Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Vet. Sci., 31 March 2023
Sec. Veterinary Surgery

Corrigendum: Internet-based survey evaluating the impact of ground substrate on injury and performance in canine agility athletes

\nIsabel A. Jimenez,
Isabel A. Jimenez1,2*Sherman O. Canapp Jr,Sherman O. Canapp Jr1,3Monica L. PercivalMonica L. Percival4
  • 1Veterinary Orthopedic and Sports Medicine Group, Annapolis Junction, MD, United States
  • 2Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
  • 3Canapp Sports Medicine LLC, Oakland, MD, United States
  • 4Clean Run Magazine, South Hadley, MA, United States

A corrigendum on
Internet-based survey evaluating the impact of ground substrate on injury and performance in canine agility athletes

Jimenez, I. A., Canapp, S. O. Jr., and Percival, M. L. (2022). Front. Vet. Sci. 9:1025331. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1025331

In the published article, there was an error in Table 1 as published.

“Substrate diversity (<3 substrates vs. ≥4 substrates)” should have read “Substrate diversity (≤3 substrates vs. ≥4 substrates)”. The corrected Table 1 and its caption appear below.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Relative risk for training injury and competition injury in canine agility athletes.

In the published article, there were two errors in the main text.

A correction has been made to the section Results, Substrate diversity and modifications to substrate use based on performance, paragraph 1.

This sentence previously stated:

“When substrate diversity was divided into binary categories—dogs with less substrate diversity (<3substrates in training regimen) vs. dogs with more substrate diversity (≥4 substrates in training regimen), there was no impact of substrate diversity on the Relative Risk of TI or CI (Table 1).”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“When substrate diversity was divided into binary categories—dogs with less substrate diversity (≤3 substrates in training regimen) vs. dogs with more substrate diversity (≥4 substrates in training regimen), there was no impact of substrate diversity on the Relative Risk of TI or CI (Table 1).”

A correction has been made to the section Discussion, paragraph 15.

This sentence previously stated:

“For example, 51.5% (141/274) of dogs with experience training on <3 substrates were reported to have at least one MDP on natural grass, while 81.8% (27/33) of dogs with experience on ≥4 substrates were reported to have at least one MDP on natural grass.”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“For example, 51.5% (141/274) of dogs with experience training on ≤3 substrates were reported to have at least one MDP on natural grass, while 81.8% (27/33) of dogs with experience on ≥4 substrates were reported to have at least one MDP on natural grass.”

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: canine agility, agility, medial shoulder syndrome, orthopedics, sports medicine, substrates, injury

Citation: Jimenez IA, Canapp SO Jr and Percival ML (2023) Corrigendum: Internet-based survey evaluating the impact of ground substrate on injury and performance in canine agility athletes. Front. Vet. Sci. 10:1130146. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1130146

Received: 22 December 2022; Accepted: 22 March 2023;
Published: 31 March 2023.

Edited by:

Karine Portier, Université de Lyon, France

Reviewed by:

Barbara Bockstahler, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria

Copyright © 2023 Jimenez, Canapp and Percival. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Isabel A. Jimenez, aXNhYmVsamltZW5lemR2bSYjeDAwMDQwO2dtYWlsLmNvbQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.