Ettore Napoli1*†
Gianluca D'Amico
Rafael Antonio Nascimento Ramos- 1Department Veterinary Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
- 2Department of Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
- 3Laboratory of Parasitology, Federal University of the Agreste of Pernambuco, Garanhuns, Brazil
- 4Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Dog filariosis: the threat walks not only in the blood stream
The scientific literature on dog filariasis has expanded considerably in the last decade. From a search on the most used database, Pubmed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=dog+filariosis), 2,179 scientific articles were published between 1902 and 2022, of which 31.8% (n = 693) was produced the last decade (2012–2022). The question that arises is: what has led to this increased scientific production of Canine filariasis? Canine filariasis, or filarial nematode infection in dogs, may be caused by different species, including the most pathogenic Dirofilaria immitis. Other filarids characterized by microfilariae in the blood, such as Dirofilaria repens and Acanthocheilonema reconditum, are just as consequential due to potential zoonosis and species misdiagnosis. However, alluded to in the title of this article collection, “The threat walks not only in the blood stream”; not all filarid microfilariae dwell within the blood. Indeed, considerable attention has been drawn to the genera Onchocerca and Cercopithifilaria, whose microfilariae are skin-dwelling.
It is well-known that all nematodes of the Family Onchocercidae (Spirurida) are transmitted by arthropod vectors (e.g., Dirofilaria spp. by mosquitoes and Cercopithifilaria spp. by ticks) (1, 2), or there is strong evidence indicative to this type of transmission (e.g., O. lupi). From an epidemiological perspective, the vectorial transmission of pathogens has dramatically shifted due to the recent climatic changes that have influenced the distribution of arthropod populations (3). One of the consequences of global warming is the broadening area of colonization of arthropod vectors (e.g., mosquitoes, ticks, fleas), with the invasion of new areas and eventually increase of their vector capacity. For example, this spreading has been clearly observed for D. immitis and D. repens in Europe (2, 4, 5). In the past, D. immitis was considered endemic only in the Mediterranean countries. However, the distribution patterns have recently changed and expanded toward eastern and north-eastern European countries (6–8). Following the same trend, D. repens has increased its prevalence in areas where it has already been reported, and its distribution range has expanded into new areas of Europe, with new cases in both dog and human hosts (9).
Dirofilaria immitis, the main representant of this genus, has been reported to predominantly infecting dogs, other animal species (e.g., cats, wild canids, badger), and humans (5, 10, 11). In dogs, adult nematodes localize primarily in the pulmonary arteries, causing a severe and debilitating cardio-pulmonary condition known as “heartworm disease” (12). Females release first-stage larvae (microfilariae) in the bloodstream of the vertebrate host. Mosquito vectors (e.g., Culex, Aedes, Ochlerotatus, and Anopheles) ingest these microfilariae and develop for ~14 days to become infective third-stage larvae (13). The success of larval development within the mosquito host depends on temperature (14). Thus, development ceases if the temperature falls below the minimum threshold (14°C). The total amount of environmental heat required for developing D. immitis can be expressed in degree-days above the threshold temperature (Heartworm Developing Units, HDU). In general, the transmission model assumes that an accumulation of 130 HDUs within a maximum period of 30 days (average life span of the mosquito host) is needed for D. immitis to reach infectivity (15).
D. repens has also been considered a notable mosquito-borne nematode, responsible for canine subcutaneous filariasis in dogs and sporadically in humans (16, 17). Adult nematodes are mainly found in the subcutaneous or intramuscular connective tissue of vertebrate hosts (2); however, the presence of this nematode has been recently reported in unusual anatomical locations such as the pelvic and mesentery cavity, eyes, and testis (18–21). Similar to D. immitis, the causative agent of subcutaneous dirofilariosis is transmitted by mosquitoes (e.g., Aedes and Culex) (22, 23). In several vertebrate hosts, including humans, most inoculated microfilariae die or migrate in host tissues originating from subcutaneous nodules (23, 24). These lesions are characterized by focal edema and erythema triggered by the presence of the parasite (25–28).
Although Dirofilaria species have been widely studied, other filarial nematodes are known to parasitize dogs, such as O. lupi (29–31). This nematode is an emergent species infecting domestic dogs and has been identified in Europe, the Middle East and North America (32–39). This parasite's infection in canids is characterized by the presence of ocular lesions, including subconjunctival granulomas (33, 40, 41). There are many gaps in the epidemiology of O. lupi, mainly because information about its vector is incomplete (42). Until recently, only Simulium tribulatum was suggested as the putative vector of this filarial worm in California, United States (US) (43).
Currently, three species of Cercopithifilaria have been recognized in dogs: Cercopithifilaria grassii, Cercopithifilaria bainae, and Cercopithifilaria sp. II (44–46). C. bainae, the most studied species within this genus, was first described in a dog from Brazil (45) and, in the last decade, was reported to infect dogs in Italy (46). Current evidence supports a broader distribution of C. bainae than previously known (29, 47–49). Unlike most filarioid species, C. bainae is vectored by R. sanguineus sensu lato (s.l) ticks (47, 50). Although its pathogenicity had not been fully elucidated, parasitism by this nematode has been associated with polyarthritis (51), dermatitis (29, 52), and the presence of a giant cutaneous cyst in dogs (53). The importance of other filarioid genera, such as Acanthocheilonema and Brugia, must be addressed. Despite low pathogenic relevance, Acanthocheilonema spp. may cause misdiagnosis in regions where Dirofilaria spp. are also endemic, and Brugia spp. has significant zoonotic implications (53).
In this Research Topic, the importance of canine filariasis have been demonstrated in five unique articles. Two literature reviews highlight the importance of cutaneous filarioids in the US (Gruntmeir et al.) and the other focus on Dirofilaria in the UK (Panarese et al.). Two research articles related to the risk of infection (Ciuca et al.) and new distribution patterns of Dirofilaria species in Italy (Napoli et al.), and finally, the evidence of the putative role of biting midges as vectors of O. lupi in the US (Roe et al.). This Research Topic will highlight significant aspects of canine filariasis to serve as a knowledge resource for any remaining gaps in the scientific literature that require attention.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Matthew Kulpa (Texas A&M University) for his suggestions in this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Brianti E, Gaglio G, Napoli E, Giannetto S, Dantas-Torres F, Bain O, et al. New insights into the ecology and biology of Acanthocheilonema reconditum (Grassi, 1889) causing canine subcutaneous filariosis. Parasitology. (2012) 139:530–6. doi: 10.1017/S0031182011002198
2. Capelli G, Genchi C, Baneth G, Bourdeau P, Brianti E, Cardoso L, et al. Recent advances on Dirofilaria repens in dogs and humans in Europe. Parasit Vectors. (2018) 11:663. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3205-x
3. Caminade C, McIntyre KM, Jones AE. Impact of recent and future climate change on vector-borne diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci USA. (2019) 1436:157–73. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13950
4. Brianti E, Panarese R, Napoli E, De Benedetto G, Gaglio G, Bezerra-Santos MA, et al. Dirofilaria immitis infection in the Pelagie archipelago: the southernmost hyperendemic focus in Europe. Transbound Emerg Dis. (2022) 69:1274–80. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14089
5. Mendoza-Roldan JA, Gabrielli S, Cascio A, Manoj RRS, Bezerra-Santos MA, Benelli G, et al. Zoonotic Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens infection in humans and an integrative approach to the diagnosis. Acta Trop. (2021) 223:106083. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.106083
6. Genchi C, Rinaldi L, Mortarino M, Genchi M, Cringoli G. Climate and Dirofilaria infection in Europe. Vet Parasitol. (2009) 163:286–92. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.03.026
7. Széll Z, Bacsadi Á, Szeredi L, Nemes C, Fézer B, Bakcsa E, et al. Rapid spread and emergence of heartworm resulting from climate and climate-driven ecological changes in Hungary. Vet Parasitol. (2020) 280:109067. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109067
8. Fuehrer HP, Morelli S, Unterköfler MS, Bajer A, Bakran-Lebl K, Dwuznik-Szarek D, et al. Dirofilaria spp. and Angiostrongylus vasorum: current risk of spreading in Central and Northern Europe. Pathogens. (2021) 10:1268. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10101268
9. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Brianti E, Traversa D, PetricetriGenchi C, et al. Vector-borne helminths of dogs and humans. Parasit Vect. (2013) 6:16. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-16
10. Ionică AM, Deak G, Boncea R, Gherman CM, Mihalca AD. The European badger as a new host for Dirofilaria immitis and an update on the distribution of the heartworm in wild carnivores from Romania. Pathogens. (2022) 11:420. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11040420
11. Adagra C, Squires R, Adagra A, Elliman J, Constantinoiu C. Prevalence of infection with Dirofilaria immitis in cats in Townsville, Australia. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Rep. (2021) 24:100580. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2021.100580
12. McCall JW, Varloud M, Hodgkins E, Mansour A, DiCosty U, McCall S, et al. Shifting the paradigm in Dirofilaria immitis prevention: blocking transmission from mosquitoes to dogs using repellents/insecticides and macrocyclic lactone prevention as part of a multimodal approach. Parasit Vectors. (2017) 10:525. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2438-4
13. Silaghi C, Beck R, Capelli G, Montarsi F, Mathis A. Development of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in Aedes japonicus and Aedes geniculatus. Parasit Vectors. (2017) 10:94. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2015-x
14. Ledesma N, Harrington L. Fine-scale temperature fluctuation and modulation of Dirofilaria immitis larval development in Aedes aegypti. Vet Parasitol. (2015) 209:93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.02.003
15. Cuervo PF, Fantozzi MC, Di Cataldo S, Cringoli G, Mera YSR, Rinaldi L. Analysis of climate and extrinsic incubation of Dirofilaria immitis in southern South America. Geospat Health. (2013) 8:175–81. doi: 10.4081/gh.2013.64
16. Gabrielli S, Mangano V, Furzi F, Oliva A, Vita S, Poscia R, et al. Molecular identification of new cases of human dirofilariosis (Dirofilaria repens) in Italy. Pathogens. (2021) 10:251. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020251
17. Pampiglione S, Rivasi F. Human dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria (Nochtiella) repens: an update of world literature from 1995 to 2000. Parassitologia. (2000) 42:231–54.
18. Napoli E, Bono V, Gaglio G, Giannetto S, Zanghdue to cia R, et al. Molecular identification oDirofilaria repens (Spirurida: Onchocercidae) infection in the testicle of a dog. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. (2019) 66:101326. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.06.007
19. Omeragić J, Beck R, Klarić D, Bačić E. Dirofilaria repens in canine testicles in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Veterinaria. (2018) 67:37–40.
20. Ravindran R, Julie B, Swapna SA, Jerin F, Jyothimol G, Lenka DR, et al. Dirofilaria repens in scrotum of dogs. Trop Biomed. (2016) 33:842–6.
21. Demiaszkiewicz AW, Karamon J, Jasik A. Case of Dirofilaria repens in a testis of a dog. Med Weter. (2013) 69:124–7.
22. Genchi C, Kramer LH. The prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis and D. repens in the old world. Vet Parasitol. (2020) 280:108995. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.108995
23. Otranto D, Giannelli A, Latrofa MS, Dantas-Torres F, Trumble NS, Chavkin M, et al. Canine infections with Onchocerca lupi nematodes, United States, 2011-2014. Emerg Infect Dis. (2015) 21:868–71. doi: 10.3201/eid2105.141812
24. Pampiglione S, Fioravanti ML, Piccolotti D, Pizzicannella G, Reale D. Human dirofilariasis in Italy: a new case in the spermatic cord. Parassitologia. (2002) 44:93–6.
25. Agapito D, Aziz NA, Wang T, Morgan ER, Wright I. Subconjunctival Dirofilaria repens infection in a dog resident in the UK. J Small Anim Pract. (2018) 59:50–2. doi: 10.1111/jsap.12795
26. Hermosilla C, Pantchev N, Dyachenko V, Gutmann M, Bauer C. First autochthonous case of canine ocular Dirofilaria repens in Germany. Vet Rec. (2006) 158:134–5. doi: 10.1136/vr.158.4.134
27. Mircean M, Ionică AM, Mircean V, Györke A, Codea AR, Tăbăran FA, et al. Clinical and pathological effects of Dirofilaria repens and Dirofilaria immitis in a dog with a natural co-infection. Parasitol Int. (2017) 66:331–4. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2017.02.003
28. Otranto D, Testini G, Dantas-Torres F, Latrofa MS, De Paiva Diniz PPV, De Caprariis D, et al. Diagnosis of canine vector-borne diseases in young dogs: a longitudinal study. J Clin Microbiol. (2010) 48:3316–24. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00379-10
29. Otranto D, Brianti E, Abramo F, Gaglio G, Napoli E, Latrofa MS, et al. Cutaneous distribution and localization of Cercopithifilaria sp. microfilariae in dogs. Vet Parasitol. (2012) 190:143–50. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.05.016
30. Ramos RA, Giannelli A, Lia RP, Brianti E, Tarallo VD, Breitshwerdt EB, et al. Incidence of Cercopithifilaria bainae in dogs and probability of co-infection with other tick-borne pathogens. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e88198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088198
31. Mutafchiev Y, Dantas-Torres F, Giannelli A, Abramo F, Papadopoulos E, Cardoso L, et al. Redescription of Onchocerca lupi (Spirurida: Onchocercidae) with histopathological observations. Parasit Vect. (2013) 6:309. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-309
32. Széll Z, Erdélyi I, Sréter T, Albert M, Varga I. Canine ocular onchocercosis in Hungary. Vet Parasitol. (2001) 97:243 doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-6-309logical o
33. Komnenou A, Eberhard ML, Kaldrymidou E, Tsalie E, Dessiris A. Subconjunctival filariasis due to Onchocerca sp. in dogs: report of 23 cases in Greece. Vet Ophthalmol. (2002) 5:119–26. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-5224.2002.00235.x
34. Hermosilla C, Hetzel U, Bausch M, GreE, Tsalie E, Dessiris A. Subconjunctival filariasis due to ption of ation of vectorVet Rec.(2005) 156:450–2. doi: 10.1136/vr.156.14.450
35. Faísca P, Morales-Hojas R, Alves M, Gomes J, Botelho M, Melo M, et al. A case of canine ocular onchocercosis in Portugal. Vet Ophthalmol. (2010) 13:117–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2010.00763.x
36. Labelle AL, Daniels JB, Dix M, Labelle P. Onchocerca lupi causing ocular disease in two cats. Vet Ophthalmol. (2011) 14:105–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-5224.2011.00911.x
37. Otranto D, Dantas-Torres F, Giannelli A, Latrofa MS, Papadopoulos E, Cardoso L, et al. Zoonotic Onchocerca lupi infection in dogs, Greece and Portugal, 2011-2012. Emerg Infect Dis. (2013) 19:2000–3. doi: 10.3201/eid1912.130264
38. Verocai GG, Sobotyk C, Lamison A, Borst MM, Edwards EE. Autochthonous, zoonotic Onchocerca lupi in a South Texas dog, United States. Parasit Vect. (2021) 14:203. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04707-4
39. McGarry JW, Carrozza R, Bradley C, Latrofa MS, Makepeace BL, Otranto D. Onchocerca lupi in imported dogs in the UK: implications for animal and public health. BMC Vet Res. (2022) 18:66. doi: 10.1186/s12917-022-03169-9
40. Sréter T, Széll Z. Onchocercosis: a newly recognized disease in dogs. Vet Parasitol. (2008) 151:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.09.008
41. Komnenou AT, Thomas AL, Papadopoulos E, Koutinas AF. Intraocular localization of Onchocerca lupi adult worm in a dog with anterior uveitis: a case report. Vet Ophthalmol. (2016) 19:245–9. doi: 10.1111/vop.12277
42. Latrofa MS, Annoscia G, Colella V, Cavalera MA, Maia C, Martin C, et al. A real-time PCR tool for the surveillance of zoonotic Onchocerca lupi in dogs, cats and potential vectors. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. (2018) 12:e0006402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006402
43. Hassan HK, Bolcen S, Kubofcik J, Nutman TB, Eberhard ML, Middleton K, et al. Isolation of Onchocerca lupi in dogs and black flies, California, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. (2015) 21:789–96. doi: 10.3201/eid2105.142011
44. Noè G. Contribuzioni alla sistematica e alla anatomia del genereFilaria. La Filaria grassii. (1907) 236–52.
45. Gouvea de Almeida GL, Vicente J. Cercopithifilaria bainae sp. n. parasita de Canis familiaris (L.) (Nematoda, Filarioidea). Atas Soc Biol Rio de Janeiro. (1985) 24.
46. Otranto D, Brianti E, Dantas-Torres F, Weigl S, Latrofa MS, Gaglio G, et al. Morphological and molecular data on the dermal microfilariae of a species of Cercopithifilaria from a dog in Sicily. Vet Parasitol. (2011) 182:221–9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.043
47. Latrofa MS, Dantas-Torres F, Giannelli A, Otranto D. Molecular detection of tick-borne pathogens in Rhipicephalus sanguineus group ticks. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. (2014) 5:943–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.07.014
48. Lineberry MW, Sundstrom KD, Little SE, Stayton EM, Allen KE. Detection of Cercopithifilaria bainae infection in shelter dogs and ticks in Oklahoma, USA. Parasit Vect. (2020) 13:216. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04089-z
49. Sazmand A, Bahiraei Z, Nemati F, Annoscia G, Bezerra-Santos MA, Nayebzadeh H, et al. Dermal microfilariae of dogs, jackals and cats in different regions of Iran. Parasit Vect. (2022) 15:28. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-05141-2
50. Ramos RA, Giannelli A, Brianti E, Annoscia G, Cantacessi C, Dantas-Torres F, et al. Tick vectors of Cercopithifilaria bainae in dogs: Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato versus Ixodes ricinus. Parasitol Res. (2013) 112:3013–7. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3474-4
51. Gabrielli S, Giannelli A, Brianti E, Dantas-Torres F, Bufalini M, Fraulo M, et al. Chronic polyarthritis associated to Cercopithifilaria bainae infection in a dog. Vet Parasitol. (2014) 205:401–4. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.06.027
52. Soares RL, Parolin LB, Mateus NLF, de Figueiredo GRD, Rodrigues VR, de Oliveira GG, et al. Giant cutaneous cyst in a dog infected by Cercopithifilaria bainae. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Rep. (2020) 20:100401. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2020.100401
Keywords: Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilaria repens, Acanthocheilonema reconditum, Cercopithifilaria spp., epidemiology, canine heartworm disease
Citation: Napoli E, D'Amico G and Ramos RAN (2023) Editorial: Dog filariosis: the threat walks not only in the blood stream. Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1258004. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1258004
Received: 13 July 2023; Accepted: 14 July 2023;
Published: 21 July 2023.
Edited and reviewed by: Yukifumi Nawa, Khon Kaen University, Thailand
Copyright © 2023 Napoli, D'Amico and Ramos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ettore Napoli, ZW5hcG9saSYjeDAwMDQwO3VuaW1lLml0
†These authors have contributed equally to this work