An evaluation of the combination effect of zoledronate and chemotherapeutic agents in canine osteosarcoma cells

Introduction: Osteosarcoma (OSA) is an aggressive form of bone cancer in both dogs and humans. The treatment options for metastatic (stage III) OSA are currently limited and the prognosis is poor. Zoledronate, a second generation amino-bisphosphonate, is commonly used for palliation of cancer induced bone pain. Zoledronate has also demonstrated anti-cancer properties and possibly enhances the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin in a canine histiocytosis cell line and human prostatic cancer cell line. The goal of this study was to evaluate the combination effect of zoledronate and various chemotherapeutic drugs in canine OSA cells.

Methods: Canine OSA cell line (D17), cells from two canine primary OSAs, and MDCK, a canine kidney cell line, were used to evaluate the therapeutic potential of these drugs. Carboplatin, doxorubicin, vinorelbine, toceranib, and isophosphoramide mustard (active metabolite of ifosfamide) were used as chemotherapeutic agents. First, cells were treated with either zoledronate or chemotherapy drug alone for 72 hours. Cell viability was assessed using CellTiter Glo and IC₅, IC₁₀, IC₂₀, and IC₅₀ were calculated. Second, cells were treated with a combination of zoledronate and each chemotherapeutic agent at their IC₅, IC₁₀, IC₂₀, and IC₅₀ concentrations. After 72 hours, cell viability was assessed by CellTiter Glo.

Results and discussion: Zoledronate, carboplatin, doxorubicin, vinorelbine, and isophosphoramide mustard showed concentration dependent decrease in cell viability. Toceranib showed decreased cell viability only at higher concentrations. When zoledronate was used in combination with chemotherapy drugs, while it showed potential synergistic effects with toceranib, potential antagonistic effects with vinorelbine and isophosphoramide mustard were observed. However, the results differed by cell line and thus, further evaluation is warranted to understand the exact mechanism of action.

1 Introduction

Osteosarcoma (OSA) is the most common bone tumor in dogs (1). This tumor exhibits locally aggressive and highly metastatic behavior (2). The current standard of care for canine appendicular OSA consists of local therapy (i.e., amputation, surgical limb-spare, or stereotactic radiation therapy) combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy (i.e., carboplatin, cisplatin, and/or doxorubicin) resulting in a median survival time of 10–12 months (2). Despite adequate local tumor control, greater than 90% of dogs are expected to develop and die from distant metastatic disease (2). Options to treat metastatic disease remain limited. Cytotoxic chemotherapy appears minimally effective for macroscopic disease with doxorubicin, cisplatin, mitoxantrone, ifosfamide, or toceranib phosphate (Palladia) demonstrating a response rate of 0–12% (3–6). The high frequency of metastasis and the resistance to chemotherapy have led to a search for novel treatment strategies.

Zoledronate is a third-generation bisphosphonate used in human and veterinary medicine for the treatment of cancer-associated bone pain, hypercalcemia, Paget’s disease, and osteoporosis (7). When administered systemically, bisphosphonates concentrate within metabolically active portions of bone and serve to inhibit osteoclasts and bone resorption. Bisphosphonates appear well-tolerated in dogs, and adverse events are limited (7, 8). Bisphosphonates have more recently been investigated for their anti-neoplastic properties. Zoledronate concentrates within osteoclasts and inhibits farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase, an enzyme required for the prenylation of GTP-binding proteins. This results in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (9). Zoledronate also appears to modulate the tumor microenvironment by activating γδ T cells (10), inhibiting matrix metalloproteinase activity (11), promoting macrophage differentiation toward an anti-tumoral M1 phenotype (11), and decreasing vascular endothelial growth factor secretion by OSA cells (12). In vitro and in vivo murine studies have shown that zoledronate reduces OSA-induced bone lysis, reduces primary tumor growth, and decreases pulmonary metastasis through its effects on OSA cell migration, adhesion, and invasiveness (12–14). A previous publication described four human patients with metastatic OSA who were treated with zoledronate after failing chemotherapy. All four patients experienced a marked improvement in progression-free survival when compared to historical controls (>19 months vs. 2 months, respectively) (15). In the mice model of canine OSA, zoledronate mitigated the extent of bone lysis in affected bones. However, the volume of metastatic tumors in the lungs increased in the group of mice that received zoledronate (16). Another study investigated the impact of zoledronate on stage III canine OSA patients and found that it did not extend the survival of these dogs with OSA (17).

In vitro synergistic anti-cancer effects of bisphosphonates and chemotherapy drugs, specifically zoledronate and doxorubicin, have been observed in canine malignant histiocytosis cells (18), human prostate cancer cells (19), and human breast cancer cells (20). In these studies, the combination of zoledronate and doxorubicin increased cell apoptosis, while the combination of zoledronate with lomustine (CCNU) and vincristine did not increase cell apoptosis. It was indicated that zoledronate increased intracellular accumulation of doxorubicin in canine malignant histiocytosis cells; however, further mechanisms of this phenomenon are still undetermined (18). Previously, a phase I study of zoledronate was conducted in humans with newly diagnosed metastatic OSA (21). This study demonstrated that zoledronate could safely be administered alongside conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Still, the synergistic anti-cancer effects of bisphosphonates and chemotherapy drugs from in vivo studies are controversial. When zoledronate was used with ifosfamide in a rat model, it showed a complete resolution of osteosarcoma vs. progressive disease in the control group (22). However, a phase III clinical trial in human OSA patients demonstrated no benefit when zoledronate was initiated after diagnosis along with surgery and chemotherapy (23, 24).

Although zoledronate is commonly used in dogs with OSA, studies evaluating the effects of zoledronate and cytotoxic chemotherapy in combination for the treatment of canine OSA are lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of zoledronate when combined with traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy in canine OSA cell lines. We hypothesized that concurrent use of zoledronate and cytotoxic chemotherapy will increase OSA cell death.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Cell lines, primary cells, and cell culture

Canine kidney cell line (MDCK), canine OSA cell line (D17), and primary OSA cells (Ronald and Walter) were used for this study. MDCK was a gift from Dr. Kyriakis (Auburn University). This cell line was confirmed as to cell origin by PCR tests (IDEXX BioAnalytics, Columbia, MO, United States). D17 was a gift from BFS, and species-specific PCR was previously performed to confirm these as canine cells. Two primary OSA cells were obtained from client-owned dogs at the time of amputation by BFS. Neither dog received chemotherapy prior to the amputation. These cells were cultured in DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium, Corning) with penicillin (100 IU/mL, Corning), streptomycin (100 ug/mL, Corning), amphotericin B (0.5 ug/mL, Corning), and 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum, Sigma). The cell lines and primary OSA cells were maintained at 37°C (95% air, 5% CO2).

2.2 Zoledronate and chemotherapeutic agents

The chemotherapeutic agents, carboplatin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, United States), doxorubicin (Sigma-Aldrich), vinorelbine (Sigma-Aldrich), toceranib (Sigma-Aldrich), isophosphoramide mustard (MedChemExpress, Monmouth Junction, NJ, United States), and the active metabolite of ifosfamide were used based on previous publications (2–6). Zoledronate (Sigma-Aldrich), carboplatin, and vinorelbine were dissolved in sterile distilled H2O at a final concentration of 10 mM. Doxorubicin and toceranib were dissolved in DMSO at a final concentration of 10 mM. Stock solutions were aliquoted and kept at −20°C for long-term storage. Isophosphoramide mustard was dissolved in DMSO at a final concentration of 100 mM. The stock solution of isophosphoramide was aliquoted and kept at −80°C. The stock solutions of carboplatin, doxorubicin, vinorelbine, and toceranib were utilized within 1 year after dissolution. Zoledronate and isophosphoramide mustard were used within 6 months following dissolution. Information on the stability of frozen solutions was only accessible for isophosphoramide mustard, and it remains stable within 6 months.

2.3 Evaluations of optimal doses of drugs

MDCK, D17, and primary OSA cells (Ronald and Walter) were suspended in cell culture medium and pipetted into a 96-well flat-bottomed plate using a final volume of 100 μL/well to give a final number of 5,000 cells/well. The cells were incubated for 24 h. Then, the cells were treated with chemotherapeutics alone or zoledronate alone. Chemotherapy agents and zoledronate were diluted in a cell culture medium before adding the intended concentration of each compound to the cells. Cells were incubated with chemotherapeutic drugs or zoledronate for 72 h. Control cells were incubated with a cell culture medium, and a vehicle was used to dissolve the drugs for 72 h. Puromycin (100 ng/mL) was used as a positive control for cytotoxicity. After the treatments, viability was determined by using a CellTiter-Glo cell viability Assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, United States). CellTiter-Glo reagent (70 μL) was added to each well, and the plate was placed at room temperature for 15 min to stabilize the luminescence signal. The luminescence signal was measured using a luminometer (BMG LABTECH Inc., Cary, NC, United States). IC₅, IC₁₀, IC₂₀, and IC₅₀ were calculated by using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, United States). Cell viability was evaluated with triplicates and repeated 3 times for each concentration of each chemotherapy agent and zoledronate.

2.4 Evaluations of combinatorial effects

Cells were suspended and pipetted into a 96-well plate, as described above, and incubated for 24 h. Chemotherapy drugs and zoledronate were then added to the wells with the combinations of (a) no drug, (b) zoledronate alone with the concentrations of IC₅, IC₁₀, IC₂₀, and IC₅₀, (c) chemotherapy drug alone with the concentration of IC₅, IC₁₀, IC₂₀, and IC₅₀, and (d) chemotherapy drug plus zoledronate with each drug concentrations of IC₅, IC₁₀, IC₂₀, and IC₅₀. Cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO₂ for 72 h. Cell viability was determined by using the CellTiter-Glo cell viability Assay Kit as mentioned earlier. The luminescence signal was measured using the luminometer. Cell viability was evaluated with triplicates and repeated 3 times for each drug or combination of drugs. Combinational effects were evaluated based on figure appearances and p-values.

2.5 Statistical and data analysis

To compare cell viabilities in more than 2 groups, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test was performed with GraphPad Prism 8. The data were normalized prior to analysis. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-values less than 0.05.

3 Results

3.1 Optimal dose finding

Zoledronate, carboplatin, doxorubicin, vinorelbine, and isophosphoramide mustard caused decreased cell viability in a dose-dependent fashion in the D17 cell line. Toceranib showed a significant reduction of cell viability above the concentration of 10 uM, and IC_5-50 could not be calculated (Supplementary Figure 1; Supplementary Table 1). In primary OSA cells (Ronald), zoledronate, carboplatin, doxorubicin, and vinorelbine caused decreased cell viability in a dose-dependent fashion. Toceranib and isophosphoramide mustard showed increased cell viability at lower doses and decreased cell viability at higher doses (Supplementary Figure 2; Supplementary Table 2). IC₅₀ of toceranib could not be calculated. In primary OSA cells from a different dog (Walter), zoledronate, carboplatin, doxorubicin, vinorelbine, and isophosphoramide mustard caused decreased cell viability in a dose-dependent fashion. Toceranib showed increased cell viability at lower doses and a significant reduction of cell viability above the concentration of 10 uM. IC₅₀ of toceranib could not be calculated (Supplementary Figure 3; Supplementary Table 3). In MDCK cell line, zoledronate, carboplatin, doxorubicin, vinorelbine, toceranib, and isophosphoramide mustard caused decreased cell viability in a dose-dependent fashion (Supplementary Figure 4; Supplementary Table 4).

3.2 Evaluation of combinatorial effects

Combinatorial effects were evaluated using IC₅, IC₁₀, IC₂₀, and IC₅₀, which were calculated (Supplementary Tables 1–4). In D17 cells, these values with toceranib could not be calculated. As a result, the concentration of 300 nM was used since that concentration was reported as Cmax in pharmacokinetics studies (25–31) (Supplementary Table 5). In addition, 10 uM of toceranib caused approximately 10% cell death based on the cell viability curve (Supplementary Figure 1) and this concentration was also used for combinatorial effect evaluation. Cell viability results with a combination of zoledronate and chemotherapy agents are shown in Figures 1–4. In D17 cells, there was no significant change in cell viability with the combination of carboplatin, doxorubicin, and toceranib. However, there was a tendency for antagonistic effects with vinorelbine and isophosphoramide (Figure 1). In primary OSA cell 1 (Ronald), there was no effect with carboplatin, doxorubicin, and isophosphoramide. There was a synergistic effect with toceranib. A tendency of antagonistic effects was observed in vinorelbine when combined with lower concentrations of zoledronate (Figure 2). In primary OSA cell 2 (Walter), there was no effect with carboplatin, vinorelbine, doxorubicin, and isophosphoramide. There was a tendency for a synergistic effect with toceranib when zoledronate was used in higher concentrations (Figure 3). In MDCK cells, no effects were noted with all chemotherapy drugs (Figure 4).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Cell viability of D17 cells treated with a combination of zoledronate and chemotherapy drugs. (A) Carboplatin, (B) Vinorelbine, (C) Doxorubicin, (D) Toceranib, (E) Isophosphoramide mustard. Data expressed as mean +/− SD and significance defined as ^*p < 0.05, ^**p < 0.01, ^***p < 0.001, ^****p < 0.0001.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Cell viability of primary osteosarcoma 1 (Ronald), treated with a combination of zoledronate and chemotherapy drugs. (A) Carboplatin, (B) Vinorelbine, (C) Doxorubicin, (D) Toceranib, (E) Isophosphoramide mustard. Data expressed as mean +/− SD and significance defined as ^*p < 0.05, ^**p < 0.01, ^***p < 0.001, ^****p < 0.0001.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Cell viability of primary osteosarcoma 2 (Walter), treated with a combination of zoledronate and chemotherapy drugs. (A) Carboplatin, (B) Vinorelbine, (C) Doxorubicin, (D) Toceranib, (E) Isophosphoramide mustard. Data expressed as mean +/− SD and significance defined as ^*p < 0.05, ^**p < 0.01, ^***p < 0.001, ^****p < 0.0001.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Cell viability of MDCK cell, treated with a combination of zoledronate and chemotherapy drugs. (A) Carboplatin, (B) Vinorelbine, (C) Doxorubicin, (D) Toceranib, (E) Isophosphoramide mustard. Data expressed as mean +/− SD and significance defined as ^*p < 0.05, ^**p < 0.01, ^***p < 0.001, ^****p < 0.0001.

4 Discussion

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of zoledronate to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents in canine OSA cells. At optimal dose-finding, zoledronate, carboplatin, vinorelbine, doxorubicin, and isophosphoramide treatment alone resulted in a dose-dependent decrease in cell viability. In contrast, toceranib caused increased cell viability at lower concentrations and then showed a significant decrease in cell viability at higher concentrations. This non-monotonic effect of toceranib could be due to its unique mechanism of action. While carboplatin, vinorelbine, doxorubicin, and ifosfamide interact with DNA or the cell cycle directly and cause cell death, toceranib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and blocks receptor tyrosine kinases expressed on the cell surface by acting as a competitive inhibitor of adenosine triphosphate binding (32). The primary targets of toceranib are KIT, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ), and FMS-like tyrosine kinases-3 (Flt-3) (32–34). Toceranib can target tumor cells by inhibiting receptor tyrosine kinases expressed on their surface that promote cell division and survival. For dogs, plasma VEGF concentration was associated with Cmax of toceranib and its minimum effective dose has been reported as 2.4 mg/kg (35). This information supports that toceranib might have a threshold value of its effectiveness. Due to its nature of competitive inhibition, toceranib might require a higher concentration to cause cell death. In the authors’ opinion, if the higher concentration is not achieved and toceranib only binds part of the targets, it might enhance opposite effects, such as enhancing cell signaling pathway or upregulation of cell surface receptors, which would favor increased viability.

In previous studies, zoledronate was shown to increase the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin in canine malignant histiocytosis cells (18), human prostate cancer cells (19), and human breast cancer cells (20). Our study is the first study that evaluated the effects of zoledronate in canine OSA cells when combined with several chemotherapy drugs. In this study, it was indicated that zoledronate may have a synergistic effect when used with toceranib. In addition, zoledronate may have antagonistic effects when used with vinorelbine and ifosfamide. Multiple mechanisms for the anti-neoplastic effect of zoledronate have been suggested, including increased intracellular accumulation of chemotherapeutics. Specifically, zoledronate caused increased intracellular doxorubicin accumulation in canine malignant histiocytosis cells (18). The mechanism for increased drug accumulation is unknown. The proposed mechanism includes altered intracellular drug metabolism via zoledronate-induced GTPase inhibition and decreased drug efflux via p-glycoprotein downregulation. While doxorubicin and vinorelbine are both drugs that efflux from cells via p-glycoprotein transporters, we found that doxorubicin and vinorelbine had different effects when they were combined with zoledronate, suggesting p-glycoprotein augmentation is not responsible for the drug increased activity. Based on this, other mechanisms likely contribute to the antagonistic effect of zoledronate with vinorelbine. As a next step, proteomics might help to determine which proteins are related to this phenomenon.

In human medicine, phase III randomized studies were performed in patients with OSA (23, 24). In these studies, OSA patients received chemotherapy or chemotherapy plus zoledronate pre- and post-surgery. The addition of zoledronate did not demonstrate a survival benefit and the zoledronate group developed additional adverse events including hypocalcemia and hypophosphatemia in comparison to the control groups. The investigators concluded that zoledronate should not be added to the standard OSA treatment. In these studies, they used two combination chemotherapy protocols—(1) methotrexate, etoposide, and ifosfamide or (2) doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and cisplatin. Based on our study, isophosphoramide mustard showed potential antagonistic effects, and this result supports the clinical outcomes reported in this phase III human OSA study.

Although side effects of zoledronate are not common, osteonecrosis of the jaw and elevation of BUN have been reported in dogs (8, 36). To evaluate any possibility of significant toxicity with the combinations of zoledronate of chemotherapeutic drugs, we used MDCK cells and analyzed their viability. In MDCK cells, there were no obvious synergistic or antagonistic effects from the combination of zoledronate and chemotherapeutic drugs; however, the cell viability seemed to decrease compared to D17 cells and primary OSA cells. This may indicate that dogs can have an increased risk of renal toxicity when zoledronate and chemotherapeutic drugs are used at the same time.

This was an in vitro study, and some conditions are different from in vivo. In vivo, cancer can create a tumor microenvironment that contributes to the further proliferation of cancer cells. There is an immunosuppressive barrier that helps cancer cells avoid immune destruction and includes regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, mesenchymal stem cells, transforming growth factor-β, and immunoglobulins (37–39). Moreover, tumor macrophages and cancer-associated fibroblasts can promote cellular proliferation, invasion, and neo-angiogenesis (40, 41). In vitro studies lack these components, and it is difficult to completely imitate the true tumor reaction to these drugs that may be influenced by the microenvironment.

In this study, we used IC_5-50 to evaluate the combination effects of drugs, and we did not use lower concentrations that did not cause cell death nor higher concentrations that caused increased cell death. This allowed us to evaluate the range of cell viability when we combined 2 drugs. The drug concentrations that we calculated in this study were slightly different from what has been reported in the in vivo pharmacokinetics studies (Supplementary Table 5); however, there was some overlap between reported drug concentrations in the canine body (25–31).

The other limitation of this study is that we did not evaluate the schedule dependency. Cell viability of canine OSA cells has been evaluated with the combination of radiation therapy and bisphosphonates (42). They evaluated the difference in cell viability when bisphosphonates are added either 24 h before, within 2 h, or 24 h after radiation therapy administration. In their study, they found that cell viability was significantly decreased when bisphosphonates were added 24 h after radiation. The mechanism is still unknown; however, changing the timing of bisphosphonate administration in relation to chemotherapy administration may be important for further evaluation.

In this study, each drug concentration resulted in different results; thus, the concentrations that can cause synergistic effects may or may not be achievable in vivo.

In conclusion, we found that zoledronate had synergistic effects with toceranib and antagonistic effects with vinorelbine and isophosphoramide. However, these effects were different depending on the cell line and concentration used, and further evaluation is needed to apply these treatments to clinical cases.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the studies on animals in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements because only commercially available established cell lines were used.

Author contributions

YI: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft. SL: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. NB: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. BS: Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing. SP: Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was funded by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Resident Research Grant and sponsored by the Purina Institute. This manuscript has not reviewed by ACVIM or the Purina Institute and do not necessarily reflect the views of the ACVIM, its officers, directors, or the Sponsor.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1327377/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Fenger, JM, London, CA, and Kisseberth, WC. Canine osteosarcoma: a naturally occurring disease to inform pediatric oncology. ILAR J. (2014) 55:69–85. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilu009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Vail, DM. Withrow and Macewen's small animal clinical oncology, vol. xiii. 6th ed. Edinburgh, New York: Elsevier (2020). 842 p.

Google Scholar

3. Ogilvie, GK, Straw, RC, Jameson, VJ, Walters, LM, Lafferty, MH, Powers, BE, et al. Evaluation of single-agent chemotherapy for treatment of clinically evident osteosarcoma metastases in dogs: 45 cases (1987-1991). J Am Vet Med Assoc. (1993) 202:304–6. doi: 10.2460/javma.1993.202.02.304

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Batschinski, K, Dervisis, NG, and Kitchell, BE. Evaluation of Ifosfamide salvage therapy for metastatic canine osteosarcoma. Vet Comp Oncol. (2014) 12:249–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5829.2012.00355.x

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Laver, T, London, CA, Vail, DM, Biller, BJ, Coy, J, and Thamm, DH. Prospective evaluation of Toceranib phosphate in metastatic canine osteosarcoma. Vet Comp Oncol. (2018) 16:E23–9. doi: 10.1111/vco.12328

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Kim, C, Matsuyama, A, Mutsaers, AJ, and Woods, JP. Retrospective evaluation of Toceranib (Palladia) treatment for canine metastatic appendicular osteosarcoma. Can Vet J. (2017) 58:1059–64.

Google Scholar

7. Fan, TM. The role of bisphosphonates in the Management of Patients that Have Cancer. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. (2007) 37:1091–110. doi: 10.1016/j.cvsm.2007.08.002

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Lundberg, AP, Roady, PJ, Somrak, AJ, Howes, ME, and Fan, TM. Zoledronate-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw in a dog with appendicular osteosarcoma. J Vet Intern Med. (2016) 30:1235–40. doi: 10.1111/jvim.13980

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Iguchi, T, Miyakawa, Y, Saito, K, Nakabayashi, C, Nakanishi, M, Saya, H, et al. Zoledronate-induced S phase arrest and apoptosis accompanied by DNA damage and activation of the Atm/Chk1/Cdc25 pathway in human osteosarcoma cells. Int J Oncol. (2007) 31:285–91. doi: 10.3892/ijo.31.2.285

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Das, H, Wang, L, Kamath, A, and Bukowski, JF. Vgamma2vdelta2 T-cell receptor-mediated recognition of Aminobisphosphonates. Blood. (2001) 98:1616–8. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.5.1616

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Roelofs, AJ, Thompson, K, Ebetino, FH, Rogers, MJ, and Coxon, FP. Bisphosphonates: molecular mechanisms of action and effects on bone cells, monocytes and macrophages. Curr Pharm Des. (2010) 16:2950–60. doi: 10.2174/138161210793563635

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ohba, T, Cates, JM, Cole, HA, Slosky, DA, Haro, H, Ichikawa, J, et al. Pleiotropic effects of bisphosphonates on osteosarcoma. Bone. (2014) 63:110–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.03.005

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Koto, K, Horie, N, Kimura, S, Murata, H, Sakabe, T, Matsui, T, et al. Clinically relevant dose of Zoledronic acid inhibits spontaneous lung metastasis in a murine osteosarcoma model. Cancer Lett. (2009) 274:271–8. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2008.09.026

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Ory, B, Heymann, MF, Kamijo, A, Gouin, F, Heymann, D, and Redini, F. Zoledronic acid suppresses lung metastases and prolongs overall survival of osteosarcoma-bearing mice. Cancer. (2005) 104:2522–9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21530

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Conry, RM, Rodriguez, MG, and Pressey, JG. Zoledronic acid in metastatic osteosarcoma: encouraging progression free survival in four consecutive patients. Clin Sarcoma Res. (2016) 6:2. doi: 10.1186/s13569-016-0046-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wolfe, TD, Pillai, SPS, Hildreth, BE, Lanigan, LG, Martin, CK, Werbeck, JL, et al. Effect of Zoledronic acid and amputation on bone invasion and lung metastasis of canine osteosarcoma in nude mice. Clin Exp Metastasis. (2011) 28:377–89. doi: 10.1007/s10585-011-9377-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Smith, AA, Lindley, SES, Almond, GT, Bergman, NS, Matz, BM, and Smith, AN. Evaluation of Zoledronate for the treatment of canine stage iii osteosarcoma: a phase ii study. Vet Med Sci. (2023) 9:59–67. doi: 10.1002/vms3.1000

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Hafeman, SD, Varland, D, and Dow, SW. Bisphosphonates significantly increase the activity of doxorubicin or vincristine against canine malignant Histiocytosis cells. Vet Comp Oncol. (2012) 10:44–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5829.2011.00274.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Clyburn, RD, Reid, P, Evans, CA, Lefley, DV, and Holen, I. Increased anti-tumour effects of doxorubicin and Zoledronic acid in prostate Cancer cells in vitro: supporting the benefits of combination therapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. (2010) 65:969–78. doi: 10.1007/s00280-009-1106-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Neville-Webbe, HL, Rostami-Hodjegan, A, Evans, CA, Coleman, RE, and Holen, I. Sequence- and schedule-dependent enhancement of Zoledronic acid induced apoptosis by doxorubicin in breast and prostate Cancer cells. Int J Cancer. (2005) 113:364–71. doi: 10.1002/ijc.20602

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Goldsby, RE, Fan, TM, Villaluna, D, Wagner, LM, Isakoff, MS, Meyer, J, et al. Feasibility and dose discovery analysis of Zoledronic acid with concurrent chemotherapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic osteosarcoma: a report from the Children's oncology group. Eur J Cancer. (2013) 49:2384–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.03.018

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Heymann, D, Ory, B, Blanchard, F, Heymann, MF, Coipeau, P, Charrier, C, et al. Enhanced tumor regression and tissue repair when Zoledronic acid is combined with Ifosfamide in rat osteosarcoma. Bone. (2005) 37:74–86. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2005.02.020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Piperno-Neumann, S, Le Deley, MC, Rédini, F, Pacquement, H, Marec-Bérard, P, Petit, P, et al. Zoledronate in combination with chemotherapy and surgery to treat osteosarcoma (Os2006): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. (2016) 17:1070–80. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30096-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Li, S, Chen, P, Pei, Y, Zheng, K, Wang, W, Qiu, E, et al. Addition of Zoledronate to chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma treated with limb-sparing surgery: a phase iii clinical trial. Med Sci Monit. (2019) 25:1429–38. doi: 10.12659/msm.913236

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Martin-Jimenez, T, De Lorimier, LP, Fan, TM, and Freise, KJ. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single dose of Zoledronate in healthy dogs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. (2007) 30:492–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2007.00883.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Chen, C, Wang, W, Zhou, H, Huang, J, Liu, P, Song, T, et al. Pharmacokinetic comparison between systemic and local chemotherapy by carboplatin in dogs. Reprod Sci. (2009) 16:1097–102. doi: 10.1177/1933719109341999

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Kirsch, M, Weisse, C, Berent, A, Clifford, C, Leibman, N, Wittenburg, L, et al. Pilot study comparing serum chemotherapy levels after intra-arterial and intravenous Administration in Dogs with naturally occurring urinary tract tumors. Can J Vet Res. (2019) 83:187–96.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

28. Kobayashi, S, Sakai, T, Dalrymple, PD, Wood, SG, and Chasseaud, LF. Disposition of the novel anticancer agent Vinorelbine Ditartrate following intravenous Administration in Mice, Rats and Dogs. Arzneimittelforschung. (1993) 43:1367–77.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

29. Selting, KA, Ogilvie, GK, Gustafson, DL, Long, ME, Lana, SE, Walton, JA, et al. Evaluation of the effects of dietary N-3 fatty acid supplementation on the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin in dogs with lymphoma. Am J Vet Res. (2006) 67:145–51. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.67.1.145

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Yancey, MF, Merritt, DA, Lesman, SP, Boucher, JF, and Michels, GM. Pharmacokinetic properties of Toceranib phosphate (Palladia, Su11654), a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in laboratory dogs and dogs with mast cell tumors. J Vet Pharmacol Ther. (2010) 33:162–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2009.01133.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Germann, N, Urien, S, Rodgers, AH, Ratterree, M, Struck, RF, Waud, WR, et al. Comparative preclinical toxicology and pharmacology of Isophosphoramide mustard, the active metabolite of Ifosfamide. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. (2005) 55:143–51. doi: 10.1007/s00280-004-0894-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. London, CA, Hannah, AL, Zadovoskaya, R, Chien, MB, Kollias-Baker, C, Rosenberg, M, et al. Phase I dose-escalating study of Su11654, a small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in dogs with spontaneous malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. (2003) 9:2755–68.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

33. London, C, Mathie, T, Stingle, N, Clifford, C, Haney, S, Klein, MK, et al. Preliminary evidence for biologic activity of Toceranib phosphate (Palladia(®)) in solid Tumours. Vet Comp Oncol. (2012) 10:194–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5829.2011.00275.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Pryer, NK, Lee, LB, Zadovaskaya, R, Yu, X, Sukbuntherng, J, Cherrington, JM, et al. Proof of target for Su11654: inhibition of kit phosphorylation in canine mast cell tumors. Clin Cancer Res. (2003) 9:5729–34.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

35. Bernabe, LF, Portela, R, Nguyen, S, Kisseberth, WC, Pennell, M, Yancey, MF, et al. Evaluation of the adverse event profile and pharmacodynamics of Toceranib phosphate administered to dogs with solid tumors at doses below the maximum tolerated dose. BMC Vet Res. (2013) 9:190. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-190

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Fan, TM, de Lorimier, LP, Garrett, LD, and Lacoste, HI. The bone biologic effects of Zoledronate in healthy dogs and dogs with malignant Osteolysis. J Vet Intern Med. (2008) 22:380–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2008.0046.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Modiano, JF, Lindborg, BA, McElmurry, RT, Lewellen, M, Forster, CL, Zamora, EA, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells inhibit murine syngeneic anti-tumor immune responses by attenuating inflammation and reorganizing the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Immunol Immunother. (2015) 64:1449–60. doi: 10.1007/s00262-015-1749-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Anderson, KL, and Modiano, JF. Progress in adaptive immunotherapy for Cancer in companion animals: success on the path to a cure. Vet Sci. (2015) 2:363–87. doi: 10.3390/vetsci2040363

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Erez, N, Truitt, M, Olson, P, Arron, ST, and Hanahan, D. Cancer-associated fibroblasts are activated in incipient neoplasia to orchestrate tumor-promoting inflammation in an Nf-Kappab-dependent manner. Cancer Cell. (2010) 17:135–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.041

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Raposo, TP, Beirao, BC, Pang, LY, Queiroga, FL, and Argyle, DJ. Inflammation and Cancer: till death tears them apart. Vet J. (2015) 205:161–74. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.015

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Terragni, R, Casadei Gardini, A, Sabattini, S, Bettini, G, Amadori, D, Talamonti, C, et al. Egfr, Her-2 and Kras in canine gastric epithelial tumors: a potential human model? PLoS One. (2014) 9:e85388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085388

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Hoddinott, K, Oblak, ML, Wood, GA, Boston, S, and Mutsaers, AJ. Effect of timing of bisphosphonate administration on canine osteosarcoma cells undergoing radiation therapy. Can J Vet Res. (2020) 84:225–9.

Google Scholar