Daniela Farke
Francesca Dörn
Sebastian Schaub2
Martin J. Schmidt- 1Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Small Animal Clinic – Neurosurgery, Neuroradiology and Clinical Neurology, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
- 2Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Small Animal Clinic – Surgery, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
- 3Unit for Biomathematics and Data Processing, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany
Background: Brachycephalic dogs are overrepresented with ventricular enlargement. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow dynamics are not completely understood. MRI techniques have been used for the visualization of CSF dynamics including phase-contrast imaging.
Objectives: This study aimed to determine a causality between CSF flow and ventriculomegaly or hydrocephalus and to compare CSF flow dynamics among dogs with ventriculomegaly, internal hydrocephalus, and physiologic ventricles.
Animals: A total of 51 client-owned dogs were included in the study.
Methods: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based FLASH sequences and phase-contrast images of the brain were obtained, and the ROI was placed at the level of the mesencephalic aqueduct. ECG monitoring was performed parallel to MRI acquisition. Evaluation of flow diagrams and processing of phase-contrast images were performed using commercially available software (Argus VA80A, Siemens AG Healthcare Sector, Erlangen, Germany). Dogs were divided into three groups: Group 1 consisted of brachycephalic dogs with ventriculomegaly (group 1A) or internal hydrocephalus (group 1B), group 2 consisted of brachycephalic dogs with normal ventricles, and group 3 consisted of meso- to dolichocephalic dogs with normal ventricles.
Results: Group 1 had a higher median Vrost (4.32 cm/s; CI: 2.94–6.33 cm/s) and Vcaud (−6.1 cm/s, CI: 3.99–9.33 cm/s) than group 2 (Vrost: 1.99 cm/s; CI 1.43–2.78 cm/s; Vcaud: 2.91 cm/s, CI: 2.01–4.21 cm/s; p = 0.008; p = 0.03) and group 3 (Vrost:1.85 cm/s, CI: 1.31–2.60 cm/s; Vcaud − 2.46 cm/s, CI 1.68–3.58 cm/s; p = 0.01; p = 0.02). The median Volcaud of group 1 (−0.23 mL/min, CI: 0.13–0.42 mL/min) was higher than that of group 2 (−0.09 mL/min, CI: 0.05 mL/min and 0.15 mL/min) (p = 0.03). Groups 1A and 1B did not differ in Vcaud, Vrost, Volcaud, and Volrost. Group 1A and 1B showed a higher median Vrost (4.01 cm/s, CI: 2.30–7.05 cm/s; 5.94 cm/s, CI: 2.16–7.88 cm/s) than group 2 (1.85 cm/s, CI: 1.24–2.80 cm/s.) (p = 0.03; p = 0.004).
Conclusion and clinical importance: Increased CSF flow velocities in rostral and caudal directions are present in dogs with ventriculomegaly and internal hydrocephalus compared to normal controls.
Introduction
Brachycephalic dogs and cats are frequently observed with internal hydrocephalus showing clinical signs and enlarged ventricles. They are also more likely to have ventriculomegaly, which is the enlargement of the ventricles (1, 2). Despite the absence of neurological signs, canine ventriculomegaly is associated with a loss of white matter and reduced periventricular perfusion, which implies an active distension of the lateral cerebral ventricles with a negative effect on the periventricular white matter (3, 4). Breeding for brachycephalic skull features has resulted in a fundamental change in the neurocranium of dogs and cats (5–9). A premature fusion of skull sutures and synchondroses of the skull base in brachycephalic breeds was found in different dog and cat breeds that leads to a shortening of the skull base, a deformation of the skull vault, and a reduction of the endocranial capacity (5, 8, 10, 11). Higher grades of brachycephaly were correlated with more severe ventricular dilation and internal hydrocephalus in dogs and cats (6, 12). Based on these findings, a pathophysiologic relation between a brachycephalic skull morphology and the development of ventricular distension must be assumed, but a definitive cause–effect relation was not shown, until now.
Phase-contrast MRI is a non-invasive technique for measuring CSF flow dynamics (13, 14) and can be used for quantitative CSF flow measurement in the mesencephalic aqueduct in both humans and dogs (15–18). In this study, the technique was used to investigate potential differences in CSF flow in the mesencephalic aqueduct in brachycephalic and mesocephalic dogs with normal ventricular dimensions compared to brachycephalic dogs with ventriculomegaly or hydrocephalus.
Materials and methods
Study population
The study population consisted of dogs with internal hydrocephalus that were referred for diagnosis and surgical intervention. Flow measurement sequences were performed as part of the diagnostic workup. Clinically normal dogs with brachycephalic and mesocephalic skull conformation were recruited for the study. Only dogs with internal hydrocephalus (group 1B) showed neurological clinical signs localized to the forebrain; all dogs of the other groups were normal on neurological examination. These dogs were also examined in the scope of another research study (19–21), which did not interfere with our research aims. Dogs with structural intracranial lesions other than enlargement of the ventricular system and animals with aqueductal stenosis were excluded from the study. Animals that showed a heart frequency below 60 and above 120 beats per minute during the MRI examination were therefore also excluded from the study, as previously described (18, 22). The study population was divided into three groups:
Group 1: Brachycephalic dogs with internal hydrocephalus or ventriculomegaly.
Group 1A:(ventriculomegaly): Dogs normal on neurological examination and with enlarged ventricles.
Group 1B:(internal hydrocephalus): Dogs with clinical signs localized to the forebrain and with enlarged ventricles.
Group 2:Brachycephalic dogs with normal ventricular dimensions (23).
Group 3:Meso- to dolichocephalic dogs with normal ventricular dimensions (23).
Ethical clearance
This study was conducted strictly according to the recommendations in the Guidelines for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the German Animal Protection Law. Clinically normal dogs with and without ventriculomegaly were scanned with the approval of the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Justus Liebig University Giessen and the Regierungspraesidium Hessen (Permit number: 22-2684-04-02-075/14). The study was conducted with the owners’ written informed consent.
Magnetic resonance imaging
CSF flow measurement using non-invasive phase-contrast MRI was performed at the Clinic for Small Animals of the Justus Liebig University in Giessen from July 2017 to December 2020. MRI acquisition was performed by a board-certified senior radiologist (SS). A standard anesthetic protocol was used for MRI examination and surgical procedure in each animal. Diazepam (0.5 mg/kg) was administered intravenously into a venous catheter (20 gauge), which was placed in the right or left cephalic vein. Anesthesia was induced with propofol (2–4 mg/kg, IV). Dogs were endotracheally intubated, and anesthesia was maintained with 2% isoflurane in oxygen. Dogs were placed in sternal recumbency during the MRI procedure.
Imaging was performed using a 3.0 Tesla Magnetom Verio (Siemens, Germany) and a four-channel flexible surface coil or a 15-channel knee coil depending on the size of the dog. The images included at least transversal T1 (TR 588, TE 15, slice thickness 1 mm) and transverse, sagittal, and dorsal T2-weighted images (turbo spin echo, TR 2900 ms, TE 120 ms, slice thickness 3 mm) to exclude central nervous system (CNS) disease or morphological abnormalities of the brain.
FLASH sequences were performed in a transverse plane perpendicular to the mesencephalic aqueduct, and phase-contrast images were generated. The region of interest (ROI) was placed at the level of the mid-mesencephalic aqueduct (Figure 1). FLASH sequence imaging parameters were obtained as follows: FoV: 180 mm; TR: 30.36 ms, TE: 10.92 ms, flip angle: 10°, slice thickness: 6 mm, phase-contrast: 100%, voxel: 0.7 × 0.7 × 6 mm, basis contrast: 256, venc: −3 – 3, matrix 256 × 256. Efforts were spent to keep surrounding brain tissue out of the ROI. In order to exclude systematic errors by imperfect suppression of eddy currents due to brain motion, another measurement in the mesencephalic tegmentum was obtained (24) representing the apparent velocity in a stationary tissue of no flow and subtracted from the apparent velocities in the ROI (25). Parallel to MRI acquisition, the cardiac cycle was derived and recorded using MR-compatible electrodes (Kendall ECG electrodes, Cardinal Health™; Norderstedt, Germany). The FLASH sequence was started with a solid electrocardiographic signal with a constant heart rate of >60 and < 120 beats per minute (18, 22). Measurements were determined from several heart cycles. After the measurement, the transverse images of the FLASH sequence and the 2D phase contrast were obtained.
Figure 1. A T2-weighted sagittal image (A) and a phase-contrast image in the transversal plane (B) of a 2-year-old French Bulldog from group 2. The T2-weighted MRI (A) demonstrates the level of the mesencephalic aqueduct (lines and circle) at which further phase-contrast images were obtained in the transverse plane (B). The region of interest is pointed out within the phase-contrast image (arrow).
Image analysis
The evaluation of the flow diagrams and the processing of the phase-contrast images and data collection were carried out using the “Argus VA80A” (Copyright 2004 Siemens). Image analysis was performed using a single investigator (FD), who was instructed and supervised by a board-certified radiologist. Directional programming was defined as negative for flow from rostral to caudal (caudal direction) and positive for flow from caudal to rostral (rostral direction) through the aqueduct. The software generated a time velocity curve and measured maximum velocity in the caudal direction (Vcaud), maximum velocity in the rostral direction (Vrost) in cm/s, and the maximal CSF net flow volume in the caudal direction (Volcaud) and rostral direction Volrost in ml/min.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using a commercial statistical software package (Base SAS® 9.4 Procedures Guide: Statistical Procedures, 2nd edition ed. Statistical Analysis System Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States). The covariables age, bodyweight, and heart rate were obtained for each dog. Variables consisted of Vcaud, Volcaud, Vrost, and Volrost and were also assessed for each dog. Vcaud, Volcaud, Vrost, Volrost, and the covariables age and bodyweight were not normally distributed. In order to obtain a normal distribution, a log10 transformation was performed on these data. An analysis of covariance was performed to determine the influence of each group and the covariates on the variables. Once the analysis of covariance had been validated, it was performed for all four variables. The first analysis of covariance was performed between groups 1, 2, and 3. Another analysis of covariance was then performed to compare group 1A, group 1B, and group 2.
The p-values of the pairwise comparisons were processed using Bonferroni correction to adjust the significance level for all variables. For all statistical tests, a significance level of 0.05 was applied. A difference between the groups was assumed with a p-value of <0.1 and a highly significant difference at p < 0.01.
Results
Animals
A total of 84 flow measurements were performed, and 33 dogs were excluded from further analysis due to a heart rate of <60 or > 120 beats per minute. A total of 51 dogs were included in the study. Phase-contrast MRI enabled the assessment of CSF flow in all these dogs.
Group 1: Internal hydrocephalus or ventriculomegaly with brachycephalic skull conformation (14); 1A: ventriculomegaly (n = 8); 1B: internal hydrocephalus (n = 7). The mean age was 24 months (5–120 months), the mean body weight was 7.7 kg (2–30 kg), and the mean heart rate was 98.5 beats per minute (63–114 beats per minute) in this group.
Group 2: Physiologic ventricular spaces with brachycephalic skull conformation (n = 16). The mean age was 48 months (12–180 months), the mean body weight was 9.6 kg (3–37 kg), and the mean heart rate was 97.1 beats per minute (70–120 beats per minute) in this group.
Group 3: Physiologic ventricular spaces with meso- or dolichocephalic skull conformation (n = 20). The mean age was 72 months (12–144 months), the mean body weight was 20.2 kg (7–50 kg), and the mean heart rate was 95.9 beats per minute (62–119 beats per minute) in this group.
A typical sinusoidal pattern of CSF flow was observed during the cardiac cycle (Figure 2). The respective flow measurements of each group are given in Table 1.
Figure 2. A biphasic sinusoidal flow curve over one cardiac cycle is shown in a Chihuahua of group 2 (A) and a Chihuahua of group 1B (B). The red dots represent the individual data sets per phase-contrast image. The x-axis corresponds to the time in milliseconds over one cardiac cycle and the y-axis to the velocity in centimeters per second. Positive values above the zero line correspond to diastolic values and represent the rostral flow direction. In contrast, negative values below the zero line correspond to the systolic values, with a caudal direction of flow. The dashed line represents the spline for curve modeling. Higher flow velocities can be observed in group 1B (B) compared to group 2 (A).
Table 1. Dog breeds including their age, body weight, and measured flow parameters in group 1A (brachycephalic dogs with internal hydrocephalus), group 1B (brachycephalic dogs with ventriculomegaly), group 2 (brachycephalic dogs with normal ventricular dimensions), and group 3 (mesocephalic dogs with normal ventricular dimensions).
Group 1 showed a significantly higher median Vrost than group 2 (group 1: 4.32 cm/s; CI: 2.94–6.33 cm/s; group 2: 1.99 cm/s; CI 1.43–2.78 cm/s; p = 0.03). There was also a significant difference between groups 1 and 3, with group 1 showing a significantly higher median Vrost than group 3 (1.85 cm/s, CI: 1.31–2.60 cm/s; p = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the median Vrost of groups 2 and 3 (p > 0.05).
Group 1 showed a significantly higher median Vcaud than group 2 (group 1: −6.1 cm/s, CI: 3.99–9.33 cm/s; group 2: −1.99 cm/s, CI 1.43–2.78 cm/s; p = 0.008). Group 1 also showed a significantly higher median Vcaud than group 3 (−2.46 cm/s, CI 1.68–3.58 cm/s) (p = 0.01). There was no significant difference between the median Vcaud of groups 2 and 3 (p > 0.05).
The median Volrost of group 1 (0.07 mL/min), group 2 (0.05 mL/min), and group 3 (0.05 mL/min) did not show any significant differences among the groups (p = 1). The median Volcaud of group 1 (−0.23 mL/min, CI: 0.13–0.42 mL/min) was significantly higher than the median Volcaud of group 2 (−0.09 mL/min, CI: 0.05 mL/min and 0.15 mL/min; p = 0.03). A comparison of group 1 and group 3 with a median Volcaud of −0.09 mL/min revealed a tendency of difference among these two groups, but it was not significant (p = 0.08). There was no significant difference between group 2 and group 3 (p > 0.05).
Groups 1A and 1B showed a higher median Vrost (group 1A: 4.01 cm/s, CI: 2.30–7.05 cm/s; group 1B: 5.94 cm/s, CI: 2.16–7.88 cm/s) than group 2 (1.85 cm/s, CI: 1.24–2.80 cm/s; p = 0.03; p = 0.004).
Group 1A had a median Vrost of 4.01 cm/s (CI: 2.30–7.05 cm/s) that was not significantly different from group 1B with a median Vrost of 5.94 cm/s (CI: 2.16–7.88 cm/s; p = 0.83). Group 1A showed a significantly higher median Vrost than group 2 (1.85 cm/s; CI: 1.24–2.80 cm/s; p = 0.03). There was also a significant difference between the median Vrost of groups 1B and 2 (p = 0.004). Group 1A had a median Vcaud of −5.27 cm/s, which was not significantly different from group 1B with a median Vcaud of −6.3 cm/s (p = 1). There was no significant difference between group 1A and the median Vcaud of group 2 (−2.73 cm/s; p = 0.29). A comparison between the median Vcaud of group 1B and group 2 also did not show any significant difference (p = 0.2).
The median Volrost of group 1A (0.09 mL/min), group 1B (0.08 mL/min), and group 2 (0.05 mL/min) did not show any significant differences among the groups (p = 1). The median Volcaud of group 1A was −0.18 mL/s and showed no significant difference compared to group 1B with a Volcaud of −0.24 mL/min (p = 1).
Discussion
A brachycephalic skull morphology has a profound influence on many organ systems in dogs including the brain (26, 27) and its ventricular system. Ventriculomegaly is often observed in brachycephalic dogs (3, 28), which raises the question of whether there is a causal relationship between brachycephalic skull features and the development of ventricular enlargement. Using phase-contrast MRI, we evaluated CSF flow velocities in the mesencephalic aqueduct of different groups of dogs and found an increased flow velocity in brachycephalic dogs with ventriculomegaly and internal hydrocephalus compared to both brachycephalic and mesocephalic dogs with physiologic ventricular dimensions.
As mentioned in the introduction, the skull conformation of brachycephalic animals is associated with premature closure of one or more skull sutures, which is referred to as craniosynostosis (8, 10, 11). Children with brachycephalic skull morphologies based on craniosynostoses often have abnormal morphology of the cranial base, causing jugular foramen stenosis and subsequent impairment of venous drainage. This, in turn, results in reduced reabsorption of CSF into the venous system, increased intraventricular pressure, and ventricular distension of variable degrees (29–32). Surgical widening of the jugular foramen was proven to lead to a reduction in internal hydrocephalus, which proves the pathophysiologic association (33). Decreased volume of the jugular foramen potentially causing venous congestion was also described in brachycephalic dog breeds (34) and was suggested to be associated with an enlargement of the cerebral ventricles (34–36).
Another pathogenic factor in children with craniosynostosis is a reduced cranial capacity (37, 38), which has important implications for the arterial “windkessel” function in the basal cisterns and for general brain compliance. Arterial distension in the basal cisterns and brain expansion during systole transform a pulsatile blood flow in the arterial ring (circle of Willis) and basilar artery to a smooth linear blood flow to the cerebral arterioles and capillaries (39). The systolic filling of the brain with blood causes brain parenchyma expansion, which, in turn, reduces the cerebral ventricle volume. This is suggested to be the driving force of CSF through the ventricular system (40, 41). Impaired space for the cerebral blood vessels and the parenchyma to expand can result in augmented pulsatile blood flow through the parenchyma and thereby a hyperdynamic CSF flow through the ventricles that cannot be fully drained through the mesencephalic aqueduct (42–46). A higher flow velocity in the aqueduct may offer a limited compensatory mechanism, but increased pumping of CSF out of the lateral and third ventricles likely results in partial reflection of the CSF pulse wave from the aqueduct back toward the third and lateral cerebral ventricles. Such an alteration of CSF flow dynamics was shown to be associated with the development of various forms of hydrocephalus in humans (15, 47–49). Again, a reduced cranial capacity was also found in dogs and cats with brachycephaly and craniosynostoses, and the same mechanisms described for humans with this skull growth disease were proposed to cause ventricular distension and hydrocephalus in animals (5, 6, 10, 50). The findings in the present study may further support this theory.
CSF flow through the aqueduct is bidirectional. Tachy- and bradycardia can result in changes in CSF flow dynamics, with tachycardia leading to reduced flow and bradycardia leading to increased flow within the mesencephalic aqueduct (22, 51). Severe tachycardia can result in the termination of measurements; therefore upper and lower reference values are chosen to account for a better comparison and reduce the risk of false measurements (18, 22). During the cardiac systole, there is a flow from the third ventricle toward the fourth ventricle, while the reverse occurs during diastole. In the dogs with internal hydrocephalus and ventriculomegaly, the caudally directed net flow volume (Volcaud) and caudal flow velocity (Vcaud) were higher than those in groups 2 and 3. This is consistent with the findings in humans with communicating internal hydrocephalus; however, published data in humans are quite inconsistent. While some authors did find increased caudal flow volume (52, 53), others documented increased rostral flow volume (54) or found both increased caudal flow volume and rostral flow volume in their cohorts (55). The measured data in group 1 would indicate that not enough CSF volume can exit the ventricular system through the lateral apertures, and a higher volume than usual flows back to the third ventricle through diastole. This CSF contributes to the overload of the third and lateral cerebral ventricles and to their progressive distension.
It is interesting to note that differences in flow velocity and volume between brachycephalic dogs with normal ventricular dimensions (group 2) and meso−/dolichocephalic dogs with normal ventricular dimensions (group 3) were not identified. Following the hypothesis that aberrant CSF flow is a pathogenetic factor in the development of ventricular distension and brachycephaly is promoting the hyperdynamic flow, it could be expected to measure a subsequent increase of flow parameters between groups, with normal brachycephalic dogs having higher CSF flow velocity and volume than normal mesocephalic dogs and brachycephalic dogs with ventriculomegaly having a higher velocity than brachycephalic dogs with normal ventricular dimensions. Finally, it could be expected to find a higher flow in brachycephalic dogs with internal hydrocephalus compared to brachycephalic dogs with ventriculomegaly. The lack of difference between normal brachycephalic dogs and mesocephalic dogs might be due to higher grades of brachycephaly in group 1 than in group 2. Evaluation of a significant difference in cranial indices between the groups would have been ideal, but the groups included many different dog breeds with different grades of brachycephaly in general. A comparison of homogenous groups of the same dog breed would have been ideal, but it was not possible during this study. Furthermore, the measurement in MRI only provides a snapshot, taken under general anesthesia and in a lying position, which potentially has an influence on measured parameters and does not reflect the conditions in the awake and standing animal. However, an alternative explanation for the lack of difference between normal brachycephalic dogs and mesocephalic dogs may be that the hypothesis concerning reduced cranial compliance and venous congestion in brachycephalic dogs in general only explains a part of the pathogenetic factors that cause ventricular distension.
The lack of a difference between groups 1A and 1B was also striking. It was suggested that ventriculomegaly might be a compensated or arrested form of hydrocephalus (3, 37). Based on the finding that both conditions have an abnormally high CSF flow, it would be possible that ventriculomegaly might be progressive, and affected dogs could be at risk of developing further ventricular distension in the future and should therefore be monitored. Further studies are necessary to investigate if a cutoff value can be found that helps to identify dogs that are at risk for further ventricular expansion and to justify repeated MRIs in these dogs.
Phase-contrast MRI is a comparably new technique in veterinary medicine. Two previous pilot studies used the technique in laboratory beagles and provided normative measurements as a reference (18, 56). It is interesting to note that peak velocities in normal mesocephalic dogs measured in the present study were higher (median 1.85 cm/s) than those in mesocephalic dogs measured in the other two studies (0.92; ± 0.5 cm/s (18) and 0.76 ± 0.43 cm/s (56)). However, there is an overlap of the measurements of all studies. CSF flow values can also vary in humans (57). First, the peak flow velocity can differ according to the level of the mesencephalic aqueduct at which the measurement was made. The aqueduct is funnel-shaped with the narrowest lumen at the rostral entry zone, while the caudal exit zone has the widest lumen. Based on our assessment, the measurements in the two studies mentioned and our own were taken at the same area of the mesencephalic aqueduct, making significant differences based on this unlikely. As in humans, variations in CSF flow measurements may be attributed to the difference in body size (58), which can influence head and brain size. Our control group included dogs with a mean body weight of 20 kg. This was much higher than in standard laboratory beagles. Age could also play a role, as a study comparing CSF flow velocity in human infants found a higher CSF flow velocity than in adults (59). Additionally, a linear increase in peak velocity with age has been observed in adult humans (60).
Conclusion
Brachycephalic dogs with both internal hydrocephalus and ventriculomegaly have increased caudally directed flow velocity and volume compared to brachycephalic and mesocephalic dogs with normal ventricular dimensions. As brachycephalic dogs with ventriculomegaly have the same increased flow as dogs with internal hydrocephalus, repetitive MRI might be indicated to control further ventricular distension.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The animal studies were approved by Regierungspräsidium Giessen, Hessen, Germany. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.
Author contributions
DF: Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. FD: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Writing – review & editing. SS: Data curation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing. EW: Investigation, Writing – review & editing. KB: Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – review & editing. MS: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abbreviations
AM, mesencephalic aqueduct; ECG, electrocardiogram; FoV, field of view; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; Volrost, maximum net volume with rostral flow direction; Volcaud, maximum net volume with caudal flow direction; cm/s, centimeter per second; ml/min, milliliter per minute; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; ROI, region of interest; TE, time of echo; TR, time of repetition; venc, “venc-velocity”; Vrost, maximum velocity in rostral direction; Vcaud, maximum velocity in caudal direction.
References
1. McGavin, MD, and Zachary, JF. Nervensystem. In: JP Teifke, C Löhr, R Klopfleisch, and RE Marschang, editors. Pathologie der Haustiere. Allgemeine. spezielle und funktionelle Veterinärpathologie. München: Elsevier Urban und Fischer (2009)
2. Biel, M, Kramer, M, Forterre, F, Jurina, K, Lautersack, O, Failing, K, et al. Outcome of ventriculoperitoneal shunt implantation for treatment of congenital internal hydrocephalus in dogs and cats: 36 cases (2001–2009). J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2013) 242:948–58. doi: 10.2460/javma.242.7.948
3. Schmidt, MJ, Laubner, S, Kolecka, M, Failing, K, Moritz, A, Kramer, M, et al. Comparison of the relationship between cerebral white matter and Grey matter in Normal dogs and dogs with lateral ventricular enlargement. PLoS One. (2015) 10:e0124174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124174
4. Schmidt, MJ, Kolecka, M, Kirberger, R, and Hartmann, A. Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates reduced periventricular cerebral blood flow in dogs with Ventriculomegaly. Front Vet Sci. (2017) 4:137. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00137
5. Schmidt, MJ, Amort, KH, Failing, K, Klingler, M, Kramer, M, and Ondreka, N. Comparison of the endocranial- and brain volumes in brachycephalic dogs. Mesaticephalic dogs and cavalier king Charles spaniels in relation to their body weight. Acta Vet Scand. (2014) 56:30. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-56-30
6. Schmidt, MJ, Kampschulte, M, Enderlein, S, Gorgas, D, Lang, J, Ludewig, E, et al. The relationship between brachycephalic head features in modern Persian cats and Dysmorphologies of the skull and internal hydrocephalus. J Vet Intern Med. (2017) 31:1487–501. doi: 10.1111/jvim.14805
7. Sieslack, J, Farke, D, Failing, K, Kramer, M, and Schmidt, MJ. Correlation of brachycephaly grade with level of exophthalmos, reduced airway passages and degree of dental malalignment' in Persian cats. PLoS One. (2021) 16:e0254420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254420
8. Geiger, M, Schoenebeck, JJ, Schneider, RA, Schmidt, MJ, Fischer, MS, and Sánchez-Villagra, MR. Exceptional changes in skeletal anatomy under domestication: the case of Brachycephaly. Integr Org Biol. (2021) 3:obab023. doi: 10.1093/iob/obab023
9. Ekenstedt, KJ, Crosse, KR, and Risselada, M. Canine Brachycephaly: anatomy. Pathology. Genetics and welfare. J Comp Pathol. (2020) 176:109–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2020.02.008
10. Schmidt, MJ, Volk, H, Klingler, M, Failing, K, Kramer, M, and Ondreka, N. Comparison of closure times for cranial base synchondroses in mesaticephalic. Brachycephalic. And cavalier king Charles spaniel dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. (2013) 54:497–503. doi: 10.1111/vru.12072
11. Schmidt, MJ, Farke, D, Staszyk, C, Lang, A, Büttner, K, Plendl, J, et al. Closure times of neurocranial sutures and synchondroses in Persian compared to domestic shorthair cats. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:573. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-04783-1
12. Rusbridge, C, and Knowler, P. The need for head space: Brachycephaly and cerebrospinal fluid disorders. Life. (2021) 11:13. doi: 10.3390/life11020139
13. Mascalchi, M, Ciraolo, L, Tanfani, G, Taverni, N, Inzitari, D, Siracusa, GF, et al. Cardiac-gated phase MR imaging of Aqueductal CSF flow. J Comput Assist Tomogr. (1988) 12:923–6. doi: 10.1097/00004728-198811000-00003
14. Ahmad, N, Salama, D, and Al-Haggar, M. MRI CSF flowmetry in evaluation of different neurological diseases. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. (2021) 52:53. doi: 10.1186/s43055-021-00429-w
15. Kim, DS, Choi, JU, Huh, R, Yun, PH, and Kim, DI. Quantitative assessment of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics using a phase-contrast cine MR image in hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst. (1999) 15:461–7. doi: 10.1007/s003810050440
16. Parkkola, RK, Komu, MES, Äärimaa, TM, Alanen, MS, and Thomsen, C. Cerebrospinal fluid flow in children with normal and dilated ventricles studied by MR imaging. Acta Radiol. (2001) 42:33–8. doi: 10.1080/028418501127346431
17. Cerda-Gonzalez, S, Olby, NJ, Broadstone, R, McCullough, S, and Osborne, JA. Characteristics of cerebrospinal fluid flow in cavalier king Charles spaniels analyzed using phase velocity cine magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. (2009) 50:467–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01571.x
18. Christen, MA, Schweizer-Gorgas, D, Richter, H, Joerger, FB, and Dennler, M. Quantification of cerebrospinal fluid flow in dogs by cardiac-gated phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Vet Intern Med. (2021) 35:333–40. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15932
19. Schaub, KI, Kelleners, N, Schmidt, MJ, Eley, N, and Fischer, MS. Three-dimensional kinematics of the pelvis and caudal lumbar spine in German shepherd dogs. Front Vet Sci. (2021) 8:709966. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.709966
20. Schikowski, L, Eley, N, Kelleners, N, Schmidt, MJ, and Fischer, MS. Three-dimensional kinematic motion of the Craniocervical junction of Chihuahuas and Labrador retrievers. Front Vet Sci. (2021) 8:709967. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.709967
21. Nickel, MK, Schikowski, L, Fischer, MS, Kelleners, N, Schmidt, MJ, and Eley, N. Three-dimensional kinematics of the craniocervical junction of cavalier king Charles spaniels compared to Chihuahuas and Labrador retrievers. PLoS One. (2023) 18:e0278665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278665
22. Bock, A, Geske, R, and Schnackenburg, B. Einfluss der Herzfrequenzänderung auf die Reproduzierbarkeit der Liquorflussmessungen im Aquädukt. Klin Neuroradiol. (2003) 13:20–6. doi: 10.1007/s00062-003-4345-7
23. Czerwik, A, Schmidt, MJ, Olszewska, A, Hinz, S, Büttner, K, and Farke, D. Reliability and interobserver variability of a grading system of ventricular distension in dogs. Front Vet Sci. (2023):10:1271545. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1271545
24. Barkhof, F, Kouwenhoven, M, Scheltens, P, Sprenger, M, Algra, P, and Valk, J. Phase-contrast cine MR imaging of normal aqueductal CSF flow. Acta Radiol. (1994) 35:123–30. doi: 10.1177/028418519403500204
25. Lee, JH, Lee, HK, Kim, JK, Kim, HJ, Park, JK, and Choi, CG. CSF flow quantification of the cerebral aqueduct in normal volunteers using phase contrast cine MR imaging. Korean J Radiol. (2004) 5:81–6. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2004.5.2.81
26. Roberts, T, McGreevy, P, and Valenzuela, M. Human induced rotation and reorganization of the brain of domestic dogs. PLoS One. (2010) 5:e11946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011946
27. Knowler, SP, Cross, C, Griffiths, S, McFadyen, AK, Jovanovik, J, Tauro, A, et al. Use of morphometric mapping to characterise symptomatic Chiari-like malformation, secondary Syringomyelia and associated Brachycephaly in the cavalier king Charles spaniel. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e0170315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170315
28. Driver, CJ, Chandler, K, Walmsley, G, Shibab, N, and Volk, HA. The association between Chiari-like malformation, ventriculomegaly and seizures in cavalier king Charles spaniels. Vet J. (2013) 195:235–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.05.014
29. Cinalli, G, Sainte-Rose, C, Kollar, EM, Zerah, M, Brunelle, F, Chumas, P, et al. Hydrocephalus and Craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg. (1998) 88:209–14. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.2.0209
30. Moritani, T, Aihara, T, Oguma, E, Makiyama, Y, Nishimoto, H, Smoker, WR, et al. Magnetic resonance venography of achondroplasia: correlation of venous narrowing at the jugular foramen with hydrocephalus. Clin Imaging. (2006) 30:195–200. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2005.10.004
31. Florisson, JM, Barmpalios, G, Lequin, M, van Veelen, MLC, Bannink, N, Hayward, RD, et al. Venous hypertension in syndromic and complex craniosynostosis: the abnormal anatomy of the jugular foramen and collaterals. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. (2015) 43:312–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.11.023
32. Bateman, GA, Yap, SL, Subramanian, GM, and Bateman, AR. The incidence of significant venous sinus stenosis and cerebral hyperemia in childhood hydrocephalus: prognostic value with regards to differentiating active from compensated disease. Fluids Barriers CNS. (2020) 17:33. doi: 10.1186/s12987-020-00194-4
33. Lundar, T, Bakke, SJ, and Nornes, H. Hydrocephalus in an achondroplastic child treated by venous decompression at the jugular foramen. Case report. J Neurosurg. (1990) 73:138–40. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.73.1.0138
34. Schmidt, MJ, Ondreka, N, Sauerbrey, M, Volk, HA, Rummel, C, and Kramer, M. Volume reduction of the foramina in cavalier king Charles spaniels with syringomyelia. BMC Vet Res. (2012) 8:158. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-158
35. Fenn, J, Schmidt, MJ, Simpson, H, Driver, CJ, and Volk, HA. Venous sinus volume in the caudal cranial fossa in cavalier king Charles spaniels with syringomyelia. Vet J. (2013) 197:896–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.007
36. Kolecka, M, Farke, D, Failling, K, Kramer, M, and Schmidt, MJ. Intraoperative measurement of intraventricular pressure in dogs with communicating internal hydrocephalus. PLoS One. (2019) 14:e0222725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222725
37. Camfield, P, Camfield, C, and Cohen, M. Neurological aspects of craniosynostosis. In: M Cohen . MacLean, R . editors. Craniosynostosis: Diagnosis. Evaluation. And management. 2. New York: Oxford University Press; (2000). pp. 177–183.
38. Hill, CA, Vaddi, S, Moffitt, A, Kane, AA, Marsh, JL, Panchal, J, et al. Intracranial volume and whole brain volume in infants with Unicoronal Craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. (2011) 48:394–8. doi: 10.1597/10-051
39. Chan, GS, Ainslie, PN, Willie, CK, Taylor, CE, Atkinson, G, Jones, H, et al. Contribution of arterial Windkessel in low-frequency cerebral hemodynamics during transient changes in blood pressure. J Appl Physiol. (2011) 110:917–25. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01407.2010
40. Han, CY, and Backous, DD. Basic principles of cerebrospinal fluid metabolism and intracranial pressure homeostasis. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. (2005) 38:569–76. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2005.01.005
41. Forner Giner, J, Sanz-Requena, R, Flórez, N, Alberich-Bayarri, A, García-Martí, G, Ponz, A, et al. Quantitative phase-contrast MRI study of cerebrospinal fluid flow: a method for identifying patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurologia. (2014) 29:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2013.02.016
42. Bradley, WG Jr, Scalzo, D, Queralt, J, Nitz, WN, Atkinson, DJ, and Wong, P. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology. (1996) 198:523–9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.198.2.8596861
43. Bradley, WG Jr . CSF flow in the brain in the context of Normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2015) 36:831–8. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4124
44. Scollato, A, Tenenbaum, R, Bahl, G, Celerini, M, Salani, B, and Di Lorenzo, N. Changes in aqueductal CSF stroke volume and progression of symptoms in patients with unshunted idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2008) 29:192–7. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0785
45. Shanks, J, Markenroth Bloch, K, Laurell, K, Cesarini, KG, Fahlström, M, Larsson, EM, et al. Aqueductal CSF stroke volume is increased in patients with idiopathic Normal pressure hydrocephalus and decreases after shunt surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2019) 40:453–9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5972
46. Maeda, S, Otani, T, Yamada, S, Watanabe, Y, Ilik, SY, and Wada, S. Biomechanical effects of hyper-dynamic cerebrospinal fluid flow through the cerebral aqueduct in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients. J Biomech. (2023) 156:111671. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2023.111671
47. Greitz, D, Wirestam, R, Franck, A, Nordell, B, Thomsen, C, and Ståhlberg, F. Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrodynamics studied by magnetic resonance phase imaging. The Monro-Kellie doctrine revisited. Neuroradiology. (1992) 34:370–80. doi: 10.1007/BF00596493
48. Gideon, P, Ståhlberg, F, Thomsen, C, Gjerri, F, Sørensen, PS, and Henriksen, O. Cerebrospinal fluid flow and production in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus studied by MRI. Neuroradiology. (1994) 36:210–5. doi: 10.1007/BF00588133
49. Tawfik, AM, Elsorogy, L, Abdelghaffar, R, Naby, AA, and Elmenshawi, I. Phase-contrast MRI CSF flow measurements for the diagnosis of Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: observer agreement of velocity versus volume parameters. Am J Roentgenol. (2017) 208:838–43. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16995
50. Scrivani, PV, Freer, SR, Dewey, CW, and Cerda-Gonzalez, S. Cerebrospinal fluid signal-void sign in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. (2009) 50:269–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01532.x
51. Sherman, JL, and Citrin, CM. Magnetic resonance demonstration of normal CSF flow. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (1986) 7:3–6.
52. Ringstad, G, Emblem, KE, and Eide, PK. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging reveals net retrograde aqueductal flow in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg. (2016) 124:1850–7. doi: 10.3171/2015.6.JNS15496
53. Yin, LK, Zheng, JJ, Zhao, L, Hao, XZ, Zhang, XX, Tian, JQ, et al. Reversed aqueductal cerebrospinal fluid net flow in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand. (2017) 136:434–9. doi: 10.1111/ane.12750
54. Qvarlander, S, Ambarki, K, Wåhlin, A, Jacobsson, J, Birgander, R, Malm, J, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and blood flow patterns in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand. (2016) 135:576–84. doi: 10.1111/ane.12636
55. Lindstrøm, EK, Ringstad, G, Mardal, KA, and Eide, PK. Cerebrospinal fluid volumetric net flow rate and direction in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroimage Clin. (2018) 20:731–41. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.09.006
56. Cho, H, Kim, Y, Hong, S, and Choi, H. Cerebrospinal fluid flow in normal beagle dogs analyzed using magnetic resonance imaging. J Vet Sci. (2021) 22:e2. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2021.22.e2
57. Kolbitsch, C, Schocke, M, Lorenz, IH, Kremser, C, Zschiegner, F, Pfeiffer, KP, et al. Phase-contrast MRI measurement of systolic cerebrospinal fluid peak velocity (CSFV (peak)) in the aqueduct of Sylvius: a noninvasive tool for measurement of cerebral capacity. Anesthesiology. (1999) 90:1546–50. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199906000-00008
58. Demirtaş, G, Siğirci, A, Öztürk, M, Görkem, SB, Kiliç, B, and Güngör, S. Is cerebral spinal fluid flow associated with body mass index and head circumference in healthy children? A phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging study. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. (2020) 51:107. doi: 10.1186/s43055-020-00227-w
59. Gideon, P, Thomsen, C, Stahlberg, F, and Henriksen, O. Cerebrospinal fluid production and dynamics in normal aging: a MRI phase-mapping study. Acta Neurol Scand. (1994) 89:362–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1994.tb02647.x
Keywords: CSF flow dynamics, brachycephaly, canine, ventriculomegaly, internal hydrocephalus
Citation: Farke D, Dörn F, Schaub S, Wenz E, Büttner K and Schmidt MJ (2024) CSF flow measurement in the mesencephalic aqueduct using 2D cine phase-contrast MRI in dogs with communicating internal hydrocephalus, ventriculomegaly, and physiologic ventricular spaces. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1473778. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1473778
Edited by:
Andrea Tipold, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, GermanyReviewed by:
Sam Long, Veterinary Referral Hospital, AustraliaRell Lin Parker, Virginia Tech, United States
Copyright © 2024 Farke, Dörn, Schaub, Wenz, Büttner and Schmidt. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Daniela Farke, RGFuaWVsYS5GYXJrZUB2ZXRtZWQudW5pLWdpZXNzZW4uZGU=