Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci., 11 June 2024
Sec. Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights in Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology: 2023 View all 12 articles

Functional infrared thermography imaging can be used to assess the effectiveness of Maxicam Gel® in pre-emptively treating transient synovitis and lameness in horses

  • 1Laboratory of Equine Exercise Physiology and Pharmacology (LAFEQ), Department of Animal Morphology and Physiology, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil
  • 2Research and Development Department, Ourofino Animal Health Company, São Paulo, Brazil
  • 3Veterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lusófona University - Lisbon University Centre, Lisbon, Portugal
  • 4Equine Sports Medicine Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, FCAV/UNESP, São Paulo, Brazil

Introduction: Diagnosing and treating lameness in horses is essential to improving their welfare. In equine orthopedic practice, infrared thermography (IRT) can indirectly detect soreness. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can treat painful and inflammatory processes in horses. Using IRT, the efficacy of meloxicam (Maxicam Gel®) was evaluated in pre-treating transient synovitis in horses induced by a middle carpal joint injection of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from E. coli 055:B5 at a dose of 10 endotoxin units.

Methods: In a cross-over design, six healthy horses were randomly assigned to receive either 0.6 mg/kg of oral Maxicam Gel® (MAXVO) or a mock administration (control group, C) following a two-week washout period. IRT of the middle carpal joint, visual lameness assessment and joint circumference were recorded over time. Clinical and hematological evaluations were performed. Synovial fluid aspirates were analyzed for total nucleated cell count, total protein, and prostaglandin E2. A mixed effects analysis of variance was performed for repeated measures over time, followed by Tukey’s test. A multinomial logistic regression was conducted to determine whether there is a relationship between a thermography temperature change and the lameness score.

Results: There were no changes in joint circumference. The MAXVO group showed a lower rectal temperature 4 h after synovitis induction. The C group presented an increase in neutrophils and a decrease in total hemoglobin and hematocrit 8 h after induction. No changes were observed in the synovial fluid between groups. The horses that received meloxicam did not show clinically significant lameness at any time, while the C group showed an increase in lameness 2, 4, and 8 h after synovitis induction.

Discussion: IRT indicated that the skin surface temperature of the middle carpal joint was lower in horses who received meloxicam, suggesting a reduction in the inflammatory process induced by LPS. It was observed that the maximum temperature peaks in the dorsopalmar and lateropalmar positions can be utilized to predict the severity of lameness, particularly when the temperature rises above 34°C. Horses pre-treated with meloxicam showed either reduced or no indication of mild to moderate pain and presented a lowehr thermographic temperature, which indicates the effectiveness of Maxicam Gel® as an anti-inflammatory.

1 Introduction

Diagnosing and treating lameness in horses is crucial for ensuring their welfare in the equine field practice. One helpful approach to diagnosis is thermal imaging, which estimates the pathophysiological response to a noxious stimulus through heat production (1). To manage inflammatory and painful conditions in horses, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are commonly administered to treat musculoskeletal diseases (2). These drugs are potent inhibitors of cyclooxygenase enzymes (COXs), which are responsible for converting arachidonic acid into eicosanoids such as prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and thromboxanes. These chemical mediators play an essential role in the inflammation cascade, including increased vascular permeability and heat. Blocking the production of these mediators causes an anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect (3, 4).

COX-1 is constitutively expressed in almost all body tissues, acting in routine and physiological functions, including gastrointestinal homeostasis, through cytoprotection of the gastric epithelium, and maintenance of renal blood perfusion. COX-2 is an enzyme up-regulated by cytokines that show increased activity during pro-inflammatory states. Unlike COX-1, COX-2 has relatively low activity under physiological conditions (3, 5, 6). In recent decades, drugs with greater selectivity for COX-2 have been developed, such as meloxicam, an NSAID belonging to the enolic acid class. The main advantage of COX-2 selective NSAIDs is the reduction in adverse effects associated with the gastrointestinal tract, such as gastric ulcerations and colitis (6). In rats, ulcerogenicity in the stomach is weak compared to anti-inflammatory potency, resulting in a high therapeutic index (7).

Meloxicam effectively relieves postoperative pain in human patients undergoing several types of surgeries, such as knee osteoarthritis surgery. For instance, a trail showed that two oral doses preemptively administered of meloxicam improved postoperative pain control in patients receiving arthroscopic knee surgery (8). According to these authors, meloxicam’s potential as a preemptive analgesic in postoperative pain control is preliminary but promising. In equine medicine, more information on the preemptive use of meloxicam that can be applied clinically needs to be present in the literature.

Some studies have shown that meloxicam is effective in treating lameness in horses caused by synovitis induced by intra-articular administration of lipopolysaccharides (LPS), principally model of inflammatory pain. These studies have used various methods and biomarkers to test the clinical effectiveness of meloxicam. The administration of meloxicam has been found to reduce clinical lameness scores (5, 911), mitigate the asymmetry of head movement (5), and suppress inflammatory markers such as total protein (TP), total nucleated cell count (TNCC), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in synovial fluid (11, 12). Thus, there is scientific evidence to suggest that meloxicam can reduce musculoskeletal pain of inflammatory origin in horses.

Another technique that demonstrates potential for detecting NSAIDs’ effectiveness is infrared thermography (IRT), a noninvasive, radiation free, practical, fast, and low-cost method. Evaluation of the surface temperature can be used as a diagnostic tool to accurately estimate the thermal, metabolic, and vascular conditions of the equine body. Changes in local perfusion, such as vasodilation, can cause alterations in the body surface temperature. Increases in vascularization and blood supply to tissues are the basis for thermography diagnosis. Temperature is a crucial physical property that can directly reflect joint inflammation. Thus, IRT can be used to map classic inflammatory clinical signs such as heat, which indicates changes in skin surface temperature caused by vascular or inflammatory alterations (1, 1315).

Heat is one of the key signs of inflammation, as the increased blood supply caused by inflammation leads to an increase in local temperature (16). IRT has been used in various studies involving horses, such as detection of jugular venipuncture for anti-doping control in equestrian events (17), monitoring of musculoskeletal adaptation to training (18), evaluation of the welfare in athlete horses (19), monitoring the effects of training (20, 21), assessment of thermoregulation during exercise (22), validation for the use of eye temperature as an indicator of well-being (23), detection of pregnancy in mares (24), evaluation of the oral administration of meloxicam or flunixin meglumine in an inflammatory response induced by the administration of systemic LPS (25), evaluation of thermoregulation using two methods of post-exercise cooling (26), evaluation of biocompatibility of polymers (27, 28), among others.

IRT has been used in humans to screen soft tissue and measure joint skin temperature to diagnose conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and ankle sprains (15, 2931). In bovines, IRT was used to compare the effectiveness of oral meloxicam and intravenous flunixin meglumine in controlling lameness-associated pain in lactating dairy cattle (32). This technique was also used to evaluate dogs with hip osteoarthritis (33).

More research is still needed on the use of IRT to indirectly assess pain and inflammation in domestic animals (1). However, IRT is a currently available method to detect soreness in horses (34). When it comes to using IRT to prove the effectiveness of NSAIDs, there is a relative scarcity of studies in horses. Some studies have used IRT to assess the vascular component of the inflammatory response and examine the effects of anti-inflammatory drugs on experimentally induced acute inflammation (35, 36). Recent studies have induced systemic inflammation by administering LPS intravenously and used IRT to evaluate the effectiveness of NSAIDs by analyzing the temperature of the hoof wall of horses (25, 37). Furthermore, IRT has been shown to be effective in detecting intrasynovial injections in horses (38).

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) using IRT as a non-invasive diagnostic method. The authors report on the use of IRT to quantify the degree of inflammation in horses with experimentally induced transient synovitis with LPS. These horses had previously received meloxicam, an older COX-2 selective inhibitor.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Ethics statement

The study adhered to the Ethical Principles in Animal Experimentation as established by the National Council for Control in Animal Experimentation (CONCEA). The protocol underwent review and approval by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals—CEUA—UNESP, Jaboticabal, Brazil (Protocol No. 2887/2021).

2.2 Horses

Six crossbreed horses, three males and three females, were used for the experiment. They weighed an average of 395 ± 35 kg and aged between 12 and 20 years. These horses belong to the didactic herd of the Equine Exercise Physiology and Pharmacology Laboratory (LAFEQ), Department of Animal Morphology and Physiology, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo State University (FCAV/UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil. They were kept in a paddock and fed with 0.05% of body weight in concentrate once a day, along with hay, hay silage, mineral salt, and water ad libitum. Before the experiment began, the horses underwent a complete physical examination to ensure their health status. Haematological and biochemical tests were also conducted. The horses were previously treated with anthelmintics and vaccinated against rabies, tetanus toxoid, eastern and western equine encephalomyelitis, and equine influenza types A1 and A2.

2.3 Experimental groups

Based on a former study (11), the study’s sample size was six horses, all housed under the same condition. The horses were distributed into two groups: the control group (C, n = 6) and the group treated with meloxicam (MAXVO, n = 6). The meloxicam was formulated and manufactured by Ourofino Animal Health Company for commercial use in Brazil, and the study was designed to meet Brazilian regulations. The study was conducted in a controlled cross-over design in a paired, blinded, randomised experiment, with a two-week washout between phases. The MAXVO group was given meloxicam orally at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg of body mass, once per day for 3 days, at 48 h (D-2), 24 h (D-1), and 1 h (0) before synovitis induction, according to a previously adapted protocol (11). If the horses still showed lameness, an additional dose was given 24 h after synovitis induction. The horses in the control group received a saline solution orally at the exact times as the MAXVO group to simulate the same conditions as the meloxicam administration. As mentioned, the study was conducted blindly, and the researchers responsible for evaluations were not aware of which group each horse belonged to. Only one researcher (JC) was responsible for administering treatments to the horses.

2.4 Preparation of LPS

Standardization of laboratory procedures for preparing the LPS solution is crucial. A previously established LPS model, described in Standardbred, was followed (11). The solution of E. coli 055:B5 (L2880, Sigma Aldrich, lot 059N4031V) was prepared using sterile materials, and all stages of solution preparation were carried out in a laminar flow, under refrigeration. From the stock solution, which had a concentration of 5 mg/mL of LPS in RPMI 1640 Medium (GibcoTM, Thermo Fisher), a new dilution was prepared by adding 1 μL of the stock solution to 5 mL of RPMI. This intermediate solution had a concentration of 3,000 EU/mL and was stored in an appropriate flask. The working solution was obtained by diluting 90 μL of the intermediate solution in 27 mL of sterile PBS, resulting in a desired concentration of 10 EU/mL. The working solution was stored in microtubes containing 1.5 mL each, and the material was thawed for a maximum of 1 h before intra-articular injection to induce the inflammatory process. The stock and intermediate solutions were vortexed for 10 min at a speed of 1,500 rpm before dilution to ensure a homogeneous solution (11). Before intra-articular administration, the working solution was vortexed again for 2 min at 1,500 rpm.

2.5 Induction of the inflammatory process

The horses underwent a procedure that induced a temporary inflammatory process by applying E. coli 055:B5 LPS to their middle carpal joint. A random drawing determined which joint (left or right) would receive the 1 mL solution containing 10 endotoxin units (EU) of LPS. To ensure the safety of the procedure, the horses were sedated with detomidine (0.01 mg/kg i.v.) and then given yohimbine (0.12 mg/kg i.v.) to reverse the sedation after the procedure was completed.

The initiation of inflammation was designated as the baseline time point (0). Before the arthrocentesis procedure, the application site was cleaned with chlorhexidine degermant and 70% alcohol to ensure antisepsis. A 30 × 8 needle and a 1 mL syringe were used to collect the synovial fluid. After that, the entire LPS solution was injected into both groups. Following the induction of transitory synovitis, the horses were kept in individual paddocks with an area of approximately 75.9 m2. These paddocks were surrounded by a wooden fence and smooth wire protected with plastic insulation and had a roof to protect against precipitation and intense sunlight. This type of management ensured the maintenance of regular habits of the equine species, such as grazing, moving, and socializing.

2.6 Assessment methods

2.6.1 Clinical and hematological evaluation

Throughout the experiment the horses were being closely monitored by veterinarians to detect any signs of systemic clinical issues that might arise due to the administration of LPS. The horses were evaluated clinically by a physical examination, and blood samples were collected for hematological analysis (complete blood count). Heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), rectal temperature (RT), degree of hydration, the color of the apparent mucous membranes (1 = pink, 2 = light pink, 3 = reddish, 4 = white, 5 = yellowish, 6 = bluish), behavior (0 = normal, 1 = apathetic; 2 = restless), and appetite (0 = normal, 1 = hyporexia; 2 = anorexia) were all measured. The horses were evaluated at several time points: five days (D-5), two days (D-2), one day (D-1), and immediately before the induction of the inflammatory process, and 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h after synovitis induction with LPS. Blood samples were collected by venipuncture of the jugular vein in negative pressure tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). The samples were kept in isothermal boxes with recyclable ice and transported to the laboratory. A hematological analyzer (ABX Micros 60, Horiba) was used. Blood collection was performed at the following time points: 0, 8, 24, and 48 h after the induction of the inflammatory process.

2.6.2 Synovial fluid

Synovial fluid was obtained via aseptic arthrocentesis of the middle carpal joint. The animals were chemically restrained using detomidine (0.01 mg/kg i.v.) and the application site was made aseptic using chlorhexidine degermant and 70% alcohol. Synovial fluid was collected using a 30 × 8 needle. Samples were divided into 0.5 mL pediatric tubes containing EDTA and plain microtubes and were immediately stored at 4°C. Samples in EDTA tubes were analyzed, whereas plain tubes were processed within 1 h after collection. Synovial fluid was collected at 0, 8, 24, and 48 h after induction of the inflammatory process. The animals were chemically reverted from sedation using yohimbine (0.12 mg/kg i.v.). Aliquots of synovial fluid collected in tubes with EDTA were used to perform TNCC and TP assays. The plain tubes were centrifuged at 2,000 G for 20 min at 4°C. The supernatant was then collected and distributed into 500 μL aliquots, placed in microtubes without anticoagulant, and stored at −80°C until the moment of quantification of PGE2. The quantification of PGE2 was performed using the Prostaglandin E2 EIA Kit (Elabscience, Texas, United States) through ELISA. The intra-assay coefficient of variation for PGE2 was 1.2%.

2.6.3 Joint circumference

To assess inflammation and oedema, joint circumference was measured using a measuring tape placed immediately distal to the accessory carpus. The measurements were taken at the following time points: 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h after the inflammation was induced.

2.6.4 Lameness

During the study, the horses were evaluated to detect movement asymmetries for their degree of lameness. Visual examination was done by inspecting the horses while they trotted in a straight line over a hard surface for approximately 40 meters. The evaluation was conducted by an experienced clinician (GCF) unaware of the experimental groups. The clinician assigned scores to the horses based on the following criteria: 0 for absence of visible lameness, (1) for discrete asymmetry that was occasionally inconsistent, (2) for visible lameness that was rarely inconsistent, (3) for visible lameness always, and (4) for complete inability to bear weight (39). The evaluations were performed at 0, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 48 h after the induction of the inflammatory process.

2.6.5 Infrared thermography

Functional IRT imaging is a useful diagnostic tool in veterinary medicine for examining inflammation. The proper use of thermography requires a controlled environment and adherence to imaging protocol to eliminate errors. Thermographic examinations were conducted on the joint that received LPS and the opposite joint, which was used as a negative control. Four images were taken for each limb of the carpal anatomic region: mediolateral (ML), lateromedial (LM), dorsopalmar (DP), and palmarodorsal (PD) views (Figure 1). The horses were led into a closed, airy environment that was free from drafts and direct sunlight (14). Before taking the images, the carpal anatomic region on both limbs was gently cleaned with dry gauze, and the area was not touched again after cleaning. These procedures were carried out to allow the horse to acclimate to the ambient environmental factors. The temperature and humidity of the environment were controlled to standardize the thermal measurements. The horses were not sedated during the evaluations. It is worth noting that before the examinations, the cutaneous area of the carpal joint was clipped at least 24 h before induction of synovitis to minimize errors caused by reflection or refraction.

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Infrared thermogram of the (A) mediolateral, (B) lateromedial, (C) dorsopalmar and (D) palmarodorsal view of the carpal joint of horses submitted to experimental induction of transient synovitis for both trials (C and MAXVO). C, control group; MAXVO received meloxicam (Maxicam Gel®), administered orally at 0.6 mg/kg daily 3 days before LPS injection. Observe temperature scale on the right. The circle delimits the evaluated area.

An infrared thermographic camera from Flir® Systems (model i50, Wilsonville, Oregon, United States) was used for the assessment. Based on the technical specifications provided by the manufacturer, the camera’s sensitivity value is less than 0.1°C, with an emissivity of 0.98, temperature range from −20 to 350°C, image frequency of 9 Hz, resolution of 140 × 140 pixels, and an accuracy of ±2%. The thermographic camera was placed perpendicular to the assessment site at a 0.4 m distance to capture infrared thermographic images. All thermographic images were taken by the same examiner (TOL). Image analysis was performed using FLIR Tools software from FLIR Systems Inc. (Wilsonville, OR, United States). An area was marked on the thermographic image across the entire carpal region. It should be noted that the middle carpal joint, where the LPS was injected, communicates with the small carpometacarpal joint situated between the third and fourth carpal bones (40). The software calculated the delimited area’s minimum, maximum, and average thermographic temperatures. The assessments were carried out at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h after the induction of the inflammatory process.

2.7 Statistical design and analysis

The data was analyzed using SigmaPlot software (v.12.5) and tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The experimental design was a factorial design with three paired replications in a split-split-plot scheme. Each split-plot was a treatment (C and MAXVO) and each split-split-plot was an examination time point (eight-time points for thermographic examination). In the next phase of the experiment, a cross-over design was applied, where the three horses that received Maxicam Gel® in the first phase became controls in the second phase and vice versa, resulting in a total of six animals per experimental group. The model Yijkl=μ+αi+βij+tk+αβik+ijk was used, in which Υijkl is observation at the meloxicam factor level I; μ is the overall mean common to all observations; α is the effect of treatment (meloxicam); β is the effect of time point (in hours); and the αβ = effect of the interaction between treatment i and time k. A mixed model was applied with the horse as a random effect and time point, treatment, and their interaction as categorical fixed effects. The treatment effect was also tested at different times separately, according to the time points of each variable for the studied variables after synovitis induction. A mixed effects analysis of variance was performed for repeated measures over time, and means were compared using Tukey’s test. For the degree of lameness, the Wilcoxon non-parametric test was used for the intergroup comparison. For the intragroup comparisons, the Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks was used, and the means were compared using the Tukey test. A multinomial logistic regression (MLR) classification algorithm was conducted with R Programming Language (version 2024.04.0 + 735 “Chocolate Cosmos” release for windows) using multinon function [“nnet” package (version 7.3–19)]. To evaluate the predictive potential of thermography variables, such as minimum peak, maximum peak, and average peak thermographic temperatures, and anatomic regions ML, LM, DP, and PD, the MLR was employed. The goal was to accurately classify and predict the lameness score based on these variables. This model was used given the classification of lameness into five scores (0 to 4, considered the outcome variables) and the ability of the MLR to evaluate outcome variables with more than two categories. Before applying the MLR, the independence of irrelevant alternatives (IIA), the independence of errors (IE) and the absence of multicollinearity were checked. The first two premises were evaluated through visual inspection of the data, ensuring two similar categories in the outcome variable (for IIA assumption) and the absence of clusters within the experimental group used (for IE assumption). The assessment of multicollinearity was evaluated using the variance inflation factor (VIF) using vif function [“car” package (version 3.1–2)] with a threshold of 5. Variables that presented VIF >5 had a high correlation with the other variables included in the model and were removed from the analysis. To create the graphs, the functions ggplot [“ggplot2” package (version 3.4.4)], ggeffect [“ggeffects” package (version 1.5.2)] and ggarrange [“ggpubr” package (version 0.6.0)] were used. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to create hundred temperature samples using the normal distribution. The means and standard deviation of each treatment and time point were taken from the original data. The simulation was also adjusted for ±2% accuracy. We applied a paired t-test to compare the generated data points to better understand the dispersion of the temperature data. Overall significance was set at 5% (p < 0.05).

3 Results

3.1 Clinical and hematological evaluation

Clinical and hematological variables were measured to detect possible signs of systemic sepsis caused by the intra-articular administration of LPS. The C group showed a higher RT 4 h after synovitis induction. Upon intragroup comparison, it was observed that in both groups the RR initially increased and then returned to its initial values. Additionally, an increase in RT was noted, especially between 4 and 12 h after synovitis induction, for both groups (Table 1). It is worth noting that most of the average values of RR and RT remained within the reference range for the equine species (41). Furthermore, there were no changes observed in the degree of hydration, colouration of the apparent mucous membranes, behaviour, or appetite of the animals. Table 2 shows no changes in erythrocytes, leukocytes, and lymphocytes. Group C exhibited a decrease in hemoglobin and hematocrit 8 h after induction. Neutrophilia was observed only at the eight-hour mark for group C.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Means ± standard deviation values of heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), and rectal temperature (RT) values of horses submitted to experimental induction of transient synovitis for both trials (C and MAXVO).

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Means ± standard deviation values of erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, leukocytes, segmented neutrophils, and lymphocytes of horses submitted to experimental induction of transient synovitis for both trials (C and MAXVO).

3.2 Synovial fluid

No significant differences in the synovial fluid variables were displayed between groups (Table 3). A rise in TNCC was observed 8 h post-injection in both groups but returned to baseline concentrations after 48 h. Similarly, TP concentrations were elevated in both trials 8 and 24 h after the induction of transient synovitis but decreased after 48 h. Over time, PGE2 concentrations increased 24 and 48 h in C, and 48 h in MAXVO after the induction of transient synovitis compared to baseline.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Means ± standard deviation of synovial fluid total nucleated cell count (TNCC), total protein (TP), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) of horses submitted to experimental induction of transient synovitis for both trials (C and MAXVO).

3.3 Joint circumference

During the evaluation period, joint circumference was measured to indirectly assess joint swelling, which is indicated by effusion and periarticular edema. No statistically significant differences in joint circumference were observed within or between groups (Figure 2).

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Graphical representation of means ± standard error of joint circumference of horses submitted to experimental induction of transient synovitis for both trials (C and MAXVO). C, control group; MAXVO received meloxicam (Maxicam Gel®), administered orally at 0.6 mg/kg daily 3 days before LPS injection. Synovitis induction by injection of the middle carpal joint with 10 EU LPS occurred at 0 h.

3.4 Lameness

Table 4 presents the median lameness scores 0, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 48 h after synovitis induction. A difference was observed for group C at 2, 4, and 8 h after synovitis induction, with the peak of lameness at 4 h. The median clinical lameness score was 3 (with a range of 3–3) in the C group, while it was 1 (with a range of 0–2) in the MAXVO group. The group that received meloxicam showed a reduction in lameness at all time intervals (2, 4, 8, 24, and 48 h) after synovitis induction (Supplementary Figure S1). As stated in the material and methods under item 2.3, if the horses continued to show signs of lameness, they would receive an additional dose of treatment 24 h after the LPS injection. Only one horse from the MAXVO group and three horses from the control (placebo) group received this additional dose.

Table 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Medians (interquartile range) of the degree of clinical lameness of horses submitted to experimental induction of transient synovitis for both trials (C and MAXVO).

3.5 Infrared thermography

IRT was used to indirectly detect inflammation by measuring heat radiation. In this study, it was found that horses who received meloxicam had lower average, maximum, and minimum cutaneous temperatures 4 h post-injection in ML and DP views. Similarly, in the LM view, the MAXVO group showed lower average and minimum temperatures 4 h post-injection of LPS and lower average temperature 24 h post-injection compared to the control group. In the PD view, the MAXVO group showed lower average temperature 4 h post-injection of LPS. These findings suggest that meloxicam may have a positive impact on reducing cutaneous temperatures in horses post-LPS injection. It is worth noting that the cutaneous temperature in the group that received meloxicam was the same as the CL group most of the time, except at 24 h (average and maximum temperatures) after synovitis induction in ML, LM and DP views. In other words, the MAXVO group had the same cutaneous temperature as the contralateral limbs, which were not subjected to any invasive procedure (Figures 35 and Supplementary Tables S1–S3). In the study, it was found that the regions farthest from the LPS infiltration site, such as the ML and PD views, showed a higher temperature at the C group, when compared to the CL group only for the average temperature at 4 and 24 h. The PD view showed higher minimum and maximum temperatures only at 8 and 24 h, respectively, for the control group when compared to CL. At the ML view the C group showed higher maximum and minimum temperature than the CL only at 24 h. The Monte Carlo simulation was used to generate means and standard deviations, adjusted for ±2% accuracy, for each treatment and moment to ensure the reliability of our findings from the original data (Supplementary Tables S4–S15).

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Graphical representation of means ± standard error of average cutaneous temperature of the (A) mediolateral, (B) lateromedial, (C) dorsopalmar and (D) palmarodorsal view of the carpal joint of horses submitted to experimental induction of transient synovitis for both trials (C and MAXVO). C, control group; MAXVO received meloxicam (Maxicam Gel®), administered orally at 0.6 mg/kg daily 3 days before LPS injection; CL, contralateral limbs (negative control). Synovitis induction by injection of the middle carpal joint with 10 EU LPS occurred at 0 h. #Indicates difference between C and MAXVO. *Indicates difference between C and CL. αIndicates difference between CL and MAXVO. CL, contralateral limb (negative control). p < 0.05.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Graphical representation of means ± standard error of minimum cutaneous temperature of the (A) mediolateral, (B) lateromedial, (C) dorsopalmar and (D) palmarodorsal view of the carpal joint of horses submitted to experimental induction of transient synovitis for both trials (C and MAXVO). C, control group; MAXVO received meloxicam (Maxicam Gel®), administered orally at 0.6 mg/kg daily 3 days before LPS injection; CL, contralateral limbs (negative control). Synovitis induction by injection of the middle carpal joint with 10 EU LPS occurred at 0 h. #Indicates difference between C and MAXVO. *Indicates difference between C and CL. αIndicates difference between CL and MAXVO. CL, contralateral limb (negative control). p < 0.05.

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Graphical representation of means ± standard error of maximum cutaneous temperature of the (A) mediolateral, (B) lateromedial, (C) dorsopalmar and (D) palmarodorsal view of the carpal joint of horses submitted to experimental induction of transient synovitis for both trials (C and MAXVO). C, control group; MAXVO received meloxicam (Maxicam Gel®), administered orally at 0.6 mg/kg daily 3 days before LPS injection; CL, contralateral limbs (negative control). Synovitis induction by injection of the middle carpal joint with 10 EU LPS occurred at 0 h. #Indicates difference between C and MAXVO. *Indicates difference between C and CL. αIndicates difference between CL and MAXVO. CL, contralateral limb (negative control). p < 0.05.

3.6 Multinomial logistic regression

Our MLR analysis revealed an association between the peaks of thermographic temperatures and lameness scores. The relative log odds, an equivalent to log odds in the logistic regression, demonstrated that a one-unit rise in the maximum temperature obtained by DP thermographic imaging is associated with an increase of 20 in the logarithm of the chances of having score 3 lameness compared to horses that presented lameness of score 0 (p < 0.0001). A significant association existed between a unit increase in maximum peak temperature obtained through LM thermographic imaging and a reduction of 18.8 in the logarithm of the odds of having a score 3 lameness compared to horses without lameness (p = 0.009). One unit increase in maximum peak temperature obtained by PD thermographic imaging is associated with an increase of 11.7 in the logarithm of the odds of having score 3 lameness compared to horses that do not lame (p < 0.0001). One unit increase in maximum temperature obtained by PD thermographic imaging is associated with a reduction of 18.7 in the logarithm of the odds of having score 3 lameness compared to horses that do not lame (p < 0.0001). The group of horses that received meloxicam orally is associated with a reduction of 76.2 in the logarithm of the odds of having grade 3 lameness compared to animals that do not lame (p < 0.0001). The relative risk ratios, equivalent to odds ratios in logistic regression, showed that one unit increase in the maximum temperature obtained by the thermographic image obtained from the DP view multiplies the chances of lameness classification 3 concerning horses that do not lame (score 0) by 4,528 (353%). Regarding the LM view, one unit increase in maximum temperature, obtained by thermal imaging, induced the chances of lameness, score 3, concerning horses that do not lame in 47.8%. The horses that received meloxicam, when compared with the control group, multiplied the chances of having a score of 1 lameness compared to animals that do not have lameness (score 0) by 146% (p < 0.0001). Lastly, the predicted probabilities, the same approach as logistic regression, but it is the probability of falling in a specific category, showed that the DP and LM positions’ maximum temperature peaks were able to predict degree 3 of lameness, especially above 34°C (Figure 6).

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Curves depicting the calculation of predicted probabilities following multinomial logistic regression showing that the maximum temperature peaks observed in the lateromedial (LMmaxP) and dorsopalmar (DPmaxP) views could predict score 3 of lameness, especially when they exceeded 34°C. The horses were submitted to experimental induction of transient synovitis with 10 EU LPS and treated with meloxicam administered orally at 0.6 mg/kg daily 3 days before LPS injection.

4 Discussion

Infrared thermography can be essential in diagnosing and treating inflammatory processes (15). This diagnostic technique indirectly determines the presence of a nociceptive stimulus through the activation of the nervous system and its vasomotor responses, leading to an inflammatory process and increased heat radiation (1). Thermography can be an important tool to measure the reduction of inflammation or to check the effectiveness of anti-inflammatory medication (14). Changes in local temperature of the middle carpal joint, in addition to the results of synovial fluid variables, such as TNCC, TP, and PGE2, confirmed the induction of synovitis. The present study showed that injecting 10 EU of E. coli O55:B5 LPS into the middle carpal joint of horses consistently induced transient synovitis and lameness. These findings are compatible with the results obtained in a previous study (11), which showed that a 10 EU dose of LPS induced lameness of clinically acceptable intensity, eliminating the need for additional doses of LPS.

It is important to highlight the use of the EU instead of mass units when processing and preparing LPS to ensure direct comparisons with other studies can be made (11). Standardizing laboratory procedures for preparing the LPS solution is also essential. Endotoxin molecules have micelle formation, which can affect their activity, so in this study, the stock and intermediate solutions were vortexed for 10 min at 1,500 rpm before dilution to break up LPS micelles and achieve a homogeneous solution. Additionally, the working solution was vortexed for 2 min at a speed of 1,500 rpm before induction, to disrupt any existing micelles (11).

This study evaluated the efficacy of oral preemptive meloxicam for inflammatory pain relief in horses with transient lameness and synovitis induced by the LPS model. The study findings suggest that this medication is a possible option for managing inflammation in horses in a preventative manner. Based on former studies, meloxicam treatment was initiated 3 days before LPS injection (10, 11). The researchers guided that the model is advantageous in providing information regarding the preemptive effects of treatments attributable to the concise duration of inflammation induced by LPS injection. This model provides relative data on whether it treats the signs of inflammation. Indeed, some of it is prevented when used in this manner. Therefore, the horses were given treatment for a few days before inducing synovitis. This decision was based on information regarding meloxicam pharmacokinetics, which indicated a maximum concentration time (Tmax) of 2.62 ± 1.88 h (range: 1.5–8 h) and an elimination half-life of 10.2 ± 3.0 h (42). Besides, after injection, the LPS effect can vary widely, so the decision was made to consider the peak lameness reported in the literature (911, 43). This preventive treatment is likely to be clinically applicable for pain management in horses undergoing arthroscopic surgery (8) or surgical trauma, especially in the presence of pre-operative pain. It may prevent the initiation of a cascade of events that sensitize peripheral and central pain networks, leading to long-lasting maladaptive pain (44).

During the trial, clinical, cardiorespiratory, and hematological assessments were conducted to ensure the horses’ health and to check for any signs of systemic illness, such as fever, tachycardia, and tachypnea, which may have been caused by the intra-articular administration of LPS. Physical examination variables remained within the reference range for horses, indicating no exacerbated systemic inflammatory response due to LPS infiltration. As expected, there was an increment in RT for both groups, with the MAXVO group showing lower RT 4 h after synovitis induction. This finding suggests that meloxicam may have potential antipyretic action. Variations in RR values were probably related to the time of day of the collection. HR, RR, and RT increases could be related to the release of inflammatory mediators due to LPS injection or pain (39, 43, 45, 46). However, these parameters alone are non-specific for determining the presence and severity of pain and can be influenced by external factors (47, 48). Some studies that induced synovitis in horses with LPS injection found no changes in HR, RR, and RT (1012, 49). These differences may be related to the dose of endotoxin used (11). Also, systolic arterial pressure could be added to check for signs of systemic LPS or meloxicam effect (39).

The results of hematological exams revealed that the group of horses who did not receive meloxicam displayed neutrophilia. This finding may indicate the presence of inflammatory conditions and pathophysiologic feedback in the body (5052). Furthermore, a decrease in total hemoglobin and hematocrit was also observed. These hematological responses in humans with septic arthritis suggest that the hematopoietic system may undergo changes during an infectious process (53). Further studies are necessary to determine whether similar results occur in horses.

The assessment of joint circumference did not indicate a clinical detection of effusion. This may be due to the inconsistent doses of LPS found in previous studies (11). A wide range of dosages have been used to induce synovitis and lameness with LPS, ranging from 0.125 ng to 5,000 ng of the same serotype of E. coli O55:B5. Some authors have reported swelling after the induction of synovitis by intra-articular administration of LPS (45, 46, 49, 54). It should be noted that the absence of effusion does not necessarily mean the absence of inflammation. Additionally, it is important to highlight that the behavior was similar between the groups.

When diagnosing synovitis, TNCC, TP, and PGE2 concentrations are the most essential variables to assess. In both groups, the dose of LPS used increased these inflammatory biomarkers over time, and there was no difference between groups. This lack of difference between groups may be attributed to the lower frequency of meloxicam administration in the current therapeutic protocol compared to former studies (10, 11). Another factor that could contribute to the increase in these synovial inflammatory markers is the impact of successive arthrocentesis over time, despite the mild impact of this repetitive procedure on synovial fluid cytology, even without clinical significance (11, 55). The intra-articular injection of LPS had a more significant impact on the synovial fluid composition than successive arthrocentesis (11, 43, 56). However, it has been suggested by former studies that the repeated aspiration of synovial fluid could potentially serve as a confounding factor when using synovial inflammatory biomarkers to diagnose joint diseases (57, 58).

The study followed established criteria (39) for determining lameness, using blinded subjective evaluation. The study found that the peak of lameness occurred 4 h after induction in the control group. However, for the horses that received meloxicam, there was no significant change in the degree of lameness after the injection of LPS. This result is consistent with another study that evaluated the experimental induction of transient lameness and synovitis in trotter breed horses treated with oral administration of meloxicam (11). This suggests that the investigational veterinary product tested in this study effectively reduces inflammation and pain. Additionally, quantitative gait analysis could complement visual lameness assessment, as it provides objective information to support clinical decision-making during lameness evaluations (59, 60).

Detecting and quantifying inflammation and joint pain in horses has been a topic of research for many years. The scores of lameness and severity of synovitis were reflected in the skin surface temperature of the middle carpal joint obtained via thermography. Temperature is a key physical property that can be quantified using infrared thermography. It directly provides information about the inflammatory component of joint diseases (15). The present study focuses on using blinded infrared thermographic examination to detect changes in skin temperature surface pattern as an indicator of the inflammatory response induced by transient synovitis. The study found that joint temperatures increased significantly in horses with synovitis, while the horses that did not receive meloxicam showed a marked increase in temperature. The skin surface temperature can be used as an accurate indicator of the physiological state, with changes in temperature being caused by changes in local perfusion. Thermographic representation is based on tissue vascularization and blood supply and inflammation causes an increase in blood supply, which increases the local temperature (13, 30).

The MAXVO group showed lower surface temperatures in comparison to the control group, which indicates less intense inflammation. Increased heat is one of the classic signs of the inflammatory process. This is because tissue injuries can cause vasodilation and an increase in exothermic cellular metabolism, leading to an increase in temperature at the site of the injury (61). Hence, it is possible to obtain quantitative data on the degree of joint inflammation by thermographically evaluating the cutaneous surface of the joints. This is done by measuring the infrared radiation emitted spontaneously by the site of the joint injury. Several studies have used this technique to evaluate joint inflammation (1, 15, 30, 31, 33, 38).

To accurately compare the left and right sides, capturing images of contralateral joints at an equal imaging distance in separate images is crucial (14). The contralateral joint was used as a negative control for both C and MAXVO. After inducing synovitis, the group that received meloxicam had a temperature of the middle carpal joint that was like that of the contralateral joint (negative control), which did not receive LPS and was always clinically normal. Only 24 h after the induction of synovitis MAXVO group presented higher cutaneous temperature than the negative control in all regions of interest, except in the PD view. This result indicates the effectiveness of meloxicam as an anti-inflammatory, as the skin temperature of the middle carpal joint that received the induction of inflammation in the group medicated with meloxicam remained like the joint that was not infiltrated with LPS at most timepoints.

MLR, a precise and reliable extension of binary logistic regression, applies to a categorical outcome variable with more than two categories. It was found that the predicted probabilities, like the approach used in logistic regression, can be used to determine the likelihood of falling into a specific category. In this case, this study found that the maximum temperature peaks of the DP and LM positions can be used to predict the severity of lameness with a high level of accuracy, especially when the temperature exceeds 34°C.

The results of this study have wide-ranging implications for the field of functional infrared thermography imaging and its use in lameness management in horses. Thermography could be a justifiable option to aid in the diagnosis of clinical or experimental synovitis, as its use could avoid sequential invasive procedures, such as sedation and intra-articular collection. Additionally, using thermography can prevent the promotion of an additional inflammatory process promoted by repeated aspiration of synovial fluid that could mask the actual effects of LPS or the action of NSAIDs. In this regard, IRT examination combined with lameness checking proved to be a more sensitive diagnostic tool to detect the effectiveness of the NSAID used herein. These findings could pave the way for future research and practical applications in this area, offering potential benefits for both human and animal health.

5 Conclusion

Horses that were given meloxicam orally before the induction of synovitis with LPS showed a notable decrease in the temperature of the middle carpal joint surface detected by infrared thermography. This reduction in temperature was accompanied by a significant mitigation of lameness. In conclusion, the use of Maxicam Gel® proved to be an effective preventive anti-inflammatory medication for horses.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The study adhered to the Ethical Principles in Animal Experimentation as established by the National Council for Control in Animal Experimentation (CONCEA). The protocol underwent review and approval by the Ethics Committee on the Use of Animals—CEUA—UNESP, Jaboticabal, Brazil (Protocol No. 2887/2021). The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

JC: Software, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. DD: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Conceptualization, Supervision. TL: Writing – original draft, Software, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. NS: Writing – original draft, Software, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. AS: Writing – original draft, Software, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation. GRi: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Formal analysis. FA: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. BA: Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization. IG: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. GRa: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Formal analysis. GF: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Supervision, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Conceptualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by a grant from the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, Process No. 2019/16779-3 and Process No. 2020/01172-3). Additionally, this study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo State University, (FCAV/UNESP) for the academic support. The authors also thank the Graduate Course Program in Veterinary Medicine (FCAV/UNESP), the Graduate Course Program in Animal Science (FCAV/UNESP), and the Department of Animal Morphology and Physiology (FCAV/UNESP) for their academic support.

Conflict of interest

DD, FA, BA, and IG were employed by company Ourofino Animal Health Company.

The authors declare that this study received funding from Ourofino Animal Health Company. The funder was involved in the study’s design, writing of this article, and the decision to submit it for publication. The meloxicam was formulated and manufactured by Ourofino Animal Health Company for commercial use in Brazil, and the study was designed to meet Brazilian regulations.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1399815/full#supplementary-material

Abbreviations

IRT, Infrared thermography; MAXVO, Group treated with meloxicam; C, Control group; LPS, Lipopolysaccharides; NSAID, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug; COX, Cyclooxygenase enzyme; ML, Mediolateral; LM, Lateromedial; DP, Dorsopalmar; PD, Palmarodorsal; TP, Total protein; TNCC, Total nucleated cell count; PGE2, Prostaglandin E2; EU, Endotoxin units; HR, Heart rate; RR, Respiratory rate; RT, Rectal temperature; EDTA, Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; CL, Contralateral limb.

References

1. Whittaker, AL, Muns, R, Wang, D, Martinez-Burnes, J, Hernández-Ávalos, I, Casas-Alvarado, A, et al. Assessment of pain and inflammation in domestic animals using infrared thermography: a narrative review. Animals. (2023) 13:2065. doi: 10.3390/ani13132065

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Jacobs, CC, Schnabel, LV, Mcllwraith, CW, and Blikslager, AT. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is equine orthopaedics. Equine Vet J. (2022) 54:636–48. doi: 10.1111/evj.13561

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Knych, HK. Nonsteirodal anti-inflammatory drug use in horses. Vet Clin N Am Equine Pract. (2017) 33:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2016.11.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Bonnesen, K, and Schmidt, M. Recategorization on non-aspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs according to clinical relevance: abandoning the traditional NSAID terminology. Can J Cardiol. (2021) 37:1707. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.06.014

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. UCVM Class of 2016 Banse, H, and Cribb, AE. Comparative efficacy of oral meloxicam and phenylbutazone in 2 experimental pain models in the horse. Can Vet J. (2017) 58:157–67.

Google Scholar

6. Ziegler, A, Fogle, C, and Blikslager, A. Update on the use of cyclooxygenase-2-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2017) 250:1271–4. doi: 10.2460/javma.250.11.1271

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Khalil, NY, and Aldosari, KF. Meloxicam In: HG Brittain, editor. Profiles of drug substances, excipients and related methodology. London: Academic Press (2020). 159–97.

Google Scholar

8. Yuan, Y, Cui, D, and Zhang, Y. Preemptive meloxicam achieves a better effect on postoperative pain control and similar tolerance compared with postoperative meloxicam in patients receiving arthroscopic knee surgery. Inflammopharmacology. (2019) 27:1091–100. doi: 10.1007/s10787-019-00614-4

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Toutain, PL, and Cester, CC. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships and dose response to meloxicam in horses with induced arthritis in the right carpal joint. Am J Vet Res. (2004) 65:1533–41. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2004.65.1533

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. de Grauw, JC, van de Lest, CHA, Brama, PAJ, Rambags, BPB, and van Weeren, PR. In vivo effects of meloxicam on inflammatory mediators, MMP activity and cartilage biomarkers in equine joints with acute synovitis. Equine Vet J. (2009) 41:693–9. doi: 10.2746/042516409x436286

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. van de Water, E, Oosterlinck, M, Korthagen, NM, Duchateau, L, Dumoulin, M, van Weeren, PR, et al. The lipopolysaccharide model for the experimental induction of transient lameness and synovitis in Standardbred horses. Vet J. (2021) 270:105626. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2021.105626

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. van de Water, E, Oosterlinck, M, Dumoulin, M, Korthagen, NM, van Weeren, PR, van den Broek, J, et al. The preventive effects of two nutraceuticals on experimentally induced acute synovitis. Equine Vet J. (2017) 49:532–8. doi: 10.1111/evj.12629

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Redaelli, V, Bergero, D, Zucca, E, Ferrucci, F, Costa, LN, Crosta, L, et al. Use of thermography techniques in equines: principles and applications. J Equine Vet. (2014) 34:345–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2013.07.007

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Soroko, M, and Howell, K. Infrared thermography: current applications in equine medicine. J Equine Vet. (2018) 60:90–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.11.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Schiavon, G, Capone, G, Frize, M, Zaffagnini, S, Candrian, C, and Filardo, G. Infrared thermography for the evaluation of inflammatory and degenerative joint diseases: a systematic review. Cartilage. (2021) 13:1790S–801S. doi: 10.1177/19476035211063862

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kruljc, P. Thermographic examination of the horse. Acta Vet. (2023) 73:289–316. doi: 10.2478/acve-2023-0023

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Daglish, J, Le Jeune, SS, Pypendop, BH, Ramirez, EM, and Turner, TA. Use of infrared thermography to detect jugular venipuncture in the horse. J Equine Vet. (2017) 59:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.09.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Prochno, HC, Barussi, FM, Bastos, FZ, Weber, SH, Bechara, GH, Rehan, IF, et al. Infrared thermography applied to monitoring musculoskeletal adaptation to training in thoroughbred race horses. J Equine Vet. (2020) 87:102935. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2020.102935

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Silva, CJFL, Trindade, KTG, Cruz, RKS, Vilela, CF, Coelho, CS, Ribeiro-Filho, JD, et al. Association between infrared thermography, blood count and creatine kinase in the evaluation of the welfare of Vaquejada horses. Open J Vet Med. (2023) 13:53–67. doi: 10.4236/ojvm.2023.136006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Witkowska-Piłaszewicz, O, Masko, M, Domino, M, and Winnicka, A. Infrared thermography correlates with lactate concentration in blood during race training in horses. Animals. (2020) 10:2072. doi: 10.3390/ani10112072

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Janczarek, I, Wiśniewska, A, Tkaczyk, E, Wnuk-Pawlak, E, Kaczmarek, B, Liss-Szczepanek, M, et al. Effect of different water-cooling treatments on changes in rectal and surface body temperature in leisure horses after medium-intensity effort. Animals. (2022) 12:525. doi: 10.3390/ani12040525

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Verdegaal, ELJMM, Howarth, GS, McWhorter, TJ, and Delesalle, CJG. Thermoregulation during field exercise in horses using skin temperature monitoring. Animals. (2024) 14:136. doi: 10.3390/ani14010136

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Kim, SM, and Cho, GJ. Validation of eye temperature assessed using infrared thermography as an indicator of welfare in horses. Appl Sci. (2021) 11:7186. doi: 10.3390/app11167186

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Domino, M, Borowska, M, Kozlowska, N, Zdrojkowski, L, Jasinski, T, Smyth, G, et al. Advances in thermal image analysis for the detection of pregnancy in horses using infrared thermography. Sensors. (2022) 22:191. doi: 10.3390/s22010191

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Urayama, S, Tanaka, A, Kusano, K, Sato, H, Muranaka, M, Mita, H, et al. Oral administration of meloxicam and flunixin meglumine have similar analgesic effects after lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory response in thoroughbred horses. J Equine Vet. (2023) 121:104205. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2022.104205

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Lisboa, BRF, Silva, JAR, Silva, WC, Barbosa, AVC, Silva, LKX, and Lourenço-Júnior, JB. Evaluation of thermoregulation of horses (Equus caballus) submitted to two methods of post-exercise cooling, in hot and humid climate conditions, in the Eastern Amazon. Front Vet Sci. (2023) 10:1150763. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1150763

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Carvalho, JRG, Conde, G, Antonioli, ML, Dias, PP, Vasconcelos, RO, Taboga, SR, et al. Biocompatibility and biodegradation of poly (lactic acid)(PLA) and an immiscible PLA/poly (ε-caprolactone) (PCL) blend compatibilized by poly (ε-caprolactone-b-tetrahydrofuran) implanted in horses. Polym J. (2020) 52:629–43. doi: 10.1038/s41428-020-0308-y

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Carvalho, JRG, Trindade, PHE, Conde, G, Antonioli, ML, Funnicelli, MIG, Dias, PP, et al. Facial expressions of horses using weighted multivariate statistics for assessment of subtle local pain induced by polylactide-based polymers implanted subcutaneously. Animals. (2022) 12:2400. doi: 10.3390/ani12182400

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Ioannou, S. Functional infrared thermal imaging: a contemporary tool in soft tissue screening. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:9303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66397-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Branco, JHL, Branco, RLL, Siqueira, TC, Souza, LC, Dalago, KMS, and Andrade, A. Clinical applicability of infrared thermography in rheumatic diseases: a systematic review. J Therm Biol. (2022) 104:103172. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.103172

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Marziani, L, Boffa, A, Angelelli, L, Andriolo, L, Di Martino, A, Zaffagnini, S, et al. Infrared thermography in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: joint temperature differs based on patient and pain characteristics. J Clin Med. (2023) 12:2319. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062319

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Warner, R, Kleinhenz, M, Ydstie, J, Schleining, J, Wulf, L, Coetzee, J, et al. Comparison of analgesics for control of lameness-associated pain in lactating dairy cattle. J Anim Sci. (2019) 97:162–3. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz122.287

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Alves, JC, Santos, A, Jorge, P, Lavrador, C, and Carreira, LM. Evaluation of digital thermography imaging to assess and monitor treatment of police working dogs with naturally occurring hip osteoarthritis. BMC Vet Res. (2021) 17:180. doi: 10.1186/s12917-021-02876-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Division on Earth and Life Studies; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources; Committee on a Review of Methods for Detecting Soreness in Horses. A review of methods for detecting soreness in horses. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (2021). 624–6242.

Google Scholar

35. Purohit, RC, and McCoy, MD. Thermography in the diagnosis of inflammatory processes in the horse. Am J Vet Res. (1980) 41:1167–74.

Google Scholar

36. Higgins, AJ, Lees, P, Sedgwick, AD, Buick, AR, and Churchus, R. Use of a novel non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drug in the horse. Equine Vet J. (1987) 19:60–6. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.1987.tb02584.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Urayama, S, Tanaka, A, Kusano, K, Sato, H, Nagashima, T, Fukuda, I, et al. Oral administration of meloxicam suppresses low-dose endotoxin challenge-induced pain in thoroughbred horses. J Equine Vet. (2019) 77:139–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2019.03.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Figueiredo, T, Dzyekanski, B, Pimpão, CT, Silveira, AB, Capriglione, LG, and Michelotto, PV Jr. Use of infrared thermography to detect intrasynovial injections in horses. J Equine Vet. (2013) 33:257–60. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.07.003

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Carregaro, AB, Freitas, GC, Ribeiro, MH, Xavier, NV, and Dória, RGS. Physiological and analgesic effects of continuous-rate infusion of morphine, butorphanol, tramadol or methadone in horses with lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced carpal synovitis. BMC Vet Res. (2014) 10:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0299-z

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Fails, AD. Functional anatomy of the equine musculoskeletal system In: GM Baxter, editor. Adams and Stashak’s lameness in horses. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2020). 1–65.

Google Scholar

41. Byars, TD, and Gonda, KC. Equine history, physical examination, records, and recognizing abuse or neglect in patients In: BP Smith, editor. Large animal internal medicine. Riverport Lane: Elsevier (2015). 14.

Google Scholar

42. Noble, G, Edwards, S, Lievaart, J, Pippia, J, Boston, R, and Raidal, SL. Pharmacokinetics and safety of single and multiple oral doses of meloxicam in adult horses. Vet Intern Med. (2012) 26:1192–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2012.00976.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Lucia, JL, Coverdale, JA, Arnold, CE, and Winsco, KN. Influence of an intra-articular lipopolysaccharide challenge on markers of inflammation and cartilage metabolism in young horses. J Anim Sci. (2013) 91:2693–9. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5981

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Guedes, A. Pain management in horses. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. (2017) 33:181–211. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2016.11.006

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Andreassen, SM, Vinther, AML, Nielsen, SS, Andersen, PH, Tnibar, A, Kristensen, AT, et al. Changes in concentrations of haemostatic and inflammatory biomarkers in synovial fluid after intra-articular injection of lipopolysaccharide in horses. BMC Vet Res. (2017) 13:182. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1089-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Martinez, RE, Leatherwood, JL, Arnold, CE, Glass, KG, Walter, KW, Valigura, HC, et al. Responses to an intra-articular lipopolysaccharide challenge following dietary supplementation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation product in young horses. J Anim Sci. (2021) 99:1–8. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab272

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Wagner, AE. Effects of stress on pain in horses and incorporating pain scales for equine practice. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract. (2010) 26:481–92. doi: 10.1016/j.cveq.2010.07.001

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. de Grauw, JC, and van Loon, JPAM. Systematic pain assessment in horses. Vet J. (2016) 209:14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.07.030

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Kahn, MK, Coverdale, JA, Leatherwood, JL, Arnold, CE, Dabareiner, RA, Bradbery, AN, et al. Age-related effects on markers of inflammation and cartilage metabolism in response to an intra-articular lipopolysaccharide challenge in horses. J Anim Sci. (2017) 95:671–80. doi: 10.2527/jas2016.1078

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Anderson, SL, and Singh, B. Equine neutrophils and their role in ischemia reperfusion injury and lung inflammation. Cell Tissue Res. (2018) 371:639–48. doi: 10.1007/s00441-017-2770-1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Sheats, MK. A comparative review of equine SIRS, sepsis, and neutrophils. Front Vet Sci. (2019) 6:69. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00069

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Meleiro, MCZ, Carvalho, HJC, Ribeiro, RR, Silva, MD, Gomes, CMS, Miglino, MA, et al. Immune functions alterations due to racing stress in thoroughbred horses. Animals. (2022) 12:1203. doi: 10.3390/ani12091203

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Borzio, R, Mulchandani, N, Pivec, R, Kapadia, BH, Leven, D, Harwin, SF, et al. Predictors of septic arthritis in the adult population. Orthopedics. (2016) 39:e657–63. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160606-05

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Neuenschwander, HM, Moreira, JJ, Vandruscolo, CP, Fülber, J, Seidel, SRT, Michelacci, YM, et al. Hyaluronic acid has chondroprotective and joint-preserving effects on LPS-induced synovitis in horses. J Vet Sci. (2019) 20:e67. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2019.20.e67

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Rinnovati, R, Bonelli, F, Tognetti, R, Gallo, C, Bassini, RF, Marchetti, V, et al. Effect of repeated arthrocentesis on cytology of synovial fluid. J Equine Vet. (2017) 57:112–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jevs.2017.07.008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Ross, TN, Kisiday, JD, Hess, T, and McIlwraith, CW. Evaluation of the inflammatory response in experimentally induced synovitis in the horse: a comparison of recombinant equine interleukin 1 beta and lipopolysaccharide. Osteoarthr Cartil. (2012) 20:1583–90. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.08.008

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

57. van den Boom, R, van de Lest, CHA, Bull, S, Brama, PAJ, van Weeren, PR, and Barneveld, A. Influence of repeated arthrocentesis and exercise on synovial fluid concentrations of nitric oxide, prostaglandin E2 and glycosaminoglycans in healthy equine joints. Equine Vet J. (2005) 37:250–6. doi: 10.2746/0425164054530740

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

58. NCR, TM, and van Weeren, PR. How exercise influences equine joint homeostasis. Vet J. (2017) 222:60–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.03.004

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Bosch, S, Serra Bragança, F, Marin-Perianu, M, Marin-Perianu, R, van der Zwaag, BJ, Voskamp, J, et al. EquiMoves: a wireless networked inertial measurement system for objective examination of horse gait. Sensors. (2018) 18:850. doi: 10.3390/s18030850

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Hardeman, AM, Egenvall, A, Serra Bragança, FM, Swagemakers, JH, Koene, MHW, Roepstorff, L, et al. Visual lameness assessment in comparison to quantitative gait analysis data in horses. Equine Vet J. (2022) 54:1076–85. doi: 10.1111/evj.13545

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

61. McManus, C, Tanure, CB, Peripolli, V, Seixas, L, Fischer, V, Gabbi, AM, et al. Infrared thermography in animal production: an overview. Comput Electron Agric. (2016) 123:10–6. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2016.01.027

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: analgesic, lameness, lipopolysaccharide, meloxicam, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, soreness, cyclooxygenase, osteoarthritis

Citation: Carvalho JRG, Del Puppo D, Littiere TO, Sales NAA, Silva ACY, Ribeiro G, Almeida FN, Alves BG, Gatto IRH, Ramos GV and Ferraz GC (2024) Functional infrared thermography imaging can be used to assess the effectiveness of Maxicam Gel® in pre-emptively treating transient synovitis and lameness in horses. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1399815. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1399815

Received: 12 March 2024; Accepted: 21 May 2024;
Published: 11 June 2024.

Edited by:

Arturo Anadón, Complutense University of Madrid, Spain

Reviewed by:

Gregg Mitchell Griffenhagen, Colorado State University, United States
Claudia Interlandi, University of Messina, Italy

Copyright © 2024 Carvalho, Del Puppo, Littiere, Sales, Silva, Ribeiro, Almeida, Alves, Gatto, Ramos and Ferraz. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Guilherme de Camargo Ferraz, Z3VpbGhlcm1lLmMuZmVycmF6QHVuZXNwLmJy

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.