Paulo de Mello Tavares Lima
Tiago do Prado Paim
Tim McAllister- 1Department of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, United States
- 2Goiano Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology (IF Goiano) Campus Rio Verde, Rio Verde, GO, Brazil
- 3Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada
Editorial on the Research Topic
Greenhouse gases mitigation strategies in grazing ruminants
Cultivated and natural grasslands from both tropical and temperate countries play a crucial role for the subsistence of rural communities all over the world by supporting ruminant livestock in developed and developing countries (1). Higher demand for animal food products such as milk and meat by 2050 will drive intensification, which also includes intensification of grazing system as a key component of ruminant production and a challenging sector to mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (2, 3). Methane (CH4) is one of the most important environmental concerns associated with ruminant production, with enteric fermentation from ruminant livestock being responsible for 30% of anthropogenic emissions (4). Inclusion of cereal grains or oils in ruminant diets can reduce the intensity of emissions (GHG/unit of animal product) as compared to grazing ruminants, by increasing gain and reducing the amount of CH4 per unit of feed digested (5). However, feeding grains in extensive grazing systems can be difficult or even impossible (4). Reducing GHG emissions from grazing ruminants has proven to be a challenge and is a priority of the industry. This Research Topic generated five manuscripts that describe integrated animal—plant management practices, as well as knowledge on the rumen microbiome that can be used to mitigate GHG emissions from grazing ruminants.
Intensification of ruminant grazing systems include approaches related to both pasture management and animal genetics. Oliveira et al. undertook a comprehensive study in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest biome in factorial design (2 × 2) where two different genotypes of dairy cows were evaluated (Holstein and crossbred Holstein × Jersey) under two different grazing systems (Continuous with low stocking rate × rotational with high stocking rate). These authors measured GHG emissions in these systems (CH4 and nitrous oxide) and observed that regardless of breed and pasture management, soil carbon sequestration was not enough to neutralize emissions from any of the systems. However, they estimated the potential of planting trees in these systems to neutralize emissions, highlighting the potential of silvo-pastoralism to enhance carbon sequestration and the sustainability of grazing systems. Planting trees in grazing systems was able to significantly reduce overall GHG emissions in all treatments.
Utilization of locally available agricultural co-products is often pointed out as a strategy of promoting sustainability in animal production systems (6). Such an approach frequently lowers feed costs and can indirectly and directly reduce GHG emissions depending on the co-product. Budel et al. evaluated the use cakes originated after oil extraction from the Amazon fruits cupuassu (Theobroma grandiflorum) and tucuma (Astrocaryum vulgare Mart.), used in both food and cosmetic industry (7, 8). These authors explored the effect of these cakes in lamb diets using a 40:60 forage:concentrate ratio. The co-products did not change GHG emissions, digestibility, blood metabolites and growth performance. Cupuassu was similar and tucuma was superior to the control diets when analyzing CH4 production per unit of body weight gain. Despite the lack of studies on these co-products, their results showed that they should be suitable for utilization in grazing systems, especially during periods of forage scarcity.
Pinnell et al. used 16S rRNA sequencing to identify discriminant taxa in different rumen microenvironments. The authors highlighted that rumen microorganisms associated with CH4 production were more abundant in the microbial community of the fluid fraction of rumen content as compared to the microbial communities associated with the rumen mucosa or those associated with fiber particles in rumen. Even though the findings were not completely novel, the work did emphasize that the association between enteric CH4 emissions and the structure of ruminal microbial community can be greatly influenced by sample collection.
Liu et al. generated a review addressing gastrointestinal microbes-related factors that affect productive traits in dairy cows. Even though this manuscript has a clearer focus on dairy cows, which often are raised in confinement (9, 10), some of the aspects considered in the review are clearly applicable to grazing ruminants, especially those components that focuses on CH4 emissions. The manuscript describes that typically, cows with lower feed conversion rates have higher ruminal microbial diversity, with methanogens of the genus Methanobrevibacter predominating. The paper also emphasized the negative relationship between CH4 production and productivity. On that same study, authors also brought attention to the fact that feeding ruminants high forage diets, which is the case with grazing, provides substrates that promotes the growth of a variety of beneficial microorganisms in the rumen, but at the disadvantage of also increasing the activity of those microbiota involved in CH4 production. For this reason, the authors suggest the utilization of feed additives such as the 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) (11) to reduce CH4 emissions, although such additives cannot be easily administered to grazing ruminants.
Finally, Smith et al. presented a review focusing on general aspects related to enteric CH4 research from pasture-fed ruminants, detailing numbers related to the representability of this gas on global GHG balances, describing physiological processes associated with CH4 production, and also providing an embracing overview of mitigation practices. The authors called particular attention to strategies that optimize animal growth, such as providing forages of improved nutritional quality, which may lead to reduced intensity and lifetime GHG emissions. Special attention was also given to the genetic selection of low-emitting animals as a promising strategy to abate GHG emissions. This review also addressed the main characteristics of technologies available for CH4 quantification, which can be of particular interest for researchers that wish to attempt to measure GHG in grazing ruminant production systems.
Overall, this Research Topic brought an updated overview about management practices and knowledge on GHG emissions from grazing ruminants, providing significant contribution to this research area.
Author contributions
PMTL: Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. TPP: Writing—review & editing, Writing—original draft. TM: Writing—review & editing, Writing—original draft.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge all reviewers that helped in the publication process of the manuscripts included in this Research Topic.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Herrero M, Thornton PK. Livestock and global change: emerging issues for sustainable food systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2013) 110:20878–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321844111
2. Teague WR, Apfelbaum S, Lal R, Kreuter UP, Rowntree J, Davies CA, et al. The role of ruminants in reducing agriculture's carbon footprint in North America. J Soil Water Conserv. (2016) 71:156–64. doi: 10.2489/jswc.71.2.156
3. Flachowsky G, Meyer U, Südekum K-H. Land use for edible protein of animal origin - a review. Animals. (2017) 7:1–19. doi: 10.3390/ani7030025
4. Beauchemin KA, Ungerfeld EM, Abdalla AL, Alvarez C, Arndt C, Becquet P, et al. Invited review: current enteric methane mitigation options. J. Dairy Sci. (2022) 105:9297–326. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22091
5. Baya AR, Ventto L, Kairenius P, Stefánski T, Leskinen H, Tapio I, et al. Dietary forage to concentrate ratio and sunflower oil supplement alter rumen fermentation, ruminal methane emissions, and nutrient utilization in lactating cows. Transl Anim Sci. (2017) 1:277–86. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0032
6. Eisler M, Lee MRF, Tarlton JF, Martin GB, Beddington J, Dungait JA, et al. Steps to sustainable livestock. Nature. (2014) 507:32–4. doi: 10.1038/507032a
7. Ferreira MJ, Mota MF, Mariano RG, Freitas SP. Current scenario and recent advancements from tucuma pulp oil and kernel fat processing. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. (2022) 124:2100231.
8. Narvaez LEM, Ferreira LMMC, Sanches S, Gyles DA, Silva-Júnior JOC, Ribeiro Costa RM. A review of potential use of Amazonian oils in the synthesis of organogels for cosmetic application. Molecules. (2022) 27:2733. doi: 10.3390/molecules27092733
9. Gao Z, Yuan H, Ma W, Liu X, Desjardins RL. Methane emissions from a dairy feedlot during the fall and winter seasons in Northern China. Environ Pollut. (2011) 159:1183–9. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.003
10. Miller DJ, Sun, k, Tao L, Pan D, Zondlo MA, Nowak JB, et al. Ammonia and methane dairy emission plumes in the San Joaquin Valley of California from individual feedlot to regional scales. J Geophys Res Atmos. (2015) 120:9718–38. doi: 10.1002/2015JD023241
Keywords: cattle, livestock, methane, sheep, sustainability
Citation: Lima PMT, Paim TP and McAllister T (2024) Editorial: Greenhouse gases mitigation strategies in grazing ruminants. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1360276. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1360276
Received: 22 December 2023; Accepted: 05 January 2024;
Published: 16 January 2024.
Edited and reviewed by: Domenico Bergero, University of Turin, Italy
Copyright © 2024 Lima, Paim and McAllister. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Paulo de Mello Tavares Lima, pdemello@uwyo.edu