al., 2013
4–7 nm (β-cyclodextrin-stabilized)S. epidermidis CSF 41498Jaiswal et al., 2015
1.9~4.3 nm (microwave accelerated and Eucalyptus globulus leaf extract-stabilized)S. aureus (MRSA)
S. aureus (MSSA)
P. aeruginosa (ESBL)
Ali et al., 2015

Selected studies on the antibiofilm activity of AgNPs.

Although metallic NPs have great potential in the future to become antimicrobial agents, the local and systemic toxic complications and the deleterious effect they have on beneficial bacteria in humans and animals may be a cause for concern (Zhang et al., 2010; Prabhu and Poulose, 2012). NPs have the ability to spread throughout the body, cross the blood-brain barrier, cause haemolysis, and may result in degradation products which have toxic effects and influence blood coagulation pathways (Kandi and Kandi, 2015). Most studies have not conclusively evaluated the exact mechanism by which nanomolecules contribute to toxic complications, and many of the interactions of the AgNPs with the human or animal body are still poorly understood (dos Santos et al., 2013). It has been observed that the larger size of NP, the greater is the risk of adverse health effects (De Jong and Borm, 2008). Research is necessary to clearly understand the interaction of nanomolecules with living cells, the extent of their distribution in the body, and their specific organ toxicity.

Concluding remarks

The paradox of antimicrobial drugs is that through their use, they not only inhibit an infection but also select for the emergence and spread of AMR, directly counteracting their long-term efficacy. Considerable inappropriate use of both prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobials in human and veterinary medicine highlights an urgent need for antibiotic stewardship initiatives. At the present time, rational use of existing antibiotics based on PK/PD dosage-regimen is a key strategy in tackling AMR, thus to preserve potent antimicrobials for both humans and animals. At the same time, we should never stop discovering novel inhibitors with new bacterial targets and digging the treasure box of “old” and “forgotten” antimicrobials. Compounds showing profound anti-resistance and antibiofilm effects are in research hotspot, but they still have limitations. Combining existing antimicrobials with compounds that inhibit their specific resistance mechanisms would be a good choice. Although metallic NPs can both kill bacteria and inhibit biofilm formation, the toxicity is still a big challenge for their clinical applications (dos Santos et al., 2013). With single-drug therapy, there is always a selective advantage to resistance; specific combinations of drugs can inhibit bacterial growth while disfavoring resistance to the individual components. These approaches can be used to invert the selective advantage of resistant bacteria competing with their sensitive cousins, or even drive a resistant bacterial population back toward drug sensitivity (Baym et al., 2016). Besides, screening and developing multiple-target inhibitors as “resistance-resistant” antimicrobials can reduce the effects of target mutation (Oldfield and Feng, 2014). The natural products have also been a prolific and unsurpassed source for new lead antimicrobial compounds, but target identification and validation has remained a major bottleneck (Farha and Brown, 2016). Functional genomics techniques are proved to be indispensible for in vitro target authentication and elucidating mechanism of action of novel antimicrobials (Khan and Khan, 2016). Since most of the new strategies described in this review are only at the early basic experimental stage, their potential for clinical applications requires more extensive investigations.

Statements

Author contributions

GC contributed to the design of the review and wrote the review. MD, SA, HH, and XW revised the review. ZY contributed to the conception of the review.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Basic Research (973) Program of China (No. 2013CB127201), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31502115) and the National Program for Risk Assessment of Quality and Safety of Livestock and Poultry Products (GJFP2016008).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

    Abbreviations

  • AMR

    antimicrobial resistance

  • HGT

    horizontal gene transfer

  • MDR

    multidrug-resistant

  • MIC

    minimum inhibitory concentration

  • NPs

    nanoparticles

  • PK

    pharmacokinetic

  • PD

    pharmacodynamic

  • QS

    quorum sensing

  • ROS

    reactive oxygen species.

References

  • 1

    AliK.AhmedB.DwivediS.SaquibQ.Al-KhedhairyA. A.MusarratJ. (2015). Microwave accelerated green synthesis of stable silver nanoparticles with eucalyptus globulus leaf extract and their antibacterial and antibiofilm activity on clinical isolates. PLoS ONE10:e0131178. 10.1371/journal.pone.0131178

  • 2

    AllisonK. R.BrynildsenM. P.CollinsJ. J. (2011). Metabolite-enabled eradication of bacterial persisters by aminoglycosides. Nature473, 216220. 10.1038/nature10069

  • 3

    AndriesK.VerhasseltP.GuillemontJ.GöhlmannH. W.NeefsJ. M.WinklerH.et al. (2005). A diarylquinoline drug active on the ATP synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science307, 223227. 10.1126/science.1106753

  • 4

    AramwitP.BangN.RatanavarapornJ.EkgasitS. (2014). Green synthesis of silk sericin-capped silver nanoparticles and their potent anti-bacterial activity. Nanoscale Res. Lett.9:79. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-79

  • 5

    ArenzS.WilsonD. N. (2016). Blast from the past: reassessing forgotten translation inhibitors, antibiotic selectivity, and resistance mechanisms to aid drug development. Mol. Cell61, 314. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.019

  • 6

    AzamA.AhmedA. S.OvesM.KhanM. S.HabibS. S.MemicA. (2012). Antimicrobial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria: a comparative study. Int. J. Nanomedicine7, 60036009. 10.2147/IJN.S35347

  • 7

    AziziS.AhmadM.MahdaviM.AbdolmohammadiS. (2013). Preparation, characterization, and antimicrobial activities of ZnO nanoparticles/cellulose nanocrystal nanocomposites. Bioresources8, 18411851. 10.15376/biores.8.2.1841-1851

  • 8

    BalamuruganP.HemaM.KaurG.SridharanV.PrabuP. C.SumanaM. N.et al. (2015). Development of a biofilm inhibitor molecule against multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with gestational urinary tract infections. Front. Microbiol.6:832. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00832

  • 9

    BaninE.BradyK. M.GreenbergE. P. (2006). Chelator-induced dispersal and killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells in a biofilm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.72, 20642069. 10.1128/AEM.72.3.2064-2069.2006

  • 10

    BaymM.StoneL. K.KishonyR. (2016). Multidrug evolutionary strategies to reverse antibiotic resistance. Science351:aad3292. 10.1126/science.aad3292

  • 11

    BeloinC.RenardS.GhigoJ. M.LebeauxD. (2014). Novel approaches to combat bacterial biofilms. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.18, 6168. 10.1016/j.coph.2014.09.005

  • 12

    BernierS. P.LebeauxD.DeFrancescoA. S.ValomonA.SoubigouG.CoppéeJ. Y.et al. (2013). Starvation, together with the SOS response, mediates high biofilm-specific tolerance to the fluoroquinolone ofloxacin. PLoS Genet.9:e1003144. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003144

  • 13

    BibbsR. K.HarrisR. D.PeoplesV. A.BarnettC.SinghS. R.DennisV. A.et al. (2014). Silver polyvinyl pyrrolidone nanoparticles exhibit a capsular polysaccharide influenced bactericidal effect against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Front. Microbiol.5:665. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00665

  • 14

    BlázquezJ. (2003). Hypermutation as a factor contributing to the acquisition of antimicrobial resistance. Clin. Infect. Dis.37, 12011209. 10.1086/378810

  • 15

    BriersY.WalmaghM.GrymonprezB.BieblM.PirnayJ. P.DefraineV.et al. (2014). Art-175 is a highly efficient antibacterial against multidrug-resistant strains and persisters of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.58, 37743784. 10.1128/AAC.02668-14

  • 16

    BulkleyD.BrandiL.PolikanovY. S.FabbrettiA.O'ConnorM.GualerziC. O.et al. (2014). The antibiotics dityromycin and GE82832 bind protein S12 and block EF-G-catalyzed translocation. Cell Rep.6, 357365. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.12.024

  • 17

    BushK.FisherJ. F. (2011). Epidemiological expansion, structural studies, and clinical challenges of new beta-lactamases from gram-negative bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.65, 455478. 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102911

  • 18

    CalyD. L.BelliniD.WalshM. A.DowJ. M.RyanR. P. (2015). Targeting cyclic di-GMP signalling: a strategy to control biofilm formation?Curr. Pharm. Des.21, 1224. 10.2174/1381612820666140905124701

  • 19

    CassirN.RolainJ. M.BrouquiP. (2014). A new strategy to fight antimicrobial resistance: the revival of old antibiotics. Front. Microbiol.5:551. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00551

  • 20

    ChangQ.WangW.Regev-YochayG.LipsitchM.HanageW. P. (2015). Antibiotics in agriculture and the risk to human health: how worried should we be?Evol. Appl.8, 240247. 10.1111/eva.12185

  • 21

    ChauhanA.BernardinA.MussardW.KriegelI.EstèveM.GhigoJ. M.et al. (2014). Preventing biofilm formation and associated occlusion by biomimetic glycocalyxlike polymer in central venous catheters. J. Infect. Dis.210, 13471356. 10.1093/infdis/jiu249

  • 22

    ChauhanA.LebeauxD.GhigoJ. M.BeloinC. (2012). Full and broad-spectrum in vivo eradication of catheter-associated biofilms using gentamicin-EDTA antibiotic lock therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.56, 63106318. 10.1128/AAC.01606-12

  • 23

    ChengG.HaoH.XieS.WangX.DaiM.HuangL.et al. (2014). Antibiotic alternatives: the substitution of antibiotics in animal husbandry?Front. Microbiol.5:217. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00217

  • 24

    ChengL.WeirM. D.XuH. H.AntonucciJ. M.KraigsleyA. M.LinN. J.et al. (2012). Antibacterial amorphous calcium phosphate nanocomposites with a quaternary ammonium dimethacrylate and silver nanoparticles. Dent. Mater.28, 561572. 10.1016/j.dental.2012.01.005

  • 25

    ChiangW. C.NilssonM.JensenP. Ø.HøibyN.NielsenT. E.GivskovM.et al. (2013). Extracellular DNA shields against aminoglycosides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.57, 23522361. 10.1128/AAC.00001-13

  • 26

    ChitraK.AnnaduraiG. (2013). Antimicrobial activity of wet chemically engineered spherical shaped ZnO nanoparticles on food borne pathogen. Int. Food Res. J.20, 5964.

  • 27

    ConibearT. C.CollinsS. L.WebbJ. S. (2009). Role of mutation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. PLoS ONE4:e6289. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006289

  • 28

    ConlonB. P.NakayasuE. S.FleckL. E.LaFleurM. D.IsabellaV. M.ColemanK.et al. (2013). Activated ClpP kills persisters and eradicates a chronic biofilm infection. Nature503, 365370. 10.1038/nature12790

  • 29

    DarouicheR. O.MansouriM. D.GawandeP. V.MadhyasthaS. (2009). Antimicrobial and antibiofilm efficacy of triclosan and DispersinB combination. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.64, 8893. 10.1093/jac/dkp158

  • 30

    D'CostaV. M.McGrannK. M.HughesD. W.WrightG. D. (2006). Sampling the antibiotic resistome. Science311, 374377. 10.1126/science.1120800

  • 31

    De JongW. H.BormP. J. (2008). Drug delivery and nanoparticles:applications and hazards. Int. J. Nanomedicine3, 133149. 10.2147/IJN.S596

  • 32

    de la Fuente-NúñezC.ReffuveilleF.HaneyE. F.StrausS. K.HancockR. E. (2014). Broad-spectrum anti-biofilm peptide that targets a cellular stress response. PLoS Pathog.10:e1004152. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004152

  • 33

    DominguesS.HarmsK.FrickeW. F.JohnsenP. J.da SilvaG. J.NielsenK. M. (2012). Natural transformation facilitates transfer of transposons, integrons and gene cassettes between bacterial species. PLoS Pathog.8:e1002837. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002837

  • 34

    dos SantosC. A.SecklerM. M.IngleA. P.GuptaI.GaldieroS.GaldieroM.et al. (2013). Silver nanoparticles: therapeutical uses, toxicity, and safety issues. J. Pharm. Sci.103, 19311944. 10.1002/jps.24001

  • 35

    DraperL. A.CotterP. D.HillC.RossR. P. (2015). Lantibiotic resistance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.79, 171191. 10.1128/MMBR.00051-14

  • 36

    DuránN.DuránM.de JesusM. B.SeabraA. B.FávaroW. J.NakazatoG. (2016). Silver nanoparticles: a new view on mechanistic aspects on antimicrobial activity. Nanomedicine12, 789799. 10.1016/j.nano.2015.11.016

  • 37

    El KassasH. Y.AttiaA. A. (2014). Bactericidal application and cytotoxic activity of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles with an extract of the red seaweed Pterocladiella capillacea on the HepG2 cell line. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev.15, 12991306. 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.3.1299

  • 38

    El-SheekhM. M.El-KassasH. Y. (2014). Application of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles against a cancer promoter cyanobacterium, Microcystis aeruginosa. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev.15, 67736779. 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.16.6773

  • 39

    EMA (2013). New EMA Guidance on Development of Antibacterials to Help in the Fight against Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens. European Medicines Agency. Available online at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/news_and_events/news/2013/11/news_detail_001944.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058004d5c1

  • 40

    FabregaJ.RenshawJ. C.LeadJ. R. (2009). Interactions of silver nanoparticles with Pseudomonas putida biofilms. Environ. Sci. Technol.43, 90049009. 10.1021/es901706j

  • 41

    FarhaM. A.BrownE. D. (2016). Strategies for target identification of antimicrobial natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1039/C5NP00127G.

  • 42

    FDA (2010). US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for industry antibacterial drug products: use of noninferiority trials to support approval. Available online at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidancecomplianceregulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm070951.pdf

  • 43

    FoleyT. L.SimeonovA. (2012). Targeting iron assimilation to develop new antibacterials. Expert Opin. Drug Discov.7, 831847. 10.1517/17460441.2012.708335

  • 44

    FranciG.FalangaA.GaldieroS.PalombaL.RaiM.MorelliG.et al. (2015). Silver nanoparticles as potential antibacterial agents. Molecules20, 88568874. 10.3390/molecules20058856

  • 45

    GermainE.RoghanianM.GerdesK.MaisonneuveE. (2015). Stochastic induction of persister cells by HipA through (p)ppGpp-mediated activation of mRNA endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.112, 51715176. 10.1073/pnas.1423536112

  • 46

    GillingsM. R.HolleyM. P.StokesH. W. (2009). Evidence for dynamic exchange of qac gene cassettes between class 1 integrons and other integrons in freshwater biofilms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.296, 282288. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01646.x

  • 47

    GillingsM. R.StokesH. W. (2012). Are humans increasing bacterial evolvability?Trends Ecol. Evol.27, 346352. 10.1016/j.tree.2012.02.006

  • 48

    Henriques-NormarkB.NormarkS. (2014). Bacterial vaccines and antibiotic resistance. Ups. J. Med. Sci.119, 205208. 10.3109/03009734.2014.903324

  • 49

    HookA. L.ChangC. Y.YangJ.LuckettJ.CockayneA.AtkinsonS.et al. (2012). Combinatorial discovery of polymers resistant to bacterial attachment. Nat. Biotechnol.30, 868875. 10.1038/nbt.2316

  • 50

    HooperD. C.JacobyG. A. (2015). Mechanisms of drug resistance: quinolone resistance. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.1354, 1231. 10.1111/nyas.12830

  • 51

    HymesS. R.RandisT. M.SunT. Y.RatnerA. J. (2013). DNase inhibits Gardnerella vaginalis biofilms in vitro and in vivo. J. Infect. Dis.207, 14911497. 10.1093/infdis/jit047

  • 52

    IslamM. S.LarimerC.OjhaA.NettleshipI. (2013). Antimycobacterial efficacy of silver nanoparticles as deposited on porous membrane filters. Mater. Sci. Eng.33, 45754581. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.07.013

  • 53

    JaiswalS.BhattacharyaK.McHaleP.DuffyB. (2015). Dual effects of beta-cyclodextrin-stabilised silver nanoparticles: enhanced biofilm inhibition and reduced cytotoxicity. J. Mater. Sci.26:5367. 10.1007/s10856-014-5367-1

  • 54

    KalishwaralalK.BarathManiKanthS.PandianS. R.DeepakV.GurunathanS. (2010). Silver nanoparticles impede the biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Colloids Surfaces79, 340344. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2010.04.014

  • 55

    KandiV.KandiS. (2015). Antimicrobial properties of nanomolecules: potential candidates as antibiotics in the era of multi-drug resistance. Epidemiol. Health37:e2015020. 10.4178/epih/e2015020

  • 56

    KhanS. N.KhanA. U. (2016). Breaking the Spell: Combating Multidrug Resistant ‘Superbugs’. Front. Microbiol.7:174. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00174

  • 57

    KhanW.BernierS. P.KuchmaS. L.HammondJ. H.HasanF.O'TooleG. A. (2010). Aminoglycoside resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms modulated by extracellular polysaccharide. Int. Microbiol.13, 207212. 10.2436/20.1501.01.127

  • 58

    KimJ. S.KukE.YuK. N.KimJ. H.ParkS. J.LeeH. J.et al. (2007). Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomedicine3, 95101. 10.1016/j.nano.2006.12.001

  • 59

    KingD. T.StrynadkaN. C. (2013). Targeting metallo-beta-lactamase enzymes in antibiotic resistance. Future Med. Chem.5, 12431263. 10.4155/fmc.13.55

  • 60

    KrokowiczL.TomczakH.BobkiewiczA.MackiewiczJ.MarciniakR.DrewsM.et al. (2015). In vitro studies of antibacterial and antifungal wound dressings comprising H2TiO3 and SiO2 nanoparticles. Pol. J. Microbiol.64, 137142.

  • 61

    KrólE.de Sousa BorgesA.da SilvaI.PolaquiniC. R.RegasiniL. O.FerreiraH.et al. (2015). Antibacterial activity of alkyl gallates is a combination of direct targeting of FtsZ and permeabilization of bacterial membranes. Front. Microbiol.6:390. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00390

  • 62

    LebeauxD.ChauhanA.LétofféS.FischerF.de ReuseH.BeloinC.et al. (2014a). pH-mediated potentiation of aminoglycosides kills bacterial persisters and eradicates in vivo biofilms. J. Infect. Dis.210, 13571366. 10.1093/infdis/jiu286

  • 63

    LebeauxD.ChauhanA.RenduelesO.BeloinC. (2013). From in vitro to in vivo models of bacterial biofilm-related infections. Pathogens2, 288356. 10.3390/pathogens2020288

  • 64

    LebeauxD.GhigoJ. M.BeloinC. (2014b). Biofilm-related infections: bridging the gap between clinical management and fundamental aspects of recalcitrance toward antibiotics. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.78, 510543. 10.1128/MMBR.00013-14

  • 65

    LekshmiN. C.SumiS. B.VivekaS.JeevaS.BrindhaJ. R. (2012). Antibacterial activity of nanoparticles from Allium sp. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Res.2, 115119.

  • 66

    LewisK. (2008). Multidrug tolerance of biofilms and persister cells. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.322, 107131. 10.1007/978-3-540-75418-3_6

  • 67

    LewisK. (2010). Persister cells. Annu. Rev. Microbiol.64, 357372. 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306

  • 68

    LiX. Z.PlésiatP.NikaidoH. (2015). The challenge of efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.28, 337418. 10.1128/CMR.00117-14

  • 69

    LimaE.GuerraR.LaraV.GuzmánA. (2013). Gold nanoparticles as efficient antimicrobial agents for Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhi. Chem. Cent. J.7:11. 10.1186/1752-153X-7-11

  • 70

    LoA. W.Van de WaterK.GaneP. J.ChanA. W.SteadmanD.StevensK.et al. (2014). Suppression of type 1 pilus assembly in uropathogenic Escherichia coli by chemical inhibition of subunit polymerization. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.69, 10171026. 10.1093/jac/dkt467

  • 71

    LosassoC.BellucoS.CibinV.ZavagninP.MiceticI.GallocchioF.et al. (2014). Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles: sensitivity of different Salmonella serovars. Front. Microbiol.5:227. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00227

  • 72

    MaisonneuveE.GerdesK. (2014). Molecular mechanisms underlying bacterial persisters. Cell157, 539548. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.02.050

  • 73

    MarkowskaK.GrudniakA. M.WolskaK. I. (2013). Silver nanoparticles as an alternative strategy against bacterial biofilms. Acta Biochim. Pol.60, 523530.

  • 74

    Martinez-GutierrezF.BoegliL.AgostinhoA.SánchezE. M.BachH.RuizF.et al. (2013). Anti-biofilm activity of silver nanoparticles against different microorganisms. Biofouling29, 651660. 10.1080/08927014.2013.794225

  • 75

    MillerK. P.WangL.ChenY. P.PellechiaP. J.BenicewiczB. C.DechoA. W. (2015). Engineering nanoparticles to silence bacterial communication. Front. Microbiol.6:189. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00189

  • 76

    MohantyS.MishraS.JenaP.JacobB.SarkarB.SonawaneA. (2012). An investigation on the antibacterial, cytotoxic, and antibiofilm efficacy of starch-stabilized silver nanoparticles. Nanomedicine8, 916924. 10.1016/j.nano.2011.11.007

  • 77

    MoritaY.TomidaJ.KawamuraY. (2014). Responses of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to antimicrobials. Front. Microbiol.4:422. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00422

  • 78

    Morones-RamirezJ. R.WinklerJ. A.SpinaC. S.CollinsJ. J. (2013). Silver enhances antibiotic activity against gram-negative bacteria. Sci. Transl. Med.5, 190ra181. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006276

  • 79

    MoutonJ. W.AmbroseP. G.CantonR.DrusanoG. L.HarbarthS.MacGowanA.et al. (2011). Conserving antibiotics for the future: new ways to use old and new drugs from a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic perspective. Drug Resist. Updat.14, 107117. 10.1016/j.drup.2011.02.005

  • 80

    MoutonJ. W.BrownD. F.ApfalterP.CantónR.GiskeC. G.IvanovaM.et al. (2012). The role of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in setting clinical MIC breakpoints: the EUCAST approach. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.18, E37E45. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03752.x

  • 81

    MukherjeM. (2014). In vitro antimicrobial activity of polyacrylamide doped magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Int. J. Mater. Mech. Manuf.2, 6466. 10.7763/ijmmm.2014.v2.101

  • 82

    MulcahyH.Charron-MazenodL.LewenzaS. (2008). Extracellular DNA chelates cations and induces antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. PLoS Pathog.4:e1000213. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000213

  • 83

    MullerA. E.TheuretzbacherU.MoutonJ. W. (2015). Use of old antibiotics now and in the future from a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic perspective. Clin. Microbiol. Infect.21, 881885. 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.06.007

  • 84

    MurimaP.McKinneyJ. D.PetheK. (2014). Targeting bacterial central metabolism for drug development. Chem. Biol.21, 14231432. 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.08.020

  • 85

    NamK. Y. (2014). Characterization and bacterial anti-adherent effect on modified PMMA denture acrylic resin containing platinum nanoparticles. J. Adv. Prosthodont.6, 207214. 10.4047/jap.2014.6.3.207

  • 86

    NguyenD.Joshi-DatarA.LepineF.BauerleE.OlakanmiO.BeerK.et al. (2011). Active starvation responses mediate antibiotic tolerance in biofilms and nutrient-limited bacteria. Science334, 982986. 10.1126/science.1211037

  • 87

    NikaidoH. (2003). Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.67, 593656. 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.593-656.2003

  • 88

    OldfieldE.FengX. (2014). Resistance-resistant antibiotics. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.35, 664674. 10.1016/j.tips.2014.10.007

  • 89

    OppermanT. J.NguyenS. T. (2015). Recent advances toward a molecular mechanism of efflux pump inhibition. Front. Microbiol.6:421. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00421

  • 90

    PageM. G.BushK. (2014). Discovery and development of new antibacterial agents targeting Gram-negative bacteria in the era of pandrug resistance: is the future promising?Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.18, 9197. 10.1016/j.coph.2014.09.008

  • 91

    PageM. G.DantierC.DesarbreE. (2010). In vitro properties of BAL3(0072). a novel siderophore sulfactam with activity against multiresistant gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.54, 22912302. 10.1128/AAC.01525-09

  • 92

    PalanisamyN. K.FerinaN.AmirulhusniA. N.Mohd-ZainZ.HussainiJ.PingL. J.et al. (2014). Antibiofilm properties of chemically synthesized silver nanoparticles found against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Nanobiotechnology12:2. 10.1186/1477-3155-12-2

  • 93

    PanJ.RenD. (2013). Structural effects on persister control by brominated furanones. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.23, 65596562. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.10.070

  • 94

    ParasionS.KwiatekM.GrykoR.MizakL.MalmA. (2014). Bacteriophages as an alternative strategy for fighting biofilm development. Pol. J. Microbiol.63, 137145.

  • 95

    ParkH. J.ParkS.RohJ.KimS.ChoiK.YiJ.et al. (2013). Biofilm-inactivating activity of silver nanoparticles: a comparison with silver ions. J. Ind. Eng. Chem.19, 614619. 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.09.013

  • 96

    PenesyanA.GillingsM.PaulsenI. T. (2015). Antibiotic discovery: combatting bacterial resistance in cells and in biofilm communities. Molecules20, 52865298. 10.3390/molecules20045286

  • 97

    PetheK.BifaniP.JangJ.KangS.ParkS.AhnS.et al. (2013). Discovery of Q203, a potent clinical candidate for the treatment of tuberculosis. Nat. Med.19, 11571160. 10.1038/nm.3262

  • 98

    PrabhuS.PouloseE. K. (2012). Silver nanoparticles: mechanism of antimicrobial action, synthesis, medical applications, and toxicity effects. Int. Nano Lett.2:32. 10.1186/2228-5326-2-32

  • 99

    PulciniC.BushK.CraigW. A.Frimodt-MøllerN.GraysonM. L.MoutonJ. W.et al. (2012). Forgotten antibiotics: an inventory in Europe, the United States, Canada, and Australia. Clin. Infect. Dis.54, 268274. 10.1093/cid/cir838

  • 100

    PuleC. M.SampsonS. L.WarrenR. M.BlackP. A.van HeldenP. D.VictorT. C.et al. (2016). Efflux pump inhibitors: targeting mycobacterial efflux systems to enhance TB therapy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.71, 1726. 10.1093/jac/dkv316

  • 101

    RadzigM. A.NadtochenkoV. A.KoksharovaO. A.KiwiJ.LipasovaV. A.KhmelI. A. (2013). Antibacterial effects of silver nanoparticles on gram-negative bacteria: influence on the growth and biofilms formation, mechanisms of action. Colloids Surfaces102, 300306. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.07.039

  • 102

    RampioniG.LeoniL.WilliamsP. (2014). The art of antibacterial warfare: deception through interference with quorum sensing-mediated communication. Bioorg. Chem.55, 6068. 10.1016/j.bioorg.2014.04.005

  • 103

    RaoC. V. S.De WaelheynsE.EconomouA.AnnéJ. (2014). Antibiotic targeting of the bacterial secretory pathway. Biochim. Biophy. Acta1843, 17621783. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.02.004

  • 104

    RoeD.KarandikarB.Bonn-SavageN.GibbinsB.RoulletJ. B. (2008). Antimicrobial surface functionalization of plastic catheters by silver nanoparticles. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.61, 869876. 10.1093/jac/dkn034

  • 105

    SambanthamoorthyK.SloupR. E.ParasharV.SmithJ. M.KimE. E.SemmelhackM. F.et al. (2012). Identification of small molecules that antagonize diguanylate cyclase enzymes to inhibit biofilm formation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.56, 52025211. 10.1128/AAC.01396-12

  • 106

    SassP.Brötz-OesterheltH. (2013). Bacterial cell division as a target for new antibiotics. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.16, 522530. 10.1016/j.mib.2013.07.006

  • 107

    SeilJ. T.WebsterT. J. (2012). Antimicrobial applications of nanotechnology: methods and literature. Int. J. Nanomedicine7, 27672781. 10.2147/IJN.S24805

  • 108

    ShawK. J.RatherP. N.HareR. S.MillerG. H. (1993). Molecular genetics of aminoglycoside resistance genes and familial relationships of the aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Microbiol. Rev.57, 138163.

  • 109

    ShetyeG. S.SinghN.JiaC.NguyenC. D.WangG.LukY. Y. (2014). Specific maltose derivatives modulate the swarming motility of nonswarming mutant and inhibit bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chembiochem15, 15141523. 10.1002/cbic.201402093

  • 110

    SinghN.SahaP.RajkumarK.AbrahamJ. (2014). Biosynthesis of silver and selenium nanoparticles by Bacillus sp. JAPSK2 and evaluation of antimicrobial activity. Der. Pharm. Lett.6, 175181.

  • 111

    SmithR. S.ZhangZ.BouchardM.LiJ.LappH. S.BrotskeG. R.et al. (2012). Vascular catheters with a nonleaching poly-sulfobetaine surface modification reduce thrombus formation and microbial attachment. Sci. Transl. Med.4, 153ra132. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004120

  • 112

    SubrameniumG. A.VijayakumarK.PandianS. K. (2015). Limonene inhibits streptococcal biofilm formation by targeting surface-associated virulence factors. J. Med. Microbiol.64, 879890. 10.1099/jmm.0.000105

  • 113

    SunJ.DengZ.YanA. (2014). Bacterial multidrug efflux pumps: mechanisms, physiology and pharmacological exploitations. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.453, 254267. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.05.090

  • 114

    SutcliffeJ. A. (2011). Antibiotics in development targeting protein synthesis. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.1241, 122152. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06323.x

  • 115

    Thekkae PadilV. V.ČerníkM. (2013). Green synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles using gum karaya as a biotemplate and their antibacterial application. Int. J. Nanomedicine8, 889898. 10.2147/IJN.S40599

  • 116

    TillotsonG. S.TheriaultN. (2013). New and alternative approaches to tackling antibiotic resistance. F1000Prime Rep.5:51. 10.12703/P5-51

  • 117

    TotsikaM.KostakiotiM.HannanT. J.UptonM.BeatsonS. A.JanetkaJ. W.et al. (2013). A FimH inhibitor prevents acute bladder infection and treats chronic cystitis caused by multidrug-resistant uropathogenic Escherichia coli ST131. J. Infect. Dis.208, 921928. 10.1093/infdis/jit245

  • 118

    TownsendJ. P.NielsenK. M.FisherD. S.HartlD. L. (2003). Horizontal acquisition of divergent chromosomal DNA in bacteria: effects of mutator phenotypes. Genetics164, 1321.

  • 119

    UrferM.BogdanovicJ.Lo MonteF.MoehleK.ZerbeK.OmasitsU.et al. (2016). A peptidomimetic antibiotic targets outer membrane proteins and disrupts selectively the outer membrane in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem.291, 19211932. 10.1074/jbc.M115.691725

  • 120

    VardanyanZ.GevorkyanV.AnanyanM.VardapetyanH.TrchounianA. (2015). Effects of various heavy metal nanoparticles on Enterococcus hirae and Escherichia coli growth and proton-coupled membrane transport. J. Nanobiotechnol.13, 69. 10.1186/s12951-015-0131-3

  • 121

    VeerachamyS.YarlagaddaT.ManivasagamG.YarlagaddaP. K. (2014). Bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on medical implants: a review. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.228, 10831099. 10.1177/0954411914556137

  • 122

    VenterH.MowlaR.Ohene-AgyeiT.MaS. (2015). RND-type drug efflux pumps from Gram-negative bacteria: molecular mechanism and inhibition. Front. Microbiol.6:377. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00377

  • 123

    WexselblattE.KaspyI.GlaserG.KatzhendlerJ.YavinE. (2013). Design, synthesis and structure-activity relationship of novel Relacin analogs as inhibitors of Rel proteins. Eur. J. Med. Chem.70, 497504. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.10.036

  • 124

    WexselblattE.Oppenheimer-ShaananY.KaspyI.LondonN.Schueler-FurmanO.YavinE.et al. (2012). Relacin, a novel antibacterial agent targeting the Stringent Response. PLoS Pathog.8:e1002925. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002925

  • 125

    WolskaK. I.GrzesK.KurekA. (2012). Synergy between novel antimicrobials and conventional antibiotics or bacteriocins. Pol. J. Microbiol.61, 95104.

  • 126

    XuH.QuF.XuH.LaiW.Andrew WangY.AguilarZ. P.et al. (2012). Role of reactive oxygen species in the antibacterial mechanism of silver nanoparticles on Escherichia coli O157:H7. Biometals25, 4553. 10.1007/s10534-011-9482-x

  • 127

    YuL.ZhangY.ZhangB.LiuJ. (2014). Enhanced antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles/halloysite nanotubes/graphene nanocomposites with sandwich-like structure. Sci. Rep.4, 4551. 10.1038/srep04551

  • 128

    ZhanelG. G.LawsonC. D.ZelenitskyS.FindlayB.SchweizerF.AdamH.et al. (2012). Comparison of the next-generation aminoglycoside plazomicin to gentamicin, tobramycin and amikacin. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. Ther.10, 459473. 10.1586/eri.12.25

  • 129

    ZhangK.WangS.ZhouX.XuH. H.WeirM. D.GeY.et al. (2015). Effect of antibacterial dental adhesive on multispecies biofilms formation. J. Dent. Res.94, 622629. 10.1177/0022034515571416

  • 130

    ZhangL.MahT. F. (2008). Involvement of a novel efflux system in biofilm-specific resistance to antibiotics. J. Bacteriol.190, 44474452. 10.1128/JB.01655-07

  • 131

    ZhangL.PornpattananangkuD.HuC. M.HuangC. M. (2010). Development of nanoparticles for antimicrobial drug delivery. Curr. Med. Chem.17, 585594. 10.2174/092986710790416290

  • 132

    ZhangW.LiC. (2016). Exploiting quorum sensing interfering strategies in gram-negative bacteria for the enhancement of environmental applications. Front. Microbiol.6:1535. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01535

  • 133

    ZhengY.LiJ.LiuX.SunJ. (2012). Antimicrobial and osteogenic effect of Ag-implanted titanium with a nanostructured surface. Int. J. Nanomedicine7, 875884. 10.2147/IJN.S28450

  • 134

    ZhouY.KongY.KunduS.CirilloJ. D.LiangH. (2012). Antibacterial activities of gold and silver nanoparticles against Escherichia coli and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. J. Nanobiotechnology10:19. 10.1186/1477-3155-10-19

  • 135

    ZhuJ.KaufmannG. F. (2013). Quo vadis quorum quenching?Curr. Opin. Pharmacol.13, 688698. 10.1016/j.coph.2013.07.003

Summary

Keywords

antimicrobial resistance, biofilm, persisters, antimicrobial drug, nanoparticles

Citation

Cheng G, Dai M, Ahmed S, Hao H, Wang X and Yuan Z (2016) Antimicrobial Drugs in Fighting against Antimicrobial Resistance. Front. Microbiol. 7:470. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00470

Received

22 December 2015

Accepted

21 March 2016

Published

08 April 2016

Volume

7 - 2016

Edited by

Yuji Morita, Aichi Gakuin University, Japan

Reviewed by

Santi M. Mandal, Vidyasagar University, India; Xian-Zhi Li, Health Canada, Canada; William Charles Nierman, J. Craig Venter Institute, USA

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Zonghui Yuan

This article was submitted to Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics