Quantification of spinal ataxia in dogs with thoracolumbar spinal cord injury

The clinical sign of ataxia is related to several neurological diseases and is seen in conjunction with paresis in dogs with spinal cord injury (SCI). Endeavours to objectify canine spinal ataxia in SCI remain limited. The aim of this clinical study was to determine and quantify differences between gait characteristics of ataxic dogs with thoracolumbar myelopathy and healthy control dogs using a computer-and treadmill-based gait analysis system. Five dogs with spinal ataxia and six healthy dogs underwent video-and computer-assisted gait analysis while walking on a four-ground reaction force plate treadmill system (maximum speed of 0.7 m/s). Spatio-temporal and kinetic gait characteristics regarding the dogs’ locomotion were analysed with a focus on the individual coefficient of variation (CV), as a potential measure for quantification of the level of ataxia. Ataxic dogs with thoracolumbar SCI showed no effect on symmetry indices but higher variability in spatio-temporal and kinetic gait parameters mainly in the pelvic, but also in the thoracic limbs. Double support phase of the individual limb was prolonged in SCI dogs at the cost of the single support and swing phase. Reduced peaks of ground reaction forces (GRF) could potentially be explained by reduction of muscle strength, as a strategy of avoiding falling by taking enthusiastic steps, or by alteration of the rhythmogenic spinal circuits between the pelvic and thoracic limb pattern generators.

1. Introduction

The neurological clinical sign of ataxia is defined as disturbed coordination of movement and can affect interaction between muscle groups (1) and adjustment of body axis orientation (2). Incoordination can be considered as the inability to maintain a cyclical interaction of temporal and spatial gait parameters, especially between the extremities and the body center (3). However, ataxia is most frequently observed in dogs with spinal cord injury (SCI) (4), secondary to intervertebral disc disease (IVDD) (5) and is then likely associated with paresis (1).

Prognostic factors do not only include severity of initial injury and its accompanying severity of neurological deficits, but also treatment options available and time until recovery of ambulation (6). Moreover, quality of life is often impacted in these patients (7). Further studies on these topics require individualized and objective spinal ataxia data, which can help study SCI in more granularity.

Interobserver reliability of observational gait analysis has been widely studied and shown to be dependable, provided that the analysis parameters are clearly defined and limited to a manageable quantity for the observer. Although observational gait analysis is an effective tool for clinical reasoning, the human eye, even in slow motion, is unable to fully analyse the complex components of the biped’s locomotion taking place within milliseconds, regardless of the observer’s degree of experience (8–10). Therefore, objective measures, such as those generated on force plate treadmills, can complement ordinal gait scales and precisely reveal different aspects in detail.

Although gait aberrations caused by neurologic dysfunctions have been a well-researched topic (11–22) there is still evidence missing on the benefits of a four-belt force plate treadmill system regarding its potential to objectively quantify ataxia, gait and step parameters, their coefficients of variation (CVs) and the relationship between the individual limbs. Four-belt force plate treadmill gait analysis is considered gold standard in veterinary orthopaedics, particularly because of their sensitivity with regard to kinetic parameters. To the best of authors’ knowledge this is the first four-belt force plate treadmill-based study with a focus on CVs of spatio-temporal and kinetic gait parameters in ambulatory dogs with SCI. The aim of the current study was to evaluate if the variability of temporal and spatial gait characteristics, as well as ground reaction forces (GRF, kinetics) of dogs with SCI-induced ataxia detected by a four-belt force plate treadmill system differ significantly from those of a healthy control group. GRF is the force exerted between a body and the ground when in contact with it. In a standing position, this force corresponds to the weight of the body, but it changes when the body is in motion. If differences to healthy dogs can be detected, the gait analysis system could provide a basis for further studies and help in the quantification of ataxia to monitor the recovery of patients in treatment trials.

2. Methods

Data collection was performed according to the German Law on Animal Protection and the EU Council Directive 210/63/EU. An ethical committee officially granted ethical approval for this study (reference number for this project: 20A555) based on §15 of the German animal welfare act together with the government agency of the Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety (LAVES). LAVES regulations limited the number of participants based on a previously conducted power analysis (G*Power, HHU University of Duesseldorf) after taking into consideration studies on similar populations and parameters.

2.1. Data collection

Data collection was performed at the Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery of the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover similar to previous studies (23–26), especially to one study on ataxic dogs receiving phenobarbital (11). In this prospective clinical study, gait parameters of clinic-owned beagle dogs (control group) were compared to a study group of patients with thoracolumbar SCI. In this study neurologically caused incoordinations were examined. Dogs with a history of an orthopaedic condition or an abnormal orthopaedic examination were excluded from the study. Furthermore, in order to exclude presence of general diseases that were incompatible with participating in this study (i.e., cardiovascular insufficiency or hyperaesthesia), general examination was performed in advance. All dogs had a neurological and orthopaedic examination and only dogs with a T3/L3 myelopathy, further characterised by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were included. Kinetic gait parameters were collected as established and formerly described for the gait lab at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover (11, 23–26). Kinetic analysis provides limb-specific information and is defined as interpretation of forces occurring during motion of subjects or objects particularly in regards of ground reaction forces transmitted to force plates by the dog’s extremities. Kinetics are established as a useful tool in objective evaluation of musculoskeletal conditions as well as different therapeutic options (27, 28). The gait laboratory at the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover contains three components: a treadmill with four integrated force measuring plates, a three-dimensional gait analysis system including high speed cameras as well as gait analysis software (29). It enables the observer to objectively measure ground reaction forces (Figure 1). The electronic four-belt treadmill (TM-07-B, Bertec Corp, United States) for detection of locomotion of participating dogs was complemented by a digital high-speed video camera (pilot piA640-210gc; Basler, Germany), videotaping from the left body position of the walking dog. All devices listed were monitored by Bertec Treadmill Control Panel software (ver 1.7.12; Bertec Corp, United States), as well as Vicon Nexus software (ver 1.8.5; Vicon Motion Systems Ltd., United Kingdom). Motion capture system was calibrated prior to use to adapt it to current conditions and an adaptation phase prior to recording was needed until the dogs were able to walk in a natural manner. For calibration a three-dimensional T-shaped calibration stick with reflective markers attached was manually moved in a random pattern above the area recorded for analysis until the video-system recognized all markers in all angles of the three-dimensional space and until the force plate measure was nulled when not carrying any weight. With this procedure the treadmill-based gait analysis system tests its functionality, inhibits incorrect measurements and reduces artifacts. In order to enable a smooth and regular walking session, treadmill speed was adjusted to 0.7 m/s.

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Ground reaction forces (GRF) measurable during stance phase of each paw. While walking in the direction of the solid black arrow, each paw was individually placed on one belt of the four-belt treadmill. GRF in vertical direction (Fz, blue arrow), GRF in cranio-caudal direction (Fy, red arrow) and GRF in medio-lateral direction (Fx, green arrow) were measured, according to McLaughlin et al. (28). Solid black arrow = direction of forward progression.

2.2. Data processing

For each participating dog, recorded gaits were reviewed to eliminate videos where gait might have been biased by turning of the head during walking or walking speed changes for further analysis of 50 complete stride cycles. If 50 complete stride cycles could not be measured in one trial run, multiple fragments of at least 10 continuous stride cycles each of adequate quality were used for further analysis. The number and length of trials and breaks in between trials was individually adapted to generate sufficient stride cycles without artifacts. Data of GRF were filtered through a low-pass 10-Hz finite-impulse response filter. The events “strike-down” and “lift-off” of paws were implemented by being linked to the high-definition video material as well as start and end of detection of vertical ground reaction forces during one stride. Captured data sets were exported to a Microsoft Excel 2010 spreadsheet (Microsoft Corp, United States). Table 1 shows definitions of spatio-temporal and kinetic gait parameters measured or calculated on behalf of this study.

TABLE 1

Table 1. Definitions of gait parameters measured or calculated on behalf of this study.

All GRF data were standardized for each participating dog by expressing data as percentage of its’ body weight using the following equation:GRF = Fz; Fy; Fx/(body weight*9.81); (9.81 = gravitational force in new/kg).

Moreover, symmetry indices, relative step length and relative step time were estimated using the following equations:

Symmetry index (SI) = 100% − [(PFz left paw/PFz right paw)*100] [modified formula by Budsberg et al. (30)].

Relative step time = step time/stride time.

Relative step length = step length/stride length.

Finally, CV of all gait parameters recorded were calculated, as used in multiple previous canine ataxia studies (12, 13, 31), horses (32) or humans (33) to enable relative comparison:

CV = Standard deviation/mean.

2.3. Statistical analysis

Statistical testing was conducted by GraphPad Prism 9 software (GraphPad Prism 9.2.0, GraphPad Software, Inc., United States). Differences in age, sex status and body weight between the groups were tested via unpaired t-test. Values of gait parameters and CVs were inspected for Gaussian distribution via Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and subsequently residual plots were visually estimated. After normality of distribution was rejected absolute parameter values of participating groups were statistically compared using the multiple Mann–Whitney test. p-values of less than 0.05 were considered as significant outcome for all statistical tests. p-values were then reviewed using a False Discovery Rate (FDR) in order to reduce Type-I error of multiple comparisons. The method selected for setting FDR was designed by Benjamini et al. (34). Data are shown as median with range in case of rejection of normal distribution and as mean with standard deviation if normal distributed.

3. Results

3.1. Study participants/animals

Eleven dogs of different ages, sex, breeds and body weights participated in this study. The control group consisted of 6 healthy Beagle dogs (age 4 [2–4] years; body weight 15.5 [12.7–16.7] kg). On the day of gait analysis, the control group needed an adaptation phase to the treadmill of 8 ± 4.56 min. The SCI group consisted of 5 dogs (1 Australian Shepherd, 1 Beagle, 2 Dachshunds, 1 Podenco; age 6 [5–7] years; body weight 9.9 [8.3–16.2] kg) that showed no signs of general nor orthopaedic disease but ataxia as a clinical sign of thoracolumbar myelopathy. SCI in all dogs of the study group was chronic, confirmed via MRI. All dogs were able to stand and take at least ten consecutive stride cycles without any external support and thus were considered ambulatory. All patients’ owners provided written informed consent for their dog to participate in the study. Four of the dogs had an intervertebral disc extrusion and underwent a hemilaminectomy for surgical decompression and one dog’s MRI revealed multiple degenerative compressive lesions in the thoracolumbar spinal cord. The owner elected against a surgical decompression. On the day of gait analysis, the study group required an adaptation phase to the treadmill of 22.4 ± 7.96 min. After individual adaptation, study participants of both groups were able to place their feet on each treadmill belt without any major difficulties. Thus, the amount of video material not usable for consecutive analysis was negligible. There was no statistical difference between sex status (p = 0.3527) and body weights (p = 0.0896) between the control group and the group of dogs with SCI. However, there was a difference in age between the groups with the control group being younger (p = 0.0007).

3.2. Spatio-temporal gait parameters

3.2.1. Parameter values of spatio-temporal gait parameters

Comparing parameter values of 50 strides in Table 2 showed significant differences between the groups regarding stride length, step length, stride time, step time, single support phase, double support phase and swing phase of the thoracic and pelvic limbs as well as stance time of the thoracic limbs.

TABLE 2

Table 2. Statistical analysis of parameter values and coefficients of variation (*p ≤ 0.05, Mann–Whitney test, FDR Q = 0.05) of spatio-temporal gait parameters.

3.2.2. Coefficients of variation of spatio-temporal gait parameters

Table 2 shows that between controls and the group of dogs with spinal ataxia, differences were seen for CVs of stride length, stance time, single support phase and swing phase of both limb pairs. Furthermore, CVs of step length, relative step length, relative step time, swing time and double support phase of the pelvic limbs differed between groups. In all cases, dogs with SCI showed higher variability.

3.3. Kinetic gait parameters

3.3.1. Parameter values of kinetic gait parameters

As presented in Table 3, differences were detected between the groups concerning PFz, IFz, PFy, as well as range and standard deviation (STDEV) of Fz and Fy of both limb pairs. Besides, comparison of the parameters MFz and range of Fx of the thoracic limbs revealed significant differences. No significant differences between the groups concerning other kinetic parameter values including symmetry indices (Supplementary Table S3) were found.

TABLE 3

Table 3. Statistical analysis of parameter values and coefficients of variation (^*p ≤ 0.05, Mann–Whitney test, FDR Q = 0.05) of kinetic gait parameters.

3.3.2. Coefficients of variation of kinetic gait parameters

Table 3 shows higher CVs in dogs with SCI than in controls regarding IFz of both limb pairs, as well as PFy of the thoracic limbs and MFz and PFx of the pelvic limbs.

4. Discussion

In the current study, objective gait analysis in dogs with SCI suggestive of ataxia was performed and compared to a healthy control group to find differences in gait parameters and their CVs. Treadmill gait analysis with four built-in ground reaction force plates revealed increased spatio-temporal and kinetic variability, a shift in dispersion of stride phases and distinct alterations in ground reaction forces of the thoracic and pelvic limbs. Results of this study are consistent with those of previous studies quantifying gait abnormalities secondary to thoracolumbar SCI. In addition, we demonstrated that ataxia can be quantified in the pelvic as well as in the thoracic limb pairs using a computer-and video-assisted four-belt treadmill system and analysis of CV. Contrary to what could be expected, failure to place one foot per treadmill belt occurred in less than a handful of measurements, making data collection very manageable.

In 2001, Olby and colleagues identified the need for a reliable ataxia scoring system to improve assessment of the different therapies for acute SCI (35). Former experimental models used histologic (36–39) or immunhistochemical (40) evaluation of the damaged spinal cord to ensure objective assessment. However, in a clinical setting indirect methods for investigating functional outcomes of different therapies of SCI have been used (41–46). Treadmill gait analysis provides an additional useful tool to quantify the neurological assessment (20–22), providing more objective data for diagnosis and monitoring (35).

The ability to walk is a result of well-adjusted interactions between afferent and efferent components such as the cortex, the thalamus, the brain stem, as well as spinal locomotion centres, fine-tuned by cerebellar activity. Stimulation of this system results in an alternation of extension and flexion of the limbs and thus alternation of swing and support phase (1). Proprioceptive disturbances as well as paresis can lead to gait abnormalities. Usually, proprioceptive mechanisms are involved in self-regulation of body postures and motion by creating an awareness of the position of the limbs in space (1). Proprioceptive deficits result in incoordinated paw placement that is not necessarily observable in every single step cycle proceeded, demanding for more than the ten usually recorded cycles in orthopaedic studies. Whereas “pure” ataxia can be exclusively found in impairments of cerebellar or vestibular origin and can artificially be induced by drugs such as phenobarbital (PB) (11, 47). Ataxia in most patients with SCI are accompanied by paresis. In SCI, damage of the efferent tract in the ventral area of the spinal cord can cause paresis or plegia, whereas damage of the afferent tract in the dorsal area of the spinal cord are more likely to affect coordination causing ataxia by decreasing proprioceptive capabilities. Hypermetric movements, muscle atrophy, conscious avoidance of falling by not taking steps, as well as uncontrolled falling of the paw to the ground caused dogs with SCI to show objectively measurable differences in pelvic gait characteristics compared to controls. In contrast to PB-treated dogs of a similar study (11), not only ataxia but also paresis is likely to have contributed to severity of findings in the pelvic limbs in the current study.

We decided to use CV to analyse variability between groups. CV is a descriptive parameter for quantification of data spread, as in this study the intraindividual variability of a gait parameter and is therefore independent of factors such as body size and weight. Relative comparison of interindividual measurements on the treadmill are hereby possible. The higher CVs, the higher is variability of data and thus the level of ataxia. CVs have been successfully used before to quantify the variability of individual gait characteristics (31) in dogs (13, 48) and horses (14). In this study, CVs of spatio-temporal and kinetic gait parameters were increased not only in the pelvic limb pairs of the study group but also some CVs of the thoracic limbs were affected which was not expected by the authors prior to data analysis. Even though variability was more severe in the pelvic limbs, the authors did not expect CVs of the thoracic limbs to be significantly increased. Previous studies were based on the assumption that increased CVs are a potential sign of ataxia. In dogs with thoracolumbar SCI the thoracic limb pair is generally recognized as non-ataxic in the neurological examination. Other gait analysis studies using CVs to quantify ataxia in dogs with thoracolumbar myelopathy focused on the changes in variation (represented by parameters’ CVs) seen in the pelvic limbs, either because they only investigated the pelvic limbs (49), or because significant changes were only identified in the pelvic limbs (31). One study did identify thoracic limb CV changes, but they were not discussed (50).

Explaining increased CVs in the thoracic limbs of dogs with thoracolumbar SCI seems more controversial. Findings might either be suggestive of the role of the thoracic limbs for compensation, indicating that an increase in CV is not exclusive for ataxia but also includes potentially the detection of compensatory gait patterns. It is possible that the thoracic limb placements might only be compensatory, the human eye might not see the subtle compensatory mechanisms of the thoracic limbs to balance the ataxic and paretic pelvic limbs.

Another explanation might be the existence of a sensory system that does not only affect caudal regions of the damaged spinal cord but can moreover induce modifications in the coordination of the thoracic limbs as well. The thoracic and pelvic limbs pattern generators are distinct, but are coordinated during physiological gait (51). In simple terms, the rhythms of gait in the thoracic and pelvic limbs are generally of similar frequencies. Olby and colleagues have used this when scoring the severity of T3/L3 myelopathies (18). In dogs with a T3/L3 myelopathy, the pelvic limb gait frequency is different and usually lower than in the thoracic limbs. As the myelopathy improves the frequency of pelvic and thoracic limbs become similar again, with the lumbar central pattern generators (CPGs) providing input to thoracic CPGs and not vice versa (51). Alongside the spinal cord between the cervical and the lumbar CPGs rhythmogenic spinal circuits exist to co-ordinate the gait via ascending and descending, parallel and diagonal propriospinal cord tracts. These pathways play an important role for the task-and phase-dependent modulation of interlimb reflexes, the arrangement of muscle-specific contractions and the pelvic-thoracic limb coordination during locomotion in dogs and cats (51). Thus, an irritation of these pathways and the rhythmogenic spinal circuits could explain that also the thoracic limbs might be affected by certain ambulatory T3/L3 myelopathies.

Absolute measures were also compared in this study, with the foresight that differences seen might be mainly secondary to shape and size of the animal. Different limb sizes of dogs included in the study can partly explain differences seen in the absolute values between groups. Dogs with shorter legs take smaller steps, not related to their abilities in locomotion (52). Thus, relative values are more valid indicators for better comparability between groups. The majority of values in the current study were set in relation to the individual’s body weight or stride cycle or were illustrated as indices. In addition to that, for all gait parameter values, instead of simply comparing one mean per individual and parameter, data from 50 steps of each participant’s ipsilateral paw (total of 100 steps per individual limb pair) were compared. Gait aberrations in the pelvic limbs can partly be explained by the influence of paresis and the rest by ataxia, creating the need for compensatory mechanisms in the thoracic limbs in order to keep the dog capable of locomotion.

Compensatory mechanisms such as the shift from single to double support and elongation of stance duration were longer in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy treated with PB as shown in the current study (11). In this study, however, dogs with SCI had higher CVs than PB-treated dogs. One possible explanation is that dogs with PB-induced ataxia had the ability of applying more sufficient and controlled compensational techniques or that the level of ataxia was more subtle. SCI causes not only ataxia but also motor deficits could hinder the SCI-ataxic dog from implementing compensatory mechanisms, making them appear more involuntary and less effective. The degree of gait aberrations in the pelvic limbs appeared to be more severe in dogs with spinal ataxia than in dogs under anti-seizure treatment. In addition, four of five participating ataxic dogs with IVDD in this study underwent hemilaminectomy. Previous studies have already indicated a lasting effect on stance time of the ipsilateral as well as the contralateral limb in Dachshunds even after surgical decompression in comparison to normal dogs (53).

4.1. Study limitations

In order to guarantee animal welfare in accordance with the Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety in Oldenburg, Germany number of participating dogs in this animal experiment was to be officially approved and thus limited. A control group was approved for clinic-owned beagles only, limiting the diversity of breeds in controls, as well as the overall amount of dogs in both groups. Nevertheless, several significant findings were observed, after corrections were applied. Considering the result of this study, further studies are needed with more diverse dog populations and SCI status to demonstrate repeatability of study outcomes and identify differences. The treadmill system used in this trial is based on specialised equipment with high-sensitive sensors. In addition, further studies could aim to identify potential correlations between the results of this study setting and those of validated ordinal open field walking scales.

Results for craniocaudal (Fy) and mediolateral (Fx) GRF might be less valid than for Fz since stride events “paw strike” and “paw off” were set mainly according to start and end of detection of vertical ground reaction forces (Fz) of kinetic gait analysis. During gait analysis, the treadmill reflective body markers did fall off of dogs’ paws sometimes, causing the gait analysis software to struggle detecting and calculating spatial gait parameters. The following data sets “stride and step time” of the group of dogs showing spinal ataxia were missing: One thoracic limb data set, one pelvic limb data set, one thoracic and pelvic limb data set. For future studies an additional objective quantification of distances between thoracic as well as pelvic paws, summarised as “Base of Support” (50), inclusion of kinematic analysis with electromyographic activity detection and selection of larger sample sizes with higher diversity of participating canines and different neuroanatomical localizations of SCI would be useful. If the software system used for data selection in this study will be supplemented for further investigations, the order of paw placements could also be a gait parameter complementing existing data sets. Consecutively, paw placement orders might reveal an additional aspect of prevalent patterns of compensatory mechanisms in dogs with SCI.

5. Conclusion

This study was the first to perform objective gait analysis of dogs with thoracolumbar SCI on a treadmill with four built-in ground reaction force plates with a focus on CVs of the gait parameters measured. We were able to show that variability in spatio-temporal and kinetic gait parameters were increased, stride phases were shifted and GRF were altered. Differences were found not only in the pelvic, but also in the thoracic limb pairs. Although variability of pelvic limbs was affected to a greater extent than thoracic limbs, findings imply that increased CVs are a tool for detecting not only ataxic but also compensatory gait patterns, or that we have to rethink our understanding of SCI and its potential influence on neurological segments cranial of the damaged T3-L3 spinal cord segments. In contrast to PB-treated ataxic dogs with IE in a similar previous study (11), gait parameters and their variability were more affected and compensatory mechanisms seem less sufficient in dogs with SCI. Treadmill analysis was well tolerated and not invasive nor distressful for participating dogs and could complement gait analysis systems using body-worn sensors and machine learning techniques (54). Gait analysis as performed in this study could be an alternative tool for follow-up monitoring studies on long-term functional outcome of dogs with SCI, before and after neurosurgical intervention.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The animal studies were approved by Lower Saxony State Office for Consumer Protection and Food Safety (LAVES), reference number for this project: 20A555. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the owners for the participation of their animals in this study.

Author contributions

TS, FT, SM, and HV performed data acquisition and planned the experiment(s). TS and AM-A ran the experiment. TS analyzed the data. TS, FT, SM, AM-A, and HV participated in manuscript writing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

The research project was fund and equipment were provided by the Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery of the University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Germany.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the owners for participating and providing their dogs for the study. The support and supervision of animal welfare of the control group during data collection on the treadmill by Dr. Beate Länger is gratefully acknowledged. The authors wish to thank Wolfgang Rottwinkel for assuring data protection during this project was legally compliant.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2023.1183755/full#supplementary-material

References

1. Jaggy, A, and Spiess, B In: A Jaggy and S Platt, editors. Small Animal Neurology. Hannover: Schlütersche (2010). 8.

Google Scholar

2. Cochrane, S. Practical approach to the abnormal gait: neurologic or orthopedic? In: Ontario Veterinary Medical Association: OVMA Conference (2005). 158–62.

Google Scholar

3. Krasovsky, T, and Levin, MF. Toward a better understanding of coordination in healthy and poststroke gait. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. (2010) 24:213–24. doi: 10.1177/1545968309348509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Ashizawa, T, and Xia, G. Ataxia articles from continuum: lifelong learning in neurology are provided here courtesy of American Academy of Neurology. Contin (Mineap Minn). (2016) 22:1208–26. doi: 10.1212/CON.0000000000000362

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Fenn, J. Olby NJ and the canine spinal cord injury consortium (CANSORT-SCI). Classification of intervertebral disc disease. Front Vet Sci. (2020) 7:579025. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.579025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Olby, N, Griffith, E, and Levine, J, CANSORT SCI Investigators. Comparison of gait assessment scales in dogs with spinal cord injury from intervertebral disc herniation. J Neurotrauma. (2020) 37:1991–8. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6804

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Levine, JM, Budke, CM, Levine, GJ, Kerwin, SC, Hettlich, BF, and Slater, MR. Owner-perceived, weighted quality-of-life assessments in dogs with spinal cord injuries. J Am Vet Med Assoc. (2008) 233:931–5. doi: 10.2460/javma.233.6.931

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Attinger, D. Subjective gait observation compared with measured asymmetry. Swiss Med. (1987) 9:58–61. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-3355-2_80

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Mair, N. Reliability of Clinical Gait Assessment. München: Med Diss (1993).

Google Scholar

10. Lee, CS, Bentley, RT, Weng, HY, and Breur, GJ. A preliminary evaluation of the reliability of a modified functional scoring system for assessing neurologic function in ambulatory thoracolumbar myelopathy dogs. BMC Vet Res. (2015) 11:241. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0557-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Sherif, T, Twele, F, Meller, S, Müller-Anders, A, and Volk, HA. Quantification of phenobarbital-induced ataxia in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy. Front Vet Sci. (2023) 10:1168335. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1168335

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Olsen, E, Suiter, E, Pfau, T, McGonnell, M, Matiasek, K, Giejda, A, et al. Cavalier king charles spaniels with chiari-like malformation and syringomyelia have increased variability of spatio-temporal gait characteristics. BMC Vet Res. (2017) 13:1–7. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1077-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Suiter, E, Packer, R, and Volk, H. Comparing the effects of first-line antiepileptic drugs on the gait of dogs with idiopathic epilepsy. Vet Rec. (2016) 178:652–2. doi: 10.1136/vr.103736

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Olsen, E, Fouchè, N, Jordan, H, Pfau, T, and Piercy, R. Kinematic discrimination of ataxia in horses is facilitated by blindfolding. Equine Vet J. (2018) 50:166–71. doi: 10.1111/evj.12737

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Stolze, H, Klebe, S, Petersen, G, Raethjen, J, Wenzelburger, R, Witt, K, et al. Typical features of cerebellar ataxic gait. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2002) 73:310–2. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.3.310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Hamilton, L, Franklin, RJM, and Jeffery, ND. Development of a universal measure of quadrupedal forelimb-hindlimb coordination using digital motion capture and computerised analysis. BMC Neurosci. (2007) 8:1–11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-77

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Jeffery, N, Hamilton, L, and Granger, N. Designing clinical trials in canine spinal cord injury as a model to translate successful laboratory interventions into clinical practice. Vet Rec. (2011) 168:102–7. doi: 10.1136/vr.d475

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Olby, NJ, Lim, JH, Babb, K, Bach, K, Domaracki, C, Williams, K, et al. Gait scoring in dogs with thoracolumbar spinal cord injuries when walking on a treadmill. BMC Vet Res. (2014) 10:58–8. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-58

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Gordon-Evans, WJ, Evans, RB, Knap, KE, Hildreth, JM, Pinel, CB, Imhoff, DJ, et al. Characterization of spatiotemporal gait characteristics in clinically normal dogs and dogs with spinal cord disease. Am J Vet Res. (2009) 70:1444–9. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.70.12.1444

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Sutton, JS, Garcia, TC, Stover, SM, Sturges, BK, and Kapatkin, AS. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis in the pelvic limbs of normal and post-hemilaminectomy dachshunds. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. (2016) 29:202–8. doi: 10.3415/VCOT-15-07-0113

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Blau, SR, Davis, LM, Gorney, AM, Dohse, CS, Williams, KD, Lim, JH, et al. Quantifying center of pressure variability in chondrodystrophic dogs. Vet J. (2017) 226:26–31. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2017.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Lewis, MJ, Williams, KD, Langley, T, Jarvis, LM, Sawicki, GS, and Olby, NJ. Development of a novel gait analysis tool measuring center of pressure for evaluation of canine chronic thoracolumbar spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. (2019) 36:3018–25. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6479

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Helmsmüller, D, Anders, A, Nolte, I, and Schilling, N. Ontogenetic change of the weight support pattern in growing dogs. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. (2014) 321:254–64. doi: 10.1002/jez.1856

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Böddeker, J, Drüen, S, Meyer-Lindenberg, A, Fehr, M, Nolte, I, and Wefstaedt, P. Computer-assisted gait analysis of the dog: comparison of two surgical techniques for the ruptured cranial cruciate ligament. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. (2012) 25:11–21. doi: 10.3415/VCOT-10-02-0025

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Drüen, S, Böddeker, J, Meyer-Lindenberg, A, Fehr, M, Nolte, I, and Wefstaedt, P. Computer-based gait analysis of dogs: evaluation of kinetic and kinematic parameters after cemented and cementless total hip replacement. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. (2012) 25:375–84. doi: 10.3415/VCOT-10-02-0026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Goldner, B, Fischer, S, Nolte, I, and Schilling, N. Kinematic adaptions to induced short-term pelvic limb lameness in trotting dogs. BMC Vet Res. (2018) 14:183–11. doi: 10.1186/s12917-018-1484-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Gillette, RL, and Angle, TC. Recent developments in canine locomotor analysis: a review. Vet J. (2008) 178:165–76. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.01.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. McLaughlin, RM. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. (2001) 31:193–201. doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(01)50045-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Off, W, and Matis, U. Gait analysis in dogs. Part 2: installation of a gait analysis laboratory and locomotion studies. Tierarztl Praxis. (1997) 25:303–11.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

30. Budsberg, SC, Jevens, DJ, Brown, J, Foutz, TL, DeCamp, CE, and Reece, L. Evaluation of limb symmetry indices, using ground reaction forces in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res. (1993) 54:1569–74.PMID: 8250378.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

31. Hamilton, L, Franklin, RJM, and Jeffery, ND. Quantification of deficits in lateral paw positioning after spinal cord injury in dogs. BMC Vet Res. (2008) 4:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-4-47

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Brighton, C, Olsen, E, and Pfau, T. Is a standalone inertial measurement unit accurate and precise enough for quantification of movement symmetry in the horse? Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. (2015) 18:527–32. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2013.819857

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Dubost, V, Annweiler, C, Aminian, K, Najafi, B, Herrmann, FR, and Beauchet, O. Stride-to-stride variability while enumerating animal names among healthy young adults: result of stride velocity or effect of attention-demanding task? Gait Posture. (2008) 27:138–43. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.03.011

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Benjamini, Y, Drai, D, Elmer, G, Kafkafi, N, and Golani, I. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res. (2001) 125:279–84. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00297-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Olby, NJ, De Risio, L, Muñana, KR, Wosar, MA, Skeen, TM, Sharp, NJ, et al. Development of a functional scoring system in dogs with acute spinal cord injuries. Am J Vet Res. (2001) 62:1624–8. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1624

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Noble, LJ, and Wrathall, JR. Correlative analyses of lesion development and functional status after graded spinal cord contusive injuries in the rat. Exp Neurol. (1989) 103:34–40. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(89)90182-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Fehlings, MG, and Tator, CH. The relationships among the severity of spinal cord injury, residual neurological function, axon counts, and counts of retrogradely labeled neurons after experimental spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. (1995) 132:220–8. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(95)90027-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Blight, AR, and Decrescito, V. Morphometric analysis of experimental spinal cord injury in the cat: the relation of injury intensity to survival of myelinated axons. Neuroscience. (1986) 19:321–41. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(86)90025-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Olby, NJ, and Blakemore, WF. A new method of quantifying the extent of tissue loss following spinal cord injury in the rat. Exp Neurol. (1996) 138:82–92. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1996.0049

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Faden, AI, Gannon, A, and Basbaum, AI. Use of serotonin immunocytochemistry as a marker of injury severity after experimental spinal trauma in rats. Brain Res. (1988) 450:94–100. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(88)91548-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Sylvestre, AM, Cockshutt, JR, Parent, JM, Brooke, JD, Holmberg, DL, and Partlow, GD. Magnetic motor evoked potentials for assessing spinal cord integrity in dogs with intervertebral disc disease. Vet Surg. (1993) 22:5–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1993.tb00360.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Poncelet, L, Michaux, C, and Balligand, M. Study of spinal cord evoked injury potential by use of computer modeling and in dogs with naturally acquired thoracolumbar spinal cord compression. Am J Vet Res. (1998) 59:300–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

43. Poncelet, L, Michaux, C, and Balligand, M. Somatosensory potentials in dogs with naturally acquired thoracolumbar spinal cord disease. Am J Vet Res. (1993) 54:1935–41.PMID: 8291776

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

44. Olby, NJ, Sharp, NJ, Muñana, KR, and Papich, MG. Chronic and acute compressive spinal cord lesions in dogs due to intervertebral disc herniation are associated with elevation in lumbar cerebrospinal fluid glutamate concentration. J Neurotrauma. (1999) 16:1215–24. doi: 10.1089/neu.1999.16.1215

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Olby, NJ, Lim, JH, Wagner, N, Zidan, N, Early, PJ, Mariani, CL, et al. Time course and prognostic value of serum GFAP, pNFH, and S100β concentrations in dogs with complete spinal cord injury because of intervertebral disc extrusion. J Vet Intern Med. (2019) 33:726–34. doi: 10.1111/jvim.15439

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Shepard, MJ, and Bracken, MB. Magnetic resonance imaging and neurological recovery in acute spinal cord injury: observations from the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study 3. Spinal Cord. (1999) 37:833–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100927

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Berendt, M, Farquhar, RG, Mandigers, PJJ, Pakozdy, A, Bhatti, SFM, De Riso, L, et al. International veterinary epilepsy task force consensus report on epilepsy definition, classification and terminology in companion animals. BMC Vet Res. (2015) 11:182. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0461-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Huels, N, Harms, O, Keim, D, Rohn, K, and Fehr, M. Treatment of the clinical symptoms of osteoarthritis in the elbow joints of dogs using nuclear magnetic resonance therapy: a randomized, double-blinded trial. Front Vet Sci. (2020) 7:1–10. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.500278

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Granger, N, Blamires, H, Franklin, RJ, and Jeffery, ND. Autologous olfactory mucosal cell transplants in clinical spinal cord injury: a randomized double-blinded trial in a canine translational model. Brain. (2012) 135:3227–37. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws268

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Song, RB, Oldach, MS, Basso, DM, da Costa, RC, Fisher, LC, Mo, X, et al. A simplified method of walking track analysis to assess short-term locomotor recovery after acute spinal cord injury caused by thoracolumbar intervertebral disc extrusion in dogs. Vet J. (2016) 210:61–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.01.013

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Frigon, A. The neural control of interlimb coordination during mammalian locomotion. J Neurophysiol. (2017) 117:2224–41. doi: 10.1152/jn.00978.2016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Budsberg, SC, Verstraete, MC, and Soutas-Little, RW. Force plate analysis of the walking gait in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res. (1987) 48:915–8.3605807.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

53. Davis, GJ, and Brown, DC. Prognostic indicators for time to ambulation after surgical decompression in nonambulatory dogs with acute thoracolumbar disk extrusions: 112 cases. Vet Surg. (2002) 31:513–8. doi: 10.1053/jvet.2002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Engelsmann, D, Sherif, T, Meller, S, Twele, F, Klein, I, Zamansky, A, et al. Measurement of canine ataxic gait patterns using body-worn smartphone sensor data. Front Vet Sci. (2022) 9:912253. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.912253

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar